A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » misc.kids » Kids Health
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Kids On ADHD Drugs - Dangerous Path To Addiction



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 9th 06, 10:00 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,sci.med,uk.people.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Kids On ADHD Drugs - Dangerous Path To Addiction

Kids On ADHD Drugs - Dangerous Path To Addiction

By Evelyn Pringle
http://www.sierratimes.com/06/04/08/75_8_36_9_51180.htm

Experts say the stimulant drugs prescribed for the treatment of ADHD
are not only dangerous, they are highly addictive. And although no drug has
been approved for the treatment of autism, drugs are routinely prescribed
off-label to treat autistic children.
According to the National Center for Health Statistics, over the
period of 5 years between 1997 and 2002, the number of children between the
age of 3 to 17, diagnosed with ADHD went from 3.3 million to 4.4 million.
In direct correlation, the number of children prescribed ADHD drugs
also rose steadily. In fact, spending on these types of medications for
children is now higher than spending on antibiotics and asthma drugs. In
February 2006, the FDA revealed that between 1999 and 2003, seventy-eight
million prescriptions for ADHD drugs were written for children between the
ages of 1 to 18. Terry Davis, a member of an FDA advisory committee, has
said prescriptions for ADHD drugs filled annually have a value of $3.1
billion.
According to Dr Peter Breggin, author of "Talking Back To Ritalin,
"parents and teachers and even doctors have been badly misled by drug
company marketing practices," he warns. "Drug companies have targeted
children as a big market likely to boost profits and children are suffering
as a result."
What critics say is most alarming, is the fact that very young
children are being placed on drugs. A study published in the Journal of the
American Medical Association in 2000 provides some insight into this trend.
The study found that fifty-seven percent of 223 Michigan Medicaid patients
younger than 4, diagnosed with ADHD, received at least one psychotropic drug
during a 15-month period in 1995 to 1996.
Additionally, the study found that in the Medicaid population in
Midwestern states, there was a 3-fold increase in the prescribing of
stimulant drugs between 1991 and 1995 for children between the age of 2 and
four.
More recent statistics show a 369% increase in spending on ADHD drugs
for children under five. From 2000 to 2003, the rise in the use of attention
deficit drugs by children under 5 contributed to an overall 23% increase for
all children, according to an analysis by the nation's largest prescription
benefit manager, Medco Health Solutions.
The debate over the drugging of children in this country has been
raging on for years. Schools have been accused of promoting the use of drugs
to control normal but active children. At a September 26, 2002, Reform
Committee hearing on the "Overmedication of Hyperactive Children," Chairman,
Rep Dan Burton (R-IN), asked pediatrician, Dr Mary Ann Block, "what have you
found that the schools do specifically to encourage the use of medications
for attention and behavior?"
Dr Block said, "parents that come to me report consistently that the
teachers and the principals and even the school nurses pressure them to go
to a physician and get their child labeled and drugged."
"Some schools," she said, "are giving lectures to parents, inviting
parents to come hear talks about diagnosing and drugging their children for
ADHD."
Congressman Burton pointed out what he considered to be inadequate and
unscientific methods of diagnosing ADHD:
"When you take your child to a doctor, instead of blood tests and a
thorough medical evaluation, you have a conversation with a doctor about the
school's checklist. And you leave a few minutes later with a prescription
for your young child for a psychotropic drug."
"Did the doctor test your child for a thyroid disorder? Did your
doctor test your child for a heavy metal toxicity? Did you doctor talk to
you about your child's allergies?
"Did your doctor even mention nutrition or possible food sensitivity?
Did your doctor ask if your child's IQ had been tested and if he was gifted?
Probably not," he said.
Sandra Lucas testifies at FDA advisory committee hearings on behalf of
the Citizens Commission on Human Rights, a psychiatric watchdog group. She
produced a copy of a January 20, 2005, pamphlet used at a training seminar
for teachers composed by Susan Barton, who billed herself as the "Founder of
Bright Solutions for Dyslexia," located in San Jose California.
Under Medication for ADD, Ms Barton states: "Medication is the most
often an essential component to effective treatment for the ADD child."
"As I've said many times now," she told the teaches, "ADD is a
neurobiological disorder and needs to be treated as such."
Ms Barton also says that without medication, other interventions are
ineffective, and claims: "This medication does not cause illegal drug use or
addiction."
Dr Fred Baughman, author of "The ADHD Fraud - How Psychiatry Makes
Patients of Normal Children," and one of the nation's leading experts on the
issue, vehemently disagrees. He calls the medical practice of ADHD a fraud -
"one in which the FDA was fully complicit," he says.
"ADHD doesn't exist--it is not a physical abnormality," he explains,
"and as such bears no risk of causing physical injury or death as does every
drug used in its treatment," he says.
In testimony on behalf of the International Center for the Study of
Psychiatry and Psychology, at the March 22 and 23, 2006, FDA advisory
committee hearings on the dangers of ADHD drugs, Dr Baughman asked the panel
of experts to "give us the reference, cite to the article, giving proof that
ADHD is a disease."
He also asked the committee to give the reference, or cite the
literature, that describes the test that provides objective evidence that
children diagnosed with ADHD have a disease.
The silence in the hearing room was deafening. According to Dr
Baughman, no one answered the questions because there is no study, test, or
scientific literature to back up the assertion that ADHD is a disease.
"ADHD is not a disease," Dr Baughman says. "This being the case," he
maintains, "giving such drugs for ADHD is not "help" or "treatment"."
He makes the point "that all practice of medicine begins with
diagnosis."
"Informed consent," Dr Baughman explained, "demands not just a
description of the drugs or surgery to be used but of the condition they are
to be used on--its prognosis and how that natural course/prognosis is likely
to be altered by the treatments to be applied."
At the March 2006, FDA advisory committee hearings, it was noted that
no other countries are drugging children with stimulants. In fact,
psychiatrist, Dr Grace Jackson, who also testified at the hearing, explains
in her book, "Rethinking Psychiatric Drugs," how in 1996 and 1997, the World
Health Organization issued press releases about the rise in the use of the
stimulant, Ritalin, in this country, "noting that the United States was
responsible for 90% of the drug's production and consumption."
At the time, the International Narcotics Control Board identified a
number of concerns about America's use of the drug, including the dangers
of: "inappropriate diagnosis of ADHD; widely divergent prescribing patterns;
off-label prescribing to children under six; and excessive duration of
treatment," Dr Jackson reports.
A report by the FDA released in February 2006, said that between 1999
and 2003, there were 25 deaths in persons using ADHD drugs, including the
deaths of 19 children. The FDA also reported receiving more than 50 cases of
cardiovascular problems, including stoke, heart attack, hypertension,
palpitations and arrhythmia.
Because only between 1 and 10% of adverse events are ever reported to
the FDA, the numbers above represent an extreme understatement of actual
cases of harm, critics point out.
According to the Drug Abuse Warning Network, there were only 271
Ritalin-related emergency room visits in 1990, but there were 1,478
Ritalin-related emergency visits recorded in 2001.
In 1999, the National Institute of Drug Abuse, found some 165
Ritalin-related poison calls in Detroit and 419 cases in Texas. Of the
nearly 600 calls, only 114 cases involved intentional misuse or abuse.
Dr Breggin maintains that ADHD drugs actually bring on the symptoms
they are supposed to treat such as hyperactivity, impulsivity and
inattention, which can lead to a vicious cycle of incorrect and dangerous
dosage increases, he warns.
In addition, Dr Breggin says, stimulants can cause "agitation and
irritability, anger, hostility, disinhibition, hypomania and mania."
A recent review of data by the FDA seems to verify Dr Breggins
assertions. The FDA found that children on ADHD drugs had an increased the
risk of psychosis, a mental disorder characterized by the inability to
distinguish between real and imaginary events. The most important finding,
the FDA said, was that signs of psychosis or mania, particularly
hallucinations, occurred in patients with no risk factors, at the usual
doses of any of the drugs used to treat ADHD.
The FDA found a "substantial portion of the psychosis-related cases
were reported to occur in children 10 years or less," an age group which
does not typically suffer from psychosis, the FDA said.
From January 2000, through June 30, 2005, FDA identified nearly 1,000
reports of psychosis or mania possibly linked to the drugs, including
Ritalin, Adderall, Concerta, and Strattera.
Most of people who have investigated the matter seem to agree that
heavy metal poisoning is by far the most likely cause of the epidemic in
autism spectrum disorders that erupted in the 1990s. Studies show that the
mercury-based preservative, thimerosal, that was used in all childhood
vaccines until recently, is the likely culprit.
Beginning in the late 1980s, the CDC began adding more and more
vaccines to the immunization schedule but failed to keep track of the toxic
levels of mercury that children would receive as each new shot was added to
the list or the amount of mercury that infants would receive when 3-in-one
shots were injected.
Nancy and Tim Hokkanen are the parents of Andy, a 6 year-old boy who
was diagnosed with autism but who is now recovering from mercury poisoning.
In June 2002 a neurologist prescribed Adderal for Andy.
"My son became psychotic," Nancy said, "for four days by mid-afternoon
he had to be held down in a dark quiet room while he screamed himself limp."
Next the neurologist prescribed Ritalin, saying, "Usually if one drug
doesn't work, the other one does," Nancy continued.
"My instincts told me that this was another disaster in the making,"
she said, "so I quit seeing that neurologist and began reading studies."
Nancy discovered the theory of mercury poisoning published by
chemistry experts, Boyd Haley, PhD and Andrew Hall Cutler, PhD, in the
study, "Autism: a novel form of mercury poisoning," which documents about
100 matching symptoms.
In November 2002, when Andy was 4 and-a-half, tests were done on
Andy's hair, blood, urine and stool samples, and the test results showed
mercury toxicity as well as high levels of copper and other metals, and
various nutritional insufficiencies.
Within 2 weeks of giving Andy supplement including Vitamin B-6, zinc,
manganese and magnesium, he showed drastic improvements in mood, behavior
and abilities, Nancy says.
"We had an almost-normal Christmas," she reported, "without tantrums
and bizarre behavior."
The Hokkenans estimate that their insurance company was billed about
$100,000 for therapy to treat autism. "However, we never noticed any drastic
improvement until we began biomedical treatment, which has cost about
$2,000," Nancy says.
"Strangely," she notes, "our insurance company wouldn't cover the
costs of those medical tests."
Nancy says that since public health officials realized their error of
failing to keep track of the toxic mercury levels in vaccines in 1999, she
views the failure to restrict the use of mercury in vaccines as a form of
fatal entrenchment -- "when an unhealthy practice or norm is allowed to
continue, she explained, "simply because it has been done that way for so
long."
In addition to all the other side effects associated with ADHD drugs,
Dr David Stein, author of "Unraveling the ADD/ADHD Fiasco," says stimulant
drugs are "near the top of the heap of potentially addictive drugs."
He says, "we have no way of knowing which child has a potential risk
for becoming addicted to drugs."
Recent studies have shown that more and more students are using the
drugs illegally. In 2004, a nationwide University of Michigan study on
non-medical use of amphetamines, found 4.9% of 8th graders had used
stimulants in the previous year, 8.5% of 10th graders had used the drugs,
and one in 10 seniors admitted to non-medical use of amphetamines.
The Partnership for a Drug Free America, released the results of a
survey in 2005, that polled more than 7,300 teenagers, and found one in 10
teenagers, or 2.3 million young people, had tried ADHD drugs without a
doctor's prescription, and that 29% of those surveyed said they had close
friends who had abused the drugs.
Experts agree that the wide-spread prescribing of stimulants will lead
many children down the path to addiction and they warn of the perils that
will follow.
"Psychology and psychiatry have extremely poor track records for
treating abuse and addiction problems," Dr Stein notes, "and therefore the
very drugs they are recommending can trigger a problem from which there may
be no return."
If medical professionals begin telling children at a very young age
that they can change the way they think, feel, and behave by simply taking a
pill, they will logically continue to take drugs in attempt to mood-alter
whenever they have problems in life.

(Evelyn Pringle is a columnist for Independent Media TV and an investigative
journalist focused on exposing corruption in government)

Public Service Announcement to the Reader:

AUTISM IS TREATABLE.
Consult these sources:

. Autism Research Institute
http://www.autismwebsite.com/ari/index.htm

. Generation Rescue
http://www.generationrescue.org








  #2  
Old April 10th 06, 12:16 AM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,sci.med,uk.people.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Kids On ADHD Drugs - Dangerous Path To Addiction

Actually, ADHD drugs reduce the risk that kids with ADHD will abuse drugs.

Jeff


  #3  
Old April 10th 06, 04:55 AM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,sci.med,uk.people.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Kids On ADHD Drugs - Dangerous Path To Addiction


Jeff wrote:
Actually, ADHD drugs reduce the risk that kids with ADHD will abuse drugs.

Jeff


Jeff also wrote:

It's good to see the FDA doing it's job.

==

When in FACT.. they were covering up the TRUTH.

==

A recent review of data by the FDA seems to verify Dr Breggins
assertions. The FDA found that children on ADHD drugs had an increased
the
risk of psychosis, a mental disorder characterized by the inability to
distinguish between real and imaginary events. The most important
finding,
the FDA said, was that signs of psychosis or mania, particularly
hallucinations, occurred in patients with no risk factors, at the usual

doses of any of the drugs used to treat ADHD.

The FDA found a "substantial portion of the psychosis-related
cases
were reported to occur in children 10 years or less," an age group
which
does not typically suffer from psychosis, the FDA said.

From January 2000, through June 30, 2005, FDA identified
nearly 1,000
reports of psychosis or mania possibly linked to the drugs, including
Ritalin, Adderall, Concerta, and Strattera.

In addition to all the other side effects associated with ADHD drugs,
Dr David Stein, author of "Unraveling the ADD/ADHD Fiasco," says
stimulant
drugs are "near the top of the heap of potentially addictive drugs."

The Partnership for a Drug Free America, released the results of a
survey in 2005, that polled more than 7,300 teenagers, and found one in
10
teenagers, or 2.3 million young people, had tried ADHD drugs without a
doctor's prescription, and that 29% of those surveyed said they had
close
friends who had abused the drugs.

Experts agree that the wide-spread prescribing of stimulants
will lead
many children down the path to addiction and they warn of the perils
that
will follow.

If medical professionals begin telling children at a very young age
that they can change the way they think, feel, and behave by simply
taking a
pill, they will logically continue to take drugs in attempt to
mood-alter
whenever they have problems in life.

These are the F A C T S!

  #4  
Old April 10th 06, 02:48 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,sci.med,uk.people.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Kids On ADHD Drugs - Dangerous Path To Addiction

john wrote:
Kids On ADHD Drugs - Dangerous Path To Addiction

By Evelyn Pringle
http://www.sierratimes.com/06/04/08/75_8_36_9_51180.htm


Weird article, gives only opinions, no facts, to prove the headline.


Experts say the stimulant drugs prescribed for the treatment of ADHD
are not only dangerous, they are highly addictive. And although no drug has
been approved for the treatment of autism, drugs are routinely prescribed
off-label to treat autistic children.
According to the National Center for Health Statistics, over the
period of 5 years between 1997 and 2002, the number of children between the
age of 3 to 17, diagnosed with ADHD went from 3.3 million to 4.4 million.
In direct correlation, the number of children prescribed ADHD drugs
also rose steadily. In fact, spending on these types of medications for
children is now higher than spending on antibiotics and asthma drugs. In
February 2006, the FDA revealed that between 1999 and 2003, seventy-eight
million prescriptions for ADHD drugs were written for children between the
ages of 1 to 18. Terry Davis, a member of an FDA advisory committee, has
said prescriptions for ADHD drugs filled annually have a value of $3.1
billion.
According to Dr Peter Breggin, author of "Talking Back To Ritalin,
"parents and teachers and even doctors have been badly misled by drug
company marketing practices," he warns. "Drug companies have targeted
children as a big market likely to boost profits and children are suffering
as a result."
What critics say is most alarming, is the fact that very young
children are being placed on drugs. A study published in the Journal of the
American Medical Association in 2000 provides some insight into this trend.
The study found that fifty-seven percent of 223 Michigan Medicaid patients
younger than 4, diagnosed with ADHD, received at least one psychotropic drug
during a 15-month period in 1995 to 1996.
Additionally, the study found that in the Medicaid population in
Midwestern states, there was a 3-fold increase in the prescribing of
stimulant drugs between 1991 and 1995 for children between the age of 2 and
four.
More recent statistics show a 369% increase in spending on ADHD drugs
for children under five. From 2000 to 2003, the rise in the use of attention
deficit drugs by children under 5 contributed to an overall 23% increase for
all children, according to an analysis by the nation's largest prescription
benefit manager, Medco Health Solutions.
The debate over the drugging of children in this country has been
raging on for years. Schools have been accused of promoting the use of drugs
to control normal but active children. At a September 26, 2002, Reform
Committee hearing on the "Overmedication of Hyperactive Children," Chairman,
Rep Dan Burton (R-IN), asked pediatrician, Dr Mary Ann Block, "what have you
found that the schools do specifically to encourage the use of medications
for attention and behavior?"
Dr Block said, "parents that come to me report consistently that the
teachers and the principals and even the school nurses pressure them to go
to a physician and get their child labeled and drugged."
"Some schools," she said, "are giving lectures to parents, inviting
parents to come hear talks about diagnosing and drugging their children for
ADHD."
Congressman Burton pointed out what he considered to be inadequate and
unscientific methods of diagnosing ADHD:
"When you take your child to a doctor, instead of blood tests and a
thorough medical evaluation, you have a conversation with a doctor about the
school's checklist. And you leave a few minutes later with a prescription
for your young child for a psychotropic drug."
"Did the doctor test your child for a thyroid disorder? Did your
doctor test your child for a heavy metal toxicity? Did you doctor talk to
you about your child's allergies?
"Did your doctor even mention nutrition or possible food sensitivity?
Did your doctor ask if your child's IQ had been tested and if he was gifted?
Probably not," he said.
Sandra Lucas testifies at FDA advisory committee hearings on behalf of
the Citizens Commission on Human Rights, a psychiatric watchdog group.


The front group for the Kriminal Kult of $cientology.


She
produced a copy of a January 20, 2005, pamphlet used at a training seminar
for teachers composed by Susan Barton, who billed herself as the "Founder of
Bright Solutions for Dyslexia," located in San Jose California.
Under Medication for ADD, Ms Barton states: "Medication is the most
often an essential component to effective treatment for the ADD child."
"As I've said many times now," she told the teaches, "ADD is a
neurobiological disorder and needs to be treated as such."
Ms Barton also says that without medication, other interventions are
ineffective, and claims: "This medication does not cause illegal drug use or
addiction."


Ms. Barton is right.

Dr Fred Baughman, author of "The ADHD Fraud - How Psychiatry Makes
Patients of Normal Children," and one of the nation's leading experts on the
issue, vehemently disagrees. He calls the medical practice of ADHD a fraud -
"one in which the FDA was fully complicit," he says.
"ADHD doesn't exist--it is not a physical abnormality," he explains,
"and as such bears no risk of causing physical injury or death as does every
drug used in its treatment," he says.
In testimony on behalf of the International Center for the Study of
Psychiatry and Psychology, at the March 22 and 23, 2006, FDA advisory
committee hearings on the dangers of ADHD drugs, Dr Baughman asked the panel
of experts to "give us the reference, cite to the article, giving proof that
ADHD is a disease."
He also asked the committee to give the reference, or cite the
literature, that describes the test that provides objective evidence that
children diagnosed with ADHD have a disease.
The silence in the hearing room was deafening. According to Dr
Baughman, no one answered the questions because there is no study, test, or
scientific literature to back up the assertion that ADHD is a disease.
"ADHD is not a disease," Dr Baughman says. "This being the case," he
maintains, "giving such drugs for ADHD is not "help" or "treatment"."
He makes the point "that all practice of medicine begins with
diagnosis."
"Informed consent," Dr Baughman explained, "demands not just a
description of the drugs or surgery to be used but of the condition they are
to be used on--its prognosis and how that natural course/prognosis is likely
to be altered by the treatments to be applied."


Dr. Baughman is affiliated with the $cientologists.

At the March 2006, FDA advisory committee hearings, it was noted that
no other countries are drugging children with stimulants. In fact,
psychiatrist, Dr Grace Jackson, who also testified at the hearing, explains
in her book, "Rethinking Psychiatric Drugs," how in 1996 and 1997, the World
Health Organization issued press releases about the rise in the use of the
stimulant, Ritalin, in this country, "noting that the United States was
responsible for 90% of the drug's production and consumption."
At the time, the International Narcotics Control Board identified a
number of concerns about America's use of the drug, including the dangers
of: "inappropriate diagnosis of ADHD; widely divergent prescribing patterns;
off-label prescribing to children under six; and excessive duration of
treatment," Dr Jackson reports.
A report by the FDA released in February 2006, said that between 1999
and 2003, there were 25 deaths in persons using ADHD drugs, including the
deaths of 19 children. The FDA also reported receiving more than 50 cases of
cardiovascular problems, including stoke, heart attack, hypertension,
palpitations and arrhythmia.
Because only between 1 and 10% of adverse events are ever reported to
the FDA, the numbers above represent an extreme understatement of actual
cases of harm, critics point out.
According to the Drug Abuse Warning Network, there were only 271
Ritalin-related emergency room visits in 1990, but there were 1,478
Ritalin-related emergency visits recorded in 2001.
In 1999, the National Institute of Drug Abuse, found some 165
Ritalin-related poison calls in Detroit and 419 cases in Texas. Of the
nearly 600 calls, only 114 cases involved intentional misuse or abuse.
Dr Breggin maintains that ADHD drugs actually bring on the symptoms
they are supposed to treat such as hyperactivity, impulsivity and
inattention, which can lead to a vicious cycle of incorrect and dangerous
dosage increases, he warns.
In addition, Dr Breggin says, stimulants can cause "agitation and
irritability, anger, hostility, disinhibition, hypomania and mania."
A recent review of data by the FDA seems to verify Dr Breggins
assertions. The FDA found that children on ADHD drugs had an increased the
risk of psychosis, a mental disorder characterized by the inability to
distinguish between real and imaginary events. The most important finding,
the FDA said, was that signs of psychosis or mania, particularly
hallucinations, occurred in patients with no risk factors, at the usual
doses of any of the drugs used to treat ADHD.
The FDA found a "substantial portion of the psychosis-related cases
were reported to occur in children 10 years or less," an age group which
does not typically suffer from psychosis, the FDA said.
From January 2000, through June 30, 2005, FDA identified nearly 1,000
reports of psychosis or mania possibly linked to the drugs, including
Ritalin, Adderall, Concerta, and Strattera.
Most of people who have investigated the matter seem to agree that
heavy metal poisoning is by far the most likely cause of the epidemic in
autism spectrum disorders that erupted in the 1990s. Studies show that the
mercury-based preservative, thimerosal, that was used in all childhood
vaccines until recently, is the likely culprit.
Beginning in the late 1980s, the CDC began adding more and more
vaccines to the immunization schedule but failed to keep track of the toxic
levels of mercury that children would receive as each new shot was added to
the list or the amount of mercury that infants would receive when 3-in-one
shots were injected.
Nancy and Tim Hokkanen are the parents of Andy, a 6 year-old boy who
was diagnosed with autism but who is now recovering from mercury poisoning.
In June 2002 a neurologist prescribed Adderal for Andy.
"My son became psychotic," Nancy said, "for four days by mid-afternoon
he had to be held down in a dark quiet room while he screamed himself limp."
Next the neurologist prescribed Ritalin, saying, "Usually if one drug
doesn't work, the other one does," Nancy continued.
"My instincts told me that this was another disaster in the making,"
she said, "so I quit seeing that neurologist and began reading studies."
Nancy discovered the theory of mercury poisoning published by
chemistry experts, Boyd Haley, PhD and Andrew Hall Cutler, PhD, in the
study, "Autism: a novel form of mercury poisoning," which documents about
100 matching symptoms.
In November 2002, when Andy was 4 and-a-half, tests were done on
Andy's hair, blood, urine and stool samples, and the test results showed
mercury toxicity as well as high levels of copper and other metals, and
various nutritional insufficiencies.
Within 2 weeks of giving Andy supplement including Vitamin B-6, zinc,
manganese and magnesium, he showed drastic improvements in mood, behavior
and abilities, Nancy says.
"We had an almost-normal Christmas," she reported, "without tantrums
and bizarre behavior."
The Hokkenans estimate that their insurance company was billed about
$100,000 for therapy to treat autism. "However, we never noticed any drastic
improvement until we began biomedical treatment, which has cost about
$2,000," Nancy says.
"Strangely," she notes, "our insurance company wouldn't cover the
costs of those medical tests."


because they knew they were bogus

Nancy says that since public health officials realized their error of
failing to keep track of the toxic mercury levels in vaccines in 1999, she
views the failure to restrict the use of mercury in vaccines as a form of
fatal entrenchment -- "when an unhealthy practice or norm is allowed to
continue, she explained, "simply because it has been done that way for so
long."
In addition to all the other side effects associated with ADHD drugs,
Dr David Stein, author of "Unraveling the ADD/ADHD Fiasco," says stimulant
drugs are "near the top of the heap of potentially addictive drugs."
He says, "we have no way of knowing which child has a potential risk
for becoming addicted to drugs."


But provides not a scintilla of proof. Just opinion.

Recent studies have shown that more and more students are using the
drugs illegally. In 2004, a nationwide University of Michigan study on
non-medical use of amphetamines, found 4.9% of 8th graders had used
stimulants in the previous year, 8.5% of 10th graders had used the drugs,
and one in 10 seniors admitted to non-medical use of amphetamines.
The Partnership for a Drug Free America, released the results of a
survey in 2005, that polled more than 7,300 teenagers, and found one in 10
teenagers, or 2.3 million young people, had tried ADHD drugs without a
doctor's prescription, and that 29% of those surveyed said they had close
friends who had abused the drugs.
Experts agree that the wide-spread prescribing of stimulants will lead
many children down the path to addiction and they warn of the perils that
will follow.


Other experts, who study this, disagree.

"Psychology and psychiatry have extremely poor track records for
treating abuse and addiction problems," Dr Stein notes, "and therefore the
very drugs they are recommending can trigger a problem from which there may
be no return."
If medical professionals begin telling children at a very young age
that they can change the way they think, feel, and behave by simply taking a
pill, they will logically continue to take drugs in attempt to mood-alter
whenever they have problems in life.

(Evelyn Pringle is a columnist for Independent Media TV and an investigative
journalist focused on exposing corruption in government)


Evelyn Dingle is a shill for a class action law firm referral service.

Public Service Announcement to the Reader:

AUTISM IS TREATABLE.
Consult these sources:

. Autism Research Institute
http://www.autismwebsite.com/ari/index.htm

. Generation Rescue
http://www.generationrescue.org








  #5  
Old April 10th 06, 06:30 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,sci.med,uk.people.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Kids On ADHD Drugs - Dangerous Path To Addiction

FACT: Mark Probert IS lying Again.

"Mark Probert" LYING again...
john wrote:
Kids On ADHD Drugs - Dangerous Path To Addiction

By Evelyn Pringle
http://www.sierratimes.com/06/04/08/75_8_36_9_51180.htm


Weird article, gives only opinions, no facts, to prove the headline.


FACT:

Experts say the stimulant drugs prescribed for the treatment of
ADHD are not only dangerous, they are highly addictive. And although no
drug has been approved for the treatment of autism, drugs are routinely
prescribed off-label to treat autistic children.


FACT:

According to the National Center for Health Statistics, over the
period of 5 years between 1997 and 2002, the number of children between
the age of 3 to 17, diagnosed with ADHD went from 3.3 million to 4.4
million.
In direct correlation, the number of children prescribed ADHD drugs

also rose steadily. In fact, spending on these types of medications for
children is now higher than spending on antibiotics and asthma drugs. In
February 2006, the FDA revealed that between 1999 and 2003, seventy-eight
million prescriptions for ADHD drugs were written for children between
the ages of 1 to 18. Terry Davis, a member of an FDA advisory committee,
has said prescriptions for ADHD drugs filled annually have a value of
$3.1 billion.
According to Dr Peter Breggin, author of "Talking Back To Ritalin,
"parents and teachers and even doctors have been badly misled by drug
company marketing practices," he warns. "Drug companies have targeted
children as a big market likely to boost profits and children are
suffering as a result."
What critics say is most alarming, is the fact that very young
children are being placed on drugs. A study published in the Journal of
the American Medical Association in 2000 provides some insight into this
trend. The study found that fifty-seven percent of 223 Michigan Medicaid
patients younger than 4, diagnosed with ADHD, received at least one
psychotropic drug during a 15-month period in 1995 to 1996.
Additionally, the study found that in the Medicaid population in
Midwestern states, there was a 3-fold increase in the prescribing of
stimulant drugs between 1991 and 1995 for children between the age of 2
and four.



FACT: (WHILE MARK PROBERT CALLED *ME* A LIAR, when I posted this was
happening....)

More recent statistics show a 369% increase in spending on ADHD
drugs for children under five. From 2000 to 2003, the rise in the use of
attention deficit drugs by children under 5 contributed to an overall 23%
increase for all children, according to an analysis by the nation's
largest prescription benefit manager, Medco Health Solutions.



The debate over the drugging of children in this country has been
raging on for years. Schools have been accused of promoting the use of
drugs to control normal but active children. At a September 26, 2002,
Reform Committee hearing on the "Overmedication of Hyperactive Children,"
Chairman, Rep Dan Burton (R-IN), asked pediatrician, Dr Mary Ann Block,
"what have you found that the schools do specifically to encourage the
use of medications for attention and behavior?"
Dr Block said, "parents that come to me report consistently that
the teachers and the principals and even the school nurses pressure them
to go to a physician and get their child labeled and drugged."
"Some schools," she said, "are giving lectures to parents, inviting
parents to come hear talks about diagnosing and drugging their children
for ADHD."
Congressman Burton pointed out what he considered to be inadequate
and unscientific methods of diagnosing ADHD:
"When you take your child to a doctor, instead of blood tests and a
thorough medical evaluation, you have a conversation with a doctor about
the school's checklist. And you leave a few minutes later with a
prescription for your young child for a psychotropic drug."
"Did the doctor test your child for a thyroid disorder? Did your
doctor test your child for a heavy metal toxicity? Did you doctor talk to
you about your child's allergies?
"Did your doctor even mention nutrition or possible food
sensitivity? Did your doctor ask if your child's IQ had been tested and
if he was gifted? Probably not," he said.
Sandra Lucas testifies at FDA advisory committee hearings on behalf
of the Citizens Commission on Human Rights, a psychiatric watchdog group.


The front group for the Kriminal Kult of $cientology.


FACT: psychiatric watchdog group


She
produced a copy of a January 20, 2005, pamphlet used at a training
seminar for teachers composed by Susan Barton, who billed herself as the
"Founder of Bright Solutions for Dyslexia," located in San Jose
California.
Under Medication for ADD, Ms Barton states: "Medication is the most
often an essential component to effective treatment for the ADD child."
"As I've said many times now," she told the teaches, "ADD is a
neurobiological disorder and needs to be treated as such."
Ms Barton also says that without medication, other interventions
are ineffective, and claims: "This medication does not cause illegal drug
use or addiction."


Ms. Barton is right.


*In your opinion*

Dr Fred Baughman, author of "The ADHD Fraud - How Psychiatry Makes
Patients of Normal Children," and one of the nation's leading experts on
the issue, vehemently disagrees. He calls the medical practice of ADHD a
fraud - "one in which the FDA was fully complicit," he says.
"ADHD doesn't exist--it is not a physical abnormality," he
explains, "and as such bears no risk of causing physical injury or death
as does every drug used in its treatment," he says.
In testimony on behalf of the International Center for the Study of
Psychiatry and Psychology, at the March 22 and 23, 2006, FDA advisory
committee hearings on the dangers of ADHD drugs, Dr Baughman asked the
panel of experts to "give us the reference, cite to the article, giving
proof that ADHD is a disease."
He also asked the committee to give the reference, or cite the
literature, that describes the test that provides objective evidence that
children diagnosed with ADHD have a disease.
The silence in the hearing room was deafening. According to Dr
Baughman, no one answered the questions because there is no study, test,
or scientific literature to back up the assertion that ADHD is a disease.
"ADHD is not a disease," Dr Baughman says. "This being the case,"
he maintains, "giving such drugs for ADHD is not "help" or "treatment"."
He makes the point "that all practice of medicine begins with
diagnosis."
"Informed consent," Dr Baughman explained, "demands not just a
description of the drugs or surgery to be used but of the condition they
are to be used on--its prognosis and how that natural course/prognosis is
likely to be altered by the treatments to be applied."


Dr. Baughman is affiliated with the $cientologists.


In testimony on behalf of the International Center for the Study of
Psychiatry and Psychology, at the March 22 and 23, 2006, FDA advisory
committee hearings on the dangers of ADHD drugs, Dr Baughman asked the
panel of experts to "give us the reference, cite to the article, giving
proof that ADHD is a disease."
He also asked the committee to give the reference, or cite the
literature, that describes the test that provides objective evidence that
children diagnosed with ADHD have a disease.
The silence in the hearing room was deafening. According to Dr
Baughman, no one answered the questions because there is no study, test,
or scientific literature to back up the assertion that ADHD is a disease.


Mark can NOT answer it either....

At the March 2006, FDA advisory committee hearings, it was noted
that no other countries are drugging children with stimulants. In fact,
psychiatrist, Dr Grace Jackson, who also testified at the hearing,
explains in her book, "Rethinking Psychiatric Drugs," how in 1996 and
1997, the World Health Organization issued press releases about the rise
in the use of the stimulant, Ritalin, in this country, "noting that the
United States was responsible for 90% of the drug's production and
consumption."
At the time, the International Narcotics Control Board identified a
number of concerns about America's use of the drug, including the dangers
of: "inappropriate diagnosis of ADHD; widely divergent prescribing
patterns; off-label prescribing to children under six; and excessive
duration of treatment," Dr Jackson reports.
A report by the FDA released in February 2006, said that between
1999 and 2003, there were 25 deaths in persons using ADHD drugs,
including the deaths of 19 children. The FDA also reported receiving more
than 50 cases of cardiovascular problems, including stoke, heart attack,
hypertension, palpitations and arrhythmia.
Because only between 1 and 10% of adverse events are ever reported
to the FDA, the numbers above represent an extreme understatement of
actual cases of harm, critics point out.
According to the Drug Abuse Warning Network, there were only 271
Ritalin-related emergency room visits in 1990, but there were 1,478
Ritalin-related emergency visits recorded in 2001.
In 1999, the National Institute of Drug Abuse, found some 165
Ritalin-related poison calls in Detroit and 419 cases in Texas. Of the
nearly 600 calls, only 114 cases involved intentional misuse or abuse.
Dr Breggin maintains that ADHD drugs actually bring on the symptoms
they are supposed to treat such as hyperactivity, impulsivity and
inattention, which can lead to a vicious cycle of incorrect and dangerous
dosage increases, he warns.
In addition, Dr Breggin says, stimulants can cause "agitation and
irritability, anger, hostility, disinhibition, hypomania and mania."
A recent review of data by the FDA seems to verify Dr Breggins
assertions. The FDA found that children on ADHD drugs had an increased
the risk of psychosis, a mental disorder characterized by the inability
to distinguish between real and imaginary events. The most important
finding, the FDA said, was that signs of psychosis or mania, particularly
hallucinations, occurred in patients with no risk factors, at the usual
doses of any of the drugs used to treat ADHD.
The FDA found a "substantial portion of the psychosis-related cases
were reported to occur in children 10 years or less," an age group which
does not typically suffer from psychosis, the FDA said.
From January 2000, through June 30, 2005, FDA identified nearly
1,000 reports of psychosis or mania possibly linked to the drugs,
including Ritalin, Adderall, Concerta, and Strattera.
Most of people who have investigated the matter seem to agree that
heavy metal poisoning is by far the most likely cause of the epidemic in
autism spectrum disorders that erupted in the 1990s. Studies show that
the mercury-based preservative, thimerosal, that was used in all
childhood vaccines until recently, is the likely culprit.
Beginning in the late 1980s, the CDC began adding more and more
vaccines to the immunization schedule but failed to keep track of the
toxic levels of mercury that children would receive as each new shot was
added to the list or the amount of mercury that infants would receive
when 3-in-one shots were injected.
Nancy and Tim Hokkanen are the parents of Andy, a 6 year-old boy
who was diagnosed with autism but who is now recovering from mercury
poisoning. In June 2002 a neurologist prescribed Adderal for Andy.
"My son became psychotic," Nancy said, "for four days by
mid-afternoon he had to be held down in a dark quiet room while he
screamed himself limp."
Next the neurologist prescribed Ritalin, saying, "Usually if one
drug doesn't work, the other one does," Nancy continued.
"My instincts told me that this was another disaster in the
making," she said, "so I quit seeing that neurologist and began reading
studies."
Nancy discovered the theory of mercury poisoning published by
chemistry experts, Boyd Haley, PhD and Andrew Hall Cutler, PhD, in the
study, "Autism: a novel form of mercury poisoning," which documents about
100 matching symptoms.
In November 2002, when Andy was 4 and-a-half, tests were done on
Andy's hair, blood, urine and stool samples, and the test results showed
mercury toxicity as well as high levels of copper and other metals, and
various nutritional insufficiencies.
Within 2 weeks of giving Andy supplement including Vitamin B-6,
zinc, manganese and magnesium, he showed drastic improvements in mood,
behavior and abilities, Nancy says.
"We had an almost-normal Christmas," she reported, "without
tantrums and bizarre behavior."
The Hokkenans estimate that their insurance company was billed
about $100,000 for therapy to treat autism. "However, we never noticed
any drastic improvement until we began biomedical treatment, which has
cost about $2,000," Nancy says.
"Strangely," she notes, "our insurance company wouldn't cover the
costs of those medical tests."


because they knew they were bogus


W R O N G!

Tests PROVED IT!

Nancy says that since public health officials realized their error
of failing to keep track of the toxic mercury levels in vaccines in 1999,
she views the failure to restrict the use of mercury in vaccines as a
form of fatal entrenchment -- "when an unhealthy practice or norm is
allowed to continue, she explained, "simply because it has been done that
way for so long."
In addition to all the other side effects associated with ADHD
drugs, Dr David Stein, author of "Unraveling the ADD/ADHD Fiasco," says
stimulant drugs are "near the top of the heap of potentially addictive
drugs."
He says, "we have no way of knowing which child has a potential
risk for becoming addicted to drugs."


But provides not a scintilla of proof. Just opinion.


BLATANT LIE.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi...document_id=20...

Millions have misused ADHD stimulant drugs, study says


By Shankar Vedantam
The Washington Post


WASHINGTON - More than 7 million Americans are estimated to have misused
stimulant drugs meant to treat attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and
substantial numbers of teen-agers and young adults appear to show signs of
addiction, according to a comprehensive national analysis tracking such
abuse.


The statistics are striking because many young people recreationally using
these drugs are seeking to boost academic and professional performance,
doctors say.


Although the drugs may allow people to stay awake longer and finish work
faster, scientists who published a new study concluded that about 1.6
million teen-agers and young adults had misused these stimulants during a
12-month period and that 75,000 showed signs of addiction.


The study published online this month in the journal Drug and Alcohol
Dependence culled data from a 2002 national survey of about 67,000
households.


The data paint a concrete and sobering picture of what many experts have
worried about for years, and present ethical and medical challenges for a
country where mental performance is highly valued and where the number of
prescriptions for these drugs has doubled every five years, said Nora
Volkow, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse.


"We live in a highly competitive society, and you want to get the top grades
and you know your colleagues are taking stimulants and you feel pressured,"
she said. "Yes, you are going to study better in the middle of the night if
you take one of these medications. The problem is a certain percentage of
people become addicted to them, and some have toxic effects."


Volkow said it was impossible to disentangle the skyrocketing prescriptions
of drugs for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder from the risks of
diversion and abuse.


"As a child, you have multiple friends who are being treated with stimulant
medications," she said. "You get the sense that these are good."


Studies have shown that the drugs are highly effective, especially among
children, and also that they reduce the risk of substance abuse among those
correctly diagnosed with the psychiatric disorder, which is characterized by
inattention and unruly behavior. Untreated ADHD has also been associated
with conduct and academic problems.


At the same time, there have been growing concerns that the drugs are
over-prescribed. A Food and Drug Administration panel earlier this month
warned that the medications carried risks of rare, but serious,
cardiovascular problems, and it recommended that the agency place serious
"black box" warnings on the drugs, as a way to restrain spiraling
prescriptions.


Lawrence Diller, a pediatrician in Walnut Creek, Calif., who prescribes the
drugs but is worried about their overuse, said that the new study showed the
real health concerns are with diversion and abuse, not with rare side
effects. "Seventy-five thousand addicts to prescription stimulants is much
more troublesome than the 100 to 200 adults who have strokes," he said.
"Houston, we have got a problem because we are just in the middle of this
epidemic."


The study found that men and women were equally likely to be misusing the
drugs, but that women seemed to be at greater risk of dependence -
characterized by a lack of control, physical need and growing tolerance for
the drug - while men seemed to be at greater risk of abuse, in which the
medication was used in dangerous situations, said lead author Larry Kroutil,
who studies health behavior and education at RTI International, a nonprofit
research group.


To obtain their findings, Kroutil and a team of researchers culled data from
a 2002 national survey conducted by the federal government's Substance Abuse
and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). H. Westley Clark,
director of SAMHSA's Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, said the 2002
data were obtained through face-to-face interviews. RTI has not yet culled
data from subsequent years regarding the misuse of ADHD drugs.


Since then, prescription rates and the popularity of various drugs have
changed, and Kroutil said continuing research is needed to track the
phenomenon. Clark noted that data from 2003 suggested that the problem of
stimulant misuse was greater among young adults 18 to 25 years old than
among teen-agers.


The RTI study was paid for by Eli Lilly and Co., which makes the
non-stimulant ADHD drug Strattera. Although non-stimulant treatments such as
Strattera were an option for ADHD patients, they were often not as potent as
stimulant drugs, Volkow said.


Both Volkow and Scott Kollins, who heads Duke University's ADHD program,
said the full range of ADHD drugs is a valuable tool. But Kollins said the
study brought home what he has seen anecdotally: A colleague who visited his
college-age son's fraternity was mobbed by requests for Adderall
prescriptions by youngsters seeking to boost academic performance.


"If I took Ritalin, I would probably stay up longer and write my grants
faster," Kollins said. But besides the fact that he did not think this is
right, Kollins said the rare side effects highlighted by the FDA panel meant
people using the drugs for nonmedical purposes were placing themselves at
risk for those adverse events.


Volkow was more blunt: "You are playing roulette," she said. "If you get
addicted, you will not only not get into Harvard, you will not finish high
school."



FACT:

Recent studies have shown that more and more students are using the
drugs illegally. In 2004, a nationwide University of Michigan study on
non-medical use of amphetamines, found 4.9% of 8th graders had used
stimulants in the previous year, 8.5% of 10th graders had used the drugs,
and one in 10 seniors admitted to non-medical use of amphetamines.


FACT:

The Partnership for a Drug Free America, released the results of a
survey in 2005, that polled more than 7,300 teenagers, and found one in
10 teenagers, or 2.3 million young people, had tried ADHD drugs without a
doctor's prescription, and that 29% of those surveyed said they had close
friends who had abused the drugs.
Experts agree that the wide-spread prescribing of stimulants will
lead many children down the path to addiction and they warn of the perils
that will follow.


Other experts, who study this, disagree.

"Psychology and psychiatry have extremely poor track records for
treating abuse and addiction problems," Dr Stein notes, "and therefore
the very drugs they are recommending can trigger a problem from which
there may be no return."


FACT:

If medical professionals begin telling children at a very young age
that they can change the way they think, feel, and behave by simply
taking a pill, they will logically continue to take drugs in attempt to
mood-alter whenever they have problems in life.

FACT:

(Evelyn Pringle is a columnist for Independent Media TV and an
investigative journalist focused on exposing corruption in government)


snip

Public Service Announcement to the Reader:

AUTISM IS TREATABLE.
Consult these sources:

. Autism Research Institute
http://www.autismwebsite.com/ari/index.htm

. Generation Rescue
http://www.generationrescue.org




  #6  
Old April 10th 06, 06:41 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,sci.med,uk.people.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Kids On ADHD Drugs - Dangerous Path To Addiction

Jan Drew wrote:
FACT: Mark Probert IS lying Again.

"Mark Probert" LYING again...


In your dreams.

  #7  
Old April 10th 06, 10:29 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,sci.med,uk.people.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Kids On ADHD Drugs - Dangerous Path To Addiction


"Jan" wrote in message
ups.com...

Jeff wrote:
Actually, ADHD drugs reduce the risk that kids with ADHD will abuse
drugs.

Jeff


Jeff also wrote:

It's good to see the FDA doing it's job.

==

When in FACT.. they were covering up the TRUTH.

==

A recent review of data by the FDA seems to verify Dr Breggins
assertions.


Dr. Breggin is an asshole.


garbage deleted


  #8  
Old April 10th 06, 10:31 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,sci.med,uk.people.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Kids On ADHD Drugs - Dangerous Path To Addiction

"Jan Drew" wrote:

FACT: Mark Probert IS lying Again.

"Mark Probert" LYING again...
john wrote:
Kids On ADHD Drugs - Dangerous Path To Addiction

By Evelyn Pringle
http://www.sierratimes.com/06/04/08/75_8_36_9_51180.htm


Weird article, gives only opinions, no facts, to prove the headline.


FACT:

Experts say the stimulant drugs prescribed for the treatment of
ADHD are not only dangerous, they are highly addictive. And although no
drug has been approved for the treatment of autism, drugs are routinely
prescribed off-label to treat autistic children.


It is indeed a fact, Jan. I agree with you. For example, quacks and
charlatans use EDTA chelation to "treat" autistic children. It does
nothing for autism, of course.

snip bilge
--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
  #9  
Old April 11th 06, 02:47 AM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,sci.med,uk.people.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Kids On ADHD Drugs - Dangerous Path To Addiction


"Peter Bowditch" did his usual:

snip

"Jan Drew" wrote:

FACT: Mark Probert IS lying Again.

"Mark Probert" LYING again...
john wrote:
Kids On ADHD Drugs - Dangerous Path To Addiction

By Evelyn Pringle
http://www.sierratimes.com/06/04/08/75_8_36_9_51180.htm

Weird article, gives only opinions, no facts, to prove the headline.


FACT:

Experts say the stimulant drugs prescribed for the treatment of
ADHD are not only dangerous, they are highly addictive. And although no
drug has been approved for the treatment of autism, drugs are routinely
prescribed off-label to treat autistic children.


FACT:

According to the National Center for Health Statistics, over the
period of 5 years between 1997 and 2002, the number of children between
the age of 3 to 17, diagnosed with ADHD went from 3.3 million to 4.4
million.
In direct correlation, the number of children prescribed ADHD drugs

also rose steadily. In fact, spending on these types of medications for
children is now higher than spending on antibiotics and asthma drugs. In
February 2006, the FDA revealed that between 1999 and 2003, seventy-eight
million prescriptions for ADHD drugs were written for children between
the ages of 1 to 18. Terry Davis, a member of an FDA advisory committee,
has said prescriptions for ADHD drugs filled annually have a value of
$3.1 billion.
According to Dr Peter Breggin, author of "Talking Back To Ritalin,
"parents and teachers and even doctors have been badly misled by drug
company marketing practices," he warns. "Drug companies have targeted
children as a big market likely to boost profits and children are
suffering as a result."
What critics say is most alarming, is the fact that very young
children are being placed on drugs. A study published in the Journal of
the American Medical Association in 2000 provides some insight into this
trend. The study found that fifty-seven percent of 223 Michigan Medicaid
patients younger than 4, diagnosed with ADHD, received at least one
psychotropic drug during a 15-month period in 1995 to 1996.
Additionally, the study found that in the Medicaid population in
Midwestern states, there was a 3-fold increase in the prescribing of
stimulant drugs between 1991 and 1995 for children between the age of 2
and four.



FACT: (WHILE MARK PROBERT CALLED *ME* A LIAR, when I posted this was
happening....)

More recent statistics show a 369% increase in spending on ADHD
drugs for children under five. From 2000 to 2003, the rise in the use of
attention deficit drugs by children under 5 contributed to an overall 23%
increase for all children, according to an analysis by the nation's
largest prescription benefit manager, Medco Health Solutions.



The debate over the drugging of children in this country has been
raging on for years. Schools have been accused of promoting the use of
drugs to control normal but active children. At a September 26, 2002,
Reform Committee hearing on the "Overmedication of Hyperactive Children,"
Chairman, Rep Dan Burton (R-IN), asked pediatrician, Dr Mary Ann Block,
"what have you found that the schools do specifically to encourage the
use of medications for attention and behavior?"
Dr Block said, "parents that come to me report consistently that
the teachers and the principals and even the school nurses pressure them
to go to a physician and get their child labeled and drugged."
"Some schools," she said, "are giving lectures to parents, inviting
parents to come hear talks about diagnosing and drugging their children
for ADHD."
Congressman Burton pointed out what he considered to be inadequate
and unscientific methods of diagnosing ADHD:
"When you take your child to a doctor, instead of blood tests and a
thorough medical evaluation, you have a conversation with a doctor about
the school's checklist. And you leave a few minutes later with a
prescription for your young child for a psychotropic drug."
"Did the doctor test your child for a thyroid disorder? Did your
doctor test your child for a heavy metal toxicity? Did you doctor talk to
you about your child's allergies?
"Did your doctor even mention nutrition or possible food
sensitivity? Did your doctor ask if your child's IQ had been tested and
if he was gifted? Probably not," he said.
Sandra Lucas testifies at FDA advisory committee hearings on behalf
of the Citizens Commission on Human Rights, a psychiatric watchdog group.


The front group for the Kriminal Kult of $cientology.


FACT: psychiatric watchdog group


She
produced a copy of a January 20, 2005, pamphlet used at a training
seminar for teachers composed by Susan Barton, who billed herself as the
"Founder of Bright Solutions for Dyslexia," located in San Jose
California.
Under Medication for ADD, Ms Barton states: "Medication is the most
often an essential component to effective treatment for the ADD child."
"As I've said many times now," she told the teaches, "ADD is a
neurobiological disorder and needs to be treated as such."
Ms Barton also says that without medication, other interventions
are ineffective, and claims: "This medication does not cause illegal drug
use or addiction."


Ms. Barton is right.


*In your opinion*

Dr Fred Baughman, author of "The ADHD Fraud - How Psychiatry Makes
Patients of Normal Children," and one of the nation's leading experts on
the issue, vehemently disagrees. He calls the medical practice of ADHD a
fraud - "one in which the FDA was fully complicit," he says.
"ADHD doesn't exist--it is not a physical abnormality," he
explains, "and as such bears no risk of causing physical injury or death
as does every drug used in its treatment," he says.
In testimony on behalf of the International Center for the Study of
Psychiatry and Psychology, at the March 22 and 23, 2006, FDA advisory
committee hearings on the dangers of ADHD drugs, Dr Baughman asked the
panel of experts to "give us the reference, cite to the article, giving
proof that ADHD is a disease."
He also asked the committee to give the reference, or cite the
literature, that describes the test that provides objective evidence that
children diagnosed with ADHD have a disease.
The silence in the hearing room was deafening. According to Dr
Baughman, no one answered the questions because there is no study, test,
or scientific literature to back up the assertion that ADHD is a disease.
"ADHD is not a disease," Dr Baughman says. "This being the case,"
he maintains, "giving such drugs for ADHD is not "help" or "treatment"."
He makes the point "that all practice of medicine begins with
diagnosis."
"Informed consent," Dr Baughman explained, "demands not just a
description of the drugs or surgery to be used but of the condition they
are to be used on--its prognosis and how that natural course/prognosis is
likely to be altered by the treatments to be applied."


Dr. Baughman is affiliated with the $cientologists.


In testimony on behalf of the International Center for the Study of
Psychiatry and Psychology, at the March 22 and 23, 2006, FDA advisory
committee hearings on the dangers of ADHD drugs, Dr Baughman asked the
panel of experts to "give us the reference, cite to the article, giving
proof that ADHD is a disease."
He also asked the committee to give the reference, or cite the
literature, that describes the test that provides objective evidence that
children diagnosed with ADHD have a disease.
The silence in the hearing room was deafening. According to Dr
Baughman, no one answered the questions because there is no study, test,
or scientific literature to back up the assertion that ADHD is a disease.


Mark can NOT answer it either....

At the March 2006, FDA advisory committee hearings, it was noted
that no other countries are drugging children with stimulants. In fact,
psychiatrist, Dr Grace Jackson, who also testified at the hearing,
explains in her book, "Rethinking Psychiatric Drugs," how in 1996 and
1997, the World Health Organization issued press releases about the rise
in the use of the stimulant, Ritalin, in this country, "noting that the
United States was responsible for 90% of the drug's production and
consumption."
At the time, the International Narcotics Control Board identified a
number of concerns about America's use of the drug, including the dangers
of: "inappropriate diagnosis of ADHD; widely divergent prescribing
patterns; off-label prescribing to children under six; and excessive
duration of treatment," Dr Jackson reports.
A report by the FDA released in February 2006, said that between
1999 and 2003, there were 25 deaths in persons using ADHD drugs,
including the deaths of 19 children. The FDA also reported receiving more
than 50 cases of cardiovascular problems, including stoke, heart attack,
hypertension, palpitations and arrhythmia.
Because only between 1 and 10% of adverse events are ever reported
to the FDA, the numbers above represent an extreme understatement of
actual cases of harm, critics point out.
According to the Drug Abuse Warning Network, there were only 271
Ritalin-related emergency room visits in 1990, but there were 1,478
Ritalin-related emergency visits recorded in 2001.
In 1999, the National Institute of Drug Abuse, found some 165
Ritalin-related poison calls in Detroit and 419 cases in Texas. Of the
nearly 600 calls, only 114 cases involved intentional misuse or abuse.
Dr Breggin maintains that ADHD drugs actually bring on the symptoms
they are supposed to treat such as hyperactivity, impulsivity and
inattention, which can lead to a vicious cycle of incorrect and dangerous
dosage increases, he warns.
In addition, Dr Breggin says, stimulants can cause "agitation and
irritability, anger, hostility, disinhibition, hypomania and mania."
A recent review of data by the FDA seems to verify Dr Breggins
assertions. The FDA found that children on ADHD drugs had an increased
the risk of psychosis, a mental disorder characterized by the inability
to distinguish between real and imaginary events. The most important
finding, the FDA said, was that signs of psychosis or mania, particularly
hallucinations, occurred in patients with no risk factors, at the usual
doses of any of the drugs used to treat ADHD.
The FDA found a "substantial portion of the psychosis-related cases
were reported to occur in children 10 years or less," an age group which
does not typically suffer from psychosis, the FDA said.
From January 2000, through June 30, 2005, FDA identified nearly
1,000 reports of psychosis or mania possibly linked to the drugs,
including Ritalin, Adderall, Concerta, and Strattera.
Most of people who have investigated the matter seem to agree that
heavy metal poisoning is by far the most likely cause of the epidemic in
autism spectrum disorders that erupted in the 1990s. Studies show that
the mercury-based preservative, thimerosal, that was used in all
childhood vaccines until recently, is the likely culprit.
Beginning in the late 1980s, the CDC began adding more and more
vaccines to the immunization schedule but failed to keep track of the
toxic levels of mercury that children would receive as each new shot was
added to the list or the amount of mercury that infants would receive
when 3-in-one shots were injected.
Nancy and Tim Hokkanen are the parents of Andy, a 6 year-old boy
who was diagnosed with autism but who is now recovering from mercury
poisoning. In June 2002 a neurologist prescribed Adderal for Andy.
"My son became psychotic," Nancy said, "for four days by
mid-afternoon he had to be held down in a dark quiet room while he
screamed himself limp."
Next the neurologist prescribed Ritalin, saying, "Usually if one
drug doesn't work, the other one does," Nancy continued.
"My instincts told me that this was another disaster in the
making," she said, "so I quit seeing that neurologist and began reading
studies."
Nancy discovered the theory of mercury poisoning published by
chemistry experts, Boyd Haley, PhD and Andrew Hall Cutler, PhD, in the
study, "Autism: a novel form of mercury poisoning," which documents about
100 matching symptoms.
In November 2002, when Andy was 4 and-a-half, tests were done on
Andy's hair, blood, urine and stool samples, and the test results showed
mercury toxicity as well as high levels of copper and other metals, and
various nutritional insufficiencies.
Within 2 weeks of giving Andy supplement including Vitamin B-6,
zinc, manganese and magnesium, he showed drastic improvements in mood,
behavior and abilities, Nancy says.
"We had an almost-normal Christmas," she reported, "without
tantrums and bizarre behavior."
The Hokkenans estimate that their insurance company was billed
about $100,000 for therapy to treat autism. "However, we never noticed
any drastic improvement until we began biomedical treatment, which has
cost about $2,000," Nancy says.
"Strangely," she notes, "our insurance company wouldn't cover the
costs of those medical tests."


because they knew they were bogus


W R O N G!

Tests PROVED IT!

Nancy says that since public health officials realized their error
of failing to keep track of the toxic mercury levels in vaccines in 1999,
she views the failure to restrict the use of mercury in vaccines as a
form of fatal entrenchment -- "when an unhealthy practice or norm is
allowed to continue, she explained, "simply because it has been done that
way for so long."
In addition to all the other side effects associated with ADHD
drugs, Dr David Stein, author of "Unraveling the ADD/ADHD Fiasco," says
stimulant drugs are "near the top of the heap of potentially addictive
drugs."
He says, "we have no way of knowing which child has a potential
risk for becoming addicted to drugs."


But provides not a scintilla of proof. Just opinion.


BLATANT LIE.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi...document_id=20...

Millions have misused ADHD stimulant drugs, study says


By Shankar Vedantam
The Washington Post


WASHINGTON - More than 7 million Americans are estimated to have misused
stimulant drugs meant to treat attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and
substantial numbers of teen-agers and young adults appear to show signs of
addiction, according to a comprehensive national analysis tracking such
abuse.


The statistics are striking because many young people recreationally using
these drugs are seeking to boost academic and professional performance,
doctors say.


Although the drugs may allow people to stay awake longer and finish work
faster, scientists who published a new study concluded that about 1.6
million teen-agers and young adults had misused these stimulants during a
12-month period and that 75,000 showed signs of addiction.


The study published online this month in the journal Drug and Alcohol
Dependence culled data from a 2002 national survey of about 67,000
households.


The data paint a concrete and sobering picture of what many experts have
worried about for years, and present ethical and medical challenges for a
country where mental performance is highly valued and where the number of
prescriptions for these drugs has doubled every five years, said Nora
Volkow, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse.


"We live in a highly competitive society, and you want to get the top grades
and you know your colleagues are taking stimulants and you feel pressured,"
she said. "Yes, you are going to study better in the middle of the night if
you take one of these medications. The problem is a certain percentage of
people become addicted to them, and some have toxic effects."


Volkow said it was impossible to disentangle the skyrocketing prescriptions
of drugs for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder from the risks of
diversion and abuse.


"As a child, you have multiple friends who are being treated with stimulant
medications," she said. "You get the sense that these are good."


Studies have shown that the drugs are highly effective, especially among
children, and also that they reduce the risk of substance abuse among those
correctly diagnosed with the psychiatric disorder, which is characterized by
inattention and unruly behavior. Untreated ADHD has also been associated
with conduct and academic problems.


At the same time, there have been growing concerns that the drugs are
over-prescribed. A Food and Drug Administration panel earlier this month
warned that the medications carried risks of rare, but serious,
cardiovascular problems, and it recommended that the agency place serious
"black box" warnings on the drugs, as a way to restrain spiraling
prescriptions.


Lawrence Diller, a pediatrician in Walnut Creek, Calif., who prescribes the
drugs but is worried about their overuse, said that the new study showed the
real health concerns are with diversion and abuse, not with rare side
effects. "Seventy-five thousand addicts to prescription stimulants is much
more troublesome than the 100 to 200 adults who have strokes," he said.
"Houston, we have got a problem because we are just in the middle of this
epidemic."


The study found that men and women were equally likely to be misusing the
drugs, but that women seemed to be at greater risk of dependence -
characterized by a lack of control, physical need and growing tolerance for
the drug - while men seemed to be at greater risk of abuse, in which the
medication was used in dangerous situations, said lead author Larry Kroutil,
who studies health behavior and education at RTI International, a nonprofit
research group.


To obtain their findings, Kroutil and a team of researchers culled data from
a 2002 national survey conducted by the federal government's Substance Abuse
and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). H. Westley Clark,
director of SAMHSA's Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, said the 2002
data were obtained through face-to-face interviews. RTI has not yet culled
data from subsequent years regarding the misuse of ADHD drugs.


Since then, prescription rates and the popularity of various drugs have
changed, and Kroutil said continuing research is needed to track the
phenomenon. Clark noted that data from 2003 suggested that the problem of
stimulant misuse was greater among young adults 18 to 25 years old than
among teen-agers.


The RTI study was paid for by Eli Lilly and Co., which makes the
non-stimulant ADHD drug Strattera. Although non-stimulant treatments such as
Strattera were an option for ADHD patients, they were often not as potent as
stimulant drugs, Volkow said.


Both Volkow and Scott Kollins, who heads Duke University's ADHD program,
said the full range of ADHD drugs is a valuable tool. But Kollins said the
study brought home what he has seen anecdotally: A colleague who visited his
college-age son's fraternity was mobbed by requests for Adderall
prescriptions by youngsters seeking to boost academic performance.


"If I took Ritalin, I would probably stay up longer and write my grants
faster," Kollins said. But besides the fact that he did not think this is
right, Kollins said the rare side effects highlighted by the FDA panel meant
people using the drugs for nonmedical purposes were placing themselves at
risk for those adverse events.


Volkow was more blunt: "You are playing roulette," she said. "If you get
addicted, you will not only not get into Harvard, you will not finish high
school."



FACT:

Recent studies have shown that more and more students are using the
drugs illegally. In 2004, a nationwide University of Michigan study on
non-medical use of amphetamines, found 4.9% of 8th graders had used
stimulants in the previous year, 8.5% of 10th graders had used the drugs,
and one in 10 seniors admitted to non-medical use of amphetamines.


FACT:

The Partnership for a Drug Free America, released the results of a
survey in 2005, that polled more than 7,300 teenagers, and found one in
10 teenagers, or 2.3 million young people, had tried ADHD drugs without a
doctor's prescription, and that 29% of those surveyed said they had close
friends who had abused the drugs.
Experts agree that the wide-spread prescribing of stimulants will
lead many children down the path to addiction and they warn of the perils
that will follow.


Other experts, who study this, disagree.

"Psychology and psychiatry have extremely poor track records for
treating abuse and addiction problems," Dr Stein notes, "and therefore
the very drugs they are recommending can trigger a problem from which
there may be no return."


FACT:

If medical professionals begin telling children at a very young age
that they can change the way they think, feel, and behave by simply
taking a pill, they will logically continue to take drugs in attempt to
mood-alter whenever they have problems in life.

FACT:

(Evelyn Pringle is a columnist for Independent Media TV and an
investigative journalist focused on exposing corruption in government)


snip

Public Service Announcement to the Reader:

AUTISM IS TREATABLE.
Consult these sources:

. Autism Research Institute
http://www.autismwebsite.com/ari/index.htm

. Generation Rescue
http://www.generationrescue.org





  #10  
Old April 11th 06, 06:03 AM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,sci.med,uk.people.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Kids On ADHD Drugs - Dangerous Path To Addiction

"Jan Drew" wrote:


"Jeff" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Jan" wrote in message
ups.com...

Jeff wrote:
Actually, ADHD drugs reduce the risk that kids with ADHD will abuse
drugs.

Jeff

Jeff also wrote:

It's good to see the FDA doing it's job.

==

When in FACT.. they were covering up the TRUTH.

==

A recent review of data by the FDA seems to verify Dr Breggins
assertions.


Dr. Breggin is an asshole.


Temper...Temper...Jeff.

Restoring the truth:


And here is all that was left after Jan restored the truth:
--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
misc.kids FAQ on Good things about having kids [email protected] Info and FAQ's 0 November 18th 05 06:35 AM
misc.kids FAQ on Good things about having kids [email protected] Info and FAQ's 0 August 30th 05 05:25 AM
Experiment shows medical doctors to be glorified drug dealers, easily manipulated by drug companies Ilena Rose Kids Health 16 August 3rd 05 01:12 AM
misc.kids FAQ on Good things about having kids [email protected] Info and FAQ's 0 December 29th 04 06:26 AM
misc.kids FAQ on Good things about having kids [email protected] Info and FAQ's 0 March 18th 04 10:12 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.