If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Child Support Lock Up
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 08:22:59 +0800, "Rambler" iamrambler (at) yahoo
"Sheila J" wrote in message Women are maternal beings. It is our most inate characteristic. To overturn this is going against nature. As a result, it is NOT common. And fathers are *not* paternal??? Bobbi ************************************************** *** Old Saudi saying: "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet airplane. His son will ride a camel." Peak Oil - coming soon to a neighborhood near you. ************************************************** *** |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Child Support Lock Up
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 08:22:59 +0800, "Rambler" iamrambler (at) yahoo
"Sheila J" wrote in message Women are maternal beings. It is our most inate characteristic. To overturn this is going against nature. As a result, it is NOT common. And fathers are *not* paternal??? Bobbi ************************************************** *** Old Saudi saying: "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet airplane. His son will ride a camel." Peak Oil - coming soon to a neighborhood near you. ************************************************** *** |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Child Support Lock Up
In article VKM_b.594130$JQ1.498881@pd7tw1no,
Sheila J wrote: Ok, I assume you are being deliberately obtuse. I quote from the reason .com article, "In California, you don't even have to have proof of service of the summons!" says Rod Wright, a recently retired Democratic state senator from Los Angeles who tried and failed to get several paternity-related reform bills, including a proof-of-service requirement, past former Gov. Gray Davis' veto. "They only are obligated to send it to the last known address." Nice try shoving it under the rug with your 'one case' argument: Having a problem with your system of service, is NOT THE SAME as having a fault in your child support system. It's just not the same. Why are you failing to understand this. It is indeed the same, when there is no redress available in those cases that are child support. The 'system' certainly does allow women to make false statements about paternity. Never heard of paternity fraud? A woman can decieve her husband for years with a child that is not his, and the courts will do nothing to her except generally order him to pay for her deception. And how is paternity fraud substantiated? Through a paternity test. Which disproves paternity. Which proves the system works. Which was my original point. That any man finding himself in a situation where he disputes paternity, he should have a DNA test. He's silly not to. The point being that actual paternity is -- by law and practice -- irrelevant to whether he has to pay child support. Cases have been shown you already. -- Robert Grumbine http://www.radix.net/~bobg/ Science faqs and amateur activities notes and links. Sagredo (Galileo Galilei) "You present these recondite matters with too much evidence and ease; this great facility makes them less appreciated than they would be had they been presented in a more abstruse manner." Two New Sciences |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Child Support Lock Up
In article VKM_b.594130$JQ1.498881@pd7tw1no,
Sheila J wrote: Ok, I assume you are being deliberately obtuse. I quote from the reason .com article, "In California, you don't even have to have proof of service of the summons!" says Rod Wright, a recently retired Democratic state senator from Los Angeles who tried and failed to get several paternity-related reform bills, including a proof-of-service requirement, past former Gov. Gray Davis' veto. "They only are obligated to send it to the last known address." Nice try shoving it under the rug with your 'one case' argument: Having a problem with your system of service, is NOT THE SAME as having a fault in your child support system. It's just not the same. Why are you failing to understand this. It is indeed the same, when there is no redress available in those cases that are child support. The 'system' certainly does allow women to make false statements about paternity. Never heard of paternity fraud? A woman can decieve her husband for years with a child that is not his, and the courts will do nothing to her except generally order him to pay for her deception. And how is paternity fraud substantiated? Through a paternity test. Which disproves paternity. Which proves the system works. Which was my original point. That any man finding himself in a situation where he disputes paternity, he should have a DNA test. He's silly not to. The point being that actual paternity is -- by law and practice -- irrelevant to whether he has to pay child support. Cases have been shown you already. -- Robert Grumbine http://www.radix.net/~bobg/ Science faqs and amateur activities notes and links. Sagredo (Galileo Galilei) "You present these recondite matters with too much evidence and ease; this great facility makes them less appreciated than they would be had they been presented in a more abstruse manner." Two New Sciences |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Child Support Lock Up
In article dNM_b.609034$X%5.399700@pd7tw2no,
Sheila J wrote: Bob wrote: Sheila J wrote: Bob wrote: There is no moral justification for women to be officers until and unless women share the risk of combat duty. 4 combat UN tours, you twit. And you? In the US army the femroids get "combat" pay while being exempted from actual combat. Don't know about the Canadians. Did you do any actual combat, or are women excluded in Canada too? Sigh. I am an artillery officer. I do everything the guys do. I was in Rwanda, Somalia, Croatia and Bosnia. I went where my troop went. No distinction. We are not excluded in Canada. And are you going to tell me that Shoshanna Johnson and Jessica Lynch were not in combat just because they weren't being given combat pay? Get a room you two. -- Robert Grumbine http://www.radix.net/~bobg/ Science faqs and amateur activities notes and links. Sagredo (Galileo Galilei) "You present these recondite matters with too much evidence and ease; this great facility makes them less appreciated than they would be had they been presented in a more abstruse manner." Two New Sciences |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Child Support Lock Up
In article dNM_b.609034$X%5.399700@pd7tw2no,
Sheila J wrote: Bob wrote: Sheila J wrote: Bob wrote: There is no moral justification for women to be officers until and unless women share the risk of combat duty. 4 combat UN tours, you twit. And you? In the US army the femroids get "combat" pay while being exempted from actual combat. Don't know about the Canadians. Did you do any actual combat, or are women excluded in Canada too? Sigh. I am an artillery officer. I do everything the guys do. I was in Rwanda, Somalia, Croatia and Bosnia. I went where my troop went. No distinction. We are not excluded in Canada. And are you going to tell me that Shoshanna Johnson and Jessica Lynch were not in combat just because they weren't being given combat pay? Get a room you two. -- Robert Grumbine http://www.radix.net/~bobg/ Science faqs and amateur activities notes and links. Sagredo (Galileo Galilei) "You present these recondite matters with too much evidence and ease; this great facility makes them less appreciated than they would be had they been presented in a more abstruse manner." Two New Sciences |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Child Support Lock Up
In article CQM_b.594137$JQ1.273477@pd7tw1no,
Sheila J wrote: Melibokus wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:48:39 GMT, Sheila J wrote: Bob wrote: bobb wrote: Could it be that women make 40% less than men do? The last I read... women now make up 60% of the work force.. and 55% of college students. Women wont' take hard, dirty, or dangerous jobs, the ones that usually pay better. Said to a female artillery officer....... A 13BoomBoom. No wonder. I have no idea what that means. I'm a 21R Go play elsewhere. -- Robert Grumbine http://www.radix.net/~bobg/ Science faqs and amateur activities notes and links. Sagredo (Galileo Galilei) "You present these recondite matters with too much evidence and ease; this great facility makes them less appreciated than they would be had they been presented in a more abstruse manner." Two New Sciences |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Child Support Lock Up
In article CQM_b.594137$JQ1.273477@pd7tw1no,
Sheila J wrote: Melibokus wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:48:39 GMT, Sheila J wrote: Bob wrote: bobb wrote: Could it be that women make 40% less than men do? The last I read... women now make up 60% of the work force.. and 55% of college students. Women wont' take hard, dirty, or dangerous jobs, the ones that usually pay better. Said to a female artillery officer....... A 13BoomBoom. No wonder. I have no idea what that means. I'm a 21R Go play elsewhere. -- Robert Grumbine http://www.radix.net/~bobg/ Science faqs and amateur activities notes and links. Sagredo (Galileo Galilei) "You present these recondite matters with too much evidence and ease; this great facility makes them less appreciated than they would be had they been presented in a more abstruse manner." Two New Sciences |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Child Support Lock Up
Would you two please go play somewhere appropriate.
-- Robert Grumbine http://www.radix.net/~bobg/ Science faqs and amateur activities notes and links. Sagredo (Galileo Galilei) "You present these recondite matters with too much evidence and ease; this great facility makes them less appreciated than they would be had they been presented in a more abstruse manner." Two New Sciences |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Child Support Lock Up
Would you two please go play somewhere appropriate.
-- Robert Grumbine http://www.radix.net/~bobg/ Science faqs and amateur activities notes and links. Sagredo (Galileo Galilei) "You present these recondite matters with too much evidence and ease; this great facility makes them less appreciated than they would be had they been presented in a more abstruse manner." Two New Sciences |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kids should work. | ChrisScaife | Spanking | 16 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |
Kids should work. | ChrisScaife | Foster Parents | 16 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |
Dennis was U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking | Kane | Spanking | 63 | November 17th 03 10:12 PM |
The Determination of Child Custody in the USA | Fighting for kids | Child Support | 21 | November 17th 03 01:35 AM |