Full Retraction—Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children

wrote in message
u...
When all this hand waving is finished, the reason he lost credibility
and the co-authors withdrew their names and the journal retracted it
is
quite simple.

He was in the pay of a lawyer in the business of sueing on the basis
of
what the paper was to come to conclude. He did not disclose this as
is
now accepted ethics in journal publishing.


It would appear based on what happened here that the "now accepted
ethics" was not a wise choice and that because of possible future
monerary outcomes the results were tainted and premature at best.

This disorder is increasing suggesting an environmental link. With
this
study withdrawn and several others showing no such link with vaccines
we
need to look elsewhere.


Of course you do and maybe they should not be so quick in the future to
sell their souls to the devil.

This put all anti-vaccer's in a bad light and showed them for what they
are, hypocrites, drowning in a sea of science that goes against them but
like any other agenda oriented group it is the final outcome of their
desire that is all important. Not truth, not honesty, not even
sincerity, just buy what the devil offers if it fits your purposes and
keep on keeping on.

Now they all look like a ship of fools.

The social movement to make the vaccinee link came from this paper.
It
is now gone and the social momentum should support efforts to now find
the real link. The motivation to do the several other studies came
from
this paper. It is proper that research turn to other possible links
in
light of the scientific findings.

On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 17:26:22 -0000, "john" wrote:

The Lancet was named after the device that spread infections around the
world for over 100 years, killing over a million

Because you have no sense of humour does not mean the rest of the
world is the same :-)