Deadbeats

Zimm wrote:
I think that most of the men here really do want to support their
children (emotionally and financially). It's the system of making that
happen that ****es them off. No arguments with that. It is very far
from perfect but I sure haven't come up with a better system.

It's the 'absolute' statements that **** ME off:

CP=Always a women
NCP=Always a man

With rare exceptions, that's the way the legal system awards it.


Custody should always be 50% (my ex can't even take care of himself, let
alone a child. And he doesn't want 50% anyway.)

Your bigoted prejudice about your ex notwithstanding, children generally
do better living with their fathers than their mothers.


Having a child is solely the womans idea/ability/responsibility/problem
(takes two to tango, remember?)

Legally, ONLY women have "a woman's right to choose."
Women also have a wide variety of contraceptive and other choices that
men don't, due to a century of anti-men sexism.


CP (who is always a woman) spends all the cs money on herself and
doesn't spend a dime on the kids.

Strawman. It's more correct to say that the money always gets paid to
the CP, and not a dime gets paid to the kids.


Woman is evil and should be killed and thrown off a bridge. (my personal
favorite)
Zimm

Hmmmmm? I hadn't seen the "thrown off a bridge" suggestion. A fake
suicide note and it could work at that. Thanks.

Bob



--

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/


























[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

Zimm wrote:
I think that most of the men here really do want to support their
children (emotionally and financially). It's the system of making that
happen that ****es them off. No arguments with that. It is very far
from perfect but I sure haven't come up with a better system.

It's the 'absolute' statements that **** ME off:

CP=Always a women
NCP=Always a man

With rare exceptions, that's the way the legal system awards it.


Custody should always be 50% (my ex can't even take care of himself, let
alone a child. And he doesn't want 50% anyway.)

Your bigoted prejudice about your ex notwithstanding, children generally
do better living with their fathers than their mothers.


Having a child is solely the womans idea/ability/responsibility/problem
(takes two to tango, remember?)

Legally, ONLY women have "a woman's right to choose."
Women also have a wide variety of contraceptive and other choices that
men don't, due to a century of anti-men sexism.


CP (who is always a woman) spends all the cs money on herself and
doesn't spend a dime on the kids.

Strawman. It's more correct to say that the money always gets paid to
the CP, and not a dime gets paid to the kids.


Woman is evil and should be killed and thrown off a bridge. (my personal
favorite)
Zimm

Hmmmmm? I hadn't seen the "thrown off a bridge" suggestion. A fake
suicide note and it could work at that. Thanks.

Bob



--

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/


























[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

Zimm wrote:
I think that most of the men here really do want to support their
children (emotionally and financially). It's the system of making that
happen that ****es them off. No arguments with that. It is very far
from perfect but I sure haven't come up with a better system.

It's the 'absolute' statements that **** ME off:

CP=Always a women
NCP=Always a man

With rare exceptions, that's the way the legal system awards it.


Custody should always be 50% (my ex can't even take care of himself, let
alone a child. And he doesn't want 50% anyway.)

Your bigoted prejudice about your ex notwithstanding, children generally
do better living with their fathers than their mothers.


Having a child is solely the womans idea/ability/responsibility/problem
(takes two to tango, remember?)

Legally, ONLY women have "a woman's right to choose."
Women also have a wide variety of contraceptive and other choices that
men don't, due to a century of anti-men sexism.


CP (who is always a woman) spends all the cs money on herself and
doesn't spend a dime on the kids.

Strawman. It's more correct to say that the money always gets paid to
the CP, and not a dime gets paid to the kids.


Woman is evil and should be killed and thrown off a bridge. (my personal
favorite)
Zimm

Hmmmmm? I hadn't seen the "thrown off a bridge" suggestion. A fake
suicide note and it could work at that. Thanks.

Bob



--

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/


























[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

Bob Whiteside wrote:
"Zimm" wrote in message
...

I think that most of the men here really do want to support their
children (emotionally and financially). It's the system of making that
happen that ****es them off. No arguments with that. It is very far
from perfect but I sure haven't come up with a better system.

It's the 'absolute' statements that **** ME off:

CP=Always a women
NCP=Always a man
Custody should always be 50% (my ex can't even take care of himself, let
alone a child. And he doesn't want 50% anyway.)
Having a child is solely the womans idea/ability/responsibility/problem
(takes two to tango, remember?)
CP (who is always a woman) spends all the cs money on herself and
doesn't spend a dime on the kids.
Woman is evil and should be killed and thrown off a bridge. (my personal
favorite)


You left out a few:

Men won't support their own flesh and blood.
Men aren't interested in parenting.
All men are deadbeats.
Having sex with a woman is consent to becoming a father.
If men don't want children they should wear condoms even if the woman claims
to be using birth control.
Fathers quit their jobs to avoid paying CS.
Fathers who don't pay CS deserve to go to jail.
Fathers only want joint custody to reduce CS payments.
If it wasn't for all the CS enforcement fathers wouldn't pay.

There's more, but you get the point.



You are absolutely correct. Got some good ones in there. My ex does fit
into a few of those categories but (Thank Goodness!) most men do not.

I do think men should always wear condoms, though. It's just the smart
thing to do. Prevents babies and cooties.

Zimm

Bob Whiteside wrote:
"Zimm" wrote in message
...

I think that most of the men here really do want to support their
children (emotionally and financially). It's the system of making that
happen that ****es them off. No arguments with that. It is very far
from perfect but I sure haven't come up with a better system.

It's the 'absolute' statements that **** ME off:

CP=Always a women
NCP=Always a man
Custody should always be 50% (my ex can't even take care of himself, let
alone a child. And he doesn't want 50% anyway.)
Having a child is solely the womans idea/ability/responsibility/problem
(takes two to tango, remember?)
CP (who is always a woman) spends all the cs money on herself and
doesn't spend a dime on the kids.
Woman is evil and should be killed and thrown off a bridge. (my personal
favorite)


You left out a few:

Men won't support their own flesh and blood.
Men aren't interested in parenting.
All men are deadbeats.
Having sex with a woman is consent to becoming a father.
If men don't want children they should wear condoms even if the woman claims
to be using birth control.
Fathers quit their jobs to avoid paying CS.
Fathers who don't pay CS deserve to go to jail.
Fathers only want joint custody to reduce CS payments.
If it wasn't for all the CS enforcement fathers wouldn't pay.

There's more, but you get the point.



You are absolutely correct. Got some good ones in there. My ex does fit
into a few of those categories but (Thank Goodness!) most men do not.

I do think men should always wear condoms, though. It's just the smart
thing to do. Prevents babies and cooties.

Zimm

Bob Whiteside wrote:
"Zimm" wrote in message
...

I think that most of the men here really do want to support their
children (emotionally and financially). It's the system of making that
happen that ****es them off. No arguments with that. It is very far
from perfect but I sure haven't come up with a better system.

It's the 'absolute' statements that **** ME off:

CP=Always a women
NCP=Always a man
Custody should always be 50% (my ex can't even take care of himself, let
alone a child. And he doesn't want 50% anyway.)
Having a child is solely the womans idea/ability/responsibility/problem
(takes two to tango, remember?)
CP (who is always a woman) spends all the cs money on herself and
doesn't spend a dime on the kids.
Woman is evil and should be killed and thrown off a bridge. (my personal
favorite)


You left out a few:

Men won't support their own flesh and blood.
Men aren't interested in parenting.
All men are deadbeats.
Having sex with a woman is consent to becoming a father.
If men don't want children they should wear condoms even if the woman claims
to be using birth control.
Fathers quit their jobs to avoid paying CS.
Fathers who don't pay CS deserve to go to jail.
Fathers only want joint custody to reduce CS payments.
If it wasn't for all the CS enforcement fathers wouldn't pay.

There's more, but you get the point.



You are absolutely correct. Got some good ones in there. My ex does fit
into a few of those categories but (Thank Goodness!) most men do not.

I do think men should always wear condoms, though. It's just the smart
thing to do. Prevents babies and cooties.

Zimm

Zimm wrote:

I do think men should always wear condoms, though. It's just the smart
thing to do. Prevents babies and cooties.
Zimm

So did you ever use a female condom? I though not.

More sexism. Pathetic.

Bob




--

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/


























[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

Zimm wrote:

I do think men should always wear condoms, though. It's just the smart
thing to do. Prevents babies and cooties.
Zimm

So did you ever use a female condom? I though not.

More sexism. Pathetic.

Bob




--

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/


























[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

Zimm wrote:

I do think men should always wear condoms, though. It's just the smart
thing to do. Prevents babies and cooties.
Zimm

So did you ever use a female condom? I though not.

More sexism. Pathetic.

Bob




--

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/


























[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

"Bob" wrote in message
...
Zimm wrote:

I do think men should always wear condoms, though. It's just the smart
thing to do. Prevents babies and cooties.
Zimm

So did you ever use a female condom? I though not.

More sexism. Pathetic.

OK, Bob, let's say it this way: The man and the woman should each take
responsibility for his/her own birth control. That way, if one is being
dishonest, the other won't get a nasty surprise. How does that sound?