If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#161
|
|||
|
|||
Teenagers faced with spankings
On 18 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote:
Doan wrote: On 18 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On 17 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On 17 Dec 2006, Greegor wrote: Kane wrote Go ahead, asshole. Ask her which she prefers. Always glad to cheer you up Kane! Sounded like Kane wanted a "civil" discussion? ;-) Doan Can I then presume that you approve of both pieces of advice he gave women that were involved as clients with CPS? Then you must be REALLY STUPID! I'm not in your league. You are really STUPID! ;-) It's stupid to presume that yelling makes it so. It's so because it is so. Nothing you can do about the fact that you are STUPID! ;-) Did I say anything about advices???? It would be stupid of me to say that. It is stupid of you not to recognize that I had questioned his advice, and asked your opinion, considering you tried to run interference for him 0:-]. You said you wanted "civil" discussion, did you not? With Greg? Are you irony impaired as well as being a liar? So you don't want a "civil" discussion, liar? All I did was commented on your idea of a "civil" discussion! Yes. That's obvious. And it's obvious no one asked your opinion so you obviously were trying to divert from the question of him that I posed. Hence, I presume you wish to ignore the question and attack me about my prior questions and the challenge: So do you want a "civil" discussion? ;-) Not if you don't. So far I've not seen that from you. Remember, I am a mirror. ;-) "Go ahead, asshole. Ask her which she prefers." Doan Now I'll ask you again, given that you intruded yourself into another's thread. Do you support Greg in the legal advice he gave, or are you going to try and dodge again? That is between you and him. Don't cross-post to a.p.s! ;-) Nonsense. I'll cross post where I wish. That is why you are STUPID! Do you then think that aps is YOUR newsgroup? Do you think this thread is your thread, STUPID? You aren't required to respond to any post. If you chose to, expect to included from then on. Hahaha! Doan You'll notice he dodged a very serious accusation. I say he gave bad legal advice. Do you wish to involve yourself at this point? Notice you passed on this? So why must I answer your question? I said I don't wish to, STUPID! Doan So, do you support his legal advice? I say they risked the person given the advice losing their children and possibly ending up in prison had they taken his advice. What do you say? My bet is you are too cowardly to give an opinion. Kane Kane |
#162
|
|||
|
|||
Teenagers faced with spankings
Doan wrote
You said you wanted "civil" discussion, did you not? Kane wrote With Greg? Are you irony impaired as well as being a liar? Aw, Kane, now you've gone and hurt my feelings! |
#163
|
|||
|
|||
Daniel al-Autistiqui
Dan, Thanks for the humorous name. I giggled.
|
#164
|
|||
|
|||
Teenagers faced with spankings
Doan wrote:
On 18 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On 18 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On 17 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On 17 Dec 2006, Greegor wrote: Kane wrote Go ahead, asshole. Ask her which she prefers. Always glad to cheer you up Kane! Sounded like Kane wanted a "civil" discussion? ;-) Doan Can I then presume that you approve of both pieces of advice he gave women that were involved as clients with CPS? Then you must be REALLY STUPID! I'm not in your league. You are really STUPID! ;-) It's stupid to presume that yelling makes it so. It's so because it is so. Nothing you can do about the fact that you are STUPID! ;-) Did I say anything about advices???? It would be stupid of me to say that. It is stupid of you not to recognize that I had questioned his advice, and asked your opinion, considering you tried to run interference for him 0:-]. You said you wanted "civil" discussion, did you not? With Greg? Are you irony impaired as well as being a liar? So you don't want a "civil" discussion, liar? All I did was commented on your idea of a "civil" discussion! Yes. That's obvious. And it's obvious no one asked your opinion so you obviously were trying to divert from the question of him that I posed. Hence, I presume you wish to ignore the question and attack me about my prior questions and the challenge: So do you want a "civil" discussion? ;-) Not if you don't. So far I've not seen that from you. Remember, I am a mirror. ;-) "Go ahead, asshole. Ask her which she prefers." Doan Now I'll ask you again, given that you intruded yourself into another's thread. Do you support Greg in the legal advice he gave, or are you going to try and dodge again? That is between you and him. Don't cross-post to a.p.s! ;-) Nonsense. I'll cross post where I wish. That is why you are STUPID! Do you then think that aps is YOUR newsgroup? Do you think this thread is your thread, STUPID? You aren't required to respond to any post. If you chose to, expect to included from then on. Hahaha! Doan You'll notice he dodged a very serious accusation. I say he gave bad legal advice. Do you wish to involve yourself at this point? Notice you passed on this? So why must I answer your question? I didn't say you must. I asked if you wished to involve yourself at this point. I said I don't wish to, STUPID! No you did not say that. Why would you lie about something so simple as this? Is it something you can’t help doing? In this thread, as fully attributed in this post, no one but myself used the term, “wish.” And you did not say what you just claimed you said. In fact, when you ask the question “why must I answer your question?” you are ignoring my comment, very clearly made: “You aren't required to respond to any post. If you chose to, expect to included from then on.”[sic] (should have been “expect to BE included," But you understood well enough chuckle). Your simple conversation is a string of these, and always has been, strange wanderings, Doan, were you imagine what the other has said and base your responses on your imaginings instead of the facts in the other’s comment. I hope you get some help with this soon. Either reading comprehension or emotional constipation. There's help for both I've heard. So, then Doan, who’s stupid? And as I now have the answer to, “ My bet is you are too cowardly to give an opinion,” thanks for your response. 0;-] Doan So, do you support his legal advice? I say they risked the person given the advice losing their children and possibly ending up in prison had they taken his advice. What do you say? My bet is you are too cowardly to give an opinion. Kane Kane |
#165
|
|||
|
|||
Teenagers faced with spankings
That's the ticket Kane! You are indeed "winning"! Ha ha..
|
#166
|
|||
|
|||
Teenagers faced with spankings
Greegor wrote:
That's the ticket Kane! You are indeed "winning"! Ha ha.. I didn't know I was competing. Certaintly not with you for fool of the newsgroup. I see you dodged the issues again. 0:- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
More Teenagers Seek Help From Psychiatrists | Jan | Kids Health | 29 | April 23rd 06 05:53 PM |
Third of US teenagers are unfit | Roman Bystrianyk | Kids Health | 1 | January 3rd 06 02:57 AM |
Teenagers' behaviour 'worsening' | Roman Bystrianyk | Kids Health | 1 | September 20th 04 12:12 PM |
PA: Erie Co., CYS failure-Busy chasin' spankings? | Fern5827 | Spanking | 0 | June 14th 04 04:19 PM |
Why are so many teenagers so foul mouthed and disgusting? | [email protected] | General | 8 | April 13th 04 06:59 PM |