If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Thimerosal Vindicated as Cause of Autism: More Questions andStill No Answers
In article ,
wrote: On Jan 14, 3:26*am, "Peter Moran" wrote: You seem to think that even 1 microgram of a substance is so tiny that you can inject it into a host with no repercussions. Let us condider thimerosal. 1 microgram of thimerosal would represent 1,200 atoms of thimerosal per affected cell in the adult human body. This compound would be even more toxic to a developing fetus and infant. Based upon the smaller size of the infant, the number of atoms per affected cell may well be more nearly 5,000 or more. Convince us that cells exposed to 1200 to 5,000 atoms of mercury that the cells cannot detoxify will not alter that cells internal biochemistry, its genetic thinking, or its enzyme capabilities. Then multiply the number of atoms by 25 per each shot containing thimerosal. Remember, in the cell, the mercury is converted to the mercuric ion, Hg++. 1 microgram may sound small, but for such a potent killer, it may be more than enough to alter and kill. Your calculations are, as usual, stupid, because they assume that all the thimerosal will be retained within the body. It won't. It will be rapidly excreted. If a microgram of mercury was enough to harm us, we'd be dead after one tuna sandwich. -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "Without Bush, what will America's schoolchildren have to look down on?" -- Bill Maher |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Thimerosal Vindicated as Cause of Autism: More Questions and Still No Answers
"The One True Zhen Jue" wrote in message ... On Jan 14, 1:48 pm, wrote: On Jan 14, 3:26 am, "Peter Moran" wrote: You seem to think that even 1 microgram of a substance is so tiny that you can inject it into a host with no repercussions. Let us condider thimerosal. 1 microgram of thimerosal would represent 1,200 atoms of thimerosal per affected cell in the adult human body. Fact: Children weren't getting mercury poisoning from vaccinations when they had thimerosal. Fact: Mercury poisoning & autism rates were unchanged by removing thimerosal from vaccines. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ When they "removed" the thimerisol from the vaccines...I noticed that there was no recall of those vaccines--that would have admitted wrongdoing and opened up companies for lawsuits. No, what happened was that companies stopped putting thimerisol in *new* doses of vaccines...but they did not remove it from *existing* supplies.... I wonder.....how many thousands--perhaps millions--of doses were already sitting on shelves, waiting to be adminsitered? I wonder--could *that* be why the rates were unchanged? -- Buny --Nobody realizes that some people expend tremendous energy merely to be normal." ~ Albert Camus |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Thimerosal Vindicated as Cause of Autism: More Questions and Still No Answers
"SumBuny" wrote in message
... "The One True Zhen Jue" wrote in message ... On Jan 14, 1:48 pm, wrote: On Jan 14, 3:26 am, "Peter Moran" wrote: You seem to think that even 1 microgram of a substance is so tiny that you can inject it into a host with no repercussions. Let us condider thimerosal. 1 microgram of thimerosal would represent 1,200 atoms of thimerosal per affected cell in the adult human body. Fact: Children weren't getting mercury poisoning from vaccinations when they had thimerosal. Fact: Mercury poisoning & autism rates were unchanged by removing thimerosal from vaccines. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ When they "removed" the thimerisol from the vaccines...I noticed that there was no recall of those vaccines--that would have admitted wrongdoing and opened up companies for lawsuits. No, what happened was that companies stopped putting thimerisol in *new* doses of vaccines...but they did not remove it from *existing* supplies.... I wonder.....how many thousands--perhaps millions--of doses were already sitting on shelves, waiting to be adminsitered? I wonder--could *that* be why the rates were unchanged? Well, I am sure without even going to look that this will have been taken into consideration. If a theory requires that medical authorities are either entirely stupid or entirely corrupt (as nearly all "alt" and antivax theories do) does that make it more likely to be the truth, or less likely? PM -- Buny --Nobody realizes that some people expend tremendous energy merely to be normal." ~ Albert Camus |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Thimerosal Vindicated as Cause of Autism: More Questions and Still No Answers
"Peter Moran" wrote in message ... "Jan Drew" wrote in message . net... "Peter Moran" wrote: "Jan Drew" wrote in message et... Thimerosal Vindicated as Cause of Autism: More Questions and Still No Answers January 8, 2008 With yet another epidemiological study reeking with conflicts of interest, thimerosal containing vaccines are declared safe by the immunization branch of the California Department of Public Health. Unfortunately, epidemiological studies done by people who are part of the immunization program have a major credibility problem. This of course does not stop the mainstream press from hopping all over these studies without even thinking of asking any questions. The study claims that "some" flu shots still contain thimerosal. Actually, out of 132 million doses of flu vaccine for the 2007-08 flu season, 8 million doses are thimerosal free. That means 94% contain the full amount of thimerosal. Stating that "some" contain thimerosal is a very deceptive statement at best. Critics will say that California has banned thimerosal containing flu shots for pregnant women and infants. This ban took effect in 2006. Last year they lifted the ban because they could not find an adequate supply of thimerosal free shots. If a pregnant woman got a flu shot in 2001 and her child followed the flu shot recommendations, the baby/fetus would have received six flu shots with the full amount of thimerosal by the year 2005. This hardly represents the claim that no thimerosal containing vaccines were given after 2001. Besides, with no government agency testing vaccines for mercury, who really knows if mercury has been removed from vaccines. Vaccines with "trace" amounts of thimerosal are supposed to contain less than 1 microgram of mercury per 0.5 ml dose. This is equal to a concentration of 2000 micrograms per liter. When looked at this way, this hardly seems like a "trace" amount of mercury. Scaremongering idiots! PM Glad to see you *Trying to ignore constant abuse for the sake of those who wish to learn something* .. My comment was not directed at anyone on this list and was fully justified by the absurdity and deceptiveness of the case. PM Your comment followed Dr Cee's post. Did you pick up this *fully justified* from your ilk member Mark Probert? You are mighty selective with *the absurdity and deceptiveness of the case.* No surprise there. Care to address *each* question below? We constantly hear that rates of autism have increased due to earlier intervention, changes in diagnostic criteria and diagnostic substitution. Were these co-factors considered? Have rates of autism in California really continued to climb? They can't have it both ways. Before we declare thimerosal containing vaccines safe, consider these numbers: 0.5 parts per billion (ppb) mercury = Kills human neuroblastoma cells (Parran et al., Toxicol Sci 2005; 86: 132-140). http://www.americanchronicle.com/art...rticleID=48356 Again Studies about Vaccines and Thimerosal are misleading When will these authors of studies stop claiming that all but a few vaccines contain the mercury additive Thimerosal? 80% of all flu vaccines contain this preservative. As of June in 2005 many other vaccines that are recommended for children still contained normal or trace amounts of Thimerosal. Many mothers and children still had mercury amalgams. Some foods such as Tuna contain mercury. We still eat and breath this highly toxic substance. When you include the many other chemicals and heavy metals that have been found to cause developmental delays that are in fact on the increase it's not to hard to figure out why numbers have not dropped. There are many questions about this latest study from the California State Public Health Department that remain unanswered. What are the ages? Are they including all ASD disorders or just regressive Autism? Why do they still falsely claim that Thimerosal is not in any other vaccine and only some Flu vaccines? This statement just is simply not true. And why isn't there an age criteria for diagnoses such as five years old when school aged children can be truly observed on a daily basis? And when using this age it shows that what little reduction there is in the use of thimerosal these children still fall under the excessive amount. Are they finding these infants up to let's say 3 years old unable to interact with their peers? Do these youngsters show signs of learning disabilities? C'mon you can't claim that mercury in any form is safe and with increased exposures of this toxin combined with others you will find that the numbers will remain or climb. This is being touted as a disorder that is untreatable and unavoidable. And that is sad as the medical community claims success in many other diseases and disorders. You can't mark mercury off the list as its toxic strength is much too strong. We are still hearing about lead that was banned 20 plus years ago as we find it everywhere. Mercury was used in paint also but that is rarely mentioned. The fact is it was used in kitchen and bathroom paints along with other areas susceptible to mold. We scream if products from China contain lead but buy food and are told to use lights that contain mercury. Of course we are seeing genetic mutations you always do when there are poisonings going on. We are witnessing children hitting puberty at younger ages, Obesity, Diabetes II, Heart Disease and many psychological and neurological disorders are on the increase along with Autism or ASD, ADD included. To give Thimerosal a no contribution label is not only dangerous but criminal when you look at what role mercury has played with those exposed to it over the years. We need to put a stop to this continuous claim that mercury in any form is somehow safe when it has been known for hundreds of years to be very dangerous and even lethal. Why did the Romans only use slaves to mine for it? Why does the manufacturer of the specific compound Thimerosal warn of its toxicity? Why was it banned in most applications except as a vaccine preservative injected directly into our blood stream? Why is it still being used in any vaccine and during the manufacture of other vaccines? And why do upwards of 85% of those tested that suffer from ASD show marked spikes when chelating heavy metals for mercury? Still too many questions abound with no serious answers that the powers that be except. http://www.americanchronicle.com/art...rticleID=48301 |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Thimerosal Vindicated as Cause of Autism: More Questions and Still No Answers
"David Wright" wrote in message . .. In article , wrote: On Jan 14, 3:26 am, "Peter Moran" wrote: You seem to think that even 1 microgram of a substance is so tiny that you can inject it into a host with no repercussions. Let us condider thimerosal. 1 microgram of thimerosal would represent 1,200 atoms of thimerosal per affected cell in the adult human body. This compound would be even more toxic to a developing fetus and infant. Based upon the smaller size of the infant, the number of atoms per affected cell may well be more nearly 5,000 or more. Convince us that cells exposed to 1200 to 5,000 atoms of mercury that the cells cannot detoxify will not alter that cells internal biochemistry, its genetic thinking, or its enzyme capabilities. Then multiply the number of atoms by 25 per each shot containing thimerosal. Remember, in the cell, the mercury is converted to the mercuric ion, Hg++. 1 microgram may sound small, but for such a potent killer, it may be more than enough to alter and kill. Your calculations are, as usual, stupid, because they assume that all the thimerosal will be retained within the body. It won't. It will be rapidly excreted. Proven to be wrong. If a microgram of mercury was enough to harm us, we'd be dead after one tuna sandwich. Thimerosal Vindicated as Cause of Autism: More Questions and Still No Answers January 8, 2008 With yet another epidemiological study reeking with conflicts of interest, thimerosal containing vaccines are declared safe by the immunization branch of the California Department of Public Health. Unfortunately, epidemiological studies done by people who are part of the immunization program have a major credibility problem. This of course does not stop the mainstream press from hopping all over these studies without even thinking of asking any questions. The study claims that "some" flu shots still contain thimerosal. Actually, out of 132 million doses of flu vaccine for the 2007-08 flu season, 8 million doses are thimerosal free. That means 94% contain the full amount of thimerosal. Stating that "some" contain thimerosal is a very deceptive statement at best. Critics will say that California has banned thimerosal containing flu shots for pregnant women and infants. This ban took effect in 2006. Last year they lifted the ban because they could not find an adequate supply of thimerosal free shots. If a pregnant woman got a flu shot in 2001 and her child followed the flu shot recommendations, the baby/fetus would have received six flu shots with the full amount of thimerosal by the year 2005. This hardly represents the claim that no thimerosal containing vaccines were given after 2001. Besides, with no government agency testing vaccines for mercury, who really knows if mercury has been removed from vaccines. Vaccines with "trace" amounts of thimerosal are supposed to contain less than 1 microgram of mercury per 0.5 ml dose. This is equal to a concentration of 2000 micrograms per liter. When looked at this way, this hardly seems like a "trace" amount of mercury. We constantly hear that rates of autism have increased due to earlier intervention, changes in diagnostic criteria and diagnostic substitution. Were these co-factors considered? Have rates of autism in California really continued to climb? They can't have it both ways. Before we declare thimerosal containing vaccines safe, consider these numbers: 0.5 parts per billion (ppb) mercury = Kills human neuroblastoma cells (Parran et al., Toxicol Sci 2005; 86: 132-140). http://www.americanchronicle.com/art...rticleID=48356 Again Studies about Vaccines and Thimerosal are misleading When will these authors of studies stop claiming that all but a few vaccines contain the mercury additive Thimerosal? 80% of all flu vaccines contain this preservative. As of June in 2005 many other vaccines that are recommended for children still contained normal or trace amounts of Thimerosal. Many mothers and children still had mercury amalgams. Some foods such as Tuna contain mercury. We still eat and breath this highly toxic substance. When you include the many other chemicals and heavy metals that have been found to cause developmental delays that are in fact on the increase it's not to hard to figure out why numbers have not dropped. There are many questions about this latest study from the California State Public Health Department that remain unanswered. What are the ages? Are they including all ASD disorders or just regressive Autism? Why do they still falsely claim that Thimerosal is not in any other vaccine and only some Flu vaccines? This statement just is simply not true. And why isn't there an age criteria for diagnoses such as five years old when school aged children can be truly observed on a daily basis? And when using this age it shows that what little reduction there is in the use of thimerosal these children still fall under the excessive amount. Are they finding these infants up to let's say 3 years old unable to interact with their peers? Do these youngsters show signs of learning disabilities? C'mon you can't claim that mercury in any form is safe and with increased exposures of this toxin combined with others you will find that the numbers will remain or climb. This is being touted as a disorder that is untreatable and unavoidable. And that is sad as the medical community claims success in many other diseases and disorders. You can't mark mercury off the list as its toxic strength is much too strong. We are still hearing about lead that was banned 20 plus years ago as we find it everywhere. Mercury was used in paint also but that is rarely mentioned. The fact is it was used in kitchen and bathroom paints along with other areas susceptible to mold. We scream if products from China contain lead but buy food and are told to use lights that contain mercury. Of course we are seeing genetic mutations you always do when there are poisonings going on. We are witnessing children hitting puberty at younger ages, Obesity, Diabetes II, Heart Disease and many psychological and neurological disorders are on the increase along with Autism or ASD, ADD included. To give Thimerosal a no contribution label is not only dangerous but criminal when you look at what role mercury has played with those exposed to it over the years. We need to put a stop to this continuous claim that mercury in any form is somehow safe when it has been known for hundreds of years to be very dangerous and even lethal. Why did the Romans only use slaves to mine for it? Why does the manufacturer of the specific compound Thimerosal warn of its toxicity? Why was it banned in most applications except as a vaccine preservative injected directly into our blood stream? Why is it still being used in any vaccine and during the manufacture of other vaccines? And why do upwards of 85% of those tested that suffer from ASD show marked spikes when chelating heavy metals for mercury? Still too many questions abound with no serious answers that the powers that be except. http://www.americanchronicle.com/art...rticleID=48301 -- David Wright |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Thimerosal Vindicated as Cause of Autism: More Questions and Still No Answers
wrote: On Jan 14, 1:48 pm, wrote: On Jan 14, 3:26 am, "Peter Moran" wrote: You seem to think that even 1 microgram of a substance is so tiny that you can inject it into a host with no repercussions. Let us condider thimerosal. 1 microgram of thimerosal would represent 1,200 atoms of thimerosal per affected cell in the adult human body. 1,200 _atoms_ of thimerosal? That is pretty odd coming from someone who claims to have a PhD in chemistry. The word you didn't know was "molecules" and, your hypothesis is really more of a feces. This compound would be even more toxic to a developing fetus and infant. Based upon the smaller size of the infant, the number of atoms per affected cell may well be more nearly 5,000 or more. Nope. You're building on a false assumption and are neglecting the amount excreted. Convince us that cells exposed to 1200 to 5,000 atoms of mercury that the cells cannot detoxify will not alter that cells internal biochemistry, its genetic thinking, or its enzyme capabilities. Then multiply the number of atoms by 25 per each shot containing thimerosal. Remember, in the cell, the mercury is converted to the mercuric ion, Hg++. 1 microgram may sound small, but for such a potent killer, it may be more than enough to alter and kill. DrCee Fact: Children weren't getting mercury poisoning from vaccinations when they had thimerosal. Fact: Mercury poisoning & autism rates were unchanged by removing thimerosal from vaccines. FACTS: Thimerosal Vindicated as Cause of Autism: More Questions and Still No Answers January 8, 2008 With yet another epidemiological study reeking with conflicts of interest, thimerosal containing vaccines are declared safe by the immunization branch of the California Department of Public Health. Unfortunately, epidemiological studies done by people who are part of the immunization program have a major credibility problem. This of course does not stop the mainstream press from hopping all over these studies without even thinking of asking any questions. The study claims that "some" flu shots still contain thimerosal. Actually, out of 132 million doses of flu vaccine for the 2007-08 flu season, 8 million doses are thimerosal free. That means 94% contain the full amount of thimerosal. Stating that "some" contain thimerosal is a very deceptive statement at best. Critics will say that California has banned thimerosal containing flu shots for pregnant women and infants. This ban took effect in 2006. Last year they lifted the ban because they could not find an adequate supply of thimerosal free shots. If a pregnant woman got a flu shot in 2001 and her child followed the flu shot recommendations, the baby/fetus would have received six flu shots with the full amount of thimerosal by the year 2005. This hardly represents the claim that no thimerosal containing vaccines were given after 2001. Besides, with no government agency testing vaccines for mercury, who really knows if mercury has been removed from vaccines. Vaccines with "trace" amounts of thimerosal are supposed to contain less than 1 microgram of mercury per 0.5 ml dose. This is equal to a concentration of 2000 micrograms per liter. When looked at this way, this hardly seems like a "trace" amount of mercury. We constantly hear that rates of autism have increased due to earlier intervention, changes in diagnostic criteria and diagnostic substitution. Were these co-factors considered? Have rates of autism in California really continued to climb? They can't have it both ways. Before we declare thimerosal containing vaccines safe, consider these numbers: 0.5 parts per billion (ppb) mercury = Kills human neuroblastoma cells (Parran et al., Toxicol Sci 2005; 86: 132-140). http://www.americanchronicle.com/art...rticleID=48356 Again Studies about Vaccines and Thimerosal are misleading When will these authors of studies stop claiming that all but a few vaccines contain the mercury additive Thimerosal? 80% of all flu vaccines contain this preservative. As of June in 2005 many other vaccines that are recommended for children still contained normal or trace amounts of Thimerosal. Many mothers and children still had mercury amalgams. Some foods such as Tuna contain mercury. We still eat and breath this highly toxic substance. When you include the many other chemicals and heavy metals that have been found to cause developmental delays that are in fact on the increase it's not to hard to figure out why numbers have not dropped. There are many questions about this latest study from the California State Public Health Department that remain unanswered. What are the ages? Are they including all ASD disorders or just regressive Autism? Why do they still falsely claim that Thimerosal is not in any other vaccine and only some Flu vaccines? This statement just is simply not true. And why isn't there an age criteria for diagnoses such as five years old when school aged children can be truly observed on a daily basis? And when using this age it shows that what little reduction there is in the use of thimerosal these children still fall under the excessive amount. Are they finding these infants up to let's say 3 years old unable to interact with their peers? Do these youngsters show signs of learning disabilities? C'mon you can't claim that mercury in any form is safe and with increased exposures of this toxin combined with others you will find that the numbers will remain or climb. This is being touted as a disorder that is untreatable and unavoidable. And that is sad as the medical community claims success in many other diseases and disorders. You can't mark mercury off the list as its toxic strength is much too strong. We are still hearing about lead that was banned 20 plus years ago as we find it everywhere. Mercury was used in paint also but that is rarely mentioned. The fact is it was used in kitchen and bathroom paints along with other areas susceptible to mold. We scream if products from China contain lead but buy food and are told to use lights that contain mercury. Of course we are seeing genetic mutations you always do when there are poisonings going on. We are witnessing children hitting puberty at younger ages, Obesity, Diabetes II, Heart Disease and many psychological and neurological disorders are on the increase along with Autism or ASD, ADD included. To give Thimerosal a no contribution label is not only dangerous but criminal when you look at what role mercury has played with those exposed to it over the years. We need to put a stop to this continuous claim that mercury in any form is somehow safe when it has been known for hundreds of years to be very dangerous and even lethal. Why did the Romans only use slaves to mine for it? Why does the manufacturer of the specific compound Thimerosal warn of its toxicity? Why was it banned in most applications except as a vaccine preservative injected directly into our blood stream? Why is it still being used in any vaccine and during the manufacture of other vaccines? And why do upwards of 85% of those tested that suffer from ASD show marked spikes when chelating heavy metals for mercury? Still too many questions abound with no serious answers that the powers that be except. http://www.americanchronicle.com/art...rticleID=48301 |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Thimerosal Vindicated as Cause of Autism: More Questions and Still No Answers
The One True Zhen Jue wrote:
On Jan 14, 1:48*pm, wrote: On Jan 14, 3:26*am, "Peter Moran" wrote: You seem to think that even 1 microgram of a substance is so tiny that you can inject it into a host with no repercussions. Let us condider thimerosal. *1 microgram of thimerosal would represent 1,200 atoms of thimerosal per affected cell in the adult human body. 1,200 _atoms_ of thimerosal? That is pretty odd coming from someone who claims to have a PhD in chemistry. The word you didn't know was "molecules" and, your hypothesis is really more of a feces. This compound would be even more toxic to a developing fetus and infant. *Based upon the smaller size of the infant, the number of atoms per affected cell may well be more nearly 5,000 or more. Nope. You're building on a false assumption and are neglecting the amount excreted. * * *Convince us that cells exposed to 1200 to 5,000 atoms of mercury that the cells cannot detoxify will not alter that cells internal biochemistry, its genetic thinking, or its enzyme capabilities. *Then multiply the number of atoms by 25 per each shot containing thimerosal. *Remember, in the cell, the mercury is converted to the mercuric ion, Hg++. 1 microgram may sound small, but for such a potent killer, it may be more than enough to alter and kill. DrCee Fact: Children weren't getting mercury poisoning from vaccinations when they had thimerosal. Fact: Mercury poisoning & autism rates were unchanged by removing thimerosal from vaccines. Fact: You don't know much about chemistry, don't know much biology I'll bet he doesn't know much about trigonometry or what a slide rule is for either. -- Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Thimerosal Vindicated as Cause of Autism: More Questions and Still No Answers
In article ,
SumBuny wrote: "The One True Zhen Jue" wrote in message ... On Jan 14, 1:48 pm, wrote: On Jan 14, 3:26 am, "Peter Moran" wrote: You seem to think that even 1 microgram of a substance is so tiny that you can inject it into a host with no repercussions. Let us condider thimerosal. 1 microgram of thimerosal would represent 1,200 atoms of thimerosal per affected cell in the adult human body. Fact: Children weren't getting mercury poisoning from vaccinations when they had thimerosal. Fact: Mercury poisoning & autism rates were unchanged by removing thimerosal from vaccines. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++ When they "removed" the thimerisol from the vaccines...I noticed that there was no recall of those vaccines--that would have admitted wrongdoing and opened up companies for lawsuits. No, what happened was that companies stopped putting thimerisol in *new* doses of vaccines...but they did not remove it from *existing* supplies.... I wonder.....how many thousands--perhaps millions--of doses were already sitting on shelves, waiting to be adminsitered? I wonder--could *that* be why the rates were unchanged? No. Even by 2002, virtually all the thimerosal-containing vaccines were gone from the shelves. -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "Without Bush, what will America's schoolchildren have to look down on?" -- Bill Maher |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Thimerosal Vindicated as Cause of Autism: More Questions andStill No Answers
SumBuny wrote:
"The One True Zhen Jue" wrote in message ... On Jan 14, 1:48 pm, wrote: On Jan 14, 3:26 am, "Peter Moran" wrote: You seem to think that even 1 microgram of a substance is so tiny that you can inject it into a host with no repercussions. Let us condider thimerosal. 1 microgram of thimerosal would represent 1,200 atoms of thimerosal per affected cell in the adult human body. Fact: Children weren't getting mercury poisoning from vaccinations when they had thimerosal. Fact: Mercury poisoning & autism rates were unchanged by removing thimerosal from vaccines. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ When they "removed" the thimerisol from the vaccines...I noticed that there was no recall of those vaccines--that would have admitted wrongdoing and opened up companies for lawsuits. No, what happened was that companies stopped putting thimerisol in *new* doses of vaccines...but they did not remove it from *existing* supplies.... I wonder.....how many thousands--perhaps millions--of doses were already sitting on shelves, waiting to be adminsitered? I wonder--could *that* be why the rates were unchanged? No. The existing stocks rapidly decreased. By now, there should have been a drop in the CDDS numbers, but there isn't. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Thimerosal Vindicated as Cause of Autism: More Questions and Still No Answers
"Peter Moran" wrote in message ... "SumBuny" wrote in message ... "The One True Zhen Jue" wrote in message ... On Jan 14, 1:48 pm, wrote: On Jan 14, 3:26 am, "Peter Moran" wrote: You seem to think that even 1 microgram of a substance is so tiny that you can inject it into a host with no repercussions. Let us condider thimerosal. 1 microgram of thimerosal would represent 1,200 atoms of thimerosal per affected cell in the adult human body. Fact: Children weren't getting mercury poisoning from vaccinations when they had thimerosal. Fact: Mercury poisoning & autism rates were unchanged by removing thimerosal from vaccines. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ When they "removed" the thimerisol from the vaccines...I noticed that there was no recall of those vaccines--that would have admitted wrongdoing and opened up companies for lawsuits. No, what happened was that companies stopped putting thimerisol in *new* doses of vaccines...but they did not remove it from *existing* supplies.... I wonder.....how many thousands--perhaps millions--of doses were already sitting on shelves, waiting to be adminsitered? I wonder--could *that* be why the rates were unchanged? Well, I am sure without even going to look that this will have been taken into consideration. If a theory requires that medical authorities are either entirely stupid or entirely corrupt (as nearly all "alt" and antivax theories do) does that make it more likely to be the truth, or less likely? PM "Truth" is what one defines it to be.... -- Buny --Nobody realizes that some people expend tremendous energy merely to be normal." ~ Albert Camus |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Far more questions than answers in Autism Tragedy | Ilena Rose | Kids Health | 0 | April 3rd 06 10:37 PM |
20 week scan - more questions than answers | Robert Powell | Pregnancy | 36 | February 28th 05 01:10 PM |
4-5 yr. old ( answers to questions! ) :) | Bebelestrnge | Single Parents | 2 | March 23rd 04 07:48 AM |
Answers to Ted's Questions???? | CountryJay | Breastfeeding | 2 | September 12th 03 12:36 AM |