If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
LadyLollipop wrote:
"Orac" wrote in message news In article 4k7Re.291910$x96.214780@attbi_s72, "LadyLollipop" wrote: "Orac" wrote in message news In article OF8Qe.287999$_o.16016@attbi_s71, "LadyLollipop" wrote: You came in late, it's all right here in this thread. I checked the whole thread out. I found no such evidence. I'm sorry, you are having a problem, it is ALL there. No it's not. Yes, it is. Claiming it is doesn't make it so. It's just a convenient excuse for you to dodge the question. I have dodged no questions. You dodge every question...like the one Orac posed to you about if the autopsy proves that the boy was killed by CHEATlation (I'll spell it any way I damn well please), will you then say that CHEATlation is dangerous? That requires a simple yes or no: [ ] Yes [ ] No Will you accept the findings of the medical examiner? |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
In article k7vSe.308506$_o.69937@attbi_s71,
"LadyLollipop" wrote: "Orac" wrote in message news In article yn7Re.294096$_o.35049@attbi_s71, "LadyLollipop" wrote: "Orac" wrote in message news I never said you didn't. No doubt you do mean what you say. But your opinions are not facts, nor are they backed up by facts. In fact their evidence is: *Substantial* *real* *solid* *convincing* *hard* *clear-cut* *reasonable* *significant* *credibile* *compelling* *copious* AND *direct* Do tell. Please list this evidence that is : "*Substantial* *real* *solid* *convincing* *hard* *clear-cut* *reasonable* *significant* *credibile* *compelling* *copious* AND *direct*" Your complete amazing lack of observation.is showing, as well as your ability to read this thread. In other words, you can't provide the evidence. Thank you for confirming that fact. -- Orac |"I am not *trying* to tell you anything. I am simply not | interested in trying to compensate for your amazing lack | of observation." | http://oracknows.blogspot.com |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
In article KavSe.307206$x96.57704@attbi_s72,
"LadyLollipop" wrote: "Orac" wrote in message news Claiming it is doesn't make it so. It's just a convenient excuse for you to dodge the question. I have dodged no questions. Really? Then where is all that evidence that chelation helps autism that you claim exists? -- Orac |"I am not *trying* to tell you anything. I am simply not | interested in trying to compensate for your amazing lack | of observation." | http://oracknows.blogspot.com |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
In article l9vSe.308510$_o.277187@attbi_s71,
"LadyLollipop" wrote: "Orac" wrote in message news In article Tf7Re.291903$x96.58258@attbi_s72, "LadyLollipop" wrote: "Orac" wrote in message news you STILL haven't said specifically what you find to be fallacious in the evidence presented. You just dismissed it. I'm quite correct about that. You are quite incorrect. At least you didn't say I was lying. I suppose that's reason for hope for you. As, I have previous stated numerous times, I only call lies when there are lies. Too bad your definition of what constitutes a "lie" is so broad. Oddly enough, almost anything that you disagree with becomes a "lie" to you if you get annoyed enough. -- Orac |"I am not *trying* to tell you anything. I am simply not | interested in trying to compensate for your amazing lack | of observation." | http://oracknows.blogspot.com |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
"Orac" wrote in message news In article l9vSe.308510$_o.277187@attbi_s71, "LadyLollipop" wrote: "Orac" wrote in message news In article Tf7Re.291903$x96.58258@attbi_s72, "LadyLollipop" wrote: "Orac" wrote in message news you STILL haven't said specifically what you find to be fallacious in the evidence presented. You just dismissed it. I'm quite correct about that. You are quite incorrect. At least you didn't say I was lying. I suppose that's reason for hope for you. As, I have previous stated numerous times, I only call lies when there are lies. Too bad your definition of what constitutes a "lie" is so broad. Oddly enough, almost anything that you disagree with becomes a "lie" to you if you get annoyed enough. -- Orac You are all mouth, Orac. Hello Orac-Still Waiting Hello Orac, can''t back up your claim AGAIN? Calling Orac's hand |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
"LadyLollipop" wrote in message news:jb4Te.329084$xm3.282656@attbi_s21... "Orac" wrote in message news In article l9vSe.308510$_o.277187@attbi_s71, "LadyLollipop" wrote: "Orac" wrote in message news In article Tf7Re.291903$x96.58258@attbi_s72, "LadyLollipop" wrote: "Orac" wrote in message news you STILL haven't said specifically what you find to be fallacious in the evidence presented. You just dismissed it. I'm quite correct about that. You are quite incorrect. At least you didn't say I was lying. I suppose that's reason for hope for you. As, I have previous stated numerous times, I only call lies when there are lies. Too bad your definition of what constitutes a "lie" is so broad. Oddly enough, almost anything that you disagree with becomes a "lie" to you if you get annoyed enough. -- Orac You are all mouth, Orac. Hello Orac-Still Waiting Hello Orac, can''t back up your claim AGAIN? Calling Orac's hand It matters not what the subject is, Richard H Jacobson sees my name and starts foaming at the mouth. His pattern of cyberstalking and badgering started long before me, I just happened to be his current target, all others he has run off, boo hoo, he has failed to do that with me. See his pattern he http://tinyurl.com/39u2g http://tinyurl.com/2vxcl http://tinyurl.com/2nbzc http://tinyurl.com/3gzhf Cue for Richard H Jacobson/akaRich..@.. to post with his usual cyberstalking and attacking me. Just watch. Just like clockwork. Sorry to belabor the obvious. Somethings are so predictable -------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------- Best defense to logic is ignorance |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
LadyLollipop wrote:
"Orac" wrote in message news In article l9vSe.308510$_o.277187@attbi_s71, "LadyLollipop" wrote: "Orac" wrote in message news In article Tf7Re.291903$x96.58258@attbi_s72, "LadyLollipop" wrote: "Orac" wrote in message news you STILL haven't said specifically what you find to be fallacious in the evidence presented. You just dismissed it. I'm quite correct about that. You are quite incorrect. At least you didn't say I was lying. I suppose that's reason for hope for you. As, I have previous stated numerous times, I only call lies when there are lies. Too bad your definition of what constitutes a "lie" is so broad. Oddly enough, almost anything that you disagree with becomes a "lie" to you if you get annoyed enough. -- Orac You are all mouth, Orac. Hello Orac-Still Waiting Hello Orac, can''t back up your claim AGAIN? Calling Orac's hand From one who is the gold medalist for Dodge Question. Jan, your imitation of the three monkeys is pathetic. No, Jan McCarthy, it is not all right here in this thread. I read the entire thread, and found no proof that Peter lied. However, you sure do make a lot of empty accusations. |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
LadyLollipop wrote:
"LadyLollipop" wrote in message news:jb4Te.329084$xm3.282656@attbi_s21... "Orac" wrote in message news In article l9vSe.308510$_o.277187@attbi_s71, "LadyLollipop" wrote: "Orac" wrote in message news In article Tf7Re.291903$x96.58258@attbi_s72, "LadyLollipop" wrote: "Orac" wrote in message news you STILL haven't said specifically what you find to be fallacious in the evidence presented. You just dismissed it. I'm quite correct about that. You are quite incorrect. At least you didn't say I was lying. I suppose that's reason for hope for you. As, I have previous stated numerous times, I only call lies when there are lies. Too bad your definition of what constitutes a "lie" is so broad. Oddly enough, almost anything that you disagree with becomes a "lie" to you if you get annoyed enough. -- Orac You are all mouth, Orac. Hello Orac-Still Waiting Hello Orac, can''t back up your claim AGAIN? Calling Orac's hand Snip Jan's diversion to Rich. She must realize that she looks like a maroon. Yes, you do get the gold medal for Dodge Question. Jan, your imitation of the three monkeys is pathetic. No, Jan McCarthy, it is not all right here in this thread. I read the entire thread, and found no proof that Peter lied. However, you sure do make a lot of empty accusations. |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
Orac wrote:
In article KavSe.307206$x96.57704@attbi_s72, "LadyLollipop" wrote: "Orac" wrote in message news Claiming it is doesn't make it so. It's just a convenient excuse for you to dodge the question. I have dodged no questions. Really? Then where is all that evidence that chelation helps autism that you claim exists? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
misc.kids FAQ on Childhood Vaccinations, Part 1/4 | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 3 | June 28th 04 07:41 PM |
misc.kids FAQ on Childhood Vaccinations, Part 1/4 | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 3 | April 17th 04 12:24 PM |
misc.kids FAQ on Childhood Vaccinations, Part 1/4 | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 3 | January 16th 04 09:15 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Childhood Vaccinations, Part 2/4 | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | December 15th 03 09:41 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Childhood Vaccinations, Part 1/4 | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 1 | December 15th 03 09:41 AM |