If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message . net... FOR CHIROS ONLY: SPEAKING OF STRICTLY SPEAKING... Yo Toddster, What do chiropodists have to do with opening birth canals 30%? See the postscript. Donald M. Petersen, Jr., Editor/Publisher of Dynamic Chiropractic says, "Strictly speaking, nutrition is not chiropractic." http://www.chiroweb.com/columnist/petersen/index.html Donald, There is scientific evidence that dietary error exists and causes disease and stops causing disease when adjusted/corrrected. There is NO scientific evidence that chiropractic's hypothetical biomechanical error ("vertebral subluxation") exists and causes disease and stops causing disease when adjusted/corrected. For Dr. DD Palmer, adjusting/correcting error was definitely chiropractic. Why would adjusting/correcting dietary error not be part of chiropractic? Todd Dr. Gastaldo PS FOR CHIROS ONLY: SPEAKING OF STRICTLY SPEAKING... Donald M. Petersen, Jr., Editor/Publisher of Dynamic Chiropractic should be publishing the fact that MD-obstetricians a 1) routinely closing birth canals up to 30%; 2) routinely keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck; and 3) routinely pulling with hands, forceps and vacuums with birth canals senselessly closed the "extra" up to 30%. Sometimes MD-obstetricians pull so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. Some babies die - some get paralyzed - some "only" have their spines gruesomely wrenched. Donald M. Petersen, Jr., Editor/Publisher of Dynamic Chiropractic should also be publishing the fact that MD-obstetricians are slicing vaginas and abdomens en masse (episiotomy/c-section) - surgically/fraudulently inferring they are doing/have done everything possible to open birth canals - even as they close birth canals up to 30%. DONALD: Many chiros indicate that birth trauma can cause vertebral subluxations. Thanks in part to your editorial silence, the chiropractic profession is missing a golden opportunity to save tiny lives and tiny limbs and PREVENT more putative vertebral subluxations than DCs will ever be able to adjust by hand. Of course, you are not the only silent voice in chiropractic... See Birth and German 'lay manipulators' (heilpraktikers) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3493 See also: Chiropractic, Pediatrics and Pregnancy http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3471 And see: Chiro exams *at* birth http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3491 And don't miss: Birth and the International Chiropractors Association http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3498 Thanks for reading. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo This post will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive. Search http://groups.google.com for "For chiros only: Speaking of strictly speaking" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message ... "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message . net... FOR CHIROS ONLY: SPEAKING OF STRICTLY SPEAKING... Yo Toddster, What do chiropodists have to do with opening birth canals 30%? As fetuses, chiropodists (just like everyone else) are used as entering wedges to open birth canals up to 30% - assuming they are born vaginally and their mothers aren't placed semisitting or dorsal. Todd See the postscript. Donald M. Petersen, Jr., Editor/Publisher of Dynamic Chiropractic says, "Strictly speaking, nutrition is not chiropractic." http://www.chiroweb.com/columnist/petersen/index.html Donald, There is scientific evidence that dietary error exists and causes disease and stops causing disease when adjusted/corrrected. There is NO scientific evidence that chiropractic's hypothetical biomechanical error ("vertebral subluxation") exists and causes disease and stops causing disease when adjusted/corrected. For Dr. DD Palmer, adjusting/correcting error was definitely chiropractic. Why would adjusting/correcting dietary error not be part of chiropractic? Todd Dr. Gastaldo PS FOR CHIROS ONLY: SPEAKING OF STRICTLY SPEAKING... Donald M. Petersen, Jr., Editor/Publisher of Dynamic Chiropractic should be publishing the fact that MD-obstetricians a 1) routinely closing birth canals up to 30%; 2) routinely keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck; and 3) routinely pulling with hands, forceps and vacuums with birth canals senselessly closed the "extra" up to 30%. Sometimes MD-obstetricians pull so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. Some babies die - some get paralyzed - some "only" have their spines gruesomely wrenched. Donald M. Petersen, Jr., Editor/Publisher of Dynamic Chiropractic should also be publishing the fact that MD-obstetricians are slicing vaginas and abdomens en masse (episiotomy/c-section) - surgically/fraudulently inferring they are doing/have done everything possible to open birth canals - even as they close birth canals up to 30%. DONALD: Many chiros indicate that birth trauma can cause vertebral subluxations. Thanks in part to your editorial silence, the chiropractic profession is missing a golden opportunity to save tiny lives and tiny limbs and PREVENT more putative vertebral subluxations than DCs will ever be able to adjust by hand. Of course, you are not the only silent voice in chiropractic... See Birth and German 'lay manipulators' (heilpraktikers) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3493 See also: Chiropractic, Pediatrics and Pregnancy http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3471 And see: Chiro exams *at* birth http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3491 And don't miss: Birth and the International Chiropractors Association http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3498 Thanks for reading. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo This post will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive. Search http://groups.google.com for "For chiros only: Speaking of strictly speaking" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message k.net... ? As fetuses, chiropodists (just like everyone else) are used as entering wedges to open birth canals up to 30% - assuming they are born vaginally and their mothers aren't placed semisitting or dorsal. Todd REPLY WoW! Chiropodists entering wedges ........ I think I saw that on America's Most Wanted .......... they are after that guy in 23 states ....... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
OB PERPS
Dentist Joel M. Eichen humorously makes light of massive child abuse by OBs. "Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message ... "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message k.net... ? As fetuses, chiropodists (just like everyone else) are used as entering wedges to open birth canals up to 30% - assuming they are born vaginally and their mothers aren't placed semisitting or dorsal. Todd REPLY WoW! Chiropodists entering wedges ........ I think I saw that on America's Most Wanted .......... they are after that guy in 23 states ...... Joel, It's a classic case of blaming the victim as the birth-canal-closing OB perps remain at large. OB perps are also robbing babies of up to 50% of blood volume. See below. THE FOUR OB LIES OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in 1957, the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvic diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery. OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet. OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the same paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention to their text... OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal open maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum births are performed with the mother in lithotomy.) See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS... http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983 I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago... http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS.... "[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage in fraud or deception." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the patient." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to patients, colleagues, and the public..." http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned. MASSIVE BABY BLOOD ROBBERY Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG indicates that OBs are robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. This is happening to EVERY CESAREAN BABY, according to Dr. Morley: "ACOG's routine treatment (B138) of these depressed neonates is immediate cord clamping to obtain cord blood pH studies. The child's only functioning source of oxygen - the placenta - is amputated together with 30% to 50+% of its natural blood volume. Total asphyxia is imposed until the lungs function, and the depressed (asphyxiated, hypovolemic) child starts its extra-uterine life in hypovolemic shock... B138 was first published in 1993. Every cesarean section baby, every depressed child, every premie, and every child born with a neonatal team in the delivery room has its cord clamped immediately to facilitate the panicked rush to the resuscitation table. The current epidemic of immediate cord clamping coincides with an epidemic of autism...For the trial lawyers, it is essential that the 'true genesis' of cerebral palsy remains unknown, because that 'true genesis' (B.138) is a standard of medico-legal care..." http://www.cordclamping.com/ac***og-cp.htm In cases where the baby MUST be resuscitated after birth - I am still wondering why pediatricians have to sever the baby's access to blood and oxygen and rush baby across the room to resuscitate. Why can't neonatal resuscitation stations be designed so that mother and baby can be wheeled underneath (or between) with baby's natural oxygenation/transfusion device still intact? No one has answered this question. My thanks to Canadian Grandmother Donna Young for calling my attention to the immediate cord clamping mass child abuse. A GOOD SIGN: Oregon Health & Science University/OHSU - Oregon's only medical school - stopped promoting immediate cord clamping and birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery online after I complained. OHSU's link to the misinformation is now dead - or rather - one is re-routed to www.ohsuwomenshealth.com... See Birth child abuse: Oregon's only medical school (OHSU) http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2986 (If anyone can find a page where OHSU is still promoting immediate cord clamping and birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery, I would like to know about it.) PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. ANOTHER PROBLEM: By immediately clamping cords, OBs are temporarily asphyxiating babies and robbing them of up to 50% of their blood volume - see the astonishing quote from Dr. Morley above. THE SOLUTION: 1. To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - BUT BEWARE - some OBs will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB. 2. To allow your baby to have the "extra" up to 50% of blood volume, do not let the OB or midwife clamp the umbilical cord until it has stopped pulsating and your baby is pink and breathing and not in need of resuscitation. NOTE #1: Allowing the birth canal to open the "extra" up to 30% will not prevent all episiotomies or c-sections or forceps/vacuum use - but OBs have no business closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30% in the first place. NOTE #2: There are rare cases where the OB must clamp immediately - but they are indeed rare. OBs are routinely clamping cords immediately - routinely robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Talk to your OB today. I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical students MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious child abuse which sometimes kills. Thanks for reading everyone. Todd Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon USA |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Who is humorously making light?
I am talking about the chiropodist on America's Most Wanted .... "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message k.net... OB PERPS Dentist Joel M. Eichen humorously makes light of massive child abuse by OBs. "Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message ... "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message k.net... ? As fetuses, chiropodists (just like everyone else) are used as entering wedges to open birth canals up to 30% - assuming they are born vaginally and their mothers aren't placed semisitting or dorsal. Todd REPLY WoW! Chiropodists entering wedges ........ I think I saw that on America's Most Wanted .......... they are after that guy in 23 states ...... Joel, It's a classic case of blaming the victim as the birth-canal-closing OB perps remain at large. OB perps are also robbing babies of up to 50% of blood volume. See below. THE FOUR OB LIES OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in 1957, the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvic diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery. OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet. OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the same paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention to their text... OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal open maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum births are performed with the mother in lithotomy.) See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS... http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983 I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago... http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS.... "[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage in fraud or deception." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the patient." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to patients, colleagues, and the public..." http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned. MASSIVE BABY BLOOD ROBBERY Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG indicates that OBs are robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. This is happening to EVERY CESAREAN BABY, according to Dr. Morley: "ACOG's routine treatment (B138) of these depressed neonates is immediate cord clamping to obtain cord blood pH studies. The child's only functioning source of oxygen - the placenta - is amputated together with 30% to 50+% of its natural blood volume. Total asphyxia is imposed until the lungs function, and the depressed (asphyxiated, hypovolemic) child starts its extra-uterine life in hypovolemic shock... B138 was first published in 1993. Every cesarean section baby, every depressed child, every premie, and every child born with a neonatal team in the delivery room has its cord clamped immediately to facilitate the panicked rush to the resuscitation table. The current epidemic of immediate cord clamping coincides with an epidemic of autism...For the trial lawyers, it is essential that the 'true genesis' of cerebral palsy remains unknown, because that 'true genesis' (B.138) is a standard of medico-legal care..." http://www.cordclamping.com/ac***og-cp.htm In cases where the baby MUST be resuscitated after birth - I am still wondering why pediatricians have to sever the baby's access to blood and oxygen and rush baby across the room to resuscitate. Why can't neonatal resuscitation stations be designed so that mother and baby can be wheeled underneath (or between) with baby's natural oxygenation/transfusion device still intact? No one has answered this question. My thanks to Canadian Grandmother Donna Young for calling my attention to the immediate cord clamping mass child abuse. A GOOD SIGN: Oregon Health & Science University/OHSU - Oregon's only medical school - stopped promoting immediate cord clamping and birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery online after I complained. OHSU's link to the misinformation is now dead - or rather - one is re-routed to www.ohsuwomenshealth.com... See Birth child abuse: Oregon's only medical school (OHSU) http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2986 (If anyone can find a page where OHSU is still promoting immediate cord clamping and birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery, I would like to know about it.) PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. ANOTHER PROBLEM: By immediately clamping cords, OBs are temporarily asphyxiating babies and robbing them of up to 50% of their blood volume - see the astonishing quote from Dr. Morley above. THE SOLUTION: 1. To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - BUT BEWARE - some OBs will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB. 2. To allow your baby to have the "extra" up to 50% of blood volume, do not let the OB or midwife clamp the umbilical cord until it has stopped pulsating and your baby is pink and breathing and not in need of resuscitation. NOTE #1: Allowing the birth canal to open the "extra" up to 30% will not prevent all episiotomies or c-sections or forceps/vacuum use - but OBs have no business closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30% in the first place. NOTE #2: There are rare cases where the OB must clamp immediately - but they are indeed rare. OBs are routinely clamping cords immediately - routinely robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Talk to your OB today. I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical students MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious child abuse which sometimes kills. Thanks for reading everyone. Todd Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon USA |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
THE 30% AND CHIROPODY (NOW CALLED PODIATRY)
See below. "Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message ... Who is humorously making light? I am talking about the chiropodist on America's Most Wanted .... LOL! And now I am talking about Margaret the chiropodist in "Bob and Margaret" (Comedy) which airs: Sundays 11:30 PM (Comedy Central): "Premise: The funny, but everyday dealings of Bob, a neurotic dentist, and his chiropodist wife, Margaret." http://tv.zap2it.com/tveditorial/tve_main/1,1002,273|3244|1|,00.html BTW, I'm pretty sure chiropodists are now called podiatrists. Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary says: "Chiropodical...pertaining to chiropody (now called podiatry)." Incidentally, when I persuaded Dorland's to correct its definition of chiropractic and include graduates of chiropractic colleges under the Dorland's definition of doctor, Dorland's took the opportunity to also include graduates dental and podiatry colleges. I see your point, Joel - offering some humor does not necessarily make light of the mass child abuse being committed by OBs. Indeed, humorous posts in response to mine could possibly help call attention to the fact that OBs are routinely closing birth canals up to 30% and routinely keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck - as they pull with hands, forceps or vacuums - sometimes so hard that spinal nerves are ripped out of tiny spinal cords. I suspect Amy's joking about OBs not really robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume helped call people's attention to the fact that OBs *are* really robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Todd PS For readers who may not be aware (perhaps Joel the dentist is still not aware): "Chiro" is a term often used by chiropractors when referring to a chiropractor or to chiropractic. I suppose chiropodists used to use the same term; but now they are called podiatrists ("pods"?)... "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message . net... FOR CHIROS ONLY: SPEAKING OF STRICTLY SPEAKING... Yo Toddster, What do chiropodists have to do with opening birth canals 30%? "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message k.net... OB PERPS Dentist Joel M. Eichen humorously makes light of massive child abuse by OBs. "Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message ... "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message k.net... ? As fetuses, chiropodists (just like everyone else) are used as entering wedges to open birth canals up to 30% - assuming they are born vaginally and their mothers aren't placed semisitting or dorsal. Todd REPLY WoW! Chiropodists entering wedges ........ I think I saw that on America's Most Wanted .......... they are after that guy in 23 states ...... Joel, It's a classic case of blaming the victim as the birth-canal-closing OB perps remain at large. OB perps are also robbing babies of up to 50% of blood volume. See below. THE FOUR OB LIES OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in 1957, the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvic diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery. OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet. OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the same paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention to their text... OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal open maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum births are performed with the mother in lithotomy.) See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS... http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983 I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago... http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS.... "[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage in fraud or deception." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the patient." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to patients, colleagues, and the public..." http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned. MASSIVE BABY BLOOD ROBBERY Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG indicates that OBs are robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. This is happening to EVERY CESAREAN BABY, according to Dr. Morley: "ACOG's routine treatment (B138) of these depressed neonates is immediate cord clamping to obtain cord blood pH studies. The child's only functioning source of oxygen - the placenta - is amputated together with 30% to 50+% of its natural blood volume. Total asphyxia is imposed until the lungs function, and the depressed (asphyxiated, hypovolemic) child starts its extra-uterine life in hypovolemic shock... B138 was first published in 1993. Every cesarean section baby, every depressed child, every premie, and every child born with a neonatal team in the delivery room has its cord clamped immediately to facilitate the panicked rush to the resuscitation table. The current epidemic of immediate cord clamping coincides with an epidemic of autism...For the trial lawyers, it is essential that the 'true genesis' of cerebral palsy remains unknown, because that 'true genesis' (B.138) is a standard of medico-legal care..." http://www.cordclamping.com/ac***og-cp.htm In cases where the baby MUST be resuscitated after birth - I am still wondering why pediatricians have to sever the baby's access to blood and oxygen and rush baby across the room to resuscitate. Why can't neonatal resuscitation stations be designed so that mother and baby can be wheeled underneath (or between) with baby's natural oxygenation/transfusion device still intact? No one has answered this question. My thanks to Canadian Grandmother Donna Young for calling my attention to the immediate cord clamping mass child abuse. A GOOD SIGN: Oregon Health & Science University/OHSU - Oregon's only medical school - stopped promoting immediate cord clamping and birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery online after I complained. OHSU's link to the misinformation is now dead - or rather - one is re-routed to www.ohsuwomenshealth.com... See Birth child abuse: Oregon's only medical school (OHSU) http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2986 (If anyone can find a page where OHSU is still promoting immediate cord clamping and birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery, I would like to know about it.) PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. ANOTHER PROBLEM: By immediately clamping cords, OBs are temporarily asphyxiating babies and robbing them of up to 50% of their blood volume - see the astonishing quote from Dr. Morley above. THE SOLUTION: 1. To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - BUT BEWARE - some OBs will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB. 2. To allow your baby to have the "extra" up to 50% of blood volume, do not let the OB or midwife clamp the umbilical cord until it has stopped pulsating and your baby is pink and breathing and not in need of resuscitation. NOTE #1: Allowing the birth canal to open the "extra" up to 30% will not prevent all episiotomies or c-sections or forceps/vacuum use - but OBs have no business closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30% in the first place. NOTE #2: There are rare cases where the OB must clamp immediately - but they are indeed rare. OBs are routinely clamping cords immediately - routinely robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Talk to your OB today. I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical students MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious child abuse which sometimes kills. Thanks for reading everyone. Todd Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon USA |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message nk.net... THE 30% AND CHIROPODY (NOW CALLED PODIATRY) REPLY Actually they are different. Chiropodists are only clip and chip while podiatrists are fully-fledged doctors! Now which group got caught with the wedge doing who knows what, I do not know. Joel See below. "Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message ... Who is humorously making light? I am talking about the chiropodist on America's Most Wanted .... LOL! And now I am talking about Margaret the chiropodist in "Bob and Margaret" (Comedy) which airs: Sundays 11:30 PM (Comedy Central): "Premise: The funny, but everyday dealings of Bob, a neurotic dentist, and his chiropodist wife, Margaret." http://tv.zap2it.com/tveditorial/tve_main/1,1002,273|3244|1|,00.html BTW, I'm pretty sure chiropodists are now called podiatrists. Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary says: "Chiropodical...pertaining to chiropody (now called podiatry)." Incidentally, when I persuaded Dorland's to correct its definition of chiropractic and include graduates of chiropractic colleges under the Dorland's definition of doctor, Dorland's took the opportunity to also include graduates dental and podiatry colleges. I see your point, Joel - offering some humor does not necessarily make light of the mass child abuse being committed by OBs. Indeed, humorous posts in response to mine could possibly help call attention to the fact that OBs are routinely closing birth canals up to 30% and routinely keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck - as they pull with hands, forceps or vacuums - sometimes so hard that spinal nerves are ripped out of tiny spinal cords. I suspect Amy's joking about OBs not really robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume helped call people's attention to the fact that OBs *are* really robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Todd PS For readers who may not be aware (perhaps Joel the dentist is still not aware): "Chiro" is a term often used by chiropractors when referring to a chiropractor or to chiropractic. I suppose chiropodists used to use the same term; but now they are called podiatrists ("pods"?)... "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message . net... FOR CHIROS ONLY: SPEAKING OF STRICTLY SPEAKING... Yo Toddster, What do chiropodists have to do with opening birth canals 30%? "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message k.net... OB PERPS Dentist Joel M. Eichen humorously makes light of massive child abuse by OBs. "Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message ... "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message k.net... ? As fetuses, chiropodists (just like everyone else) are used as entering wedges to open birth canals up to 30% - assuming they are born vaginally and their mothers aren't placed semisitting or dorsal. Todd REPLY WoW! Chiropodists entering wedges ........ I think I saw that on America's Most Wanted .......... they are after that guy in 23 states ...... Joel, It's a classic case of blaming the victim as the birth-canal-closing OB perps remain at large. OB perps are also robbing babies of up to 50% of blood volume. See below. THE FOUR OB LIES OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in 1957, the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvic diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery. OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet. OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the same paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention to their text... OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal open maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum births are performed with the mother in lithotomy.) See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS... http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983 I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago... http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS.... "[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage in fraud or deception." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the patient." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to patients, colleagues, and the public..." http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned. MASSIVE BABY BLOOD ROBBERY Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG indicates that OBs are robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. This is happening to EVERY CESAREAN BABY, according to Dr. Morley: "ACOG's routine treatment (B138) of these depressed neonates is immediate cord clamping to obtain cord blood pH studies. The child's only functioning source of oxygen - the placenta - is amputated together with 30% to 50+% of its natural blood volume. Total asphyxia is imposed until the lungs function, and the depressed (asphyxiated, hypovolemic) child starts its extra-uterine life in hypovolemic shock... B138 was first published in 1993. Every cesarean section baby, every depressed child, every premie, and every child born with a neonatal team in the delivery room has its cord clamped immediately to facilitate the panicked rush to the resuscitation table. The current epidemic of immediate cord clamping coincides with an epidemic of autism...For the trial lawyers, it is essential that the 'true genesis' of cerebral palsy remains unknown, because that 'true genesis' (B.138) is a standard of medico-legal care..." http://www.cordclamping.com/ac***og-cp.htm In cases where the baby MUST be resuscitated after birth - I am still wondering why pediatricians have to sever the baby's access to blood and oxygen and rush baby across the room to resuscitate. Why can't neonatal resuscitation stations be designed so that mother and baby can be wheeled underneath (or between) with baby's natural oxygenation/transfusion device still intact? No one has answered this question. My thanks to Canadian Grandmother Donna Young for calling my attention to the immediate cord clamping mass child abuse. A GOOD SIGN: Oregon Health & Science University/OHSU - Oregon's only medical school - stopped promoting immediate cord clamping and birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery online after I complained. OHSU's link to the misinformation is now dead - or rather - one is re-routed to www.ohsuwomenshealth.com... See Birth child abuse: Oregon's only medical school (OHSU) http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2986 (If anyone can find a page where OHSU is still promoting immediate cord clamping and birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery, I would like to know about it.) PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. ANOTHER PROBLEM: By immediately clamping cords, OBs are temporarily asphyxiating babies and robbing them of up to 50% of their blood volume - see the astonishing quote from Dr. Morley above. THE SOLUTION: 1. To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - BUT BEWARE - some OBs will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB. 2. To allow your baby to have the "extra" up to 50% of blood volume, do not let the OB or midwife clamp the umbilical cord until it has stopped pulsating and your baby is pink and breathing and not in need of resuscitation. NOTE #1: Allowing the birth canal to open the "extra" up to 30% will not prevent all episiotomies or c-sections or forceps/vacuum use - but OBs have no business closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30% in the first place. NOTE #2: There are rare cases where the OB must clamp immediately - but they are indeed rare. OBs are routinely clamping cords immediately - routinely robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Talk to your OB today. I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical students MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious child abuse which sometimes kills. Thanks for reading everyone. Todd Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon USA |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message ... "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message nk.net... THE 30% AND CHIROPODY (NOW CALLED PODIATRY) REPLY Actually they are different. Chiropodists are only clip and chip while podiatrists are fully-fledged doctors! Now which group got caught with the wedge doing who knows what, I do not know. I am pretty sure Chiropodists and Podiatrists are the same profession in the US - I could be wrong though. The British Society of Chiropodists and Podiatrists, 53 Welbeck Street, London W1M 7HE Telephone: 0207 486 3381 - Fax: 0207 935 6359 has this to say: "Chiropodists and Podiatrists....Nowadays, the recognised schools are all departments of universities, or colleges of higher education, and issue BSc degrees in podiatry,...After graduation you will find there are almost limitless opportunities for postgraduate study and advancement. Several polytechnics have been running post-registration BSc degrees in chiropody for some years..." "The profession is in the process of changing its title from Chiropody to Podiatry, to indicate the advances that have been made, and are still being made, in the professional scope of practice, and to use the title that is recognised in most other countries with similar level of education." http://www.ca.courses-careers.com/chiropody.htm Todd See below. "Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message ... Who is humorously making light? I am talking about the chiropodist on America's Most Wanted .... LOL! And now I am talking about Margaret the chiropodist in "Bob and Margaret" (Comedy) which airs: Sundays 11:30 PM (Comedy Central): "Premise: The funny, but everyday dealings of Bob, a neurotic dentist, and his chiropodist wife, Margaret." http://tv.zap2it.com/tveditorial/tve_main/1,1002,273|3244|1|,00.html BTW, I'm pretty sure chiropodists are now called podiatrists. Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary says: "Chiropodical...pertaining to chiropody (now called podiatry)." Incidentally, when I persuaded Dorland's to correct its definition of chiropractic and include graduates of chiropractic colleges under the Dorland's definition of doctor, Dorland's took the opportunity to also include graduates dental and podiatry colleges. I see your point, Joel - offering some humor does not necessarily make light of the mass child abuse being committed by OBs. Indeed, humorous posts in response to mine could possibly help call attention to the fact that OBs are routinely closing birth canals up to 30% and routinely keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck - as they pull with hands, forceps or vacuums - sometimes so hard that spinal nerves are ripped out of tiny spinal cords. I suspect Amy's joking about OBs not really robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume helped call people's attention to the fact that OBs *are* really robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Todd PS For readers who may not be aware (perhaps Joel the dentist is still not aware): "Chiro" is a term often used by chiropractors when referring to a chiropractor or to chiropractic. I suppose chiropodists used to use the same term; but now they are called podiatrists ("pods"?)... "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message . net... FOR CHIROS ONLY: SPEAKING OF STRICTLY SPEAKING... Yo Toddster, What do chiropodists have to do with opening birth canals 30%? "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message k.net... OB PERPS Dentist Joel M. Eichen humorously makes light of massive child abuse by OBs. "Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message ... "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message k.net... ? As fetuses, chiropodists (just like everyone else) are used as entering wedges to open birth canals up to 30% - assuming they are born vaginally and their mothers aren't placed semisitting or dorsal. Todd REPLY WoW! Chiropodists entering wedges ........ I think I saw that on America's Most Wanted .......... they are after that guy in 23 states ...... Joel, It's a classic case of blaming the victim as the birth-canal-closing OB perps remain at large. OB perps are also robbing babies of up to 50% of blood volume. See below. THE FOUR OB LIES OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in 1957, the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvic diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery. OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet. OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the same paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention to their text... OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal open maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum births are performed with the mother in lithotomy.) See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS... http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983 I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago... http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS.... "[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage in fraud or deception." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the patient." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to patients, colleagues, and the public..." http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned. MASSIVE BABY BLOOD ROBBERY Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG indicates that OBs are robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. This is happening to EVERY CESAREAN BABY, according to Dr. Morley: "ACOG's routine treatment (B138) of these depressed neonates is immediate cord clamping to obtain cord blood pH studies. The child's only functioning source of oxygen - the placenta - is amputated together with 30% to 50+% of its natural blood volume. Total asphyxia is imposed until the lungs function, and the depressed (asphyxiated, hypovolemic) child starts its extra-uterine life in hypovolemic shock... B138 was first published in 1993. Every cesarean section baby, every depressed child, every premie, and every child born with a neonatal team in the delivery room has its cord clamped immediately to facilitate the panicked rush to the resuscitation table. The current epidemic of immediate cord clamping coincides with an epidemic of autism...For the trial lawyers, it is essential that the 'true genesis' of cerebral palsy remains unknown, because that 'true genesis' (B.138) is a standard of medico-legal care..." http://www.cordclamping.com/ac***og-cp.htm In cases where the baby MUST be resuscitated after birth - I am still wondering why pediatricians have to sever the baby's access to blood and oxygen and rush baby across the room to resuscitate. Why can't neonatal resuscitation stations be designed so that mother and baby can be wheeled underneath (or between) with baby's natural oxygenation/transfusion device still intact? No one has answered this question. My thanks to Canadian Grandmother Donna Young for calling my attention to the immediate cord clamping mass child abuse. A GOOD SIGN: Oregon Health & Science University/OHSU - Oregon's only medical school - stopped promoting immediate cord clamping and birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery online after I complained. OHSU's link to the misinformation is now dead - or rather - one is re-routed to www.ohsuwomenshealth.com... See Birth child abuse: Oregon's only medical school (OHSU) http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2986 (If anyone can find a page where OHSU is still promoting immediate cord clamping and birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery, I would like to know about it.) PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. ANOTHER PROBLEM: By immediately clamping cords, OBs are temporarily asphyxiating babies and robbing them of up to 50% of their blood volume - see the astonishing quote from Dr. Morley above. THE SOLUTION: 1. To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - BUT BEWARE - some OBs will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB. 2. To allow your baby to have the "extra" up to 50% of blood volume, do not let the OB or midwife clamp the umbilical cord until it has stopped pulsating and your baby is pink and breathing and not in need of resuscitation. NOTE #1: Allowing the birth canal to open the "extra" up to 30% will not prevent all episiotomies or c-sections or forceps/vacuum use - but OBs have no business closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30% in the first place. NOTE #2: There are rare cases where the OB must clamp immediately - but they are indeed rare. OBs are routinely clamping cords immediately - routinely robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Talk to your OB today. I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical students MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious child abuse which sometimes kills. Thanks for reading everyone. Todd Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon USA |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
http://www.footdoc.ca/www.FootDoc.ca...20Medicine.htm
excerpted ... Is a Podiatrist the same as a Chiropodist? A U.S.-trained podiatrist is not a chiropodist, no. But in some parts of Canada, the use of these words is a little more confusing than that, and requires some explanation to fully understand it. The term "chiropodist" and the profession of chiropody is British in origin. It has been traditionally used to describe an individual who treats feet in various ways, and up until the 1950's and earlier, there were chiropodists in both the U.S. (where Abraham Lincoln had a chiropodist) and Canada based on that British standard. With the advancements in medicine, however, it gradually became evident in the U.S. that the level of education received by chiropodists was inadequate to allow practitioners to practice in a comprehensive way. Hence, in the 1950's, the profession of chiropody was abandoned in the U.S., and podiatric medicine, with its much lengthier training, developed. This is known as the "Doctor of Podiatric Medicine" standard. Because of these changes, the term "chiropody" or "chiropodist" has not existed in the United States for about 50 years now. So there is little confusion between the terms "chiropodist" and "podiatrist" in the U.S. The situation in parts of Canada is not so clear-cut. Provinces with "Doctors of Podiatric Medicine" While chiropody was being abandoned and podiatric medicine was being born in the United States, Canada was caught somewhat between the influence of its British heritage and the influence of the United States' changing standard. As all the schools of podiatric medicine were (and still are) located in the United States, however, provinces like Ontario, British Columbia and Alberta quickly adopted the U.S.-based podiatric standard. Quebec adopted the U.S. standard sometime later. In these locations, the term "podiatrist" has the same meaning as in the United States. In those provinces where chiropodists of one sort or another continue to practice makes things much more confusing. Chiropodists in Ontario While Ontario also accepted the U.S. standard, and there are quite a few podiatrists practicing in that province, Ontario has also added a new level of chiropody training into the mix. While it had been a 2-year program, current licensing requirements for this group in Ontario involves a 3-year course after high school, leading to a "Diploma of Chiropody". The "Diploma of Chiropody" or "DCh" designation is accepted in Ontario, but is not recognized in other locations. Those with a DCh following their name are known as "chiropodists". They are not called "podiatrists" because that would confuse them with the "Doctors of Podiatric Medicine" who already practice in Ontario. Chiropodists in New Brunswick Chiropodists also practice in New Brunswick. Because there is no podiatric (meaning "Doctor of Podiatric Medicine") organization in the province, these practitioners use the title "podiatrist" even though they have no degree in the field. In fact, some chiropodists who practice there may have as little as a 2-year educational program after high school, yet have begun calling themselves "D.P.", or Doctor of Podiatry. This despite the fact that they have earned no doctorate in podiatric medicine. And this despite the fact that there is no "D.P." degree offered anywhere in the world. British-trained practitioners in Saskatchewan and Manitoba While U.S.-trained podiatrists are licensed in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, too, these provinces are unique in Canada in that they continuing to follow the British standard as the minimum requirement to practice there. "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message .net... "Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message ... "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message nk.net... THE 30% AND CHIROPODY (NOW CALLED PODIATRY) REPLY Actually they are different. Chiropodists are only clip and chip while podiatrists are fully-fledged doctors! Now which group got caught with the wedge doing who knows what, I do not know. I am pretty sure Chiropodists and Podiatrists are the same profession in the US - I could be wrong though. The British Society of Chiropodists and Podiatrists, 53 Welbeck Street, London W1M 7HE Telephone: 0207 486 3381 - Fax: 0207 935 6359 has this to say: "Chiropodists and Podiatrists....Nowadays, the recognised schools are all departments of universities, or colleges of higher education, and issue BSc degrees in podiatry,...After graduation you will find there are almost limitless opportunities for postgraduate study and advancement. Several polytechnics have been running post-registration BSc degrees in chiropody for some years..." "The profession is in the process of changing its title from Chiropody to Podiatry, to indicate the advances that have been made, and are still being made, in the professional scope of practice, and to use the title that is recognised in most other countries with similar level of education." http://www.ca.courses-careers.com/chiropody.htm Todd See below. "Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message ... Who is humorously making light? I am talking about the chiropodist on America's Most Wanted .... LOL! And now I am talking about Margaret the chiropodist in "Bob and Margaret" (Comedy) which airs: Sundays 11:30 PM (Comedy Central): "Premise: The funny, but everyday dealings of Bob, a neurotic dentist, and his chiropodist wife, Margaret." http://tv.zap2it.com/tveditorial/tve_main/1,1002,273|3244|1|,00.html BTW, I'm pretty sure chiropodists are now called podiatrists. Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary says: "Chiropodical...pertaining to chiropody (now called podiatry)." Incidentally, when I persuaded Dorland's to correct its definition of chiropractic and include graduates of chiropractic colleges under the Dorland's definition of doctor, Dorland's took the opportunity to also include graduates dental and podiatry colleges. I see your point, Joel - offering some humor does not necessarily make light of the mass child abuse being committed by OBs. Indeed, humorous posts in response to mine could possibly help call attention to the fact that OBs are routinely closing birth canals up to 30% and routinely keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck - as they pull with hands, forceps or vacuums - sometimes so hard that spinal nerves are ripped out of tiny spinal cords. I suspect Amy's joking about OBs not really robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume helped call people's attention to the fact that OBs *are* really robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Todd PS For readers who may not be aware (perhaps Joel the dentist is still not aware): "Chiro" is a term often used by chiropractors when referring to a chiropractor or to chiropractic. I suppose chiropodists used to use the same term; but now they are called podiatrists ("pods"?)... "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message . net... FOR CHIROS ONLY: SPEAKING OF STRICTLY SPEAKING... Yo Toddster, What do chiropodists have to do with opening birth canals 30%? "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message k.net... OB PERPS Dentist Joel M. Eichen humorously makes light of massive child abuse by OBs. "Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message ... "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message k.net... ? As fetuses, chiropodists (just like everyone else) are used as entering wedges to open birth canals up to 30% - assuming they are born vaginally and their mothers aren't placed semisitting or dorsal. Todd REPLY WoW! Chiropodists entering wedges ........ I think I saw that on America's Most Wanted .......... they are after that guy in 23 states ...... Joel, It's a classic case of blaming the victim as the birth-canal-closing OB perps remain at large. OB perps are also robbing babies of up to 50% of blood volume. See below. THE FOUR OB LIES OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in 1957, the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvic diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery. OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet. OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the same paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention to their text... OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal open maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum births are performed with the mother in lithotomy.) See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS... http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983 I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago... http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS.... "[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage in fraud or deception." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the patient." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to patients, colleagues, and the public..." http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned. MASSIVE BABY BLOOD ROBBERY Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG indicates that OBs are robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. This is happening to EVERY CESAREAN BABY, according to Dr. Morley: "ACOG's routine treatment (B138) of these depressed neonates is immediate cord clamping to obtain cord blood pH studies. The child's only functioning source of oxygen - the placenta - is amputated together with 30% to 50+% of its natural blood volume. Total asphyxia is imposed until the lungs function, and the depressed (asphyxiated, hypovolemic) child starts its extra-uterine life in hypovolemic shock... B138 was first published in 1993. Every cesarean section baby, every depressed child, every premie, and every child born with a neonatal team in the delivery room has its cord clamped immediately to facilitate the panicked rush to the resuscitation table. The current epidemic of immediate cord clamping coincides with an epidemic of autism...For the trial lawyers, it is essential that the 'true genesis' of cerebral palsy remains unknown, because that 'true genesis' (B.138) is a standard of medico-legal care..." http://www.cordclamping.com/ac***og-cp.htm In cases where the baby MUST be resuscitated after birth - I am still wondering why pediatricians have to sever the baby's access to blood and oxygen and rush baby across the room to resuscitate. Why can't neonatal resuscitation stations be designed so that mother and baby can be wheeled underneath (or between) with baby's natural oxygenation/transfusion device still intact? No one has answered this question. My thanks to Canadian Grandmother Donna Young for calling my attention to the immediate cord clamping mass child abuse. A GOOD SIGN: Oregon Health & Science University/OHSU - Oregon's only medical school - stopped promoting immediate cord clamping and birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery online after I complained. OHSU's link to the misinformation is now dead - or rather - one is re-routed to www.ohsuwomenshealth.com... See Birth child abuse: Oregon's only medical school (OHSU) http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2986 (If anyone can find a page where OHSU is still promoting immediate cord clamping and birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery, I would like to know about it.) PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. ANOTHER PROBLEM: By immediately clamping cords, OBs are temporarily asphyxiating babies and robbing them of up to 50% of their blood volume - see the astonishing quote from Dr. Morley above. THE SOLUTION: 1. To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - BUT BEWARE - some OBs will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB. 2. To allow your baby to have the "extra" up to 50% of blood volume, do not let the OB or midwife clamp the umbilical cord until it has stopped pulsating and your baby is pink and breathing and not in need of resuscitation. NOTE #1: Allowing the birth canal to open the "extra" up to 30% will not prevent all episiotomies or c-sections or forceps/vacuum use - but OBs have no business closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30% in the first place. NOTE #2: There are rare cases where the OB must clamp immediately - but they are indeed rare. OBs are routinely clamping cords immediately - routinely robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Talk to your OB today. I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical students MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious child abuse which sometimes kills. Thanks for reading everyone. Todd Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Birth stuff (also: Dr. Mal is part of God - chiropractically speaking) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | February 21st 05 05:55 PM |