If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dealing with others who try to "parent"
I don't want this to get into a really venty thread or anything, but just
wondering what advice there is on caring for baby the way YOU choose to, and keeping other people from interfering. It seems pretty common for grandparents etc to step in and do things their way- so how can especially a new mom stop this without such drastic extreme measures- is there an effective wa to deal with this when "It is my baby, it's my call" doesn't work? In my case, the trust has already broken down by the grandparents, who have pretty much let us know that they will do with Rachel what they have always done with all other babies they have had/kept/watched etc. They let us know they will microwave breatmilk if they need to heat it because it is not going to hurt, they have microwaved formula for years. They will feed Rachel solid foods when they did for their own kids, which is MUCH earlier than I am going to for her. They say it never hurt their kids and itis not going to hurt her. (I feel very strongly about when and what foods are to be intro'd, becasue both my husband and I have allergy type things- very sensitive skin prone to rashes and breakouts, allergies and sinus problems, food sensitivities, and in my case, migraine headaches triggered by foods. For example I would never say this to her, and maybe her giving my husband solids at 2 months DIDN;T cause anything, but what if I can have Rachel wait forsolid foods until after about 6 months when she lets me know she is ready, and what if this and taking other care in her nutrition DOES make a difference? It is my call- I am no expert, but I really want to go by the dr rec's on this.) etc etc. I don't feel I have to explain, but, it bothers me that the grandparents and others are okay as long as we around, but that the minute we aren't, will go have their way. So we don't leave the baby- is that the only solution? I would never leave Rachel for long since I am bf, but what I mean by not leaving her i that literally, we don't let her out of our sight, or let others feed her or keep her. In particular, I do not want others giving her ANY solid foods, so I am afraid to even leave for an hour, or let them take care of a feeding without me around, etc. My husband says this is no problem- he agrees that certain family memebrs just arent ever going to care about what we want them to do and what we want them to avoid with Rachel, and he sayd it is no problem for us just to never leave her. But, I am the one who is with her 24/7, so it is easier for him to say that. I do wish I could have some help and get a SMALL, short break-- at this point I can't even go get my hair cut when it's frazzly, or go to my own dr appointmetns without dragging Rachel along (And she gets fussy out!) I just wish there was a way to rsolve ths without just having to watch Rache around them at all times. They don't understand why I feel SO strongly about my decisions for Rachel's best interest, and I don't understand why they are so careLESS that they don't feel the least bit hesitant about refusing to follow our wishes. Thank goodness again, my husband pretty much agrees with me on everything, and even if he doesn't feel as strongly about certain things, he listens to me and lets my decision stand. He knows I read and research a lot and have a good reason for everything I choose. The others just think I don't want to let them do ANYthing. You know what surprises me???? I thought this was just a problem to ME-- I *AM* a serious person with strong beliefs, and am around a lot of people who just don't think things tthrough much or care as strongly. But, I know several other new moms who say the same thing-- we don't have the same ideas about raising our kidss so maybe it is different issues, but they face the same thing in dealing with experienced moms- be it grandmas, aunts, sisters etc, who want to instruct them as to what to do with their kid, or tell them that this or that will or won't hurt. SO how do most people handle this? One relative even told me that when SHE had kids 40 years ago, HER mother did what she wanted with the baby when she kept her and she did what she herself wanted when she was at home, shrug, that's just the way it is. People have different opinions and everyone will do what they want when THEY have the baby. Nuh-uh!! The way I see it, they HAD their baby and did exactly what they wanted, it is my turn. I don't have a problem with not letting others do things with Rachel that I don't want done, when I am around. But I would say that the problem is.........that I can't let her out of my sight with them! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Dealing with others who try to "parent"
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 17:04:53 GMT, "Jill" snuck out
of the ether to utter: I don't have a problem with not letting others do things with Rachel that I don't want done, when I am around. But I would say that the problem is.........that I can't let her out of my sight with them! There you have it.... don't let them care for her out of your sight. If they can't respect you enough to follow your wishes you have every right to keep their visits only when you're there. My suggestion is to find another mom you can trade babysitting with for those times you feel you need a break, or hire a sitter. Nan -- "when the sun goes down we'll be groovin' when the sun goes down we'll be feelin' alright, when the sun sinks down over the water everything gets hotter when the sun goes down" ~Kenny Chesney |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Dealing with others who try to "parent"
"Jill" wrote in message .com... So we don't leave the baby- is that the only solution? I would never leave Rachel for long since I am bf, but what I mean by not leaving her i that literally, we don't let her out of our sight, or let others feed her or keep her. Basically, yes. This is the only way to ensure that your wishes are respected. If tis is the way you decide to go, just remember, she'll only be small for a short period of time. If there are things you need to do without Rachel, can you do them when your DH is home? If not, remember there are so many things you can do with a baby that will be way harder when she's a toddler (like shopping). Do you have a sling? Kerry always conks right out when I put her in mine. Nancy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Dealing with others who try to "parent"
Jill wrote:
I don't want this to get into a really venty thread or anything, but just wondering what advice there is on caring for baby the way YOU choose to, and keeping other people from interfering. Just take care of the baby yourself. I breastfed too so of course I was the only one that fed them, I changed them and did all the regular baby care unless I was at work. You can search for a sitter that will respect your choices but you are stuck with the relatives you have ;-0. Relatives held the baby and played until they cried or fell asleep. Sometimes they would try to keep them content while we ate. If you need a break, get one when dh is home. If you and dh want to go out together hire a babysitter (or find another mother to trade with) that will do just as they are told if you can't take a baby where you go. I can sense your frustration at not being able to leave your daughter with her grandma's for fear they'll do something against your wishes. Try not to be to fatalistic about that. You can manage well without having Grandma's as babysitters you just need to come up with other options instead of spinning your wheels about the grandmas. -- Nikki Mama to Hunter (5) and Luke (3) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Dealing with others who try to "parent"
Jill wrote:
I don't want this to get into a really venty thread or anything, but just wondering what advice there is on caring for baby the way YOU choose to, and keeping other people from interfering. It seems pretty common for grandparents etc to step in and do things their way- so how can especially a new mom stop this without such drastic extreme measures- is there an effective wa to deal with this when "It is my baby, it's my call" doesn't work? I think you do a couple of things: 1) Pick your battles. Only get particular about things that *really* matter to you. 2) Explain your requests *once* (no use belaboring the issue). 3) If you don't get buy-in, don't leave the baby. So we don't leave the baby- is that the only solution? Nope, you just don't leave the baby with those people ;-) You can always hire a babysitter, which is what you should do to get yourself a break when you need it. Babysitters are paid to do what you ask them to do, the way you ask them to do it. My mother would *never* do anything I specifically asked her not to do. There are many things she does differently from me that I don't particularly care about, even if I would do it differently myself. I think it's important for different people to be able to establish their own relationships. I don't tell my husband he has to do everything my way with the baby, nor do I tell my mother that. But, then again, I trust both my husband and my mother (and my father, and my in-laws, and my sister...) not to do anything dangerous or anything I've specifically requested they not do. Best wishes, Ericka |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Dealing with others who try to "parent"
Jill wrote in message .com... I don't want this to get into a really venty thread or anything, but just wondering what advice there is on caring for baby the way YOU choose to, and keeping other people from interfering. It seems pretty common for grandparents etc to step in and do things their way- so how can especially a new mom stop this without such drastic extreme measures- is there an effective wa to deal with this when "It is my baby, it's my call" doesn't work? See if you can find a nice parent & baby group. If there are mothers there, they may be willing to look after Rachel in return for the same back from you. I'd be happy to do that if you were closer :-) Debbie |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Dealing with others who try to "parent"
"Nancy P" wrote If not, remember there are so many things you can do with a baby that will be way harder when she's a toddler (like shopping). Ew...that's hard NOW! Rachel only sleeps while *moving*, so she is ok in the car, and ok sometimes in a buggy-- but you better keep moving fast, or she will wail. Lol- I ran through Target last time I was there. I need to get comfy with the Baby Bjorn I think. But I was hoping that once she is a toddler I will be able to control it better? Probably not, with tantrums and all....but with her now, she basically only cries when she wants to nurse or wants to be held or has a wet diaper. I can nurse her right before we leave, but she always wants to nurse when she is in an unfamiliar environment, so by the time we get to the store after about 5 minutes, she is crying and rooting (oh.....bless her, poor little thing!).... Not that I am complaining much- some days are very taxing, but also for every one of those, there will come a day where she is VERY satisfied all day! I will feel ok about leaving her more with some family when she gets to be well established on solids-- but I think I will NEVER feel ok or trusting about leaving her, while she is on breastmilk only because no one respects that. Of course, I will then worry about people giving her candy and hot dogs and whole grapes and seafood such as shellfish. Yuck, but especially DH's side of the family feeds that stuff to babies! I don't even think it is appropriate for 2-3 year olds, but DH's family tried to get my nephew to eat fire roasted oysters on the shell when he was about a year old. They were all slurping them down, I was sitting there at the picnic table in horror, completely grossed out, and they were feeding them to him. He could barely talk, and he said "No good! Yuck."...You can't even *chew* oysters well- they are runny and slurpy when cooked that way. But I have read that seafood (shellfish) is highly allergenic to kids' immune systems. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Dealing with others who try to "parent"
"Welches" wrote See if you can find a nice parent & baby group. If there are mothers there, they may be willing to look after Rachel in return for the same back from you. I'd be happy to do that if you were closer :-) Debbie I'd sure let you! One plus side is that spending all this 24/7 time with Rachel, is getting us really attached to each other. I feel like no one knows her the way I do and I am finding all kinds of quirks- I found a tickly spot today that makes her squeal (accidentally while changing her diaper, I found that a spot on her hip, to the side of her belly button and a little bit down, near the hip bone, drives her crazy if you touch it- I was trying to get her diaper straightened out. lol!).... Jill |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Dealing with others who try to "parent"
FWIW, my suggestion as a non-parent is to find a responsible family member
or friend who doesn't have children to be your respite. My SIL kindly allows us to take our niece for the weekend every once in a while when she has plans and we love it! She leaves us a long and detailed "schedule" and we follow it to the letter because we just don't have any preconceived ideas about what babies should eat, etc. She likes getting away when she needs to and rather than being an imposition, it's a huge treat for us, so we all win! I suspect part of her reason for letting us take her are similar problems with certain other family members. They don't feel as slighted because it gets presented as a chance for us to "practice" and in the meanwhile we do what she tells us to do! Good luck, Amy ttc#1 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Dealing with others who try to "parent"
"Jill" wrote in message .com... SO how do most people handle this? One relative even told me that when SHE had kids 40 years ago, HER mother did what she wanted with the baby when she kept her and she did what she herself wanted when she was at home, shrug, that's just the way it is. People have different opinions and everyone will do what they want when THEY have the baby. Nuh-uh!! The way I see it, they HAD their baby and did exactly what they wanted, it is my turn. I don't have a problem with not letting others do things with Rachel that I don't want done, when I am around. But I would say that the problem is.........that I can't let her out of my sight with them! With all due respect, I think the bottom line here is that nothing is "free". If you want free babysitting from the grandparents, then the cost is that they will feed your baby as they see fit in your absence. If you want to dictate the terms of care, then you're probably going to have to pay people real cash to babysit - then they are your employees and you get to tell them what to do. It is unrealistic to expect grandparents to behave as paid employees - they are not! In my case, I just choose to wait until my babies are at least six months old before I leave them with anyone other than their father for any amount of time. This way, if a caregiver violates my stated preferences for feeding, it is unlikely that any harm will be done to my babies health wise. That being said, I have never had a problem with my relatives' ignoring my preferences in caring for my kids. If you are only planning on leaving your baby for long enough to get a hair cut, I'm not sure what the problem is? If you feed your baby before you go to the salon, then she probably won't even be hungry before you get back. Even if she does eat a bottle of microwaved milk once a month or so, it's not going to hurt her. eggs. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Habitual Liar....was..... Fosters in TX find out DFPS' agenda. No wonder no one fosters | Kane | General | 8 | July 23rd 04 08:02 PM |
Parent Stress Index another idiotic indicator list | Greg Hanson | General | 11 | March 22nd 04 12:40 AM |
| | Kids should work... | Kane | General | 13 | December 10th 03 02:30 AM |
Kids should work. | LaVonne Carlson | General | 22 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |