Hepatitis B Vaccine: An Unmitigated Disaster By J.B. Handley

ttp://www.ageofautism.com/2009/10/hepatitis-b-vaccine-an-unmitigated-disaster-.html


October 09, 2009



Hepatitis B Vaccine: An Unmitigated Disaster By J.B. Handley

As most readers of AoA know, the Hep B vaccine was added to the CDC's
childhood immunization schedule in the early 1990s, requires four doses
before a child is eighteen months old, and is the only vaccine on the CDC's
schedule that is recommended to be given on an infant's first day of life.

What else do we know about this vaccine? Quite a bit, actually. In no
particular order:

1) A recent study published in the journal Neurotoxicology called "Delayed
Acquisition of Neonatal Reflexes in Newborn Primates Receiving a
Thimerosal-containing Hepatitis B Vaccine: Influence of Gestational Age and
Birth Weight" found that monkeys who received a Hepatitis B vaccine on the
first day of life experienced a significant delay in survival reflexes
versus monkeys who received a placebo.

2) A recent study published in the journal the Annals of Epidemiology titled
"Hepatitis B Vaccination of Male Neonates and Autism" found that "Boys who
received the hepatitis B vaccine during the first month of life had 2.94
greater odds for ASD [autism] compared to later- or unvaccinated boys."

3) A recent study published in the journal Neurology called "Hepatitis B
vaccine and the risk of CNS inflammatory demyelination in childhood" found
that the Engerix B vaccine for Hep B (the one my son received) appears to
increase the risk of central nervous system inflammatory demyelination.

4) A recent study published in Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry
titled "Hepatitis B triple series vaccine and developmental disability in US
children aged 1-9 years" stated "the odds of receiving EIS [special
education services] were approximately nine times as great for vaccinated
boys as for unvaccinated boys after adjustment for confounders. This study
found statistically significant evidence to suggest that boys in United
States who were vaccinated with the triple series Hepatitis B vaccine,
during the time period in which vaccines were manufactured with thimerosal,
were more susceptible to developmental disability than were unvaccinated
boys."

5) In 2002, the Institute of Medicine (which I personally believe is a
corrupt agent of the vaccine industry but many believe is the final word on
medical issues) published a study titled, "Immunization Safety Review:
Hepatitis B Vaccine and Demyelinating Neurological Disorders" in which they
reached the following non-conclusion: "Additionally, the committee found
that the epidemiological evidence favors rejection of a causal relationship
between the hepatitis B vaccine in adults and multiple sclerosis. However,
the evidence was inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship
between the hepatitis B vaccine and all other demyelinating conditions."
(Author's note: If you're a vaccine, and you can't get an "all clear" from
the vaccine-loving IOM, you're in big trouble.")

6) Generation Rescue analyzed the vaccine schedules of 30 first-world
countries. 60%, or 18 countries, have Hep B vaccine on their schedule. That
means 12 countries, or 40% of the countries, DO NOT require the Hep B
vaccine, despite the fact that it has been readily available for 19 years.
Of countries that do require Hep B vaccine, we could only find a few Eastern
European countries like Bulgaria and Latvia who also give the shot to babies
on the first day of life. Many other countries appear to pursue a more
balanced approach to Hep B vaccine, here are some direct quotes from country
vaccination schedules.
a.. Italy: "Hepatitis B vaccine is administered at birth only to children
born to HBsAg + mothers. Otherwise immunisation starts at 3 months of age."
b.. Finland: "Hepatitis B vaccine is given only to infants of HbsAg
c.. carrier mothers or fathers at the age of 0, 1, 2 and 12 months."
d.. Denmark: "Vaccination against hepatitis B is recommended to children
of HBsAg-positive mothers starting at birth with both hepatitis B
immunoglobulin and one dose of HepB."
e.. Norway: "HepB is recommended for risk groups only."
f.. Sweden: "HepB is only recommended to children considered high-risk
groups. Vaccination is given at birth to infants of mothers positive for
hepatitis B."
g.. The Netherlands: "Only for children born to HBsAg positive mothers."

The Hepatitis B vaccine addition to the U.S. vaccination schedule for
children is a wildly destructive disaster for seemingly little benefit to
public health. The science proving what a disaster it is will keep coming.

I'd like to wrap this piece up with two remarkable statements from a very
courageous father, Michael Belkin, who lost his infant daughter to a
Hepatitis B vaccine. And, it's not only this dad's command of the facts that
makes his statements remarkable, it's also because these statements were
delivered in public, to both the Advisory Committee on Immunization
Practices, the very group that added Hep B to our schedule, and the U.S.
Congress, TEN YEARS AGO:

Statement #1:

TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL BELKIN BEFORE THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IMMUNIZATION
PRACTICES -- CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (February 17,
1999) -- Atlanta Georgia

My name is Michael Belkin. I am a father, businessman, former quantitative
strategist at Salomon Brothers, and Director of the Hepatitis B Vaccine
Project of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC).

The NVIC has studied Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data
obtained under the Freedom of Information Act covering the last nine years
on hepatitis B vaccine adverse events -- and in 1996 there were more than
three times as many reported serious adverse reactions as reported cases of
the disease in the 0 to 14 age group. Of the total 2,424 adverse event
reports made between 1990 and October 1998 in children under age 14 who only
received hepatitis B vaccine, there were 1,209 serious events and 73 deaths.
Thus, one half of the reports for children under age 14 who received only
hepatitis B vaccine were for serious events that required an emergency room
visit, hospitalization, or caused life-threatening health problems or
permanent disabilities.

As a UC Berkeley graduate and advisor to some of the largest financial
institutions in the world, I am qualified to analyze and make conclusions
about statistics. Based on that experience, I am astonished that the
scientists on this Committee would disregard or cover up data showing the
number and severity of adverse reactions to this vaccine. Science is
observing and learning from what is observed. The assertions of the CDC that
the many reported adverse reactions to this vaccine do not exist or are a
coincidence violates the basic principle of science, which is rooted in the
observation and analysis of data.
A benefit/risk analysis of the hepatitis B vaccine for the average infant in
America, not born to infected parents, must conclude that the VAERS data on
adverse reactions shows the real-world risk of a newborn infant dying or
being injured by the hepatitis B vaccine is a greater threat than the remote
chance of contracting the primarily blood-transmitted disease.

My 5-week old daughter, Lyla Rose, died within 16 hours of her hepatitisB
vaccination, which she received because of the universal vaccination policy
this Committee instituted in 1991. At her death, Lyla had four of the eight
highest-reported symptoms in the VAERS hepatitis B vaccine adverse reaction
data. The NY Medical Examiner observed brain swelling at the autopsy but
refused to record that or mention the hepatitis B vaccine Lyla received in
the autopsy report.

I hold each one of you who participated in the promulgation or perpetuation
of that mandated newborn vaccination policy personally responsible for my
daughter's death and the deaths and injuries of all the other beautiful,
healthy infants who are victims of the hepatitis B vaccine. Your negligence
is the proximate cause of my daughter's death and you have failed to
exercise reasonable care.

At the NVIC, we are overwhelmed following up constant new reports of deaths,
seizures and autoimmune reactions following hepatitis B vaccination. Because
the CDC refuses to acknowledge this large number of serious adverse
reactions, hospitals and doctors who have been misled about the risks
continue to administer the vaccine and then deny any vaccine connection when
children die, get ill or have seizures within hours or days. CDC officials
tell parents they have never heard of hepatitis B vaccine reactions.

That is a lie. For this government to continue to insist that hepatitis B
vaccine adverse reaction reports do not exist is negligent, unethical -- and
is a crime against the children of America.

It is a sad day for the U.S. when the nation's children need protection from
the official medical authorities who are charged with protecting them from
disease.
Thank you.

Statement #2:

MICHAEL BELKIN TESTIMONY TO U.S. CONGRESS (Tuesday May 18, 1999)

My daughter Lyla Rose Belkin died on September 16, 1998 at the age of five
weeks, about 15 hours after receiving her second Hepatitis B vaccine booster
shot. Lyla was a lively, alert five-week-old baby when I last held her in my
arms. Little did I imagine as she gazed intently into my eyes with all the
innocence and wonder of a newborn child that she would die that night. She
was never ill before receiving the Hepatitis B shot that afternoon. At her
final feeding that night, she was extremely agitated, noisy and feisty --
and then she fell asleep suddenly and stopped breathing. The autopsy ruled
out choking. The NY Medical Examiner ruled her death Sudden Infant Death
Syndrome (SIDS).

But the NY Medical Examiner (Dr. Persechino) neglected to mention Lyla's
swollen brain or the hepatitis B vaccine in the autopsy report. The coroner
spoke to my wife and I and our pediatrician (Dr. Zullo) the day of the
autopsy and clearly stated that her brain was swollen. The pediatrician Dr.
Zullo's notes of that conversation are "brain swollen ... not sure cause yet
.... could not see how recombinant vaccine could cause problem."

SIDS is a diagnosis of exclusion ..it wasn't this, it wasn't that,
everything has been ruled out and we don't know what it was. A swollen brain
is not SIDS. Through conversations with other experienced pathologists, I
subsequently discovered that brain inflammation is a classic adverse
reaction to vaccination (with any vaccine) in the medical literature.
I set out to do an investigation of the Hepatitis B vaccine and attended a
workshop at the National Academy of Sciences, Institute of Medicine on
"Neo-Natal Death and the Hepatitis B Vaccine," the Advisory Committee on
Immunization Practices (ACIP) February meeting, and a debate in New
Hampshire between the Chairman of the ACIP, Dr. Modlin, and Dr. Waisbren
about the safety of the Hepatitis B vaccine. I also obtained the entire
Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database on Hepatitis B
vaccine adverse reactions and have investigated it thoroughly.

These are my conclusions, supported by the following pages of text and
analysis that are too lengthy to present in entirety in the time allotted
for this appearance. Please read the results of my investigation, as it will
help you understand the magnitude of the hepatitis B vaccine issue.

* Newborn babies are not at risk of contracting the hepatitis B disease
unless their mother is infected.

* Hepatitis B is primarily a disease of junkies, gays, and promiscuous
heterosexuals.

* The vaccine is given to babies because health authorities couldn't get
those risk groups to take the vaccine.

* Adverse reactions out-number cases of the disease in government
statistics.

* Nothing is being done to investigate those adverse reactions.

* Those adverse reactions include numerous deaths, convulsions and arthritic
conditions that occur within days after

* The CDC is misrepresenting hypothetical, estimated disease statistics as
real cases of the disease.

* The ACIP is recommending new vaccines for premature infants without having
scientific studies proving they are safe.

* The U.S. vaccine recommendation process is hopelessly compromised by
conflicts of interest with vaccine manufacturers, the American Academy of
Pediatrics and the CDC.
Conclusion: If (as with the recently-recommended rotavirus vaccine)
Hepatitis B vaccine was recommended in 1991 without scientific proof that it
was safe in a broad sample of racially and genetically diverse babies less
than 48 hours old before they established that recommendation, then the CDC
has been experimenting on babies like guinea pigs and this Committee should
suspend that universal immunization policy.

The Hepatitis B vaccine was effectively mandated in 1991 for universal
immunization of newborn babies by the Advisory Committee on Immunization
Practices (ACIP) -- an adjunct of the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC). Paradoxically, the CDC's own Fact Sheet on the Hepatitis B
disease does not include newborn babies as a risk group for that disease.
That Fact Sheet lists the risk groups as injection drug users, homosexual
men, sexually active heterosexuals, infants/children of immigrants from
disease-endemic areas, low socio-economic level, sexual/household contacts
of infected persons, infants born to infected mothers, health care workers
and hemodialysis patients NOT NEWBORN BABIES.

Question: Why then, did the ACIP establish a policy mandating that newborn
babies not at risk of the disease be automatically administered the 3-shot
Hepatitis B vaccine as their first involuntary indoctrination into the
pediatric care of America?

Answer: Here is that rationale from the original ACIP 1991 statement
establishing the official vaccination policy "Hepatitis B Virus: A
Comprehensive Strategy for Eliminating Transmission in the United States
Through Universal Childhood Vaccination ..." "In the United States, most
infections occur among adults and adolescents ... The recommended strategy
for preventing these infections has been the selective vaccination of
persons with identified risk factors ... However, this strategy has not
lowered the incidence of Hepatitis B, primarily because vaccinating persons
engaged in high-risk behaviors, life-styles, or occupations before they
become infected generally has not been feasible ... Efforts to vaccinate
persons in the major risk groups have had limited success. For example,
programs directed at injecting drug users failed to motivate them to receive
three doses of vaccine ... In the United States it has become evident that
HBV transmission cannot be prevented through vaccinating only the groups at
high risk of infection ... In the long term, universal infant vaccination
would eliminate the need for vaccinating adolescents and high-risk adults
.... Hepatitis B vaccination is recommended for all infants, regardless of
the HBsAg status of the mother ... The first dose can be administered during
the newborn period, preferably before the infant is discharged from the
hospital, but no later than when the infant is 2 months of age ..."
(emphasis added).

So in the CDC and ACIP's own words, almost every newborn U.S. baby is now
greeted on its entry into the world by a vaccine injection against a
sexually transmitted disease for which the baby is not at risk -- because
they couldn't get the junkies, prostitutes, homosexuals and promiscuous
heterosexuals to take the vaccine. That is the essence of the Hepatitis B
universal vaccination program.

Question: What are the risks and benefits for administering this vaccine to
infants?

Answer: Hepatitis B is a rare, mainly blood-transmitted disease. In 1996,
only 54 cases of the disease were reported to the CDC in the 0-1 age group.
There were 3.9 million births that year, so the observed incidence of
hepatitis B in the 0-1 age group was just 0.001%. In the Vaccine Adverse
Event Reporting System (VAERS), there were 1,080 total reports of adverse
reactions from Hepatitis B vaccine in 1996 in the 0-1 age group, with 47
deaths reported. Total VAERS Hepatitis B reports for the 0-1 age group
outnumber reported cases of the disease 20 to 1.

Question: Why don't they just screen the mother to see if she is infected
with Hepatitis B (since that's about the only way a baby is likely to get
the disease), instead of vaccinating all infants?

Answer: Selling vaccines is extremely profitable and the process of
mandating vaccines is fraught with conflicts of interest between vaccine
manufacturers, the ACIP and the American Academy of Pediatrics. The business
model of having the government mandate everyone must buy your product is a
monopolist's delight.

Question: What studies are being done on the data from the FDA's Vaccine
Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)?

Answer: Absolutely nothing. The 25,000 reports are going into a drawer and
being forgotten.

How many reports are enough to show a drug or vaccine is dangerous -- 2,500?
25,000? 250,000? Chen of the CDC and Ellenberg of the FDA monitor this data,
write reports and deliver speeches about how VAERS Hepatitis B adverse
reaction reports show nothing out of the ordinary and show "the relative
safety of HB vaccine when given to neonates and infants." VAERS shows
nothing of the kind. TAKE A LOOK AT THE VAERS DATA YOURSELF.

The health authorities continue to negligently downplay the steady stream of
serious adverse reactions to this vaccine and more infants and adults
continue to die and suffer central nervous system and liver damage after HB
vaccination.

Question: Why do the CDC, ACIP and Merck say that there are 140,000-320,000
new infections/yr (70,000-160,000 symptomatic infections/yr) when their own
CDC data shows only 10,000 reported cases year?

Answer: They are passing off estimated, hypothetical numbers as actual
cases. This is statistical fraud. In the financial world such
mis-representation would lead to criminal charges. If a company inflated its
earnings or revenues by 300% (as the CDC does hepatitis B disease
statistics) and foisted those figures off as official data (and not some
back-of-the-envelope guess-timate) -- that company would be investigated by
the SEC and sued by shareholders. Why doesn't that happen in the medical
world? There's no regulator to keep the CDC honest. They do not say those
figures are hypothetical estimates, they misrepresent the data. Go try to
audit those 320,000 supposed new infections/yr. You will not find them. The
whole exercise is designed to increase public hysteria about the risk of a
low-risk disease so the CDC can extend it's pervasive influence and Merck
can increase it's $900 million/year vaccine revenues.

Question: What process does the Center for Disease Control employ to make a
vaccine recommendation?

I attended the February Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)
meeting in Atlanta and was absolutely appalled. Every vote by the Committee
on new vaccine mandates was unanimous (except for one dissenting vote on
Rotavirus vaccine for premature infants). There was hardly any discussion of
adverse reactions, the ACIP simply rubber-stamped every proposal on the
agenda. I call it Vaccination Without Representation. In one instance, the
ACIP passed a recommendation for Rotavirus vaccine for premature infants
even though no scientific studies had been done showing it was medically
safe. Dr. Modlin, (Chairman of the ACIP), said in a pro-Hepatitis B vaccine
debate in New Hampshire "How do we determine whether something is
scientifically valid or not? ... 1) Is the theory biologically plausible? 2)
Has it been tested by appropriate methods? 3) Is the study well concluded?
4) Are the results statistically sound?" But at the February ACIP meeting,
when it came time for the ACIP to rubber-stamp approval of Rotavirus vaccine
for premature infants, here are Modlin's quotes from the official
transcript: "... available data are insufficient to fully establish the
safety and efficacy of rotavirus vaccine in premature infants ... there is a
section under Adverse Events that details what little information there
actually are with respect to premature infants ... To my knowledge we don't
have data from a clinical trial specifically ... Some bit of information
from Seattle, as I recall, that had suggested there was a slight increase in
relative risk for hospitalization for premature infants ... Obviously a
situation where we have to make a judgment in the absence of data, and with
a vaccine that has not yet been tested in the group ..." (ACIP transcript,
pages 102-112) Modlin then held a vote and the recommendation for premature
infants passed nine to one -- Modlin voted yes, Dr. Glode against. This is a
clear example of how the medical bureaucracy (led by the CDC and ACIP), is
recommending vaccines without scientific evidence that those vaccines are
safe in a broad sample of racially and genetically diverse infants.

What Should Be Done? This Committee should investigate the 1991 ACIP
recommendation establishing universal hepatitis B vaccination of newborn
babies in the hospital -- and if (as with the Rotavirus vaccine example
above) no studies were done to prove this was safe in a broad sample of
racially and genetically diverse babies less than 48 hours old before they
established that recommendation, then the CDC has been experimenting on
babies like guinea pigs and this Committee should suspend that universal
immunization policy.
VAERS ANALYSIS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System)

I studied statistics at the University Of California at Berkeley and went on
to develop sophisticated proprietary risk/reward statistical models at
Salomon Brothers from 1986-91 -- and in my subsequent, ongoing business
provide statistical economic and financial forecasts to mutual funds,
investment banks, pension funds and hedge funds.

I studied VAERS Hepatitis B vaccine data obtained by the National Vaccine
Information Center (NVIC) under the Freedom of Information Act. The data has
some flaws (incomplete fields, some multiple reports) but any qualified,
impartial quantitative analyst or statistician not affiliated with Merck,
Smithkline, the CDC, the FDA or the AAP who examines these reports will find
a clear and undeniable pattern of central nervous system (CNS) and liver
disease striking thousands of people within 0-4 days after vaccination with
Hepatitis B vaccine. These reports have been ignored, explained away, or
considered "acceptable" by the FDA, CDC and drug companies. This Committee
should launch an investigation of the VAERS Hepatitis B data by a team of
independent scientists not beholden to vaccine manufacturers or the FDA/CDC
bureaucracy. The following is intended to be a starting point for such an
investigation. This does not profess to be a complete, exhaustive
analysis -- simply an overview, highlighting aspects of the data that may
not previously have been brought to your attention.

The total 24,775 VAERS Hepatitis B reports from July 1990 to October 31,
1998 show 439 deaths and 9673 serious reactions involving emergency room
visits, hospitalization, disablement or death. Therefore, more than one
third of total reports were serious events. 17,497 of those total reports
were for Hepatitis B vaccine only, the remainder were vaccine cocktails
where hepatitis B was administered along with DPT, HIB, IPV, OPV, etc.

The Hepatitis-B-vaccine-only reports show a shocking cluster of reactions in
females starting in their teenage years (the male/female reporting ratio is
balanced before age 16). For ages 16-55, 77% of VAERS reports are women --
more than three times as many women as men are reporting adverse reactions
to Hepatitis B vaccine. The median onset of adverse event after vaccination
is one day, 70% of reactions happen within four days of vaccination.
Independent scientists should investigate why females are more disposed to
have adverse reactions to Hepatitis B vaccine and/or report them to VAERS.
One possible explanation is that nurses have to take this vaccine for their
jobs and are thus more exposed than most adults to Hepatitis B vaccine
adverse reactions. Rather than dismiss that factor as an "over-reporting
bias" as Dr. Chen of the CDC did at the February ACIP meeting, perhaps
investigators might consider that nurses are alert health care workers and
ought to be listened to with regard to the dangers of adverse events with
any vaccine (rather than ignored). Personal case studies reported to the
author have showed many teenage girls getting severe, debilitating adverse
reactions to Hepatitis B vaccine, having nothing to do with nursing. Do
women have a greater vulnerability to auto-immune reactions to Hepatitis B
vaccine? Is the government discriminating against women by administering
this vaccine without regard for genetic risk of CNS and liver disease? Those
are questions that independent scientists should investigate.

A second area of concern is the VAERS reports involving Hepatitis B vaccine
administered with other vaccines (vaccine cocktails). Health officials are
fond of dismissing those reports as being attributable to Hepatitis B
vaccine, because of the multiple other antigens present (almost as if they
wanted to cloak Hepatitis B vaccine reactions from scrutiny). Let's avoid
that controversy and focus on the extremely disturbing VAERS data of
Hepatitis B vaccine with other vaccines. These reports amount to only one
third of total reports (7,275), but account for two thirds of total deaths
(291). The median onset of those deaths was 2 days after vaccination --
displaying a clear temporal association. The median age of death was 0.5
years in this group. 50% of all Hepatitis-B-vaccine-cocktail reports were
serious (died, emergency room, hospitalized, disabled). I grouped convulsive
reactions together from the Hep-B-vaccine-cocktail data and found a deeply
disturbing pattern. These were anything labeled convulsions, seizures or
tremors in the VAERS Hep-B-cocktail data. Of the 1189 such reports, fully
80% (950) were serious (died, ER, hospitalized, disabled) median age 0.5
years, median onset after vaccination 0 days (less than one day). Someone
should do follow-up and find out what happened to those poor infants who
suffered severe convulsions after a Hepatitis B-multi-vaccine cocktail. In
the personal reports I've taken of similar adverse reactions, the children
were left brain-damaged and developmentally disabled. Looking beyond the
debate over whether VAERS reports of vaccine cocktails can be attributed to
Hepatitis B, the data strongly suggests combining multiple vaccines may be
convenient and profitable for pediatricians -- but fatal or debilitating for
infants. Where are the scientific studies showing Hepatitis B vaccine is
safe to administer with DPT, HIB, IPV, OPV, etc.? Did anyone doing
cost/benefit analysis for those studies include data showing the higher
mortality and serious reactions present in the VAERS data? Why not? Is there
an identifiable genetic marker in those who suffered convulsive reactions to
screen out those vulnerable in the future? These are all matters for
independent scientists to audit.

Another area that leaps out of the VAERS database is something I dubbed
arthritic reactions. These are joint pains, tingling, numbness, aching,
fatigue, etc. I found 2,400 of those reports in just a quick survey of the
first reporting column of VAERS (Hepatitis B vaccine only). Almost one half
of those are serious, involving an ER visit, hospitalization, death or
disablement. These are the type of adverse reactions reported by many adults
who are forced to take the Hepatitis B vaccine for their jobs. In the
reports of such adverse reactions I've taken, the symptoms do not go away,
most patients complain it gets worse over time. Scientists not corrupted by
drug company or CDC/FDA institutional bias should examine the thousands of
VAERS Hepatitis B arthritic reaction reports and develop a diagnosis of
their Hepatitis B vaccine-related illness.

Anyone who doubts if Hepatitis B vaccine adverse reactions exist should sit
down and read the symptoms and text comments of a random selection of VAERS
reports. When one does so, they will find a similar but wide-ranging list of
CNS and liver reactions that occur within days of vaccination. The Merck
package insert claims "Injection site reactions and systemic complaints were
reported following 17% and 15% on the injections, respectively." The
standard rule of thumb is only about 10% of reactions are reported to VAERS.
So the actual number and full horror of the Hepatitis B vaccine reaction
story is potentially much larger than even VAERS suggests.

J.B. Handley is co-founder of Generation Rescue.

"john" wrote in message
...
ttp://www.ageofautism.com/2009/10/hepatitis-b-vaccine-an-unmitigated-disaster-.html


October 09, 2009



Hepatitis B Vaccine: An Unmitigated Disaster By J.B. Handley


Guess J.B. Handley is not trustworthy, eh? Now who can you trust?