If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
Rich.@. wrote:
On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 02:34:46 GMT, Rich.@. wrote: Cue Jan to accuse me of cyberstalking her simply for responding to her post. Just watch. Aloha, Rich On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 02:11:38 GMT, "LadyLollipop" wrote: cyberstalking Some things are so predictable. Sunrise, sunset, what you said...all the same level of predictability. |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
In article R1NTe.316480$_o.34622@attbi_s71,
"LadyLollipop" wrote: "Orac" wrote in message news In article ZNsTe.313126$x96.152256@attbi_s72, "LadyLollipop" wrote: "Orac" wrote snip In article , Rich.@. wrote: snip what the cyberstalker wrote This thread is not about Jan Perhaps not, but it is about your blithe dismissal of the death of a 5-year-child with "it happens, as with all procedures." This thread is not about me, period. Correct. It is about a quack who killed a 5-year-old. However, now that you dismissed it with "it happens, as with all procedures," you're fair game. Nor your opinion. Wrong, Jan. Every thread I choose to enter is about my opinion, just as every thread *you* choose to enter is about your opinion. That's what Usenet is for: expressing your opinion. Geez, that's a lame dodge, even for you. -- Orac |"I am not *trying* to tell you anything. I am simply not | interested in trying to compensate for your amazing lack | of observation." | http://oracknows.blogspot.com |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
In article J7NTe.315424$x96.41710@attbi_s72,
"LadyLollipop" wrote: Most interesting that so many of the *gang* cares so very much what I think. Most amusing that Jan is so persistent in dodging a very simple question. -- Orac |"I am not *trying* to tell you anything. I am simply not | interested in trying to compensate for your amazing lack | of observation." | http://oracknows.blogspot.com |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Mark Probert wrote: LadyLollipop wrote: Most interesting that so many of the *gang* cares so very much what I think. The fact is, you are a judgmental blowhard. We just want to see if you are consistent and not being selective. I note that you, as usual, dodged the question. Obviously, she's being selective... -- Orac |"I am not *trying* to tell you anything. I am simply not | interested in trying to compensate for your amazing lack | of observation." | http://oracknows.blogspot.com |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
Orac wrote:
In article , Mark Probert wrote: LadyLollipop wrote: Most interesting that so many of the *gang* cares so very much what I think. The fact is, you are a judgmental blowhard. We just want to see if you are consistent and not being selective. I note that you, as usual, dodged the question. Obviously, she's being selective... Jan is in training for the Usenet Olympics and will ten-peat for gold in Dodge-The-Question. |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
"Orac" wrote in message news (...) If it was chelation that killed the boy, will you join me in condemning Dr. Kerry as a quack? Yes or no? It's a simple question. Wrong question. Actually, I wouldn't condemn Kerry as a quack because he killed the boy. Plenty of allopathic treatments kill people. I have lost patients to infections resulting from chemotherapy. I have had patients die following surgery. For these treatments, there are benefits and risks. Unfortunately, in both cases, the risks were worth the potential benefits. Rather, I condemn Kerry as a quack because he took a needless risk with a patient for no proven benefit and no valid theoreritcal reason to believe that the treatment might work. Jeff -- Orac |"I am not *trying* to tell you anything. I am simply not | interested in trying to compensate for your amazing lack | of observation." | http://oracknows.blogspot.com |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
In article .net,
"Jeff" wrote: "Orac" wrote in message news (...) If it was chelation that killed the boy, will you join me in condemning Dr. Kerry as a quack? Yes or no? It's a simple question. Wrong question. Actually, I wouldn't condemn Kerry as a quack because he killed the boy. Plenty of allopathic treatments kill people. I have lost patients to infections resulting from chemotherapy. I have had patients die following surgery. For these treatments, there are benefits and risks. Unfortunately, in both cases, the risks were worth the potential benefits. Rather, I condemn Kerry as a quack because he took a needless risk with a patient for no proven benefit and no valid theoreritcal reason to believe that the treatment might work. Point taken. That's essentially what I meant; I should have elaborated a bit. -- Orac |"I am not *trying* to tell you anything. I am simply not | interested in trying to compensate for your amazing lack | of observation." | http://oracknows.blogspot.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|