The ultimate vaccine sales method?

"Jeff" wrote in message
news:GUW_i.24405$CI1.22108@trnddc03...
t wrote:
"Jeff" wrote in message
news:QGN_i.24363$CI1.17714@trnddc03...
The parents have the option of getting a religious exemption.

So, if the parents are not believers in some "god", they would have to
lie? Nice.

Why is god in quotes? What do you mean by "god?"
OK , god, goddess, elephant wearing a dress or what ever illusion fits your
fancy.
Anyway, those are their options. Another option is to home school the
kids.

Jeff

On Nov 15, 7:58 am, Mark Probert wrote:

The Marked Pervert wrote:

Regardless of the type of exemption, a non-vaccinating freeloading
parent must expect to have their children home during outbreaks of
vaccine preventable diseases. That is the way the system works.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Explain to us again how effective vaccines are yet...there can be
outbreaks of vaccine preventable diseases. Clearly the outbreaks must
be among the vaccinated.

DrCee
Not a member of the medical monopoly
Not a member of the church of modern medicine

wrote:
On Nov 15, 7:58 am, Mark Probert wrote:

The Marked Pervert wrote:

Regardless of the type of exemption, a non-vaccinating freeloading
parent must expect to have their children home during outbreaks of
vaccine preventable diseases. That is the way the system works.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Explain to us again how effective vaccines are yet...there can be
outbreaks of vaccine preventable diseases. Clearly the outbreaks must
be among the vaccinated.

No, they are not. Vaccines, like everything else, are not 100%
effective. Thus, there are those responsible people who have their
children vaccinated but still have children at risk. They are at risk
because of the freeloading parents who rely on herd immunity.

Those kids who are unvaccinated are not allowed in school because they
pose a risk to those kids who have been vaccinated but do not have
effective immunity.

"Mark Probert" wrote in message
news:eS7%i.4005$ET.2907@trndny03...
wrote:
On Nov 15, 7:58 am, Mark Probert wrote:

The Marked Pervert wrote:

Regardless of the type of exemption, a non-vaccinating freeloading
parent must expect to have their children home during outbreaks of
vaccine preventable diseases. That is the way the system works.- Hide
quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Explain to us again how effective vaccines are yet...there can be
outbreaks of vaccine preventable diseases. Clearly the outbreaks must
be among the vaccinated.

No, they are not. Vaccines, like everything else, are not 100% effective.
Thus, there are those responsible people who have their children
vaccinated but still have children at risk. They are at risk because of
the freeloading parents who rely on herd immunity.

Those kids who are unvaccinated are not allowed in school because they
pose a risk to those kids who have been vaccinated but do not have
effective immunity.



A non-vaccinated kid has no more likelihood of being a danger to others than
vaccinated.
This is not to say I am against vaccination, just some idiotic and
uneducated educators.

On Nov 15, 10:10 pm, Mark Probert
wrote:
wrote:
On Nov 15, 7:58 am, Mark Probert wrote:

The Marked Pervert wrote:

Those kids who are unvaccinated are not allowed in school because they
pose a risk to those kids who have been vaccinated but do not have
effective immunity.

Wait a minute. What is the difference between a non-vaccinated child
and a vaccinated
child who does not have "effective immunity"? The placebo effect?

Why not check the "effective immunity" of those being vaccinated?
That effort should generate more billions of dollars for the medical
monopoly. Those not "effectively immunized" could be jabbed until
they do test positive for whatever is being tested for.

So you do admit that the vaccines work....sometimes. We just don't
know when or how many may be "protected". Yes, go and get your kids
injected. With any kind of luck when a sickness develops, the
attending blood poisoner ( your doc ) will diagnose them with a diease
for which they have not been immunized. Wow, what a great business
idea. Even better if laws were passed whereby those maimed or killed
by the injections could not sue you but could beg the government for
redress. Lemme think, maybe we could call it VAERS.

DrCee
Not a member of the medical monopoly
Not a member of the church of modern medicine

Vernono O wrote:
"Mark Probert" wrote in message
news:eS7%i.4005$ET.2907@trndny03...
wrote:
On Nov 15, 7:58 am, Mark Probert wrote:

The Marked Pervert wrote:

Regardless of the type of exemption, a non-vaccinating freeloading
parent must expect to have their children home during outbreaks of
vaccine preventable diseases. That is the way the system works.- Hide
quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Explain to us again how effective vaccines are yet...there can be
outbreaks of vaccine preventable diseases. Clearly the outbreaks must
be among the vaccinated.
No, they are not. Vaccines, like everything else, are not 100% effective.
Thus, there are those responsible people who have their children
vaccinated but still have children at risk. They are at risk because of
the freeloading parents who rely on herd immunity.

Those kids who are unvaccinated are not allowed in school because they
pose a risk to those kids who have been vaccinated but do not have
effective immunity.



A non-vaccinated kid has no more likelihood of being a danger to others than
vaccinated.

Not correct. The unvaccinated kid can be contagious with the wild virus
and thus poses a risk.

This is not to say I am against vaccination, just some idiotic and
uneducated educators.

wrote:
On Nov 15, 10:10 pm, Mark Probert
wrote:
wrote:
On Nov 15, 7:58 am, Mark Probert wrote:
The Marked Pervert wrote:

Those kids who are unvaccinated are not allowed in school because they
pose a risk to those kids who have been vaccinated but do not have
effective immunity.

Wait a minute. What is the difference between a non-vaccinated child
and a vaccinated
child who does not have "effective immunity"? The placebo effect?

Partial immunity, etc. It is a complex concept and you would not
understand.

Why not check the "effective immunity" of those being vaccinated?

Why stick needles in kids uneccessarily?

That effort should generate more billions of dollars for the medical
monopoly. Those not "effectively immunized" could be jabbed until
they do test positive for whatever is being tested for.

So you do admit that the vaccines work....sometimes.

According to the research I posted, nearly all the time.

We just don't
know when or how many may be "protected". Yes, go and get your kids
injected. With any kind of luck when a sickness develops, the
attending blood poisoner ( your doc ) will diagnose them with a diease
for which they have not been immunized. Wow, what a great business
idea. Even better if laws were passed whereby those maimed or killed
by the injections could not sue you but could beg the government for
redress. Lemme think, maybe we could call it VAERS.

You do realize that your grip on reality requires the use of both hands.
Please do not let go like you did here.

Mark Probert wrote:
..

Those kids who are unvaccinated are not allowed in school because they
pose a risk to those kids who have been vaccinated but do not have
effective immunity.

Not to a risk to themselves (or more accurately, the parents are a risk
to their children when they choose not to protect their children).

Vernono O wrote:
...

A non-vaccinated kid has no more likelihood of being a danger to others than
vaccinated.

An unvaccinated kid is much more likely to get sick in an outbreak. And
vaccinated kids who do get sick are likely to have a less severe illness
than sick unvaccinated kids. And for many illnesses, like chicken pox,
vaccinated kids who got sick are less likely to spread the infection (in
the case of chicken pox, because they have far fewer lesions).

Jeff

This is not to say I am against vaccination, just some idiotic and
uneducated educators.

Mark Probert wrote:
...

A non-vaccinated kid has no more likelihood of being a danger to
others than vaccinated.

Not correct. The unvaccinated kid can be contagious with the wild virus
and thus poses a risk.

The same is true with the vaccinated kids. However, an unvaccinated kid
is much more likely to be contagious and spread the virus, as well.

This is not to say I am against vaccination, just some idiotic and
uneducated educators.