modify child support (lower)

(TeacherMama) wrote in message . com...
"REB4MWC" reb4mwc@nospam. wrote in message alkaboutparenting.com...
Why? So the parent responsible for paying support can be legal deadbeats?
(moms or dads) And yes you do have both parties paying support and evading
support.

Are you of the opinion that there is no good reason to request a
lowering of child support?

There certainly are good reasons for lowering child support. Had the
couple raised the children as a famly, each parent would normally
contribute according to their ability. This is oftentimes done by
combining the incomes to pay the bills. When couples do not do this
together, is there any reason why it should be different? Hence, a
large child support amount when the custodial parent is making less
than the non-custodial parent would certainly need to be lowered if
the tables were turned. The goal of child support should be to
provide for the children while allowing each parent enough to live on
themselves...so they will be alive for the children's benefit, if you
will. Children of separated households are not entitled to more than
they would have had if the household remained intact.

(TeacherMama) wrote in message . com...
"REB4MWC" reb4mwc@nospam. wrote in message alkaboutparenting.com...
Why? So the parent responsible for paying support can be legal deadbeats?
(moms or dads) And yes you do have both parties paying support and evading
support.

Are you of the opinion that there is no good reason to request a
lowering of child support?

There certainly are good reasons for lowering child support. Had the
couple raised the children as a famly, each parent would normally
contribute according to their ability. This is oftentimes done by
combining the incomes to pay the bills. When couples do not do this
together, is there any reason why it should be different? Hence, a
large child support amount when the custodial parent is making less
than the non-custodial parent would certainly need to be lowered if
the tables were turned. The goal of child support should be to
provide for the children while allowing each parent enough to live on
themselves...so they will be alive for the children's benefit, if you
will. Children of separated households are not entitled to more than
they would have had if the household remained intact.

(TeacherMama) wrote in message . com...
"REB4MWC" reb4mwc@nospam. wrote in message alkaboutparenting.com...
Why? So the parent responsible for paying support can be legal deadbeats?
(moms or dads) And yes you do have both parties paying support and evading
support.

Are you of the opinion that there is no good reason to request a
lowering of child support?

There certainly are good reasons for lowering child support. Had the
couple raised the children as a famly, each parent would normally
contribute according to their ability. This is oftentimes done by
combining the incomes to pay the bills. When couples do not do this
together, is there any reason why it should be different? Hence, a
large child support amount when the custodial parent is making less
than the non-custodial parent would certainly need to be lowered if
the tables were turned. The goal of child support should be to
provide for the children while allowing each parent enough to live on
themselves...so they will be alive for the children's benefit, if you
will. Children of separated households are not entitled to more than
they would have had if the household remained intact.

"REB4MWC" reb4mwc@nospam. wrote in message
lkaboutparenting.com...

Why? So the parent responsible for paying support can be legal deadbeats?
(moms or dads) And yes you do have both parties paying support and evading
support.

You know, I'd like to meet one of these CP's that's evading the payment of
their CS....

I've yet to hear about a court ordering -both- parents to pay CS. Who would
get the money??

To be a "legal deadbeat" it only takes the stroke of a pen and you've become
one. Or get laid off from work, get sick, have some sort of an accident,
loose your car, or any of a gazillion different things that happen in the
course of one's life and you'll become a deadbeat in a New York minute.

Of course, NCP's are forbidden by the courts to have anything happen to them
that would interrupt the flow of money from their wallets into the CSE
coffers. If that happened, for any reason, the NCP would be threatened with
jail time for "failure to pay" or "contempt of court" or worse!!

And if they attempt to have their CS lowered... well, let me just say that
very few judges will ever lower the amount of money they can extort from
you. I speak from experience.

"REB4MWC" reb4mwc@nospam. wrote in message
lkaboutparenting.com...

Why? So the parent responsible for paying support can be legal deadbeats?
(moms or dads) And yes you do have both parties paying support and evading
support.

You know, I'd like to meet one of these CP's that's evading the payment of
their CS....

I've yet to hear about a court ordering -both- parents to pay CS. Who would
get the money??

To be a "legal deadbeat" it only takes the stroke of a pen and you've become
one. Or get laid off from work, get sick, have some sort of an accident,
loose your car, or any of a gazillion different things that happen in the
course of one's life and you'll become a deadbeat in a New York minute.

Of course, NCP's are forbidden by the courts to have anything happen to them
that would interrupt the flow of money from their wallets into the CSE
coffers. If that happened, for any reason, the NCP would be threatened with
jail time for "failure to pay" or "contempt of court" or worse!!

And if they attempt to have their CS lowered... well, let me just say that
very few judges will ever lower the amount of money they can extort from
you. I speak from experience.

"REB4MWC" reb4mwc@nospam. wrote in message
lkaboutparenting.com...

Why? So the parent responsible for paying support can be legal deadbeats?
(moms or dads) And yes you do have both parties paying support and evading
support.

You know, I'd like to meet one of these CP's that's evading the payment of
their CS....

I've yet to hear about a court ordering -both- parents to pay CS. Who would
get the money??

To be a "legal deadbeat" it only takes the stroke of a pen and you've become
one. Or get laid off from work, get sick, have some sort of an accident,
loose your car, or any of a gazillion different things that happen in the
course of one's life and you'll become a deadbeat in a New York minute.

Of course, NCP's are forbidden by the courts to have anything happen to them
that would interrupt the flow of money from their wallets into the CSE
coffers. If that happened, for any reason, the NCP would be threatened with
jail time for "failure to pay" or "contempt of court" or worse!!

And if they attempt to have their CS lowered... well, let me just say that
very few judges will ever lower the amount of money they can extort from
you. I speak from experience.

"R Isaacs J.D." wrote in message
om...
The new site lowersupport.com has a free petition to modify(lower) child
support.

And just where are people that little to live on supposed to come up with
the cash to pay $75 for one of your "kits", much less the $175 to cover one
of your "deluxe litigation kit"??

Sounds like a sure-fire scam to get some cash from those that don't have it
to spend in the first place. Give a beaten dead parent a ray of hope, watch
the courts turn a deaf ear (again) and take their money and run. Good plan.

Nothin' like adding to the divorced parents suicide rate...

"R Isaacs J.D." wrote in message
om...
The new site lowersupport.com has a free petition to modify(lower) child
support.

And just where are people that little to live on supposed to come up with
the cash to pay $75 for one of your "kits", much less the $175 to cover one
of your "deluxe litigation kit"??

Sounds like a sure-fire scam to get some cash from those that don't have it
to spend in the first place. Give a beaten dead parent a ray of hope, watch
the courts turn a deaf ear (again) and take their money and run. Good plan.

Nothin' like adding to the divorced parents suicide rate...

"R Isaacs J.D." wrote in message
om...
The new site lowersupport.com has a free petition to modify(lower) child
support.

And just where are people that little to live on supposed to come up with
the cash to pay $75 for one of your "kits", much less the $175 to cover one
of your "deluxe litigation kit"??

Sounds like a sure-fire scam to get some cash from those that don't have it
to spend in the first place. Give a beaten dead parent a ray of hope, watch
the courts turn a deaf ear (again) and take their money and run. Good plan.

Nothin' like adding to the divorced parents suicide rate...

"Beverly" wrote in message
om...
(TeacherMama) wrote in message
. com...
"REB4MWC" reb4mwc@nospam. wrote in message
alkaboutparenting.com...
Why? So the parent responsible for paying support can be legal
deadbeats?
(moms or dads) And yes you do have both parties paying support and
evading
support.

Are you of the opinion that there is no good reason to request a
lowering of child support?

There certainly are good reasons for lowering child support. Had the
couple raised the children as a famly, each parent would normally
contribute according to their ability. This is oftentimes done by
combining the incomes to pay the bills. When couples do not do this
together, is there any reason why it should be different? Hence, a
large child support amount when the custodial parent is making less
than the non-custodial parent would certainly need to be lowered if
the tables were turned. The goal of child support should be to
provide for the children while allowing each parent enough to live on
themselves...so they will be alive for the children's benefit, if you
will. Children of separated households are not entitled to more than
they would have had if the household remained intact.

Actually child of intact and separated households are NOT ientitled to any
of the parents money.