1,637 Gardasil reactions have been reported

1,637 Gardasil reactions have been reported
http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive...ERSReports.pdf

JOHN wrote:
1,637 Gardasil reactions have been reported
http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive...ERSReports.pdf

The vast majority of the reports are not serious events. Things like
pain at the injection site and swelling, itching and drug given during
pregnancy.

Sometimes there is more than one report for me than one report for the
same vaccination. And more than one vaccination given at the same time.

Some of the reports are serious, like some Guillain-Barre Syndrome and
viral meningitis. The thing is that people get sick with these things
whether or not they are vaccinated. The trick is to find out if the
vaccines are related, so we better know the risks of the vaccines.

I am glad that the federal government requires that these sorts of
reports be publically available. It makes the government more accountable.

Thanks for sharing this with us. It gives me even more confidence in the
safety of the vaccine.

Jeff

On May 25, 3:14 am, "JOHN" wrote:
1,637 Gardasil reactions have been reportedhttp://www.judicialwatch.org/archive/2007/GardasilVAERSReports.pdf

Accuracy of Reports. VAERS is a passive surveillance system, and the
large number of reports to VAERS precludes checking the specifics of
the vast majority of reports, especially the less serious ones. Few
reports to VAERS include full medical record documentation, and some
doubtless include errors. In addition, the VAERS forms often have
missing data; even simple data such as age, sex, vaccination date and
adverse event onset date are missing for about 11%, 8%, 10% and 14%,
respectively, of domestic VAERS reports.

"Jeff" wrote in message
news:9IB5i.3$NM.1@trnddc02...
JOHN wrote:
1,637 Gardasil reactions have been reported
http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive...ERSReports.pdf

The vast majority of the reports are not serious events. Things like pain
at the injection site and swelling, itching and drug given during
pregnancy.


Only about .5 to 3% of reactions are reported. So if 100% were reported
then it would be very conservative to say .5-3% were genuine.

That was 3 deaths reported I think, for a useless vaccine, based on an
unproven theory, and based around stone age allopathic medicine for cervical
cancer, when it is easily curable with non-allopathic med

if they can't cure cancer, how come anyone believes they can prevent it?

hardly worth dying for

get the full story http://www.whale.to/vaccines/gardasil_h.html

In New Zealand, after the Menomune A, they were forced to set up hotlines,
and then when they compared parent reporting, with reactions that the
parents said that the doctors had been asked to report, that doctors only
reported .9%.

JOHN wrote:
"Jeff" wrote in message
news:9IB5i.3$NM.1@trnddc02...
JOHN wrote:
1,637 Gardasil reactions have been reported
http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive...ERSReports.pdf
The vast majority of the reports are not serious events. Things like pain
at the injection site and swelling, itching and drug given during
pregnancy.


Only about .5 to 3% of reactions are reported. So if 100% were reported
then it would be very conservative to say .5-3% were genuine.

But, at the same time, serious reactions are more likely to be reported
than reactions that are not serious.

That was 3 deaths reported I think, for a useless vaccine,

life-saving vaccine, actually.

And it is not known if those deaths were caused by the vaccine or not.

based on an
unproven theory,

It is well proven that HPV causes cancer and that the vaccine prevents
HPV infections.

and based around stone age allopathic medicine for cervical
cancer,

Actually, cervical cancer was not very common in the stone age.

A more accurate term would be "21 century evidence-based medicine"

when it is easily curable with non-allopathic med

Prove this assertion, if you please and can.

if they can't cure cancer, how come anyone believes they can prevent it?

What do you mean? Half of all victims of cancer in the US are cured.

You can't cure AIDS, but wearing some rubber prevents it.

hardly worth dying for

Which is exactly why the vaccine is needed. It prevents deaths.

get the full story http://www.whale.to/vaccines/gardasil_h.html

I think you got the right word for it: "Story." As in made up.

Get accurate info at: http://www.cdc.gov/nip/default.htm

Happy Memorial day everyone!

Jeff

In New Zealand, after the Menomune A, they were forced to set up hotlines,
and then when they compared parent reporting, with reactions that the
parents said that the doctors had been asked to report, that doctors only
reported .9%.


John, Is that point 9 percent????? Not even one percent!! This is
disgusting.

On May 25, 6:11 pm, "JOHN" wrote:
In New Zealand, after the Menomune A, they were forced to set up hotlines,
and then when they compared parent reporting, with reactions that the
parents said that the doctors had been asked to report, that doctors only
reported .9%.

Roman Bystrianyk wrote:
On May 25, 3:14 am, "JOHN" wrote:
1,637 Gardasil reactions have been reportedhttp://www.judicialwatch.org/archive/2007/GardasilVAERSReports.pdf

Accuracy of Reports. VAERS is a passive surveillance system, and the
large number of reports to VAERS precludes checking the specifics of
the vast majority of reports, especially the less serious ones. Few
reports to VAERS include full medical record documentation, and some
doubtless include errors. In addition, the VAERS forms often have
missing data; even simple data such as age, sex, vaccination date and
adverse event onset date are missing for about 11%, 8%, 10% and 14%,
respectively, of domestic VAERS reports.

Hey, Roman, we fact based evidence types have been saying that to John
and his ilk for years. They still insist that VAERS provides useful
information.

It is a waste of taxpayer money and should be shut down and replaced
with something useful.

"Kevysmom" wrote in message
ups.com...
In New Zealand, after the Menomune A, they were forced to set up
hotlines,
and then when they compared parent reporting, with reactions that the
parents said that the doctors had been asked to report, that doctors only
reported .9%.


John, Is that point 9 percent????? Not even one percent!! This is
disgusting.


Yeah. Point 9. It is usually 1-4% at best.

JOHN wrote:
"Kevysmom" wrote in message
ups.com...
In New Zealand, after the Menomune A, they were forced to set up
hotlines,
and then when they compared parent reporting, with reactions that the
parents said that the doctors had been asked to report, that doctors only
reported .9%.

John, Is that point 9 percent????? Not even one percent!! This is
disgusting.


Yeah. Point 9. It is usually 1-4% at best.

Yet, more serious reactions are more likely to get reported.

A little soreness after the shots are less likely to get reported. Go
figure.

Jeff