Choice for Men Entertainment

"Moon Shyne" wrote in message
...
aren't you 2 idiots done, yet?


Do you need to make it a threesom?

" krp -" wrote in message
news:1quYe.4071$yN1.3338@trnddc03...

wrote in message
oups.com...
I think there is a rather large difference between lynching and
consentual sex. In your instance, a person is a victim of unwanted
violence. In the instance of Pam and Frank, Frank consented to having
sex with Pam, and neglected to utilize birth control, placing the
responsibility with Pam. We are discussing an act in which both
people willfully participate, in which both people are aware that there
are repurcussions if they fail to protect themselves. That's a far cry
from lynching.

Since PAM is the only one of the two who CAN get pregnant, logically
doesn't the primary responsibility fall on her? Since she has SOLE and
ABSOLUTE control over any result of the recreational intercourse, then it
should stand to reason that she bear the same ABSOLUTE responsibility for
the results. Since the law of the land is essentially that she can
terminate any product of the night's activities with Frank having
absolutely NO say in the mater, or she can place the child for adoption
WITHOUT Frank's consent, or she can have the child. In short she reaps
ALL the legal benes and HE gets to
PAY.....................................


What does that sound like?



It sounds like the condemned not only having to dig his own grave, but being
forced to purchase the gravesite and rent the shovel.

"AndBlankets01" wrote in message
news:Rhfbf.3828$HB.2942@dukeread12...

" krp -" wrote in message
news:1quYe.4071$yN1.3338@trnddc03...

wrote in message
oups.com...
I think there is a rather large difference between lynching and
consentual sex. In your instance, a person is a victim of unwanted
violence. In the instance of Pam and Frank, Frank consented to having
sex with Pam, and neglected to utilize birth control, placing the
responsibility with Pam. We are discussing an act in which both
people willfully participate, in which both people are aware that there
are repurcussions if they fail to protect themselves. That's a far cry
from lynching.

Since PAM is the only one of the two who CAN get pregnant, logically
doesn't the primary responsibility fall on her? Since she has SOLE and
ABSOLUTE control over any result of the recreational intercourse, then it
should stand to reason that she bear the same ABSOLUTE responsibility for
the results. Since the law of the land is essentially that she can
terminate any product of the night's activities with Frank having
absolutely NO say in the mater, or she can place the child for adoption
WITHOUT Frank's consent, or she can have the child. In short she reaps
ALL the legal benes and HE gets to
PAY.....................................


What does that sound like?


Kind of like a Cha Cha Cha I would think. Maybe by the Tito Puente band.