If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
The Embry Study: What it actually said.
Doan wrote:
Try calling her a "smelly-****"! Maybe she will answer. ;-) Then you can tell her how proud that makes your mom! Doan My goodness how rude you are. You know I only called one person that, and for her support of parents having their church members hang the children up naked and whip them with straps and hangers and such. You didn't approve of that, Surely? What did YOU call Fern for that? Anything? Did you even mention it as abusive to Fern and try to help her see how horrible it was to treat children so? I sure hope so. But you being so much more polite than me would probably only have called her names like, "hypocrit," "liar," and "her name with anus in it" Sure is nice to have such a polite poster as you here. No, I can't think of a single reason to call Alina names. Why would you suggest that, when I'm worried that she doesn't return my posts. She might see this and be insulted that you would suggest such a thing. Being from another culture she might not get your real meaning. I grew fond of here even though we only exchanged a couple of posts. I won't tell you what she said about you though. Not publicly anyway. 0:- On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan, why don't you have Aline/Alina write me back. I keep sending messages and no response. Weird, eh? You must have known her better than I. Please intercede for me. I want to find out from her what she thought of the study after I mailed the report to her. She just won't answer back. Heck, I'd even discuss it with her if she'd just post back her, or personally. Sure funny, isn't it? No answer, I mean. 0:- -- Isn't it interesting that the more honest an author appears to be, the more like ourselves we think him. And the less so, how very alien he doth appear? Kane 2006 -- Isn't it interesting that the more honest an author appears to be, the more like ourselves we think him. And the less so, how very alien he doth appear? Kane 2006 |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
The Embry Study: What it actually said.
Doan wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: .......snip......... I, on the other hand, OFFERED to provide this study to anyone that asked. My offer still stand, anyone want a copy of this study, just email me. R R R ... you going to demand a stamped addressed envelope again, when it's available electronically....or was that a lie of yours? It's my choice, right? ;-) Why of course. It most assuredly is. I just asked a question. You okay with a question? You not able to answer a question? As I said, "R R R ... you going to demand a stamped addressed envelope again, when it's available electronically....or was that a lie of yours?" Or were you mistaken about the electronic availability you copied and pasted? LOL! Why don't you try to get an electronic copy for everyone? Try it! Sure. Why don't you post the URL that the post you included a reference to offered? I don't have the URL. I wouldn't lie to you. You have the URL? I'll happily try it for you. Why didn't you offer Aline/Alina the abstract then, Doan? Why didn't you offer her the access to the library, Doan? I don't own the library, STUPID! That's funny. You could point "becca" to it. Why couldn't you point Alina to it? Why did she have to get it from you, and not from either the electronic source or the library? What's different now than from then? You said you had it then. Didn't you get it from the library, or download it electronically? It would have been superfast over your internal highspeed WAN. Doan My you do withhold a lot of information. One would think you didn't even want to discuss the study with "becca" or Alina. Naw, that's not it. Not you. If YOU had a copy then you surely knew how to GET THE COPY, did you not? Yet, here you are, pointing the way to "becca," but demanding an envelope from Alina/Aline. Could it be YOU were her and wrote that phony bull**** to me in an attempt to get a copy from me? Before you had to admit you didn't have it yourself? Nothing, Doan the liar? Just your usual bull****? You be such a funny little boy. If you weren't so pitiful. Doan lyin' then, lyin' now, and you'll keep on lyin. R R R R R -- Isn't it interesting that the more honest an author appears to be, the more like ourselves we think him. And the less so, how very alien he doth appear? Kane 2006 Well, have a nice day. 0:- -- Isn't it interesting that the more honest an author appears to be, the more like ourselves we think him. And the less so, how very alien he doth appear? Kane 2006 |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
The Embry Study: What it actually said.
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:
Doan wrote: On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: ......snip......... I, on the other hand, OFFERED to provide this study to anyone that asked. My offer still stand, anyone want a copy of this study, just email me. R R R ... you going to demand a stamped addressed envelope again, when it's available electronically....or was that a lie of yours? It's my choice, right? ;-) Why of course. It most assuredly is. I just asked a question. You okay with a question? You not able to answer a question? Already answered, STUPID. It's my choice. Doan |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
The Embry Study: What it actually said.
Doan wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: ......snip......... I, on the other hand, OFFERED to provide this study to anyone that asked. My offer still stand, anyone want a copy of this study, just email me. R R R ... you going to demand a stamped addressed envelope again, when it's available electronically....or was that a lie of yours? It's my choice, right? ;-) Why of course. It most assuredly is. I just asked a question. You okay with a question? You not able to answer a question? Already answered, STUPID. It's my choice. You still can't read? It was, I admit, a bit beyond your comprehensive abilities. It was a three parter. Envelope, electronic, or were you lying? I never asked you if you had a choice. Just those three things. See, real simple. We already KNOW it's your choice. You are stupid to try that dodge. Now answer the actual question. Next time you call me "stupid" be sure and remove your head from your ass. Your voice sounds muffled. 0:- Doan -- Isn't it interesting that the more honest an author appears to be, the more like ourselves we think him. And the less so, how very alien he doth appear? Kane 2006 |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
The Embry Study: What it actually said.
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:
Doan wrote: On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: ......snip......... I, on the other hand, OFFERED to provide this study to anyone that asked. My offer still stand, anyone want a copy of this study, just email me. R R R ... you going to demand a stamped addressed envelope again, when it's available electronically....or was that a lie of yours? It's my choice, right? ;-) Why of course. It most assuredly is. I just asked a question. You okay with a question? You not able to answer a question? Already answered, STUPID. It's my choice. You still can't read? It was, I admit, a bit beyond your comprehensive abilities. It was a three parter. Envelope, electronic, or were you lying? I never asked you if you had a choice. Just those three things. And I chose USPS, stupid! ;-) Doan |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
The Embry Study: What it actually said.
Doan wrote: On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: ......snip......... I, on the other hand, OFFERED to provide this study to anyone that asked. My offer still stand, anyone want a copy of this study, just email me. R R R ... you going to demand a stamped addressed envelope again, when it's available electronically....or was that a lie of yours? It's my choice, right? ;-) Why of course. It most assuredly is. I just asked a question. You okay with a question? You not able to answer a question? Already answered, STUPID. It's my choice. You still can't read? It was, I admit, a bit beyond your comprehensive abilities. It was a three parter. Envelope, electronic, or were you lying? I never asked you if you had a choice. Just those three things. And I chose USPS, stupid! ;-) "Stupid!" has proven to be a baseless claim. Obviously. So you are now, of course, simply lying reflexively . How very sad. You must be getting so frustrated about now. How ARE you going to get out of this one? Fascinating to watch you writh and squirm. And only you and I, and of course a few posters I've invited to watch this from what I might call, "the inside," actually know what is going on. It's better than Earle Stanley Gardiner. Doan Whistle while you work, dumdi dum dum dum dum dee. 0:- |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
The Embry Study: What it actually said.
Doan wrote:
On 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: .......................snip And I chose USPS, stupid! ;-) "Stupid!" has proven to be a baseless claim. Obviously. So you are now, of course, simply lying reflexively . And it fit you PERFECTLY! ;-) It fits your need perfectly to try and convince yourself I'm stupid. 0:- Doan -- Isn't it interesting that the more honest an author appears to be, the more like ourselves we think him. And the less so, how very alien he doth appear? Kane 2006 |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
The Embry Study: What it actually said.
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:
Doan wrote: On 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: ......................snip And I chose USPS, stupid! ;-) "Stupid!" has proven to be a baseless claim. Obviously. So you are now, of course, simply lying reflexively . And it fit you PERFECTLY! ;-) It fits your need perfectly to try and convince yourself I'm stupid. 0:- No. I have already proven that you are STUPID! It's now just a fact! ;-) Doan |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
The Embry Study: What it actually said.
Doan wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: ......................snip And I chose USPS, stupid! ;-) "Stupid!" has proven to be a baseless claim. Obviously. So you are now, of course, simply lying reflexively . And it fit you PERFECTLY! ;-) It fits your need perfectly to try and convince yourself I'm stupid. 0:- No. I have already proven that you are STUPID! It's now just a fact! ;-) You topped me that time. I never figured you become delusional. Lie, of course, but delusional? Tsk. Doan Others may not be able to see, Doan, but you and I know who's in check. MMmmm.....it's off to work we go, Hi ho hi ho, etc. 0:- -- Isn't it interesting that the more honest an author appears to be, the more like ourselves we think him. And the less so, how very alien he doth appear? Kane 2006 |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
The Embry Study: What it actually said.
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:
Doan wrote: On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: ......................snip And I chose USPS, stupid! ;-) "Stupid!" has proven to be a baseless claim. Obviously. So you are now, of course, simply lying reflexively . And it fit you PERFECTLY! ;-) It fits your need perfectly to try and convince yourself I'm stupid. 0:- No. I have already proven that you are STUPID! It's now just a fact! ;-) You topped me that time. I never figured you become delusional. Lie, of course, but delusional? Tsk. Only in your dream! ;-) Doan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Classic Droan was R R R R, should I DOUBLE DARE HIM? ..was... LaVonne | Kane | Spanking | 0 | April 17th 04 07:13 PM |
Kids should work... | Doan | Spanking | 33 | December 10th 03 08:05 PM |
| | Kids should work... | Kane | Spanking | 12 | December 10th 03 02:30 AM |
Kids should work. | ChrisScaife | Foster Parents | 16 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |
Kids should work... | Doan | Foster Parents | 31 | December 7th 03 03:01 AM |