|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
June 22nd 04, 10:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
If women are on welfare
"short" wrote in message ... "Bob Whiteside" wrote in message link.net... "Simpledog" wrote in message ... And they ever get off, do they have to pay the state back child support? No. A person receiving public benefits is presumed to be unable to pay CS. Is unemployment a public benefit? No. Public assistance benefits are things like TANF, GA, SSI, and state supplemental income and medical programs. 
|
|
#12
June 22nd 04, 10:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
If women are on welfare
"short" wrote in message ... "Bob Whiteside" wrote in message link.net... "Simpledog" wrote in message ... And they ever get off, do they have to pay the state back child support? No. A person receiving public benefits is presumed to be unable to pay CS. Is unemployment a public benefit? No. Public assistance benefits are things like TANF, GA, SSI, and state supplemental income and medical programs.
|
|
#13
June 22nd 04, 10:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
If women are on welfare
"short" wrote in message ... "Bob Whiteside" wrote in message link.net... "Simpledog" wrote in message ... And they ever get off, do they have to pay the state back child support? No. A person receiving public benefits is presumed to be unable to pay CS. Is unemployment a public benefit? No. Public assistance benefits are things like TANF, GA, SSI, and state supplemental income and medical programs.
|
|
#14
June 23rd 04, 06:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
If women are on welfare
The obvious question is, assuming they are presumed "unable" to support
their kids or reimburse the state WHILE collecting these benefits...what makes them REMAIN "unable" to repay the state after they have moved on from these programs to such high-paying jobs as "OFFICIAL STATE MAN-HATER" (child support collection officer) or "OFFICIAL ASSISTANT STATE MAN-HATER" (child support collection clerk) or "OFFICIAL STATE-SPONSORED NON-PROFIT MAN-HATER" (Women's shelter worker)??? Why should a mother be able to claim such benefits, get government-paid schooling, and move on to an $80K/year job without having to repay a penney, while the father who has only been earning $20K/year the whole time will be jailed for failing to repay the state for his "fair share" of the benefits provided to mom and kids? The obvious answer is that he has those grotesque THINGS hanging between his legs and should therefore be held to higher standards that a mother. Mel Gamble Bob Whiteside wrote: "short" wrote in message ... "Bob Whiteside" wrote in message link.net... "Simpledog" wrote in message ... And they ever get off, do they have to pay the state back child support? No. A person receiving public benefits is presumed to be unable to pay CS. Is unemployment a public benefit? No. Public assistance benefits are things like TANF, GA, SSI, and state supplemental income and medical programs.
|
|
#15
June 23rd 04, 06:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
If women are on welfare
The obvious question is, assuming they are presumed "unable" to support
their kids or reimburse the state WHILE collecting these benefits...what makes them REMAIN "unable" to repay the state after they have moved on from these programs to such high-paying jobs as "OFFICIAL STATE MAN-HATER" (child support collection officer) or "OFFICIAL ASSISTANT STATE MAN-HATER" (child support collection clerk) or "OFFICIAL STATE-SPONSORED NON-PROFIT MAN-HATER" (Women's shelter worker)??? Why should a mother be able to claim such benefits, get government-paid schooling, and move on to an $80K/year job without having to repay a penney, while the father who has only been earning $20K/year the whole time will be jailed for failing to repay the state for his "fair share" of the benefits provided to mom and kids? The obvious answer is that he has those grotesque THINGS hanging between his legs and should therefore be held to higher standards that a mother. Mel Gamble Bob Whiteside wrote: "short" wrote in message ... "Bob Whiteside" wrote in message link.net... "Simpledog" wrote in message ... And they ever get off, do they have to pay the state back child support? No. A person receiving public benefits is presumed to be unable to pay CS. Is unemployment a public benefit? No. Public assistance benefits are things like TANF, GA, SSI, and state supplemental income and medical programs.
|
|
#16
June 23rd 04, 06:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
If women are on welfare
The obvious question is, assuming they are presumed "unable" to support
their kids or reimburse the state WHILE collecting these benefits...what makes them REMAIN "unable" to repay the state after they have moved on from these programs to such high-paying jobs as "OFFICIAL STATE MAN-HATER" (child support collection officer) or "OFFICIAL ASSISTANT STATE MAN-HATER" (child support collection clerk) or "OFFICIAL STATE-SPONSORED NON-PROFIT MAN-HATER" (Women's shelter worker)??? Why should a mother be able to claim such benefits, get government-paid schooling, and move on to an $80K/year job without having to repay a penney, while the father who has only been earning $20K/year the whole time will be jailed for failing to repay the state for his "fair share" of the benefits provided to mom and kids? The obvious answer is that he has those grotesque THINGS hanging between his legs and should therefore be held to higher standards that a mother. Mel Gamble Bob Whiteside wrote: "short" wrote in message ... "Bob Whiteside" wrote in message link.net... "Simpledog" wrote in message ... And they ever get off, do they have to pay the state back child support? No. A person receiving public benefits is presumed to be unable to pay CS. Is unemployment a public benefit? No. Public assistance benefits are things like TANF, GA, SSI, and state supplemental income and medical programs.
|
|
#17
June 23rd 04, 06:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
If women are on welfare
The obvious question is, assuming they are presumed "unable" to support
their kids or reimburse the state WHILE collecting these benefits...what makes them REMAIN "unable" to repay the state after they have moved on from these programs to such high-paying jobs as "OFFICIAL STATE MAN-HATER" (child support collection officer) or "OFFICIAL ASSISTANT STATE MAN-HATER" (child support collection clerk) or "OFFICIAL STATE-SPONSORED NON-PROFIT MAN-HATER" (Women's shelter worker)??? Why should a mother be able to claim such benefits, get government-paid schooling, and move on to an $80K/year job without having to repay a penney, while the father who has only been earning $20K/year the whole time will be jailed for failing to repay the state for his "fair share" of the benefits provided to mom and kids? The obvious answer is that he has those grotesque THINGS hanging between his legs and should therefore be held to higher standards that a mother. Mel Gamble Bob Whiteside wrote: "short" wrote in message ... "Bob Whiteside" wrote in message link.net... "Simpledog" wrote in message ... And they ever get off, do they have to pay the state back child support? No. A person receiving public benefits is presumed to be unable to pay CS. Is unemployment a public benefit? No. Public assistance benefits are things like TANF, GA, SSI, and state supplemental income and medical programs.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Child Support Policy and the Welfare of Women and Children | Dusty | Child Support | 0 | May 13th 04 12:46 AM |
| ICAN and The Pink Kit: a dark side (Wintergreen is wrong) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | January 30th 04 09:45 PM |
Linear Mode
