[2009 Aug] What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations? by Dr. Anders Bruun Laursen

What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations?

by Dr. Anders Bruun Laursen
..
Global Research, August 20, 2009
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=14851

There seems to be quite a lot of uncertainty about the technical nature of
Swine Flu (H1N1) vaccines.

As a medical doctor, I wish to clarify a number of improtant issues: First,
we should talk about vaccines instead of vaccine, since the vaccines vary as
for their compositions and even their ways of being dispensed: some by
injection, another by the nose.

I think the fears as for the vaccines can be referred to:

1. the adjuvants - in particular squalene which was in all probability
responsible for the Gulf War syndrome,

2. the virus antigen´s condition (dead, attenuated, live)

3. a deeply rooted mistrust in our politicians and the vaccine producers´
motives and morals: e.g. Baxter´s live bird flu virus last Winter (12), the
Bayer AIDS haemophiliac product scandal (15).

First it is necessary to understand, that pandemic vaccines are made
according to two procedures:

1. The Developement of a totally new vaccine from scratch. This takes more
time, administration and testing than mock up vaccines (see below).

2. A Mock-up vaccine is a vaccine with all the adjuvants of the pandemic
vaccine - but without the killed or attenuated pandemic virus. (1) This
virus is - until the pandemic virus is known - a different, attenuated known
potentially pandemic virus, in the case of the Pandemrix vaccine for the EU
it is an attenuated H5N1 bird flu virus. This is the mock-up vaccine. When
the nature of the pandemic swine flu virus (H1N1) is known, it replaces the
H5N1 virus in an attenuated form, the adjuvants being left unchanged.

Until now mock-up vaccine test-vaccinations have been going on on
voluntary "human guinea pigs." Since most of the contents of the vaccine has
already been approved, the approval of the pandemic vaccine is easier to
implement.

After the exchange of virus in the vaccine, the company will have to apply
for a "variation". However, this is just a matter of form, since such a
variation approval is given by the EU within 5 days - which means that there
is no objective testing of the vaccine requiring official approval. The
safety is entirely left to the vaccine producer, who has been granted
immunity to actions of damages due to expected side effects (2).

So, as you see, there is no confusion with regard to swine flu and bird flu
viruses. But there is another important consideration: the role of squalene.

The average quantity of squalene injected into the US soldiers abroad and at
home in the anthrax vaccine during and after the Gulf War was 34.2
micrograms per billion micrograms of water. According to one study, this was
the cause of the Gulf War syndrome in 25% of 697.000 US personnel at home
and abroad. (3). You can find this table of FDA analyses from the Gulf War
lots on The Military Vaccine Resource Directory website (4)

a.. AVA 020 - 11 ppb squalene (parts per billion)
b.. AVA 030 - 10 ppb squalene
c.. AVA 038 - 27 ppb squalene
d.. AVA 043 - 40 ppb squalene
e.. AVA 047 - 83 ppb squalene

These values were confirmed by Prof. R. F. Garry (5) before the House of
Representatives. Prof Garry was the man to discover the connection between
the Gulf War syndrome and squalene.

According to his findings, the Gulf War syndrome was caused by squalene,
which was banned by a Federal Court Judge in 2004 from the Pentagon´s use.
(6)

As seen on p. 6 of this EMEA document (7), the Pandremix vaccine contains
10,68 mg of squalene per 0,5 ml. This corresponds to 2.136.0000 microgrammes
pr. billion microgrammes of water, i.e. one million times more squalene per
dose than in (4). There is any reason to believe that this will make people
sick to a much higher extent than in 1990/91. This appears murderous to me.

I have contacted the Danish National Health Service: They are to decree mass
vaccinations in Denmark - and yet they knew nothing about the composition of
the Pandremix vaccine.

Then I addressed the Danish Medicinal Agency. They admitted that the
Pandremix vaccine from GlaxoSmithKline does contain squalene and thimerosal.
They have not rejected my remark that the squalene concentration is
dangerous. In contrast, the AstraZeneca MedImmune nasal vaccination (8)
avoids squalene side effects.

So far the use of squalene has been banned by the FDA in the US according to
Der Spiegel (9). However, this may not last long (10).

"Clearly bypassing the FDA requirements for safety testing of these new
adjuvants and the vaccines which contain them puts the entire population at
risk for serious, possibly life threatening side effects, particularly any
of the 12,000 paid trial participants (6,000 children) who are unfortunate
enough to be randomized into the adjuvant containing groups."

Still, on July 23, 2009, the FDA announced, "Currently, no U.S. licensed
vaccine contains the adjuvants MF-59 or ASO3 (squalene). It is expected that
a novel influenza A (H1N1) vaccine manufactured using the same process as
U.S. licensed seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine but administered with
MF-59 or ASO3 will be authorized for emergency use only."

Furthermore, "Two of the manufacturers (Novartis and GSK) have proprietary
oil-in-water adjuvants (MF-59 and ASO3, respectively) which have been
evaluated in a number of clinical studies including studies with influenza
vaccines. These manufacturers will include an evaluation of the utility of
the adjuvant for dose sparing and higher effect in their clinical studies."

"The same document indicates that vaccines containing the un-approved
adjuvants will be given to 100 children 6 months to 3 years old, 100
children 3 years old to 8 years, 100 individuals 18 to 64 years old and 100
individuals 65 and older in each of the multiple clinical trials. In
addition, 700 individuals in each trial will be given non-adjuvanted
vaccine".

Now for the immunological side effects of squalene to occur takes months to
years - and cannot be evaluated after up to 6 weeks of observation. Der
Spiegel (9) calls the mass vaccinations on Europeans a gigantic cost free
experiment to provide the FDA with mass vaccination experience to clear the
track for sale in the US.

EMEA admits that side effects can only be found through extensive
vaccination campaigns! (1).

Here is what EMEA (4) has to say about risks of GSK Pandemrix:

EMEAs Pandemrix is commonly or very commonly associated with a range of
local and systemic adverse reactions but these are not often of severe
intensity and the safety profile would not preclude the use of the vaccine
in healthy adults aged 18-60 years or 60 years.

However, there are some adverse reactions known to be very rarely associated
with influenza vaccines and it is currently not possible to predict if
higher rates might be observed with Pandemrix compared with, for example,
seasonal influenza vaccines.

Dr Keiji Fukuda, the WHO's flu chief, today warned about the potential
dangers of the untested vaccine (11): "There are certain areas where you
simply do not try to make any economies. One of the things which cannot be
compromised is the safety of vaccines."

Which is exactly what is going on!

What I do not know is, if they are going to leave the attenuated (or live -
Baxter (12)) bird flu vaccine - or to totally replace it by the H1N1 virus.

Other severe, but rare side effects are autism in children due to thimerosal
(13) and the Guillan-Barré syndrome seen with 400-500 Americans after the
1976 unnecessary mass vaccinations against swine flu (14) - videos. As for
additional severe side effects of squalene - see Stephen Lendman (15).

My advice: If you are forced to be vaccinated against the harmless swine flu
(H1N1) - demand a vaccination with the AstraZeneca nasal vaccine MedImmune
(8)- thereby avoiding squalene side effects.

References
(1) EMEA
http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human...46147609en.pdf
(2) Global Research 20 July
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=14453
(3 Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War_syndrome
(4) The Military Vaccine Resource Directory
http://www.mvrd.org/showpage.cfm?ID=69 .
(5) Statement for Hearing Record, The House Subcommittee on National
Security, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations
http://www.autoimmune.com/Subcommitt...ry24Jan02.html
(6) Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War_syndrome
(7) EMEA
http://www.emea.europa.eu/humandocs/.../H-832-en6.pdf
(8) Reuters
http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssH...11997420090601
(9) Der Spiegel
http://www.spiegel.de/international/...0853-2,00.html
(10) Your Spine
http://www.yourspine.com/Chiropracti...+Adjuvant.aspx
(11) The London Evening Standard
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa...WHO/article.do

(12) The Toronto Sun
http://www.torontosun.com/news/canad...7/8560781.html
(13) Global Research 23 July, 2009
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=14510
(14) Video 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFcnneAqnTM

Video 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9Bvf9AaC-4
(15) Youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wg-52mHIjhs
(13) Global Research 23 July 2009
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=14510
(14) 1. video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFcnneAqnTM 2. video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9Bvf9AaC-4
(15) Stephen Lendman, Global Research, 10 June, 2009
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=13925
Surveys can be seen here http://euro-med.dk/?p=9152 and here
http://euro-med.dk/?p=9895

On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:55:49 +0100, "john" wrote:



What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations?

Clear answer: all those who spread fear against the vaccination. Because it is
them who cause dead.

--
Homöopathisches Akutmittel bei Asthma

http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_akut.htm

john wrote:
What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations?

by Dr. Anders Bruun Laursen
.
Global Research, August 20, 2009
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=14851

There seems to be quite a lot of uncertainty about the technical nature of
Swine Flu (H1N1) vaccines.

As a medical doctor, I wish to clarify a number of improtant issues: First,
we should talk about vaccines instead of vaccine, since the vaccines vary as
for their compositions and even their ways of being dispensed: some by
injection, another by the nose.

I think the fears as for the vaccines can be referred to:

1. the adjuvants - in particular squalene which was in all probability
responsible for the Gulf War syndrome,

What adjuvants? According the CDC, the vaccine won't contain adjuvants.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwr...r58e0821a1.htm.

The person who wrote the article can't get his facts strait.

Jeff

"Jeff" wrote in message news:EGGlm.1203

What adjuvants? According the CDC, the vaccine won't contain adjuvants.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwr...r58e0821a1.htm.

The person who wrote the article can't get his facts strait.

Jeff

they lie 24/7

"We probed the CDC official further about this and he insisted that the hope
of the gov't at this time is that the adjuvent-free version will be
sufficient and they won't have to "resort" to going ahead with the licensing
of the adjuvent version. One of the enlightened women in my group went
further to ask, "If that is so, then how do you explain the fact that $300
million has been spent for the manufacture of the non-adjuvent version while
over $758 million has been spent on the manufacture of the version that
contains squalene. The man couldn't answer the questioned, turned very red
and soon after excused himself from the room."
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/feedback.html

"Jeff" wrote in message news:EGGlm.1203

What adjuvants? According the CDC, the vaccine won't contain adjuvants.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwr...r58e0821a1.htm.

The person who wrote the article can't get his facts strait.

Jeff

PS: "the CDC lady says the vaccine being used in the clinical trials does
NOT contain any adjuvant." http://www.whale.to/vaccine/injecting.html

"Jeff" wrote in message news:EGGlm.1203

What adjuvants? According the CDC, the vaccine won't contain adjuvants.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwr...r58e0821a1.htm.

The person who wrote the article can't get his facts strait.

Jeff

http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2009pr...20090713b.html

Bulk Oil and Water Adjuvant

$71,400,000

$343,810,470

"Jeff" wrote in message
...
john wrote:
What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations?

by Dr. Anders Bruun Laursen
.
Global Research, August 20, 2009
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=14851

There seems to be quite a lot of uncertainty about the technical nature
of Swine Flu (H1N1) vaccines.

As a medical doctor, I wish to clarify a number of improtant issues:
First, we should talk about vaccines instead of vaccine, since the
vaccines vary as for their compositions and even their ways of being
dispensed: some by injection, another by the nose.

I think the fears as for the vaccines can be referred to:

1. the adjuvants - in particular squalene which was in all probability
responsible for the Gulf War syndrome,

What adjuvants? According the CDC, the vaccine won't contain adjuvants.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwr...r58e0821a1.htm.

The person who wrote the article can't get his facts strait.

Jeff
Looks like ol Jeffy has brain fog again. Gets it from constipation.

t wrote:
"Jeff" wrote in message
...
john wrote:
What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations?

by Dr. Anders Bruun Laursen
.
Global Research, August 20, 2009
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=14851

There seems to be quite a lot of uncertainty about the technical nature
of Swine Flu (H1N1) vaccines.

As a medical doctor, I wish to clarify a number of improtant issues:
First, we should talk about vaccines instead of vaccine, since the
vaccines vary as for their compositions and even their ways of being
dispensed: some by injection, another by the nose.

I think the fears as for the vaccines can be referred to:

1. the adjuvants - in particular squalene which was in all probability
responsible for the Gulf War syndrome,
What adjuvants? According the CDC, the vaccine won't contain adjuvants.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwr...r58e0821a1.htm.

The person who wrote the article can't get his facts strait.

Jeff
Looks like ol Jeffy has brain fog again. Gets it from constipation.



Rather than making personal attacks, why don't you provide information
that shows I am incorrect?

"Jeff" wrote in message
...
t wrote:
"Jeff" wrote in message
...
john wrote:
What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations?

by Dr. Anders Bruun Laursen
.
Global Research, August 20, 2009
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=14851

There seems to be quite a lot of uncertainty about the technical nature
of Swine Flu (H1N1) vaccines.

As a medical doctor, I wish to clarify a number of improtant issues:
First, we should talk about vaccines instead of vaccine, since the
vaccines vary as for their compositions and even their ways of being
dispensed: some by injection, another by the nose.

I think the fears as for the vaccines can be referred to:

1. the adjuvants - in particular squalene which was in all probability
responsible for the Gulf War syndrome,
What adjuvants? According the CDC, the vaccine won't contain adjuvants.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwr...r58e0821a1.htm.

The person who wrote the article can't get his facts strait.

Jeff Looks like ol Jeffy has brain fog again. Gets it from constipation.



Rather than making personal attacks, why don't you provide information
that shows I am incorrect?
Why would one believe the CDC?