Elimination of mercury

"Peter Bowditch" wrote in message
...

Joe Mercola has a page blaming fluoridation for autism. Of course, he
also has another page blaming mercury and yet another blaming, wait
for it, pasteurised milk. But what else would you expect from him -
consistency?
--

You consistently state the same bull**** --that autism couldn't be caused
by more than one thing

wrote in message
ups.com...

john wrote:
LOL. Get the facts
http://www.crazyperson.to/IDon'tUnderstandScience.html

If by fact you mean the crazy rambling of people who don't understand
science, can't form a cogent argument, and address studies that prove
them wrong.... then yes there are lots of facts there.

Eric


LOL. Dr. Boyd Haley, Professor and Chair, Dept. of Chemistry, University of
Kentucky and one of the world's leading authorities on mercury toxicity.

I think that the biological case against Thimerosal is so dramatically
overwhelming anymore that only a very foolish or a very dishonest person
with the credentials to understand this research would say that Thimerosal
wasn't most likely the cause of autism.---Interview of Dr. Boyd E. Haley by
Teri Small: http://www.whale.to/v/haley_q.html

wrote in message
ups.com...

john wrote:
LOL. Get the facts
http://www.crazyperson.to/IDon'tUnderstandScience.html

If by fact you mean the crazy rambling of people who don't understand
science, can't form a cogent argument, and address studies that prove
them wrong.... then yes there are lots of facts there.

Eric


It's really very simple Eric, see if you can follow this:

Deadly Mercury

Courtesy of www.healthmyths.net
By Shane Ellison, M.Sc., Ex-Drug Chemist

Mercury is a neuro/nephrotoxin. The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) insists that the upper limit for mercury exposure is
0.1ug/kg/day and the World Health Organization (WHO)
0.47ug/kg/day. At this exposure humans experience negative
central nervous system (CNS) effects such as tremors, mood
changes, shyness and slowed sensory and nerve function. Long term
damage is possible.


By the liberal WHO standards, this upper limit equates to 2.13ug
(0.45ug by EPA standards) for a 10lb baby. According to the Food
and Drug Administration a single vaccine can deliver a whopping
25.0ug of mercury! This amount is 11 times (55 times by EPA
standards) the safe upper limit for our vulnerable 10lb baby!
Based on these figures, children of any weight and even adults are
being poisoned when administered a single mercury latent influenza
vaccine.


The universal language of math communicates the real and present
danger associated with the influenza vaccine. Administering it
goes against the "First do no Harm" vow in medicine.

Gambling with our children's (or our own) health is not necessary.
Their well-being rests in proper hygiene and nutrition (Iron,
zinc, folate, whey isolate and the vitamins C, E, B6 and B12).
This simplistic notion escapes most "intellects" and is rarely
discussed among the pharmaceutically-compliant media.


Shane Ellison, M.Sc.

"john" wrote:


wrote in message
oups.com...

john wrote:
LOL. Get the facts
http://www.crazyperson.to/IDon'tUnderstandScience.html

If by fact you mean the crazy rambling of people who don't understand
science, can't form a cogent argument, and address studies that prove
them wrong.... then yes there are lots of facts there.

Eric


LOL. Dr. Boyd Haley, Professor and Chair, Dept. of Chemistry, University of
Kentucky and one of the world's leading authorities on mercury toxicity.

That would be the Boyd Haley that told me that ethylmercury could be
considered to be the same chemical as methylmercury. It would also be
the Boyd Haley that told me that the proportion of the molecular
weight of a compound made up by one of the elements had something to
do with transferring the properties of the element to the compound. In
other words, that would be the Boyd Haley who probably knew something
about chemistry once (he did get an academic job in the area) but has
either forgotten it all or is prepared to lie.

And let's not forget that that would be the Boyd Haley who called
autism "mad child disease".



I think that the biological case against Thimerosal is so dramatically
overwhelming anymore that only a very foolish or a very dishonest person
with the credentials to understand this research would say that Thimerosal
wasn't most likely the cause of autism.---Interview of Dr. Boyd E. Haley by
Teri Small: http://www.whale.to/v/haley_q.html


Joe Mercola disagrees with him.
--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

"john" wrote:


"Peter Bowditch" wrote in message
.. .

Joe Mercola has a page blaming fluoridation for autism. Of course, he
also has another page blaming mercury and yet another blaming, wait
for it, pasteurised milk. But what else would you expect from him -
consistency?
--

You consistently state the same bull**** --that autism couldn't be caused
by more than one thing


Well, which is it? In each case, Mercola says that it is THE cause. Is
he lying? What else does he lie about?

And I have never said that autism can't be caused by more than one
thing. It could be caused by more than one gene, for example. It's
just not caused by one of or any combination of fluoridation,
vaccination or pasteurisation.
--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

Peter Bowditch wrote:
"john" wrote:


wrote in message
oups.com...

john wrote:
LOL. Get the facts
http://www.crazyperson.to/IDon'tUnderstandScience.html

If by fact you mean the crazy rambling of people who don't understand
science, can't form a cogent argument, and address studies that prove
them wrong.... then yes there are lots of facts there.

Eric


LOL. Dr. Boyd Haley, Professor and Chair, Dept. of Chemistry, University of
Kentucky and one of the world's leading authorities on mercury toxicity.

That would be the Boyd Haley that told me that ethylmercury could be
considered to be the same chemical as methylmercury. It would also be
the Boyd Haley that told me that the proportion of the molecular
weight of a compound made up by one of the elements had something to
do with transferring the properties of the element to the compound. In
other words, that would be the Boyd Haley who probably knew something
about chemistry once (he did get an academic job in the area) but has
either forgotten it all or is prepared to lie.

The Boyd Haley whose evidence was dismissed by the courts because he
wasn't qualified to speak about autism, and his opinion that thimerosal
causes autism was not an "expert opinion", but a "strong belief". Pfui.


And let's not forget that that would be the Boyd Haley who called
autism "mad child disease".

Yes, that certainly adds weight to the decision that he's not qualified
to offer opinions about autism.

Cathy




I think that the biological case against Thimerosal is so dramatically
overwhelming anymore that only a very foolish or a very dishonest person
with the credentials to understand this research would say that Thimerosal
wasn't most likely the cause of autism.---Interview of Dr. Boyd E. Haley by
Teri Small: http://www.whale.to/v/haley_q.html


Joe Mercola disagrees with him.
--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

Mark Probert wrote:
Since the mercury has been eliminated by natural means, just what are
those CHEATlators chelating?

Calcium mostly. It's killed a few people through hypocalcenemia...

Bryan

Bryan Heit wrote:
Mark Probert wrote:
Since the mercury has been eliminated by natural means, just what are
those CHEATlators chelating?

Calcium mostly. It's killed a few people through hypocalcenemia...

Hmmm...and, of course, the patient's money.

Peter Bowditch wrote:
wrote:

Mark Probert wrote:

Clearly, the claim by the Mercury Militia that it accumulates after each
vaccination is not supported by this research. Ethyl Mercury, the
byproduct of thimerosal metabolism is eliminated rapidly, and is gone
before the next vaccination.

Shhhhhhh, your gonna ruin a perfectly good conspiracy. Next thing you
know they will be blaming it on sunspots, florination of the water, or
inorganic farming.

Eric

Joe Mercola has a page blaming fluoridation for autism. Of course, he
also has another page blaming mercury and yet another blaming, wait
for it, pasteurised milk. But what else would you expect from him -
consistency?

Mercola's consistency is homeopathic.

john wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
john wrote:
LOL. Get the facts
http://www.crazyperson.to/IDon'tUnderstandScience.html
If by fact you mean the crazy rambling of people who don't understand
science, can't form a cogent argument, and address studies that prove
them wrong.... then yes there are lots of facts there.

Eric


LOL. Dr. Boyd Haley, Professor and Chair, Dept. of Chemistry, University of
Kentucky and one of the world's leading authorities on mercury toxicity.

I think that the biological case against Thimerosal is so dramatically
overwhelming anymore that only a very foolish or a very dishonest person
with the credentials to understand this research would say that Thimerosal
wasn't most likely the cause of autism.---Interview of Dr. Boyd E. Haley by
Teri Small: http://www.whale.to/v/haley_q.html

It is truly sad when a person of Haley's education and experience tries
to support his theories by claiming that the fact that the one mercury
atom in thimerosal comprising 49% of the molecular weight actually has
some form of meaning.

Further, Haley was recently toss on his tushy by a district court judge
who found that his opinions do not meet the Daubert standard.