Woman sentenced to 14 years for abusing foster daughter

Woman sentenced to 14 years for abusing foster daughter

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...babuse07m.html

By Christine Clarridge and Natalie Singer

Seattle Times staff reporters

KENT — A woman who punished her foster daughter by plunging hypodermic
needles into the girl's eyes and beating her with various objects was
sentenced today to 14 years in prison. Prosecutors asked for and
received a high-end sentence for Chornice Kabbelliyaa, who pleaded
guilty in September to one count of first-degree assault and two counts
of second-degree assault. Prosecutors said Child Protective Services
reports that the girl, who is now 16, has been moved to another family
and is doing well.

Kabbelliyaa's defense attorneys asked Judge James Cayce to deliver an
exceptionally low sentence because they said their client was insane at
the time of the abuse and didn't realize she had mental illness until
she was jailed.

"She's much better now and is totally astounded at what happened," said
defense attorney Marvin McCoy. But Cayce said a report from Western
State Hospital, where Kabbelliyaa was evaluated, indicated she knew what
she was doing when she punished the child and then tried to hide her
from authorities who came to her home to investigate.

"She's manipulative and cruel," said Senior Deputy Prosecuting Attorney
Corinn Bohn. "Her level of torture is incomprehensible."

Kabbelliyaa, who also goes by the last name of Lewis, abused and
tortured the girl she had cared for since the girl, who was also her
cousin, was 5. Police and prosecutors said Kabbelliyaa routinely
punished the girl by burning her tongue with a heated fork, beating her
feet with dumbbells and sticking a needle into the girl's eye, telling
her she would blinded if she moved.

The girl suffered permanent vision loss. According to charging documents
filed in King County Superior Court, Kabbelliyaa had been the girl's
licensed foster mother since the girl was 5. She was arrested last year
after Child Protective Services was called by someone acquainted with
the family who reported seeing Kabbelliyaa punch the girl, hit her with
an umbrella and lock her in an outside storage unit for hours.

The girl was 14 when police arrested Kabbelliyaa.

Physicians examining the foster girl found serious damage to the girl's
right eye, scarring, bruising and a severely burned tongue.

Charging documents also state that Kabbelliyaa would turn on the stove's
burner until it was red-hot before pressing the girl's palm onto the burner.

The foster girl's brother and another child that had been placed with
Kabbelliyaa told investigators that they too were mistreated before
being placed in other homes.

Kabbelliyaa's biological children did not show signs of abuse,
investigators said.

CPS officials admitted after the arrest that the girl's case had been
mismanaged and that caseworkers overlooked some red flags because they
were pleased she had been placed in a relative's home.

Christine Clarridge: 206-464-8983 or

Copyright © 2007 The Seattle Times Company





CURRENTLY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES VIOLATES MORE CIVIL RIGHTS ON A
DAILY BASIS THEN ALL OTHER AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NATIONAL
SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WIRETAPPING PROGRAMS....

CPS Does not protect children...
It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and even
killed at the hands of Child Protective Services.

every parent should read this .pdf from
connecticut dcf watch...

http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com/8x11.pdf

http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com

Number of Cases per 100,000 children in the US
These numbers come from The National Center on
Child Abuse and Neglect in Washington. (NCCAN)
Recent numbers have increased significantly for CPS

*Perpetrators of Maltreatment*

Physical Abuse CPS 160, Parents 59
Sexual Abuse CPS 112, Parents 13
Neglect CPS 410, Parents 241
Medical Neglect CPS 14 Parents 12
Fatalities CPS 6.4, Parents 1.5

Imagine that, 6.4 children die at the hands of the very agencies that
are supposed to protect them and only 1.5 at the hands of parents per
100,000 children. CPS perpetrates more abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse
and kills more children then parents in the United States. If the
citizens of this country hold CPS to the same standards that they hold
parents too. No judge should ever put another child in the hands of ANY
government agency because CPS nationwide is guilty of more harm and
death than any human being combined. CPS nationwide is guilty of more
human rights violations and deaths of children then the homes from which
they were removed. When are the judges going to wake up and see that
they are sending children to their death and a life of abuse when
children are removed from safe homes based on the mere opinion of a
bunch of social workers.


CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, HAPPILY DESTROYING THOUSANDS OF INNOCENT
FAMILIES YEARLY NATIONWIDE AND COMING TO YOU'RE HOME SOON...


BE SURE TO FIND OUT WHERE YOUR CANDIDATES STANDS ON THE ISSUE OF
REFORMING OR ABOLISHING CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES ("MAKE YOUR CANDIDATES
TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY
ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION...

"Dan Sullivan" wrote in message
...
On Dec 9, 11:04 am, Greegor wrote:
Firemonkey wrote

This sentence totally ****es me off. !$ 140 years would'nt have been
enough. If it were up to me she do her time getting needles stuck in
her eyes and her tongue burned with fork several times per day.

This woman was a Foster Contractor.

How did she pass the psych screening to be a Foster Contractor?

When psych evals are done, is the burden to prove
that they are safe or to prove that they are dangerous?

Which way is presumed until proven otherwise?

Are Fosters presumed safe until ""proven dangerous"",
whereas parents are presumed dangerous until ""proven safe""?

Is there a shift in this burden induced by the
agency and outside of the courts scrutiny?

Post the answers when you find them, greg.

Can you surf the net on your breaks at Best Buy?


Is that the OFFICIAL position of CPS Danny? We all know where YOU work
Mr. Wolf.

"Dan Sullivan" wrote in message
...

This sentence totally ****es me off. !$ 140 years would'nt have been
enough. If it were up to me she do her time getting needles stuck in
her eyes and her tongue burned with fork several times per day.

This woman was a Foster Contractor.
How did she pass the psych screening to be a Foster Contractor?
When psych evals are done, is the burden to prove
that they are safe or to prove that they are dangerous?
Which way is presumed until proven otherwise?
Are Fosters presumed safe until ""proven dangerous"",
whereas parents are presumed dangerous until ""proven safe""?
Is there a shift in this burden induced by the
agency and outside of the courts scrutiny?

Post the answers when you find them, greg.
Can you surf the net on your breaks at Best Buy?

Is that the OFFICIAL position of CPS Danny?

That greg should do his own research?



Is that something you have tacked on the cork board at your office
Danny? Is it a bulletin for all the case workers?

"Dan Sullivan" wrote in message
...

This sentence totally ****es me off. !$ 140 years would'nt have
been
enough. If it were up to me she do her time getting needles stuck
in
her eyes and her tongue burned with fork several times per day.

This woman was a Foster Contractor.
How did she pass the psych screening to be a Foster Contractor?
When psych evals are done, is the burden to prove
that they are safe or to prove that they are dangerous?
Which way is presumed until proven otherwise?
Are Fosters presumed safe until ""proven dangerous"",
whereas parents are presumed dangerous until ""proven safe""?
Is there a shift in this burden induced by the
agency and outside of the courts scrutiny?

Post the answers when you find them, greg.
Can you surf the net on your breaks at Best Buy?

Is that the OFFICIAL position of CPS Danny?

That greg should do his own research?

Is that something you have tacked on the cork board at your office
Danny? Is it a bulletin for all the case workers?

I don't have a cork board and I work in an industry completely
unrelated to child protection.

Yeah you work for CPS, so that statement is 100% TRUE!

"Greegor" wrote in message
...
On Dec 9, 10:20 am, Dan Sullivan wrote:
On Dec 9, 11:04 am, Greegor wrote:





Firemonkey wrote

This sentence totally ****es me off. !$ 140 years would'nt have been
enough. If it were up to me she do her time getting needles stuck in
her eyes and her tongue burned with fork several times per day.

This woman was a Foster Contractor.

How did she pass the psych screening to be a Foster Contractor?

When psych evals are done, is the burden to prove
that they are safe or to prove that they are dangerous?

Which way is presumed until proven otherwise?

Are Fosters presumed safe until ""proven dangerous"",
whereas parents are presumed dangerous until ""proven safe""?

Is there a shift in this burden induced by the
agency and outside of the courts scrutiny?

Post the answers when you find them, greg.

Can you surf the net on your breaks at Best Buy?

http://i230.photobucket.com/albums/e...scps/danno.jpg

Dan, If you live in a place like this, maybe you
should apply for a job at Best Buy?

From the look of that scruffy looking triplex it
might be a step up for you Dan!

I don't know if that's Dan's house or not, but I personally don't see
anything wrong with it.
Of course, I haven't seen the inside. It could be a dump for all I know.
My house needs a new coat of paint...seriously.
You'd never guess from looking at my house from the street that it is chock
full of rooms, has wood flooring, etc etc.
Don't judge a book by it's cover, as they say.

"Greegor" wrote in message
...
On Dec 12, 2:47 pm, "dragonsgirl" wrote:
"Greegor" wrote in message

...





On Dec 9, 10:20 am, Dan Sullivan wrote:
On Dec 9, 11:04 am, Greegor wrote:

Firemonkey wrote

This sentence totally ****es me off. !$ 140 years would'nt have
been
enough. If it were up to me she do her time getting needles stuck
in
her eyes and her tongue burned with fork several times per day.

This woman was a Foster Contractor.

How did she pass the psych screening to be a Foster Contractor?

When psych evals are done, is the burden to prove
that they are safe or to prove that they are dangerous?

Which way is presumed until proven otherwise?

Are Fosters presumed safe until ""proven dangerous"",
whereas parents are presumed dangerous until ""proven safe""?

Is there a shift in this burden induced by the
agency and outside of the courts scrutiny?

Post the answers when you find them, greg.

Can you surf the net on your breaks at Best Buy?

http://i230.photobucket.com/albums/e...scps/danno.jpg

Dan, If you live in a place like this, maybe you
should apply for a job at Best Buy?

From the look of that scruffy looking triplex it
might be a step up for you Dan!

I don't know if that's Dan's house or not, but I personally don't see
anything wrong with it.
Of course, I haven't seen the inside. It could be a dump for all I know.
My house needs a new coat of paint...seriously.
You'd never guess from looking at my house from the street that it is
chock
full of rooms, has wood flooring, etc etc.
Don't judge a book by it's cover, as they say.

That would be a nice caption under your photo, Betty!

Instead of kissing Dan's butt why don't
you help him move into a trailer home?
It could be a step up!

Better yet, why not refer him yourself?
According to records it appears that you know where all the cheap housing
is.


Or help him get a job at Best Buy?

"Greegor" wrote in message
...
On Dec 13, 1:46 am, "dragonsgirl" wrote:
"Greegor" wrote in message

...





On Dec 12, 2:47 pm, "dragonsgirl" wrote:
"Greegor" wrote in message

...

On Dec 9, 10:20 am, Dan Sullivan wrote:
On Dec 9, 11:04 am, Greegor wrote:

Firemonkey wrote

This sentence totally ****es me off. !$ 140 years would'nt have
been
enough. If it were up to me she do her time getting needles
stuck
in
her eyes and her tongue burned with fork several times per day.

This woman was a Foster Contractor.

How did she pass the psych screening to be a Foster Contractor?

When psych evals are done, is the burden to prove
that they are safe or to prove that they are dangerous?

Which way is presumed until proven otherwise?

Are Fosters presumed safe until ""proven dangerous"",
whereas parents are presumed dangerous until ""proven safe""?

Is there a shift in this burden induced by the
agency and outside of the courts scrutiny?

Post the answers when you find them, greg.

Can you surf the net on your breaks at Best Buy?

http://i230.photobucket.com/albums/e...scps/danno.jpg

Dan, If you live in a place like this, maybe you
should apply for a job at Best Buy?

From the look of that scruffy looking triplex it
might be a step up for you Dan!

I don't know if that's Dan's house or not, but I personally don't see
anything wrong with it.
Of course, I haven't seen the inside. It could be a dump for all I
know.
My house needs a new coat of paint...seriously.
You'd never guess from looking at my house from the street that it is
chock
full of rooms, has wood flooring, etc etc.
Don't judge a book by it's cover, as they say.

That would be a nice caption under your photo, Betty!

Instead of kissing Dan's butt why don't
you help him move into a trailer home?
It could be a step up!

Better yet, why not refer him yourself?
According to records it appears that you know where all the cheap housing
is.

Isn't this cheap housing on Long Island, New York?

http://i230.photobucket.com/albums/e...scps/danno.jpg

Or help him get a job at Best Buy?

Betty, you're funny.

When your hero Dan attacks and insults, nothing
is sacred, but when I respond to that puke you
expect Dan's opponents to abide by the Marquis
de Queensbury rules.

You participate in the puke about trying to
run me down for once living in a trailer in Iowa,

I don't think **** of you living in a trailer in Iowa...show that I EVER
said anything to you about it.
I don't agree with the crammed conditions, the evictions, etc...but living
in a trailer doesn't make you **** and I never said it did.

for working at Best Buy,

Don't care if you work for best buy. A job, and honest one at that, is a
job. I don't belittle people for working at an honest living.
Prove I ever did.

for can collecting,

Don't have a thing on this earth against you collecting cans, and have never
said anything about it.
It's the having a child do it for you is what I don't agree with, if, indeed
you did.
Prove I ever said otherwise.

but
when a picture of Dan's Roach Motel residence
comes up, suddenly it's "not so bad"!

Because it's not. Duh, are you DENSE?


The joke is on YOU Betty! It's MY house!

It's a nice looking place IMHO. I don't see a thing wrong with it, just
like I said before.
So-fugging-what?


I'm glad you say that it's not so bad! Ha ha!

My honest opinion?
You think that's hilarious?
What a freak you are.
I actually like the place.
It looks very similar to the house that I grew up in.
Big whipping deal.
Are we having fun yet?
Did you get a tight feeling in your balls?
Wooo-hooo!

"Michael©" wrote in message
. 1...
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:17:34 GMT, Dan Sullivan

This sentence totally ****es me off. !$ 140 years would'nt have
been enough. If it were up to me she do her time getting
needles stuck in her eyes and her tongue burned with fork
several times per day.

This woman was a Foster Contractor.

How did she pass the psych screening to be a Foster Contractor?

When psych evals are done, is the burden to prove
that they are safe or to prove that they are dangerous?

Which way is presumed until proven otherwise?

Are Fosters presumed safe until ""proven dangerous"",
whereas parents are presumed dangerous until ""proven safe""?

Is there a shift in this burden induced by the
agency and outside of the courts scrutiny?

Post the answers when you find them, greg.

Can you surf the net on your breaks at Best Buy?

http://i230.photobucket.com/albums/e...scps/danno.jpg

Dan, If you live in a place like this, maybe you
should apply for a job at Best Buy?

I don't live in a place like that.

From the look of that scruffy looking triplex it
might be a step up for you Dan!

First, if that picture is in Brooklyn or Queens I live nowhere near
there.

You live in Hollis, which IS SE Queens, my brutha.

Danny boy has certainly been hanging around Moore too much. Next thing
you know, the dip**** will be telling us that Danny Sullivan is NOT his real
name!

"Dan Sullivan" wrote in message
...
On Dec 13, 9:38 pm, Greegor wrote:
FM This sentence totally ****es me off. !$ 140 years would'nt have
FM been enough. If it were up to me she do her time getting
FM needles stuck in her eyes and her tongue burned with fork
FM several times per day.

G This woman was a Foster Contractor.
G How did she pass the psych screening to be a Foster Contractor?
G When psych evals are done, is the burden to prove
G that they are safe or to prove that they are dangerous?
G Which way is presumed until proven otherwise?
G Are Fosters presumed safe until ""proven dangerous"",
G whereas parents are presumed dangerous until ""proven safe""?
G Is there a shift in this burden induced by the
G agency and outside of the courts scrutiny?

DS Post the answers when you find them, greg.

G Can you surf the net on your breaks at Best Buy?

http://i230.photobucket.com/albums/e...scps/danno.jpg

G Dan, If you live in a place like this, maybe you
G should apply for a job at Best Buy?

DS I don't live in a place like that.

G No place LIKE that, because that IS the place eh?

G From the look of that scruffy looking triplex it
G might be a step up for you Dan!

DS First, if that picture is in Brooklyn or
DS Queens I live nowhere near there.

M You live in Hollis, which IS SE Queens, my brutha.

DS How'd you figure that?

G By Dan Sullivan logic, he doesn't live NEAR
G Queens because he lives IN Queens.

G Right Dan?

KRP Danny boy has certainly been hanging
KRP around Moore too much. Next thing you
KRP know, the dip**** will be telling us that
KRP Danny Sullivan is NOT his real name!

He sure has talked up Long Island a lot!

What's my address?

You trolling for a date Danny?