If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Need real help?
"Layne Barlow" wrote in message
... Layne... help needed - father, logging business owner. Married over 20 years. Two children - both boys, 17 & 13. Mom had two affairs and hasn't lived at home for over 7 months. She wants everything she can get, including but not limited to - alimony, child-support, the kids, at least half of everything, etc. The boys don't want anything to do with her. Dad lives in Lincoln county. Mom lives in Benton. She filed in Benton. If he pushed, can the jurisdiction change from Benton to Lincoln due to the location of the boys, and family home, assets, etc? Do you feel he stands a better chance in Benton or Lincoln county? He lives near Mary's Peak in Lincoln county. He has offered to purchase her a home (anywhere). The boys want to live with dad. Dad's business was a partnership, which included her father at one time. Her father is not paid off. Therefore, she and her family still profit from the logging company - which is running strong. He has no problem is paying her part of that profit, but she wants half of his! She has worked off and on during marriage - licensed beautician, but refuses to work - alimony is better. If the boys speak their minds in court - which county is best? Last question - do you know of a good father's rights attorney somewhere between Corvallis & Newport? He has gone as far as Salem. He was served just last week after 4 attempts. Other three times the guy was chased away. LOL... I brought you up Sunday when I met him and we were talking about his situation. Basically my boyfriend brought up my activity in this group, and I brought up OMEN. Tracy ~~~~~~~ http://www.hornschuch.net/tracy/ "You can't solve problems with the same type of thinking that created them." Albert Einstein *** spamguard in place! to email me: tracy at hornschuch dot net *** |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Need real help?
Layne Barlow wrote:
There are some of us who have been following what you do, Layne. And you ROCK. The Lie-yer's don't come close to doing what is needed. You know as well as anyone that if they did, the court's would not be in the mess that they are in now. What we need is more people like you who are willing to work to fix what's broken. Mel hit it right on, in his answer to Drew a few post back. Keep it up. Not to say anything against any of you in here who read this, because you wouldn't be here if you weren't working for a solution yourself. We are all working toward the same goal. Some, like Layne do it on a more personal level. I want to get there before my children have to worry about the same **** themselves. And becoming a lawyer is not exactly the answer. Of course there is Barbara Johnson, but such as her are few and very far between. nuff said. ~dani |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Need real help?
"Layne Barlow" wrote in message ... On Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:02:04 -0400, "Freedom" wrote: Layne, Where is your expertise? Physically, philosophically, or ...? Or do you mean in what areas? I thought I explained in the original post. I know the issues we face most often a 1) Support guidelines do not take into account the once "intact" family now has TWO homes. Support issues are incredibly more complicated, twisted and deep than just how much should dad pay mom. I know people who have worked their entire professional careers in the Child Support Collection Machine and still don't understand everything about it. I spent some time on our state's last guidelines advisory committee. Reality isn't something they're overly concerned with -- best example is imputed or potential income. If you make $0 per month, they decide you can make at least minimum wage. Worse, if you're in a state like Washington, they'll actually set your income by your age, whether you make that kind of $$ or not. It's hidden in the laws the obligor has to retain enough $$ to support himself. Lots of good stuff is hidden in the law -- estoppels, full faith and credit tests, resulting and constructive trusts. 2) Breastfeeding has expanded from 2 years in the early 1900's to this concept (case law?) of a nurturing mother that lasts for years and years. In Europe it's not unusual for a child to nurse through age 4-5. The concept your talking about is a holdover from the tender years doctrine that dominate most of the last century. This is an abrogation of the common law, where the father's right to custody was "paramount." 3) "Status Quo" being more important than a loving parent (i.e.: Fake domestic violence charge leads to one year separation of kids and NCP, then judge rules "status quo" and says "best interest of kids" to keep as is: ncp and kids apart). This is a common scenario, repeated thousands of times every day in courtrooms all across this country. Should've reserved your federal rights and removed the case outta the state's hands.. 4) Current body of psychological evidence points to "joint custody" as best for kids, yet it is not into mainstream case law yet. Screw "psychological evidence." A custody award in itself usually violates the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. That's why *everyone* should put some thought into their federal questions -- based mostly if not entirely on the 14th Amendment -- and remove their cases to their local U.S. District Courts. Anyone who wants one, email me, let me know what format you use (WordPerfect, Word, etc.), and I'll be thrilled to send you a raw form to use. Layne |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Need real help?
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 19:39:57 GMT, "Batch File" wrote:
Keep doing what you are doing. Just becareful of the Lawyers. They hate competition just like the Government. If a truely free Country, there would be no problem with what you are doing. Too many of us forget the true nature of our government and constitutions: government is one of limited or enumerated authority -- it has *only* the express power the constitution gives it, no more. Lawyers are officers of the courts, which is one of the three legs each state and our country stand on. The judicial branch of government is charged now with enforcing law but declaring it. "Jurisdiction" is Greek for "speak the law." Think about it ... what is a judge, really? A signature. And what does that signature actually represent? The authority given by the people through the constitution. In Oregon every judge's oath is imposed by Article VII (Original)j of our state constitution and reads "I ________ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States, and the constitution of the State of Oregon, and that I will faithfully, and impartially discharge the duties of a Judge of the Supreme, and Circuits (sic) Courts of said, State according to the best of my ability, and that I will not accept any other office, except Judicial offices during the term for which I have been elected." Judges don't enforce law. They don't step off the bench and put the cuffs on defendants, they don't go to our houses and execute warrants. *'All a judge is is a signature.* And it means the people trusted them to *support* the Constitution of the United States, and the constitution of the State of Oregon, and to *faithfully* and *impartially* discharge the duties of a Judge. We the people have the power to hold judges in contempt of their oaths, especially when they do what Judge Philip Arnold did to Dennis Holder in the Circuit Court for Jackson County. What did he do? To put it bluntly, he wiped his ass with the Constitutions and the laws put plainly before him in black and white. I *will* figure out a way to hold him in contempt of oath. For Gini52 and my other detractors out there, look up "coram non judice" and see if you can explain here what it means in practical terms. Why do judges and lawyers get away with it? Because, people, *we let them.* We gave them the authority. And we can take it away. End of rant. Layne |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Need real help?
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 17:15:48 -0500, "dC" wrote:
"Layne Barlow" wrote in message ... If you're serious about defending your rights or offending your opponents in court or administrative cases, but don't know where to start, what laws to use, how to write your papers, etc., *real* help is just an email away. Layne: You got my attention with "boyish good looks" ... love or money - sounds like both, huh? Another paralegal, dC You haven't seen me. I'm fat, old, hairy and lonely. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Need real help?
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 06:57:30 GMT, dani wrote:
Layne Barlow wrote: There are some of us who have been following what you do, Layne. And you ROCK. The Lie-yer's don't come close to doing what is needed. You know as well as anyone that if they did, the court's would not be in the mess that they are in now. What we need is more people like you who are willing to work to fix what's broken. Mel hit it right on, in his answer to Drew a few post back. Keep it up. Not to say anything against any of you in here who read this, because you wouldn't be here if you weren't working for a solution yourself. We are all working toward the same goal. Some, like Layne do it on a more personal level. I want to get there before my children have to worry about the same **** themselves. And becoming a lawyer is not exactly the answer. Of course there is Barbara Johnson, but such as her are few and very far between. nuff said. ~dani Dani, you are *so* cool. And Barbara is cool, too, in my book. Layne |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Need real help?
Hmmm.....
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 17:15:48 -0500, "dC" wrote: "Layne Barlow" wrote in message ... If you're serious about defending your rights or offending your opponents in court or administrative cases, but don't know where to start, what laws to use, how to write your papers, etc., *real* help is just an email away. Layne: You got my attention with "boyish good looks" ... love or money - sounds like both, huh? Another paralegal, dC You haven't seen me. I'm fat, old, hairy and lonely. I'd have to say that you appear - at least in public - to be "heavyset", middle-aged, and well-groomed in a collegiate fashion : ) Don't get down on yourself so hard - there are others who are doing a fine job of that : ( But, yes, the warrior's life is a lonely one...... Mel Gamble |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Need real help?
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Need real help?
"Layne Barlow" wrote ............................... We the people have the power to hold judges in contempt of their oaths, especially when they do what Judge Philip Arnold did to Dennis Holder in the Circuit Court for Jackson County. What did he do? To put it bluntly, he wiped his ass with the Constitutions and the laws put plainly before him in black and white. I *will* figure out a way to hold him in contempt of oath. For Gini52 and my other detractors out there, look up "coram non judice" and see if you can explain here what it means in practical terms. == Gosh, teach, are we going to get graded? == == Why do judges and lawyers get away with it? Because, people, *we let them.* We gave them the authority. And we can take it away. End of rant. Layne |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Need real help?
"Layne Barlow" wrote in message ... On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 17:15:48 -0500, "dC" wrote: Layne: You got my attention with "boyish good looks" ... love or money - sounds like both, huh? Another paralegal, dC You haven't seen me. I'm fat, old, hairy and lonely. You sell yourself short sweetie - I've seen your picture on the internet - yep, when I do my research I do it all the way! Call yourself lonely if you must but Forget those other adjectives!!! A comrade in arms, dC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Book - Three-Ring Circus: How Real Couples Balance Marriage,Work, and Family | Douglas E. Welch | Foster Parents | 0 | April 9th 04 08:04 AM |
Book - Three-Ring Circus: How Real Couples Balance Marriage,Work, and Family | Douglas E. Welch | Twins & Triplets | 0 | April 9th 04 08:00 AM |
"Time Wasting Rules" - from Real Simple Magazine - NOT GOOD! | Corinne | General | 138 | July 25th 03 09:31 PM |