If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
'the MMR10'.
Disbarred attorney Mark S Probert claimed:
There is absolutely no proof that the MMR causes autism. He is blind to the evidence. He also claimed there is absolutely no proof that he was ever disbarred. See the NY Supreme Court Order to Disbar him he www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/SandraProbert.htm So much for veracity from HealthFraud Probert. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
'the MMR10'.
O MY GOD!
J P Utz has now changed his tune ... progress is being made!!!! However, the studies clearly show that measles does not cause autism, except, perhaps in a very small minority of cases. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
'the MMR10'.
In article , Ilena Rose
wrote: Disbarred attorney Mark S Probert claimed: There is absolutely no proof that the MMR causes autism. He is blind to the evidence. He also claimed there is absolutely no proof that he was ever disbarred. See the NY Supreme Court Order to Disbar him he www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/SandraProbert.htm So much for veracity from HealthFraud Probert. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ilena, Welcome back. I enjoy reading your posts. Mark is also an expert in diverting attention from the central issue in posts. For example, if someone posts information about a study that shows that MMR causes autism, he will attack the organization that conducted the study instead of discussing the actual study. It usually works since his buddies take his side in regard to attacking the organization that conducted the study instead of discussing the actual study. It reminded me of how a defense attorney representing a murderer trys to get the members of the jury to believe that someone else must have done the murder. This is a method of diverting attention away from his client. He also trys to divert attention by attacking the person that made the post related to the study. He is making use of his legal training related to responding to posts. If anyone does not believe me, read his future posts. Jason ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
'the MMR10'.
Jason Johnson wrote:
In article , Ilena Rose wrote: Disbarred attorney Mark S Probert claimed: There is absolutely no proof that the MMR causes autism. He is blind to the evidence. He also claimed there is absolutely no proof that he was ever disbarred. See the NY Supreme Court Order to Disbar him he www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/SandraProbert.htm So much for veracity from HealthFraud Probert. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ilena, Welcome back. I enjoy reading your posts. Mark is also an expert in diverting attention from the central issue in posts. For example, if someone posts information about a study that shows that MMR causes autism, he will attack the organization that conducted the study instead of discussing the actual study. Often, the biases of the sponsors of a study are as important as the results are. It usually works since his buddies take his side in regard to attacking the organization that conducted the study instead of discussing the actual study. It reminded me of how a defense attorney representing a murderer trys to get the members of the jury to believe that someone else must have done the murder. This is a method of diverting attention away from his client. He also trys to divert attention by attacking the person that made the post related to the study. He is making use of his legal training related to responding to posts. If anyone does not believe me, read his future posts. Thank you Jason, for now proving something that I suspected all along. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
'the MMR10'.
In article , Mark Probert
wrote: Jason Johnson wrote: In article , Ilena Rose wrote: Disbarred attorney Mark S Probert claimed: There is absolutely no proof that the MMR causes autism. He is blind to the evidence. He also claimed there is absolutely no proof that he was ever disbarred. See the NY Supreme Court Order to Disbar him he www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/SandraProbert.htm So much for veracity from HealthFraud Probert. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ilena, Welcome back. I enjoy reading your posts. Mark is also an expert in diverting attention from the central issue in posts. For example, if someone posts information about a study that shows that MMR causes autism, he will attack the organization that conducted the study instead of discussing the actual study. Often, the biases of the sponsors of a study are as important as the results are. It usually works since his buddies take his side in regard to attacking the organization that conducted the study instead of discussing the actual study. It reminded me of how a defense attorney representing a murderer trys to get the members of the jury to believe that someone else must have done the murder. This is a method of diverting attention away from his client. He also trys to divert attention by attacking the person that made the post related to the study. He is making use of his legal training related to responding to posts. If anyone does not believe me, read his future posts. Thank you Jason, for now proving something that I suspected all along. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Mark, Read your most recent posts. In one case, you actually discounted one research study while promoting another research study. It's my opinion (and let me know if I am wrong) that you discount any study results that you do not agree with and believe any study results that support your point of view. Many people do the same thing. A true scientist will read all of the research studies and try to keep an open mind related to studies that do not support his or her point of view. Jason ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
'the MMR10'.
Jeffrey P Utz, in utter stupidity, blindness and denial spewed forth:
How stupid can you be? There is more than one Mark Probert in New York. You have the wrong one. Jeff No, I don't. I do appreciate you going on record for making this false claim however. It shows your ingnorance and inability to look at data and come to a proper conclusion. You did the same thing about breast implants which brought me to research why you were lying to the public about them. The Mark S Probert who posts Healthfraud nonsense and Ritalin Pushing here has the same wife, had the same address and has the same birthdate as the disbarred Mark S Probert. For you to continue to lie is pathetic and so revealing of your ignorance. www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/sandraprobert.htm Probert he was a fool to lie about it when caught. Instead of being upfront ... he started posting that I was a "sick woman" and began writing people who supported me with more lies. Bad move. He was caught btw ... because he donned the disguise of a sick implanted woman to attempt to infiltrate my group ... then called my home / office and threatened me. You two are two pees in a Healthfraud pod. Why were you never allowed an unrestricted medical license Utz? After years of med school, several with a restricted license, then NONE. Why is that? Why did you come to Usenet and lie that you were a Pediatrician? http://www.BreastImplantAwareness.or...WatchWatch.htm |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
'the MMR10'.
In article , Ilena Rose
wrote: Jeffrey P Utz, in utter stupidity, blindness and denial spewed forth: How stupid can you be? There is more than one Mark Probert in New York. You have the wrong one. Jeff No, I don't. I do appreciate you going on record for making this false claim however. It shows your ingnorance and inability to look at data and come to a proper conclusion. You did the same thing about breast implants which brought me to research why you were lying to the public about them. The Mark S Probert who posts Healthfraud nonsense and Ritalin Pushing here has the same wife, had the same address and has the same birthdate as the disbarred Mark S Probert. For you to continue to lie is pathetic and so revealing of your ignorance. www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/sandraprobert.htm Probert he was a fool to lie about it when caught. Instead of being upfront ... he started posting that I was a "sick woman" and began writing people who supported me with more lies. Bad move. He was caught btw ... because he donned the disguise of a sick implanted woman to attempt to infiltrate my group ... then called my home / office and threatened me. You two are two pees in a Healthfraud pod. Why were you never allowed an unrestricted medical license Utz? After years of med school, several with a restricted license, then NONE. Why is that? Why did you come to Usenet and lie that you were a Pediatrician? http://www.BreastImplantAwareness.or...WatchWatch.htm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ilena, I love the way you stand up for yourself and don't take no crap from anyone. Keep up the great work and the interesting posts. Jason ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
'the MMR10'.
"Jason Johnson" wrote in message ... In article , Ilena Rose wrote: Disbarred attorney Mark S Probert claimed: There is absolutely no proof that the MMR causes autism. He is blind to the evidence. He also claimed there is absolutely no proof that he was ever disbarred. See the NY Supreme Court Order to Disbar him he www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/SandraProbert.htm So much for veracity from HealthFraud Probert. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ilena, Welcome back. I enjoy reading your posts. Mark is also an expert in diverting attention from the central issue in posts. For example, if someone posts information about a study that shows that MMR causes autism, he will attack the organization that conducted the study instead of discussing the actual study. It usually works since his buddies take his side in regard to attacking the organization that conducted the study instead of discussing the actual study. It reminded me of how a defense attorney representing a murderer trys to get the members of the jury to believe that someone else must have done the murder. This is a method of diverting attention away from his client. He also trys to divert attention by attacking the person that made the post related to the study. He is making use of his legal training related to responding to posts. If anyone does not believe me, read his future posts. Jason ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Exactly. He also accuses others of his exact guilt. {just one of many} http://groups.google.com/group/misc....89d4696eb1d8df Sat, Aug 23 2003 Rod wants to silence someone with whom he disagrees. How typical of the Alties. == *When all else fails, pull the old switcheroo* |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
'the MMR10'.
In article ,
(David Wright) wrote: In article , Jason Johnson wrote: I love the way you stand up for yourself and don't take no crap from anyone. Keep up the great work and the interesting posts. Gee, Jason, glad you're not biased or anything. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ David, Believe it or not--everyone is biased. For example, people in the medical establishment are biased against alternative doctors that in most cases treat medical problems and diseases with vit., minerals and herbs. I receive a newsletter each month from Doctor Julian Whitaker (alternative doctor). He has told lots of stories in those newsletters about his battles with the medical establishment. www.whitakerwellness.com www.drwhitaker.com Those that are in favor of placing mercury and aluminum in vaccines seem to me to be biased against those of us that don't want known poisons to be placed in vaccines. Jason ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
'the MMR10'.
Jason Johnson wrote:
In article , Mark Probert wrote: Jason Johnson wrote: In article , Ilena Rose wrote: Disbarred attorney Mark S Probert claimed: There is absolutely no proof that the MMR causes autism. He is blind to the evidence. He also claimed there is absolutely no proof that he was ever disbarred. See the NY Supreme Court Order to Disbar him he www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/SandraProbert.htm So much for veracity from HealthFraud Probert. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ilena, Welcome back. I enjoy reading your posts. Mark is also an expert in diverting attention from the central issue in posts. For example, if someone posts information about a study that shows that MMR causes autism, he will attack the organization that conducted the study instead of discussing the actual study. Often, the biases of the sponsors of a study are as important as the results are. It usually works since his buddies take his side in regard to attacking the organization that conducted the study instead of discussing the actual study. It reminded me of how a defense attorney representing a murderer trys to get the members of the jury to believe that someone else must have done the murder. This is a method of diverting attention away from his client. He also trys to divert attention by attacking the person that made the post related to the study. He is making use of his legal training related to responding to posts. If anyone does not believe me, read his future posts. Thank you Jason, for now proving something that I suspected all along. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Mark, Read your most recent posts. In one case, you actually discounted one research study while promoting another research study. I wish you would post the URL of what you are talking about, so I would know what you are talking about. It's my opinion (and let me know if I am wrong) that you discount any study results that you do not agree with and believe any study results that support your point of view. Many people do the same thing. Generally speaking, as you did not provide the courtesy of a link to what you are talking about, I discount studies that are poorly done, "unique" in the sense that they have never been replicated, done by someone who has a proven bias, etc. However, what you have observed is that my opinions are supported by good science, and I dismiss bad science, if you want to call some of the crap that. A true scientist will read all of the research studies and try to keep an open mind related to studies that do not support his or her point of view. That's nice, but irrelevant. A true scientist, and I am not a scientist, will review a study for various things, such as selection bias, methodology, valid sampling, appropriate use of statistical analysis, etc. They would know that not all studies, just like not all opinions, are created equal. Some actually are better than others. BTW, just for your information, if wish to have further discussion with me, I suggest that you email me. mark{dot}probert{at}gmail{dot}com No email, no further responses. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
'the MMR10'. | john | Kids Health | 76 | August 5th 06 04:33 AM |