Ken Pangborn reneges on word

Who is this ""Coalition"" really?
Is it one guy pretending to be many?

On Feb 16, 3:47 pm, Anonyma wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm).

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.



On Feb 16, 3:52 pm, Borked Pseudo Mailed
wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm)

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.

On 17 Feb 2007 08:27:32 -0800, "Greegor" wrote:

Who is this ""Coalition"" really?
Is it one guy pretending to be many?

Dennis Deakin?

Michael?

On Feb 16, 3:47 pm, Anonyma wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm).

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.



On Feb 16, 3:52 pm, Borked Pseudo Mailed
wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm)

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.

Looks like your puppy is taking a whippin' Greg. Think he'll thank you
for your introduction to me?

R R R RRR R R R RR R

He's the same kind of fool and liar you are, Greg.

On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, 0:- wrote:

On 17 Feb 2007 08:27:32 -0800, "Greegor" wrote:

Who is this ""Coalition"" really?
Is it one guy pretending to be many?

Dennis Deakin?

Michael?

On Feb 16, 3:47 pm, Anonyma wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm).

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.



On Feb 16, 3:52 pm, Borked Pseudo Mailed
wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm)

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.

Looks like your puppy is taking a whippin' Greg. Think he'll thank you
for your introduction to me?

R R R RRR R R R RR R

He's the same kind of fool and liar you are, Greg.

Hihihi! Still foaming at the mouth, Kane? He whipped your ass at
debating so bad you had to concede!

Doan

On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:56:11 -0800, Doan wrote:

On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, 0:- wrote:

On 17 Feb 2007 08:27:32 -0800, "Greegor" wrote:

Who is this ""Coalition"" really?
Is it one guy pretending to be many?

Dennis Deakin?

Michael?

On Feb 16, 3:47 pm, Anonyma wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm).

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.



On Feb 16, 3:52 pm, Borked Pseudo Mailed
wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm)

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.

Looks like your puppy is taking a whippin' Greg. Think he'll thank you
for your introduction to me?

R R R RRR R R R RR R

He's the same kind of fool and liar you are, Greg.

Hihihi! Still foaming at the mouth, Kane?

Foaming? That's your game, monkeyboy.

He whipped your ass at
debating so bad you had to concede!

R R R R R post the proof, dummy. It got tired of him dodging the study
by refusing to debate anything but the title of a REVIEW, and
conceded....rrrrr..just what I had said in the first place. That the
title was not consistent with the study OR even the article.

I'm still waiting for him to answer my challenge....what about the
study, Doan?

He ran.

I asked him to provide proof for his claim that there was scientific
evidence that children that are not spanked are at a higher risk of
developing "sociopathy."

HE RAN.

I later asked YOU to then defend his claim if you think he won. AND
DOAN........YOU RAN FASTER THAN HIM.

Doan

If anyone has missed what a liar, a proven liar you are, and have read
the exchange between you pet dog Ken, this would end any doubts of
theirs you ARE a liar.

0;]

On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, 0:-] wrote:

On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:56:11 -0800, Doan wrote:

On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, 0:- wrote:

On 17 Feb 2007 08:27:32 -0800, "Greegor" wrote:

Who is this ""Coalition"" really?
Is it one guy pretending to be many?

Dennis Deakin?

Michael?

On Feb 16, 3:47 pm, Anonyma wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm).

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.



On Feb 16, 3:52 pm, Borked Pseudo Mailed
wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm)

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.

Looks like your puppy is taking a whippin' Greg. Think he'll thank you
for your introduction to me?

R R R RRR R R R RR R

He's the same kind of fool and liar you are, Greg.

Hihihi! Still foaming at the mouth, Kane?

Foaming? That's your game, monkeyboy.

Hihihi!

He whipped your ass at
debating so bad you had to concede!

R R R R R post the proof, dummy. It got tired of him dodging the study
by refusing to debate anything but the title of a REVIEW, and
conceded....rrrrr..just what I had said in the first place. That the
title was not consistent with the study OR even the article.

Hihihi! You CONCEDED! You LOST!

I'm still waiting for him to answer my challenge....what about the
study, Doan?

He ran.

Hihihi! You lost! End of story.

I asked him to provide proof for his claim that there was scientific
evidence that children that are not spanked are at a higher risk of
developing "sociopathy."

HE RAN.

I later asked YOU to then defend his claim if you think he won. AND
DOAN........YOU RAN FASTER THAN HIM.

Hihihi! He whipped your ass. You lost!


Doan

If anyone has missed what a liar, a proven liar you are, and have read
the exchange between you pet dog Ken, this would end any doubts of
theirs you ARE a liar.

Hihihi! You are a LOSER!

0;]

On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:22:18 -0800, Doan wrote:

On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, 0:-] wrote:

On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:56:11 -0800, Doan wrote:

On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, 0:- wrote:

On 17 Feb 2007 08:27:32 -0800, "Greegor" wrote:

Who is this ""Coalition"" really?
Is it one guy pretending to be many?

Dennis Deakin?

Michael?

On Feb 16, 3:47 pm, Anonyma wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm).

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.



On Feb 16, 3:52 pm, Borked Pseudo Mailed
wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm)

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.

Looks like your puppy is taking a whippin' Greg. Think he'll thank you
for your introduction to me?

R R R RRR R R R RR R

He's the same kind of fool and liar you are, Greg.

Hihihi! Still foaming at the mouth, Kane?

Foaming? That's your game, monkeyboy.

Hihihi!

He whipped your ass at
debating so bad you had to concede!

R R R R R post the proof, dummy. It got tired of him dodging the study
by refusing to debate anything but the title of a REVIEW, and
conceded....rrrrr..just what I had said in the first place. That the
title was not consistent with the study OR even the article.

Hihihi! You CONCEDED!

What did I "CONCEDED," Doan?

You LOST!

Show your proof. Don't leave out the link and the full quote,
monkeyboy.

I'm still waiting for him to answer my challenge....what about the
study, Doan?

He ran.

Hihihi! You lost! End of story.

Well it's the end of the story all right, as Ken ran, and so did YOU
when I asked YOU to defend HIS claim about non-spanked children,
coward.

I asked him to provide proof for his claim that there was scientific
evidence that children that are not spanked are at a higher risk of
developing "sociopathy."

HE RAN.

I later asked YOU to then defend his claim if you think he won. AND
DOAN........YOU RAN FASTER THAN HIM.

Hihihi! He whipped your ass. You lost!

You are lying again, little coward.


Doan

If anyone has missed what a liar, a proven liar you are, and have read
the exchange between you pet dog Ken, this would end any doubts of
theirs you ARE a liar.

Hihihi! You are a LOSER!

You are the loser because you are a coward.

Show what he won, Doan. Go ahead, provide something besides your usual
hysterical screeching and dancing monkeyboy act. R R R R R RRR

0;]

0;-]

"Greegor" wrote in message
oups.com...
Who is this ""Coalition"" really?
Is it one guy pretending to be many?

Does it really matter gregg? We ran that pathetic dolt kenny out of here,
and the news group is the better for it. If he feels the need to sneak back
in under another name that's up to him, but at least he will know that we
exposed him for the fraud he is the first time and that we can do it again.

My guess, if I were forced to give one, is that they are a coalition of
individuals that have been subjected to kenny's inept posts before, and have
no wish to be forced to deal with him again.

Ron


On Feb 16, 3:47 pm, Anonyma wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm).

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and
basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.



On Feb 16, 3:52 pm, Borked Pseudo Mailed
wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm)

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and
basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.