If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Gut flora
On 9/27/10 7:53 AM, carole wrote:
wrote in message ... On 9/27/10 5:25 AM, carole wrote: Wrong again. Blood purity and lack of toxins (orthopathic definition) is what helps the immune system. Blood purity can be achieved by proper nutrition and help prevent against all sorts of microbes, harmful bacteria, fungi and parasites. You're talking about dumbed-down allopathic medicine ...I'm talking alternative medicine. You don't know what you're talking about at all. Alternative medicine is conjecture-based medicine (con-med) by definition. There is no evidence for it. Wrong again dr not doc. Once we get real medicine, the importance of nutritional cures will be acknowledged. The importance of nutritional cures has already been acknowledged. For real vitamin deficiencies, protein deficiencies, etc., a proper diet reverses those deficiencies. However, for treating other diseases, nutritional cures don't work. If they do work, show us the science. The problem is dr no doc I have developed my thinking through alternative avenues and my own experience. No help whatsoever from your "scientific sources". You've got that right, although I wouldn't call what you do, "thinking." And you're right about not developing it through scientific sources. Instead, you developed it through unreliable, unproven sources. But you want me to change my whole orientation and begin to give you scientific evidence. Gee, you're posting to sci.med, short for science.medicine. That should give you a hint that using science is appropriate in the newsgroup. If scientific evidence worked for me I wouldn't have had to figure out all my health solutions out for myself. That's a stupid comment. You've no clue about science or medicine. I have spent years working this stuff out and have come to the conclusion that scientific medicine is geared to suit the pharmaceutical business with disease rather than cure anybody of anything. Yes, there are some good people working in the system is hopelessly broken and corrupt. You're wrong. There is no better way than science to understand how the body works or nature works. So what I have figured out so far is that the soil theory is more important than the germ theory, homeopathy, nutritional remedies and detoxing are good. Yeap, you just demonstrated you have no clue. Giving water (homeopathy) to cure a disease doesn't work. Nor do "soil theory," "nutritional remedies" or "detoxing" work. They are good for the liars selling them. Nutritional remedies can cure disease from microbes, bacteria, fungi and parasites. No, it can't. Scientific evidence is a skeptic tool, designed to screen out anything not approved by the pharmaceutical cartel. No, scientific evidence is a science designed to screen out things that don't work or are not true. Not the dumbed-down crap that treats deficiency diseases with drugs and waits until diseases reach crisis stage before being able to offer a solution. Please describe what these "deficiency diseases" are, give some examples, and explain how the nutritional cures work. Don't forget to back your claims with science. One deficiency disease is underarm odour which is a deficiency of silica. That is a stupid statement. Silica is also beneficial for bone growth and arterial health, amongst other things. Silica is harmful and can cause inflamation if inside the body. It is not absorbed by the body. Therefore underarm odour is indication of a health problem. Go walk into a middle school or a high school after gym. If what you say, the entire gym class would be about to die. Jeff |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|