If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Adoption subsidies center of storm at DYFS, CPS adoptions
Which is part of the reason the Congress will be holding hearings about greater
accountability to the over 7B they give to the states under ASFA adoption programs. FWD aa: Subject: Adoption subsidies at center of storm From: ospam (LilMtnCbn) Date: 11/13/2003 10:16 AM Eastern Standard Time Message-id: http://www.nj.com/news/times/index.s...1807345880.xml Adoption subsidies at center of storm Thursday, November 13, 2003 By TRACEY L. REGAN Staff Writer New Jersey child welfare officials are facing ever-sharper questions about the use of adoption subsidies, as a storm of controversy swirls around charges that four adopted boys were starved by an out-of-work Collingswood couple receiving $28,000 a year in state and federal aid to support the children. More than 80 percent of parents who adopt through the state's child welfare system receive a monthly stipend that averages more than $500 per child and continues until the child reaches adulthood. Under current rules, parents who receive adoption subsidies must show proof once a year that they are still raising the child, but they are not otherwise required to account for their expenses. Some state and federal officials are calling for more oversight of adoptive families who receive subsidies, while advocates for children remain leery about intruding upon parents who provide permanent homes for children who have bounced around in foster care. New Jersey officials were called to Washington last week to testify about the Jackson family case before the congressional subcommittee that oversees the disbursement of billions in federal aid each year for adoption expenses, among other child welfare programs. Raymond and Vanessa Jackson are accused of starving their four adopted sons. "Sadly, in this case, these funds were not put to the good purpose Congress intended," U.S. Rep. Wally Herger, R-Calif., chairman of the House Ways and Means subcommittee on human resources, said at the hearing. "These taxpayer dollars were not used to better the lives of children in need of a good home. Instead, it appears, these funds subsidized appalling neglect."-- -- -- A prominent New Jersey legislator has already said she will seek legislation if necessary to require parents who receive adoption subsidies to show proof that the children receive a yearly medical exam. "If it can't be done administratively, I will (introduce) the legislation," said Assemblywoman Mary Previte, D-Haddonfield, chairwoman of the Family, Women and Children's Services Committee. "I can't imagine that honorable adoptive parents would object." Any family that adopts what is broadly defined as a "special needs" child, regardless of income, is eligible for a subsidy. Those children also receive Medicaid insurance. In her testimony before Congress last week, Carla Katz, president of a Communications Workers of America local that represents New Jersey child-care workers, said, "It seems clear - (the state Division of Youth and Family Services) should be following up on adoptions." But some child welfare advocates caution that the state should not risk what they call dramatic progress in finding permanent homes for thousands of foster children by imposing intrusive measures for checking up on them once they are adopted. They say it would alienate would-be parents and smudge the line between the temporary care of foster homes and the permanence of adoption. They describe the Jackson boys' situation as an anomaly, in noting that many would-be parents are not even aware of the subsidies, though the children they are adopting are often in need of significant care for emotional and physical problems. Other adoptive parents bridled at the suggestion that they view the adoptions as a source of income. "Most of the families I've spoken to, there is a need for more money, but the families are often hesitant to renegotiate settlements," said Irene Lando, who has adopted three children through DYFS and advises other would-be parents on their eligibility for subsidies. "A lot of families are eking it out and don't want to ask for more because they don't want DYFS hovering." Lando said she recently advised a woman whose adopted daughter has cerebral palsy and needed a wheelchair and a van with a lift. Families are not saying, "My daughter needs designer clothes," Lando said.-- -- -- New Jersey child welfare officials say they are planning no significant policy changes in the near future, based on the Collingswood case. "These are not snap decisions," said Ralph Siegel, spokesman for DYFS. "We don't want to make massive policy changes that affect thousands of families according to the specific and incomplete information we have about one case." Adoption subsidies were established by Congress more than two decades ago to encourage families to reach out to children described as having "special needs" or being "hard to place," including those over 10 years old, according to New Jersey's rules. The subsidies are supposed to cover monthly board and a clothing allowance. Parents said the impression that families are living off the subsidies is skewed, although some said they were forced periodically to stop working when it was clear a troubled child needed more attention. "I quit because my older one was in crisis, and I didn't want him to end up in jail," said one adoptive mother, who is now back at work.-- -- -- Assemblywoman Loretta Weinberg, D-Teaneck, said she also has mixed feelings about increasing state involvement with adoptive families. "If you adopt, that child is yours," said Weinberg, co-chairwoman of the Assembly Family, Women and Children's Services Committee. "How can the state get involved with people's personal lives. What if the parents say I want them to see pediatrician A and the state says to see pediatrician B. "With my biological children, no one oversaw how much I spent on food or care," she noted. Weinberg added, however, that she hopes to see substantial reform of the state's educational guidelines, which allow parents to homeschool children without ever reporting on their progress. "This is a disaster. There is no oversight," she said. While calling for better scrutiny of families prior to adoptions, child advocates say they are concerned that the Collingswood case could prompt a backlash that would set back the state's zealous efforts to find homes for children. The rate of adoptions has more than doubled in the past five years. "It would be tragic if the mishandling of this one case led to the dismantling of programs that have allowed hundreds of these children in foster care to be adopted," said Cecile Zalkind, director of the Association for Children of New Jersey. ------------------------- DESCRIPTORS; CHILD PROTECTIVE, CPS, KINSHIP CARE, FOSTER CARE, HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE, PUBLIC KINSHIP CARE, GRANDPARENTS, FAMILY LAW, SOCIAL WORK, ADOPTION AND SAFE FAMILIES ACT, DHHS, GA, GAO, FEDERAL FUNDS,CONGRESS, IMMUNITY, STARVATION, OVERSIGHT |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NJ DYFS cw's violated state law-Not interviewing all family members | Fern5827 | Foster Parents | 0 | November 11th 03 03:00 PM |