WHY can't she rescind this agreement?

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Let us know what you find out, Greg.

Attorney Says Twins Shouldn't Return To Adoptive Parents

An attorney for a [natural] mother charged with kidnapping her
17-month-old twins said Saturday the children shouldn't be returned to
their adoptive parents until a custody battle over them is concluded.

Allison Lee Quets, 49, and the twins were found Friday night when
police in Ottawa, Canada, acted on a tip, the FBI said in a statement
early Saturday. The toddlers, Tyler Lee and Holly Ann Needham, were
unharmed. They were placed in the custody of Canadian Social Services.

"This tip was very specific to a residential location in the city of
Ottawa," FBI Special Agent Greg Baker told WRAL.

Quets could face federal charges of international parental kidnapping.

Her attorney, Jeff Schroeder, told a Canadian television statement
that Quets, in poor physical and mental state after tough pregnancy
and birth, consented to adoption but changed her mind within 12 hours.
She has fought the adoptive parents, Denise and Kevin Needham, for
custodial rights ever since.

"She's been fighting since day one," said Gail Quets, Allison's
sister. "She spent her entire savings -- $400,000 -- on the legal
process."

The case is currently before an appellate court in Florida, where
Allison Quets gave birth to the twins. Schroeder said the court
proceedings should play out before the Needhams are allowed to take
the toddlers back the United States.

The children lived in Apex with the Needhams, while Allison Quets had
a residence in Durham.

A custody agreement allowed Allison Quets to take the children for a
brief visit December 22-24, but authorities said she never returned
them. The FBI said an investigation indicated she crossed the Canadian
border with the twins December 23.

Officials with the FBI Victim Witness program were arranging for the
adoptive parents to travel to Canada to be with their children.

Denise and Kevin Needham told WRAL Saturday they are ecstatic and
relieved that Allison Quets and the children are safe.

Let us know what you find out, Greg.

Greegor wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Let us know what you find out, Greg.

Attorney Says Twins Shouldn't Return To Adoptive Parents

An attorney for a [natural] mother charged with kidnapping her
17-month-old twins said Saturday the children shouldn't be returned to
their adoptive parents until a custody battle over them is concluded.

Allison Lee Quets, 49, and the twins were found Friday night when
police in Ottawa, Canada, acted on a tip, the FBI said in a statement
early Saturday. The toddlers, Tyler Lee and Holly Ann Needham, were
unharmed. They were placed in the custody of Canadian Social Services.

"This tip was very specific to a residential location in the city of
Ottawa," FBI Special Agent Greg Baker told WRAL.

Quets could face federal charges of international parental kidnapping.

Her attorney, Jeff Schroeder, told a Canadian television statement
that Quets, in poor physical and mental state after tough pregnancy
and birth, consented to adoption but changed her mind within 12 hours.
She has fought the adoptive parents, Denise and Kevin Needham, for
custodial rights ever since.

"She's been fighting since day one," said Gail Quets, Allison's
sister. "She spent her entire savings -- $400,000 -- on the legal
process."

The case is currently before an appellate court in Florida, where
Allison Quets gave birth to the twins. Schroeder said the court
proceedings should play out before the Needhams are allowed to take
the toddlers back the United States.

The children lived in Apex with the Needhams, while Allison Quets had
a residence in Durham.

A custody agreement allowed Allison Quets to take the children for a
brief visit December 22-24, but authorities said she never returned
them. The FBI said an investigation indicated she crossed the Canadian
border with the twins December 23.

Officials with the FBI Victim Witness program were arranging for the
adoptive parents to travel to Canada to be with their children.

Denise and Kevin Needham told WRAL Saturday they are ecstatic and
relieved that Allison Quets and the children are safe.


Oh please. This is SOOOOO bogus. The birth mother had $400,000 dollars
for legal fees but could not hire help to assist her in caring for her
children as she went through being "in poor physical and mental state
after [a] tough pregnancy and birth?" R R R R R ...get real.

She could have hired round the clock 24/7 help.

Where was the sister during this tough pregnancy and birth to help her
through the poor physical and mental state, eh?

Give me a break, Greg.

Something else is going on here. Someone is lying and I've a hunch it's
not the adoptive couple in this case.

With that kind of money my bet is a "poor little rich girl," the to
late got it that she had screwed up.

12 hours indeed.

Crock. And you want to buy it and blame CPS, right?

What group are you posting to, Greg, tha tyou think this is on topic
for anyway?

Just entertaining yourself and diverting from what is true here...that
you vandalizing goons have been abusing families in this newsgroup for
years, leading them astray, attacking them at every turn, generally
make a puckering fool of yourselves?

I knew if I pushed you pimple-assed porno actors even a little bit
you'd choke and go over the edge and reveal just how ethically and
morally challenged you are.

Man, you are making one hell of a spectacle of yourselves, my boy.

So tell us, you waiting for Lisa to win that big money, or will you
marry her before, just to make sure she doesn't boot you once the money
is her's, eh?

I wonder why she never posts here?

0:-]

Please explain why she was not immediately
allowed to rescind the agreement.

Greegor wrote:
Please explain why she was not immediately
allowed to rescind the agreement.

Do your own research, Greg, and let us know.

Greegor wrote:
Please explain why she was not immediately
allowed to rescind the agreement.

I will explain it when you come up with some rational reason for
someone with $400,000 dollars to spend on legal fees for not hiring
help when they were stressed out by a difficult birth?

And explain how the sister is here to help her now, but not then.

Do you suppose this might just be about suing?

Seems that the inept and hapless twist, liars, and assorted frauds are
busy with that tool rather than doing for themselves.

Answer my quetions, I'll answer yours.

Nothing else will do.

Or do you not have any answers, Greg?

Kane

Greegor wrote:
Please explain why she was not immediately
allowed to rescind the agreement.

Kane wrote
I will explain it when you come up with some rational reason for
someone with $400,000 dollars to spend on legal fees for not hiring
help when they were stressed out by a difficult birth?

Maybe she didn't want to go from savings of 400K to 0 savings?
Maybe she worked hard for the 400K or maybe it ws the last
of an inheritance.

Is it so hard to understand why a person would be very
determined NOT to end up completely broke?

And explain how the sister is here to help her now, but not then.

Did the sister show up WITH the 400K after the twins were born?

Do you suppose this might just be about suing?

Seems that the inept and hapless twist, liars, and assorted frauds are
busy with that tool rather than doing for themselves.

Answer my quetions, I'll answer yours.

Nothing else will do.

Grey Poupon or nothing.

Or do you not have any answers, Greg?

Mostly questions.

Greegor wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Please explain why she was not immediately
allowed to rescind the agreement.

Kane wrote
I will explain it when you come up with some rational reason for
someone with $400,000 dollars to spend on legal fees for not hiring
help when they were stressed out by a difficult birth?

Maybe she didn't want to go from savings of 400K to 0 savings?

Do you have any idea how long it would take to pay the salary of three
people doing child care respite to use up 400k?

Maybe she worked hard for the 400K or maybe it ws the last
of an inheritance.

So? She wouldn't spend it to keep her twins, but will on trying to get
them back. Mmmmmhhhhmmmmmmm....sure, that's it.

Is it so hard to understand why a person would be very
determined NOT to end up completely broke?

You can't spend 400K dollars very fast on child care. Trust me. It's not
that expensive. Even a live in nanny wouldn't cost but a fraction of that.

Please explain your lack of logic in your answer?

Or is this why you no longer work in the family business?

And explain how the sister is here to help her now, but not then.

Did the sister show up WITH the 400K after the twins were born?

I asked you to explain. That question, even stretching, has nothing to
do with my request of you.

Are you suggesting the sister could only help with the $400k?

How about just taking the kids off her hands for a few weeks or even
months? Family does such things often...without the state even being
aware of it.


Do you suppose this might just be about suing?

Seems that the inept and hapless twist, liars, and assorted frauds are
busy with that tool rather than doing for themselves.

Answer my quetions, I'll answer yours.

Nothing else will do.

Grey Poupon or nothing.

As I thought. Proving more each day you are a Aging Troll. Here to
disrupt and attack people that have come here either for help, or to
give it.

Or do you not have any answers, Greg?

Mostly questions.

No, mostly dodges. Real questions are responded to when answered.

You ask. Get an answer, then smart ass or otherwise dodge.

You have not answered my questions or responded responsibly to my request.

You are obviously here to vandalize.

Just as Doan and aps, Greg at ascps. Both vandals.

No reasoned debate. No response even from posters that give them back
reasonable responses when asked.

You're just another criminal minded goon as far as I can see. Don't you
think so?

0:-

Kane wrote
Just as Doan and aps, Greg at ascps. Both vandals.

Yes, All of your opponents conspire against you.

Greegor wrote:
Kane wrote
Just as Doan and aps, Greg at ascps. Both vandals.

Yes, All of your opponents conspire against you.

Yeah, and everyone on the internet that disagrees with you, Greg, is
me!!!!

BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!