If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Court: Woman Must Pay Husband for Baby
It seems South Korea has it right, at least once.
SEOUL, South Korea (AP) - A South Korean court ordered a woman to pay her husband $42,380 in compensation for having a baby with another man, a judge said Monday. The 26-year-old woman told her husband in February 2002 she was pregnant with his baby, and demanded that they marry. The baby was born in November 2002. "The man had used condoms whenever they had sex, but he agreed to marry, thinking that one of the condoms didn't work," said Hong Joong-pyo, a judge at the Seoul Family Court. But the man's suspicion grew when relatives complained that "the baby didn't look like him at all," Hong said. When the husband confronted his wife with a DNA test that showed the baby was not his, the woman argued that the baby must have been switched at hospital. When the husband moved to sue the hospital, the woman confessed to having been pregnant with another man's baby, Hong said. Hong also nullified the marriage in his ruling Thursday. The wife said she was sexually assaulted by the baby's real father, but the court rejected her argument for lack of evidence. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Court: Woman Must Pay Husband for Baby
"Phil #3" wrote in message ink.net... It seems South Korea has it right, at least once. SEOUL, South Korea (AP) - A South Korean court ordered a woman to pay her husband $42,380 in compensation for having a baby with another man, a judge said Monday. Exactly what they do in Amerika, except for two things: 1. They reversed the victim/perpetrator roles (by gender). 2. The victim is robbed of significantly LESS money! Of course I forgot to mention that the woman still is the one who makes the SOLE decision whether or not such child will legally exist in the first place. The 26-year-old woman told her husband in February 2002 she was pregnant with his baby, and demanded that they marry. The baby was born in November 2002. "The man had used condoms whenever they had sex, but he agreed to marry, thinking that one of the condoms didn't work," said Hong Joong-pyo, a judge at the Seoul Family Court. But the man's suspicion grew when relatives complained that "the baby didn't look like him at all," Hong said. When the husband confronted his wife with a DNA test that showed the baby was not his, the woman argued that the baby must have been switched at hospital. When the husband moved to sue the hospital, the woman confessed to having been pregnant with another man's baby, Hong said. Hong also nullified the marriage in his ruling Thursday. The wife said she was sexually assaulted by the baby's real father, but the court rejected her argument for lack of evidence. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Court: Woman Must Pay Husband for Baby
"Phil #3" wrote in message ink.net... It seems South Korea has it right, at least once. SEOUL, South Korea (AP) - A South Korean court ordered a woman to pay her husband $42,380 in compensation for having a baby with another man, a judge said Monday. Exactly what they do in Amerika, except for two things: 1. They reversed the victim/perpetrator roles (by gender). 2. The victim is robbed of significantly LESS money! Of course I forgot to mention that the woman still is the one who makes the SOLE decision whether or not such child will legally exist in the first place. The 26-year-old woman told her husband in February 2002 she was pregnant with his baby, and demanded that they marry. The baby was born in November 2002. "The man had used condoms whenever they had sex, but he agreed to marry, thinking that one of the condoms didn't work," said Hong Joong-pyo, a judge at the Seoul Family Court. But the man's suspicion grew when relatives complained that "the baby didn't look like him at all," Hong said. When the husband confronted his wife with a DNA test that showed the baby was not his, the woman argued that the baby must have been switched at hospital. When the husband moved to sue the hospital, the woman confessed to having been pregnant with another man's baby, Hong said. Hong also nullified the marriage in his ruling Thursday. The wife said she was sexually assaulted by the baby's real father, but the court rejected her argument for lack of evidence. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Court: Woman Must Pay Husband for Baby
"Phil #3" wrote in message ink.net... It seems South Korea has it right, at least once. SEOUL, South Korea (AP) - A South Korean court ordered a woman to pay her husband $42,380 in compensation for having a baby with another man, a judge said Monday. Exactly what they do in Amerika, except for two things: 1. They reversed the victim/perpetrator roles (by gender). 2. The victim is robbed of significantly LESS money! Of course I forgot to mention that the woman still is the one who makes the SOLE decision whether or not such child will legally exist in the first place. The 26-year-old woman told her husband in February 2002 she was pregnant with his baby, and demanded that they marry. The baby was born in November 2002. "The man had used condoms whenever they had sex, but he agreed to marry, thinking that one of the condoms didn't work," said Hong Joong-pyo, a judge at the Seoul Family Court. But the man's suspicion grew when relatives complained that "the baby didn't look like him at all," Hong said. When the husband confronted his wife with a DNA test that showed the baby was not his, the woman argued that the baby must have been switched at hospital. When the husband moved to sue the hospital, the woman confessed to having been pregnant with another man's baby, Hong said. Hong also nullified the marriage in his ruling Thursday. The wife said she was sexually assaulted by the baby's real father, but the court rejected her argument for lack of evidence. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Court: Woman Must Pay Husband for Baby
Chris wrote:
"Phil #3" wrote in message ink.net... It seems South Korea has it right, at least once. SEOUL, South Korea (AP) - A South Korean court ordered a woman to pay her husband $42,380 in compensation for having a baby with another man, a judge said Monday. Exactly what they do in Amerika, except for two things: 1. They reversed the victim/perpetrator roles (by gender). 2. The victim is robbed of significantly LESS money! Of course I forgot to mention that the woman still is the one who makes the SOLE decision whether or not such child will legally exist in the first place. In this case don't you mean the woman makes the "SEOUL" decision? ;-) Bob The 26-year-old woman told her husband in February 2002 she was pregnant with his baby, and demanded that they marry. The baby was born in November 2002. "The man had used condoms whenever they had sex, but he agreed to marry, thinking that one of the condoms didn't work," said Hong Joong-pyo, a judge at the Seoul Family Court. But the man's suspicion grew when relatives complained that "the baby didn't look like him at all," Hong said. When the husband confronted his wife with a DNA test that showed the baby was not his, the woman argued that the baby must have been switched at hospital. When the husband moved to sue the hospital, the woman confessed to having been pregnant with another man's baby, Hong said. Hong also nullified the marriage in his ruling Thursday. The wife said she was sexually assaulted by the baby's real father, but the court rejected her argument for lack of evidence. -- When did we divide into sides? "As president, I will put American government and our legal system back on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/ [Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.] |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Court: Woman Must Pay Husband for Baby
Chris wrote:
"Phil #3" wrote in message ink.net... It seems South Korea has it right, at least once. SEOUL, South Korea (AP) - A South Korean court ordered a woman to pay her husband $42,380 in compensation for having a baby with another man, a judge said Monday. Exactly what they do in Amerika, except for two things: 1. They reversed the victim/perpetrator roles (by gender). 2. The victim is robbed of significantly LESS money! Of course I forgot to mention that the woman still is the one who makes the SOLE decision whether or not such child will legally exist in the first place. In this case don't you mean the woman makes the "SEOUL" decision? ;-) Bob The 26-year-old woman told her husband in February 2002 she was pregnant with his baby, and demanded that they marry. The baby was born in November 2002. "The man had used condoms whenever they had sex, but he agreed to marry, thinking that one of the condoms didn't work," said Hong Joong-pyo, a judge at the Seoul Family Court. But the man's suspicion grew when relatives complained that "the baby didn't look like him at all," Hong said. When the husband confronted his wife with a DNA test that showed the baby was not his, the woman argued that the baby must have been switched at hospital. When the husband moved to sue the hospital, the woman confessed to having been pregnant with another man's baby, Hong said. Hong also nullified the marriage in his ruling Thursday. The wife said she was sexually assaulted by the baby's real father, but the court rejected her argument for lack of evidence. -- When did we divide into sides? "As president, I will put American government and our legal system back on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/ [Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.] |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Court: Woman Must Pay Husband for Baby
Chris wrote:
"Phil #3" wrote in message ink.net... It seems South Korea has it right, at least once. SEOUL, South Korea (AP) - A South Korean court ordered a woman to pay her husband $42,380 in compensation for having a baby with another man, a judge said Monday. Exactly what they do in Amerika, except for two things: 1. They reversed the victim/perpetrator roles (by gender). 2. The victim is robbed of significantly LESS money! Of course I forgot to mention that the woman still is the one who makes the SOLE decision whether or not such child will legally exist in the first place. In this case don't you mean the woman makes the "SEOUL" decision? ;-) Bob The 26-year-old woman told her husband in February 2002 she was pregnant with his baby, and demanded that they marry. The baby was born in November 2002. "The man had used condoms whenever they had sex, but he agreed to marry, thinking that one of the condoms didn't work," said Hong Joong-pyo, a judge at the Seoul Family Court. But the man's suspicion grew when relatives complained that "the baby didn't look like him at all," Hong said. When the husband confronted his wife with a DNA test that showed the baby was not his, the woman argued that the baby must have been switched at hospital. When the husband moved to sue the hospital, the woman confessed to having been pregnant with another man's baby, Hong said. Hong also nullified the marriage in his ruling Thursday. The wife said she was sexually assaulted by the baby's real father, but the court rejected her argument for lack of evidence. -- When did we divide into sides? "As president, I will put American government and our legal system back on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/ [Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.] |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Paternity Fraud - US Supreme Court | Wizardlaw | Child Support | 12 | June 4th 04 02:19 AM |
Mother's Paternity Fraud - US Supreme Court Case | TrashBBRT | Child Support | 8 | May 21st 04 05:52 PM |