If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
My Wish
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
My Wish
Stephanie Stowe wrote:
"Bob" wrote in message ... dragonlady wrote: "Gender" and "sex" are two different things. A person's gender identity generally matches their biological sex, but it does not always. Udder nonsense! Nonsense having to do with the mamary of a cow? And the asshole of a cow. IOW Cow****! Bob -- When did we divide into sides? "As president, I will put American government and our legal system back on the side of women." John Kerry, leading Democratic candidate for President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/ [Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.] |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
My Wish
Fair For All wrote:
"Jeff" wrote in message ... "Fair For All" wrote in message .com... I just wish kids were treated equally regardless of their gender. I just wish kids were treated according to their age and behavior instead of their gender. I don't knwo what gender is when it refers to kids. Gendoer refers to nouns and verbes iand adjectives in some lanquages. Not to people. The proper term is sex. Will my dream ever come true? I hope not. Why not?? The advantage I see would be a miraculous decrease in domestic violence and spousal abuse. As Ralph used to say, "To the moon, Alice." Most men who hurt girls were themselves abused as little boys. Abused by this misandrist society. The boys' abusers were also male and were in all likelihood heterosexual. The boys' abusers were acting out of both anti-male sadism and their urge to blend in with society to be popular. When these poor boys find how they were exploited in childhood, they become jealous of girls and abuse girls. They want revenge. Girls might not have attacked them, however girls benefited from the same society that hurt those boys. Those who benefit from evil are evil. Jealousy and anger is what drives men/boys to hurt girls. More often it's girls/women taunting boys/men to get attention, and/or girls/women emotionally abusing boys/men. Q. What is the moral of the story? A. Harming one gender (i.e. boys) eventually results in harm to the other gender (i.e. girls). So if you really care about girls, you'd better care for boys equally. You must *not*: 1. Treat girl children better than boy children 2. Treat boy children worse than girl children If people understood this and behaves accordingly, then perhaps male-to-female violence would decrease by 90%. David Westerfield wouldn't have the girl-hating anger in him to attack Danielle Vandam. Samantha Runnion would be alive and in peace and so would her family. Focusing on male-to-female violence and ignoring female-to-male violence is the same kind of sexist misandry you seem to have argued against in the paragraph above. The abuse of boys is perpetrated solely by heterosexual men. Boys' abusers are purely heterosexual and male. That is a total crock of misandrist ****. MOTHERS are the most likely persons who abuse boys. Mothers do twice as much reported child abuse as men, and are twice as likely to abuse boys as girls. Females are incapable of raping males. Lies and cow****. Many boys are raped by mothers or other older women. So the abuse of boys is NOT perpetrated by women, though woman-haters often fantasize about this. Lies and cow****. It makes you look stupid. Gay males are incapable of perpertrating any form of aggression. ROFLMAO!!! Violence in the gay community is MORE common than among straights. What a pack of lies. So people need to stop labeling gay men as abusers. NAMBLA's men are purely heterosexual. That is what gives the ability to abuse. These straight male pedophiles harm boys because if they harmed girls, society would lynch them. In adaptation to society misandry, these straight men hurt boys. With as much importance, pre-adolescent boy children are incapable of perpetrating any form of aggression. A boy who kisses a girl should not be labeled as an abuser. A girl who harms a boy deserves as much punishment as a boy who harms a girl. A kid who harms another kid of the same gender deserves as much punishment as a boy who harms a girl. Boys and girls are different, and more just in their sex organs. Their behavior on average, is different. No. Where the science? Yes, boys and girls are different. So are men and women different. Boys are not stronger than girls. Macho *******s should respect this fact and stop telling boys to be "men". The term "macho *******s" is sexist and offensive. That is because they have innate differences in their interests. Scientific proof? Boys like to play with trucks,, play sports and be rougher than girls while prefer dolls and playing house more than boys. That is because our sick misandrist macho society forces boys to be "tough", artificial, and supress their emotions. Girls are free to do anything they want. Boys are told not to cry or hit girls. The sick misandrist is you fella. Given a choice, boys would express themselves and stay in the house more. They would be equally passive to, if not more than, girls. Boys like softness just as girls do. LOL. What a crock. BTW: Men express themselves too. That feminazi lie about men not expressing our emotions is feminist crap. Men use more subtle forms of expression and don't blather and gossip like women. That doesn't mean we don't feel or express our feelings. Women usually aren't sensitive enough to notice anyone but themselves though, and hence come to believe that nobody matters but HER! Adult men are much rougher w/ boy babies than w/ girl babies. No wonder boy babies die more frequently than girl babies. Females MURDER boys much more often than girls. Fathers do not murder children any where near as often as females. Pre-adolescent boys do not necessarily like to be rougher than pre-adolescent girls. Science actually proves the reverse. Cow****! That is just the way it is. No. That is how our perverted society forces it to be. That's just your sick feminist lies. Bob -- When did we divide into sides? "As president, I will put American government and our legal system back on the side of women." John Kerry, leading Democratic candidate for President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/ [Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.] |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
My Wish
In ,
dragonlady wrote: *In article , * "Jeff" wrote: * * "Fair For All" wrote in message * om... * I just wish kids were treated equally regardless of their gender. I * just wish kids were treated according to their age and behavior * instead of their gender. * * I don't knwo what gender is when it refers to kids. Gendoer refers to nouns * and verbes iand adjectives in some lanquages. Not to people. The proper term * is sex. * *There you go with that bizarre statement again. It's not bizarre. It's absolutely consistent with my grammar instruction from 4th grade onward. h. -- hillary israeli vmd http://www.hillary.net "uber vaccae in quattuor partes divisum est." not-so-newly minted veterinarian-at-large |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
My Wish
In article , Bob says...
Fair For All wrote: LOL. What a crock. BTW: Men express themselves too. That feminazi lie about men not expressing our emotions is feminist crap. Men use more subtle forms of expression and don't blather and gossip like women. That doesn't mean we don't feel or express our feelings. Women usually aren't sensitive enough to notice anyone but themselves though, and hence come to believe that nobody matters but HER! This is amusing. "Bob" saying "Fair for All" is saying feminazi stuff. Banty |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
My Wish
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
My Wish
enigma wrote in message ...
actually, infant boys are more frail than infant girls. Yet our sick society is gentler w/ baby girls than w/ baby boys. In fact, the proof that infant boys are weaker than infant girls only stimulates the cold-hearted, sadistic, anti-male, sexual perversions of the people who make up our misandrist society. It is through this sick sexual sadism that adult men often treat boy babies so much worse than girl babies. In addition, men who treat girls better than boys often blend in w/ this sick macho society and are actually popular. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
My Wish
Bob wrote in message ...
Fair For All wrote: "Jeff" wrote in message ... "Fair For All" wrote in message .com... I just wish kids were treated equally regardless of their gender. I just wish kids were treated according to their age and behavior instead of their gender. I don't knwo what gender is when it refers to kids. Gendoer refers to nouns and verbes iand adjectives in some lanquages. Not to people. The proper term is sex. Will my dream ever come true? I hope not. Why not?? The advantage I see would be a miraculous decrease in domestic violence and spousal abuse. As Ralph used to say, "To the moon, Alice." Most men who hurt girls were themselves abused as little boys. Abused by this misandrist society. The boys' abusers were also male and were in all likelihood heterosexual. The boys' abusers were acting out of both anti-male sadism and their urge to blend in with society to be popular. When these poor boys find how they were exploited in childhood, they become jealous of girls and abuse girls. They want revenge. Girls might not have attacked them, however girls benefited from the same society that hurt those boys. Those who benefit from evil are evil. Jealousy and anger is what drives men/boys to hurt girls. More often it's girls/women taunting boys/men to get attention, and/or girls/women emotionally abusing boys/men. No its straight men adapting to societal misandry by abusing boys. Q. What is the moral of the story? A. Harming one gender (i.e. boys) eventually results in harm to the other gender (i.e. girls). So if you really care about girls, you'd better care for boys equally. You must *not*: 1. Treat girl children better than boy children 2. Treat boy children worse than girl children If people understood this and behaves accordingly, then perhaps male-to-female violence would decrease by 90%. David Westerfield wouldn't have the girl-hating anger in him to attack Danielle Vandam. Samantha Runnion would be alive and in peace and so would her family. Focusing on male-to-female violence and ignoring female-to-male violence is the same kind of sexist misandry you seem to have argued against in the paragraph above. Female-to-male sexual violence is so rare it might as well be ignored. It is male-to-male sexual violence that is the problem. The abuse of boys is perpetrated solely by heterosexual men. Boys' abusers are purely heterosexual and male. That is a total crock of misandrist ****. MOTHERS are the most likely persons who abuse boys. Mothers do twice as much reported child abuse as men, and are twice as likely to abuse boys as girls. Mothers are the *least* likely to abuse boys. Mothers - at least in their hearts - love sons as much as daughters. It is the outdoor society (e.g. school and the public) that are the nasty culprit. They force boys to be "tough", not to cry, not to hit girls. Females are incapable of raping males. Lies and cow****. Many boys are raped by mothers or other older women. No. Boys are raped by straight men. So the abuse of boys is NOT perpetrated by women, though woman-haters often fantasize about this. Lies and cow****. It makes you look stupid. You need to relax and read some science books. Gay males are incapable of perpertrating any form of aggression. ROFLMAO!!! Violence in the gay community is MORE common than among straights. What a pack of lies. Please understand the difference between "homosexual males" and "heterosexual males practicing homosexuality". Gay males are totally innocent. People in the gay community aren't necessarily gay at all. Straight men who practice homosexuality are the danger. They almost always include pedophila, necrophilia, coprophilia, sadism, molestation, and rape in their acts. BTW prison rape is always perpetrated by straight men. So people need to stop labeling gay men as abusers. NAMBLA's men are purely heterosexual. That is what gives the ability to abuse. These straight male pedophiles harm boys because if they harmed girls, society would lynch them. In adaptation to society misandry, these straight men hurt boys. With as much importance, pre-adolescent boy children are incapable of perpetrating any form of aggression. A boy who kisses a girl should not be labeled as an abuser. A girl who harms a boy deserves as much punishment as a boy who harms a girl. A kid who harms another kid of the same gender deserves as much punishment as a boy who harms a girl. Boys and girls are different, and more just in their sex organs. Their behavior on average, is different. No. Where the science? Yes, boys and girls are different. So are men and women different. Boys are not stronger than girls. Macho *******s should respect this fact and stop telling boys to be "men". The term "macho *******s" is sexist and offensive. Why do you say so? It is the macho men who attack weaker males and male children. They force males to be self-destuctive. BTW I have read many of your posts. All lot of people respond to you by calling you "faggot", "sister", "rapist", and other misandrist terms. These are the macho people who hurt you because you are a male expressing your feelings. By saying that "macho *******" is an offensive term, you are only protecting your attackers. It is the macho men in much of usenet that attack you. That is because they have innate differences in their interests. Scientific proof? Boys like to play with trucks,, play sports and be rougher than girls while prefer dolls and playing house more than boys. That is because our sick misandrist macho society forces boys to be "tough", artificial, and supress their emotions. Girls are free to do anything they want. Boys are told not to cry or hit girls. The sick misandrist is you fella. Please re-organize your frontal cortex. No offense. Given a choice, boys would express themselves and stay in the house more. They would be equally passive to, if not more than, girls. Boys like softness just as girls do. LOL. What a crock. BTW: Men express themselves too. That feminazi lie about men not expressing our emotions is feminist crap. Men use more subtle forms of expression and don't blather and gossip like women. That doesn't mean we don't feel or express our feelings. Women usually aren't sensitive enough to notice anyone but themselves though, and hence come to believe that nobody matters but HER! Please understand. It is those evil misandrists who force males not to express their emotions. They call these males "sissies" forcing showing any sign of emotion. Adult men are much rougher w/ boy babies than w/ girl babies. No wonder boy babies die more frequently than girl babies. Females MURDER boys much more often than girls. Fathers do not murder children any where near as often as females. Once again, you are not understanding that the abuse of boys is perpetrated solely by straight men. Straight men often adapt to societal misandry by molesting boys. Around the whole world girls are treated better than boys. They always have been since humans entered the world. Yes. This occurs even in Islam. If you don't believe, please check out: http://www.theforumz.com/forumz/showthread/t-2345.html Pre-adolescent boys do not necessarily like to be rougher than pre-adolescent girls. Science actually proves the reverse. Cow****! Why do you say so? I am only supporting your pro-male views by saying the above. That is just the way it is. No. That is how our perverted society forces it to be. That's just your sick feminist lies. I am not feminist. I just believe that kids should be treated equally regardless of their gender. Bob -- When did we divide into sides? "As president, I will put American government and our legal system back on the side of women." John Kerry, leading Democratic candidate for President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/ [Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.] |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
My Wish
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
My Wish
In article ,
enigma wrote: (Fair For All) wrote in om: enigma wrote in message ... actually, infant boys are more frail than infant girls. Yet our sick society is gentler w/ baby girls than w/ baby boys. In fact, the proof that infant boys are weaker than infant girls only stimulates the cold-hearted, sadistic, anti-male, sexual perversions of the people who make up our misandrist society. It is through this sick sexual sadism that adult men often treat boy babies so much worse than girl babies. In addition, men who treat girls better than boys often blend in w/ this sick macho society and are actually popular. i think you need to look beyond your sample of one into reality. i'm terribly sorry if you were abused as a child, but your experience doesn't mean all boys are abused or all of society is misandrist abusers. FWIW, my parents raised myself & my brothers equally once they figured out i didn't *like* dolls & girly stuff, which was about the time i became verbal at 2. i have no idea how one treats a girl *infant* differently than a boy. infants are just so non-gendered. do you have any cites on how boy infants are treated differently than girls? It's been a long time since the studies that I'm familiar with were done, but there HAVE been studies that show that people tend to handle boy infants and girl infants differently. They use softer voices and are more gentle with girls, and are more likely to do physical, fast games with boys. Even in infancy, boy babies were more likely to have people hold them up in the air, or do other physical things, while girl babies were more likely to be held very softly, and closer to the body. Even the tone of voice was different: softer and higher pitched with girls, louder and lower pitched with boys. It was NOT physical cues the babies were giving indicating a preference for one over the other; they did some studies with babies dressed in yellow or green, where they told some folks the baby was a boy, and some the baby was a girl, and the difference was about the same, and pretty marked. When my oldest was about 2, she and I spent an afternoon at a park that was nearly deserted. She was in typical toddler-wear: overalls and a long sleeved shirt. She had very little hair. A teenage boy started to play with her in a sterotypical teen-boy fashion: nothing inappropriate, but very phisical. She was having a GREAT time with him. When he found out she was a girl, he appologized for being so rough with her; no amount of verbage on my part seemed to make any difference -- he said he only behaved the way he did because he thought she was a little boy. He even told me I needed to dress her differently so others wouldn't make the same mistake and treat her like a boy. My daughter is only 21 now, and I doubt seriously if things have changed all that much, though I think there's been some improvement. meh -- Children won't care how much you know until they know how much you care |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|