911 call: Mom makes me do HOMEWORK!

IOW, a case of "Supermom" blaming her kid instead of taking
responsibility as the adult, but still managing to hide
behind tradition like one.


"What this kid needs is a good kick in the rear end, to make
him do his homework" - oh, such a quaint and traditional
sounding line for a liberal to take to excuse a mother.

Yeah. Now that society has conveniently forgotten that most
"single mothers" are really just bimbos and that everyone
had to argue against traditional families in order to
accommodate their lifestyles - yeah - why NOT cherrypick
from that set of "values" that you rejected and blame the
kid? The whole point is to make others share the blame for
HER decisions. Let's break a young back, too.


Forget poor mommy's plight for a minute. Maybe THE BOY
actually lives in a ****ty unstructured environment - of HER
making. One which interferes with his ability to do some of
this deified "homework" which she can't be bothered doing
herself by going to college and getting a real job to
support her lifestyle.

Maybe SHE's got HIM living in a ****ing concrete jungle that
doesn't give him any opportunity to have two leave-raking
jobs, or any other picturesque guilt-trip which spoiled
two-parent liberals love to throw in the faces of poor boys
(so that they can exploit them as soon as they reach a ripe
age).


Maybe HIS young overly pressured mind was actually
accurately pinpointing one source of the problem that was
interfering with the demands being placed upon HIM, and he
did the only thing he could think of.

Maybe our virtuous widow was bringing home strange men all
the time - to the point that the old "are you going to be my
new dad" (or first), wore so thin that it wasn't even worth
thinking. Just maybe, this is a perfidious reversal and all
he WANTED was to do his homework. Maybe because it would
give him a point of reference away from the ugliness in the
whorehouse that he lives in, toward society's real rules,
because he knew he couldn't depend on her for anything more
than to play mom for other eyes to see. Maybe he was
getting so many mixed signals that calling the police was
just his way trying to tell someone that she wasn't really
being a parent.


Back to mommy. Yeah, Jr. should do his homework so that SHE
can keep living off of those setasides. Someday he'll need
to earn enough to pay his own child support to another
absentee wife, just like "Mom". Now that her youth is going
on her, and she's not one of the cute young thing getting
her perpetual "start", it's probably not fun doing floozy
work anymore.

In fact, it's probably downright unglamorous,
and that is often when even bigger problems start building
up in the single-mommy home. So, in the meantime, Jr. had
better be a model child who doesn't force her to stop to be
a parent. It cuts into her stay-young pursuits, as well as
her other whore's pursuits.


Why didn't our saintly, struggling "Mom" plan ahead by going
on to college, first, when doing so would have made it less
of a struggle? Lots of other women do.


Nobody told her?

Yeah, Right. Lying skank.


She "trusted" some guy (to pay her bills for her, for doing
30 minutes of meal preparation "work" a day), who then
"abandoned" her?

Yeah, right. If SHE does the walking out, and hurts
everyone in the wake of her actions, then NO ONE criticizes
her. It's up to everyone else to adapt. "**** all of you
people. It's MY life, MY body, MY decision ...MY
EVERYTHING."

Rather, she's cheered - making the whole rationale behind
"abandonment" meaningless. All she needs is a few lousy
excuses (lies) to justify her selfishness and she's in the
clear - for everything short of murder in front of 100
witnesses.


What's the real reason?

She was young. She knew how to get payment and prerogatives
by using her pussy. She didn't think about the future. She
was having a good time. Now, she's two years over the hill
and not so many guys look twice at her, anymore.


"Uh-oh!" "Better start putting on a fine 'mom' act!"

"Let's act like I give this kid everything!"

"He I work fast-food, but I'll buy him one pair of Nikes.
(Or, maybe I'll just have my mom buy them and tell
everyone it was me). Then, every time somebody is looking
critically at me, I'll bring up my one token effort and
stand back and watch while the world dumps my **** and shame
onto him. I deserve a break!

"Besides, isn't he a 'man'? Isn't he supposed to be the
'man' of the family? Isn't he supposed to be strong for me
when I'm abandoned?

"Oh, that's right. He's only ten years old and I did the
abandoning. No problem! I just have to practice my lines
to make sure I don't cross my lies too badly. Lots of
people WANT to believe me, and that's the ticket."


Oh, and which "liberal/commie/pinko media" outfit is it
that's writing this editorialized job, defending a single
mother and "destroying da family" because this kid is
obviously so in control of his environment (and her) that
she needs it? ...hahaha, why it's Gannett Co. Inc., "a
multi-media company serving the Lower Hudson Valley (New
York's Westchester, Rockland and Putnam counties) since 1850"

I'll be damned. I thought it was going to be Pravda. Or,
at least, PBS. ...CONSTANTLY! We're just ping-ponged back
and forth between ****ing liberals and ****ing
conservatives......






"I still lament my father's death;
when I lost my mother, I lit a perfect bonfire from joy."

~ The Marquis de Sade

- - -

Beloved of the Gods:

Turin


I have such sites to show you...
------------------------

http://members.fortunecity.com/turinturambar/
http://groups.google.com/group/Men_First

------------------------

"He who changeth, altereth, misconstrueth, argueth with,
deleteth, or maketh a lie about these words or causeth them
to not be known shall burn in hell forever and ever...."

-----





Greegor wrote:
Mom works Fast Food to buy the kid Nike's and he does
this. At age 10, fully able to call 911 for such crap, is
leaving this kid alone for a few hours really neglect?

Can't 10 year olds be certified for babysitting?

http://www.thejournalnews.com/apps/p...44/1018/NEWS02

http://www.nyjournalnews.com/apps/pb...WS02/612280344


White Plains boy calls cops on mom who ordered him to do
homework By RICHARD LIEBSON THE JOURNAL NEWS (Original
publication: December 28, 2006)

WHITE PLAINS - She insisted her son do his homework the
day after Christmas, so he called the cops on her.

Now, the 10-year-old's mother is due in City Court today
to answer to a child endangerment charge after police
responding to the boy's 911 call discovered that he'd
been left home alone.

The 32-year-old mom was arrested Tuesday after her son
made the emergency call and beseeched officers "to come
and take his mother away because she was pressuring him
to do his homework,'' according to a police report.

When police arrived at the Ferris Avenue apartment, they
found the youngster home alone and were informed that his
mother was working a 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. shift at a local
restaurant. While police were there, the boy's mother
called to check on him.

Mother and child were taken to police headquarters. The
mom, whose name is being withheld by The Journal News to
protect the boy's identity, was charged with endangering
the welfare of a child, a misdemeanor. She does not have
a listed telephone number and could not be reached for
comment.

She was arraigned by City Court Judge Brian Hansbury, who
released her without bail after signing an order of
protection requiring her not to leave her son alone or
abuse him in any way.

Police said the state's Child Protective Services agency
was notified of the arrest and is conducting its own
investigation.

There was no word on whether the boy finished his
homework.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
when i was 10 years old i had 2 jobs raking leaves and
delivering newspapers. i lived with foster parents and
when i needed money i worked as they also worked to raise
their families. they arrested this woman for leaving her
child alone at home , give me a break, this spoiled brat
did not want to do his homework so he called 911. what
he really needs is a job to keep him busy, to help out
his mom who is doing the best that she can. now some
child protection agency will put her on it's watch list.
she will lose her job and go back on welfare. nice
system, in fact her kid needs more than a job. like a
good hit in the rear end. but i guess this would also get
her locked up for child endangerment. sometimes these
systems over do it, and cause more harm than good .

Posted by: thomas j stroh on Thu Dec 28, 2006 8:49 am

AnneF- wrote:
Greegor wrote:
AnneF- wrote:
So will CPS provide free child care to single parents like this mother?
Or would CPS rather spend 40-60 thousand dollars a
year once a child like [this] one is in foster care?

40-60 K per year is only a FRACTION of what it costs.

Based on newspaper reports a few years ago it looks
like 160 K per year would even be low.

If a family actually fights the legal costs could
easily push the total package up to $ 230 K per year or more.

All of those "contractors" add up fast.

Probably with big bucks spent on state's attorneys and
$ 200 spent on the public defender
(raised from 50/hour up to 60/Hour in Iowa months ago).

If that is true than that's sad!

That info is from Greg Hanson.

His girlfriend's seven year old daughter was removed SIX YEARS ago
because of (he claims) "clutter."

Reunification with the mother is nowhere in sight.

If you think the figures Greg threw out were high, you should know he's
planning on suing Iowa DFS for millions because the removal lasted so
long.

Not that he's married to the mother or he's the little girl's real
father, just that he figures it's a cash cow looking to be milked.

Greg says he'll marry the mother when her daughter can attend the
ceremony.

Should be sometime in 2012.

I've got my tux reserved. ;-P

Still around, huh greaser? You're getting
weak in your old age and piles of spew.

AnneF- wrote:
Carlson LaVonne wrote:
This 10 year old child was left alone. Can 10 year olds be left alone?
Of course. Of course, we also know nothing about this case, nor do
you, Greegor, know anything about how she was spending her money.
Perhaps she wasn't working for Nike's, but for food and shelter for her
child.

The child's call to 911 was possibly a call for help. A call from a
little child who felt alone and abandoned. A little child who needed
the presence of a parent or caring adult? And yes, a 10 year old is a
little child.

LaVonne

So will CPS provide free child care to single parents like this mother?

No. That's not their mandate. In other words, the legislature and the
people they represent won't allow CPS to do that. Take up lobbying,
Doan.

Or would CPS
rather spend 40-60 thousand dollars a year once a child like one is in
foster care?

CPS doesn't make the call. My guess is that if you asked a worker and
let them know it would reduce their caseload, as well as meet the
dictates of conscience that led them originally to child protection and
family work, they'd go for the free daycare.

You have to remember (or maybe you don't since it won't service your
disruptive agenda) the both free daycare and spending a lot of the
citizens money are "liberal" agendas.

It's claimed that most child protection workers are socialists, or
liberals.

Get the connect here?

So, then, are YOU advocating that the CPS budget be spent on free day
care?

And if so, how that might lower child abuse and neglect?

In most cases children left home alone is not about "going to work,"
but going to Vegas or Atlantic City, Doan.

AF ...
.... Silly boy.

Thanks for playing, Kane

Ol' pole-hak-qu is still kanin', thinking it
can write, huh? Poor, poor THING!

I've got my tux reserved. ;-P

Hey Dan! Can I hitch a ride with ya to the wedding? I just got a
lovely Ren gown for my bday that would be most appropriate for such an
event! Greg, do you have a DJ lined up for the wedding that will
happen when Lisa's daughter comes home? If not, I'll bring along my
mixing table and all my CDs.

Greegor wrote:
AnneF- wrote:
So will CPS provide free child care to single parents like this mother?

Was this child removed?

Or would CPS rather spend 40-60 thousand dollars a
year once a child like [this] one is in foster care?

If the child wasn't removed the argument is specious.

40-60 K per year is only a FRACTION of what it costs.

Show your source, and your work product to support this claim.


Based on newspaper reports a few years ago it looks
like 160 K per year would even be low.

Which newspaper reports? Your ratio of errors to facts in such matters
is about 99%.

If a family actually fights the legal costs could
easily push the total package up to $ 230 K per year or more.

Wonderful blather, but based in this case on a specious argument.

All of those "contractors" add up fast.

I doubt there's be a contractor involved in this case even IF the child
had been removed. Do you know for a fact he was?

Probably with big bucks spent on state's attorneys and
$ 200 spent on the public defender
(raised from 50/hour up to 60/Hour in Iowa months ago).


Yep....those that file frivolous lawsuits, that they arranged the
circumstances to create do in fact, GREG, cost the taxpayers a lot of
money in insurance costs.

Know, GREG, that insurance companies are consulting on ALL such cases,
and if they take a notion, their investigations are far more vigorous
than even the state's AG office.

They are remorseless. My bet is they look everywhere there is any chance
of finding out about the frivolous lawsuit miscreant...even places like
this, simply by googling his or her name.


Now, you boys, though you have had fun peddling your propaganda offal,
just based it on an assumption not in evidence.

From the article YOU posted, Greg:

"She was arraigned by City Court Judge Brian Hansbury, who released her
without bail after signing an order of protection requiring her not to
leave her son alone or abuse him in any way. "

Gee, now what did that cost the people, eh?

Blame the child, for calling, or blame the parent for leaving a ten year
old, whose judgment is obviously that of less than a normal ten year
old, "come take my mom away" because she's making him do his homework?
The kid could have been retarded given that level of cause and effect
thinking.

So, what parent with a child that limited in his thinking capacity
SHOULD be leaving him alone?

He's likely to open the door to strangers because he's bored with
homework, or go skipping out and going who knows where.

You boys get stupider by the day, if that's possible.

Can't you come up with something better than spreading your nonsense
starting with a non sequitur?

R R R R R R R R

AnneF- wrote:
Greegor wrote:
AnneF- wrote:
So will CPS provide free child care to single parents like this mother?
Or would CPS rather spend 40-60 thousand dollars a
year once a child like [this] one is in foster care?
40-60 K per year is only a FRACTION of what it costs.

Based on newspaper reports a few years ago it looks
like 160 K per year would even be low.

If a family actually fights the legal costs could
easily push the total package up to $ 230 K per year or more.

All of those "contractors" add up fast.

Probably with big bucks spent on state's attorneys and
$ 200 spent on the public defender
(raised from 50/hour up to 60/Hour in Iowa months ago).

If that is true than that's sad! Truly the money is not spending in
the right place.

See the public. See your legislator. Fix it then.

Surely you have a solution to the problem that feminist liberals
(socialists) have been trying for decades to resolve...cheap or free
child care.

A babysitter would have cost less than 20K.

And who would that be? Greg?

This child, by the way, dummy Doan, was not removed. Remember, or can't
you read a cut and paste article?

Whatsamattah, USC catch up with your misuse of their servers? You
reduced to using anon remailers, or anon proxies?

AF

0:- wrote:
AnneF- wrote:
Greegor wrote:
AnneF- wrote:
So will CPS provide free child care to single parents like this mother?
Or would CPS rather spend 40-60 thousand dollars a
year once a child like [this] one is in foster care?
40-60 K per year is only a FRACTION of what it costs.

Based on newspaper reports a few years ago it looks
like 160 K per year would even be low.

If a family actually fights the legal costs could
easily push the total package up to $ 230 K per year or more.

All of those "contractors" add up fast.

Probably with big bucks spent on state's attorneys and
$ 200 spent on the public defender
(raised from 50/hour up to 60/Hour in Iowa months ago).

If that is true than that's sad! Truly the money is not spending in
the right place.

See the public. See your legislator. Fix it then.

Gee! If only I were the Emperor.

Surely you have a solution to the problem that feminist liberals
(socialists) have been trying for decades to resolve...cheap or free
child care.

So you would rather spend 40K instead.

A babysitter would have cost less than 20K.

And who would that be? Greg?

I heard there is alot of immigrants willing to do the job.

This child, by the way, dummy Doan, was not removed. Remember, or can't
you read a cut and paste article?

Now where in the post did I said that the child was removed?

Whatsamattah, USC catch up with your misuse of their servers? You
reduced to using anon remailers, or anon proxies?

What makes you think that? Are you exposing your stupidity in public
again?

AF

AF

AnneF- wrote:
0:- wrote:
AnneF- wrote:
Greegor wrote:
AnneF- wrote:
So will CPS provide free child care to single parents like this mother?
Or would CPS rather spend 40-60 thousand dollars a
year once a child like [this] one is in foster care?
40-60 K per year is only a FRACTION of what it costs.

Based on newspaper reports a few years ago it looks
like 160 K per year would even be low.

If a family actually fights the legal costs could
easily push the total package up to $ 230 K per year or more.

All of those "contractors" add up fast.

Probably with big bucks spent on state's attorneys and
$ 200 spent on the public defender
(raised from 50/hour up to 60/Hour in Iowa months ago).

If that is true than that's sad! Truly the money is not spending in
the right place.

See the public. See your legislator. Fix it then.

Gee! If only I were the Emperor.

Only Emperor's can speak out publicly, and to their legislator?

I must be in some other country....or you are.

Surely you have a solution to the problem that feminist liberals
(socialists) have been trying for decades to resolve...cheap or free
child care.

So you would rather spend 40K instead.

Now where did I say that?

A babysitter would have cost less than 20K.

And who would that be? Greg?

I heard there is alot of immigrants willing to do the job.

You looking for something more than dog food for dinner?

This child, by the way, dummy Doan, was not removed. Remember, or can't
you read a cut and paste article?

Now where in the post did I said that the child was removed?

Well, you'd have a hard time arguing that this child could have been
given a baby sitter base on the argument that otherwise it would cost
thousands to remove him...as you see, he was't removed.

Now were you referring to some other children? Like those who are
removed?

Most of those are removed for cause far more serious than leaving them
home alone at 10 years old.

Whatsamattah, USC catch up with your misuse of their servers? You
reduced to using anon remailers, or anon proxies?

What makes you think that?

Cause you are a stupid asshole.

Are you exposing your stupidity in public
again?

Nope, just yours.


AF

No class, Doan. Stupid, clumsy, crude, and half asleep.

Go back to your dogmeat dinner, dummy.

0:-


AF