If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Vaccination and a bizarre chiropractic silence explained -perhaps...
VACCINATION AND A BIZARRE CHIROPRACTIC SILENCE EXPLAINED - PERHAPS...
(Chiros: See the strange four year delay in Wilk v. AMA discussed below.) Steven C. Eisen, DC writes: "[Tedd Koren, DC] decided...to officially link Barrett to the original conspiracy revealed in Wilk v. AMA...[The] Barrett v. Koren trial...provide[d]...evidence to show that [Barrett] was linked to the continued conspiracy against chiropractic." http://www.bolenreport.net/feature_article_3.htm OPEN LETTER (archived for global access; see below) Steven C. Eisen, DC, Research Coordinator Foundation for Health Choice 1400 16th Street, NW, Suite 330, Washington, DC* 20036 202-462-8805 Steven, Tedd Koren, DC and Stephen Barrett, MD are both linked - via their silence - to a massive spinal manipulation crime of obstetricians (among other MD crimes discussed below). The reason for medical silence is obvious. But the reason for CHIROPRACTIC silence is not so obvious. It may be due to chiropractic associations being deathly afraid that chiropractors will finally be prosecuted for their ongoing Medicare fraudulent billing for adjustment of "correctable"/"documented" vertebral subluxations when in fact there is no evidence that vertebral subluxations even exist let alone causing disease and stopping disease when adjusted. Barrett indicates that back when the Medicare legislation was passed, AMA attorney Doyl Taylor told him that someone (AMA?) - aware of the fraud - lobbied Congress to mandate radiation (documentation of vertebral subluxation on x-ray) prior to all Medicare-reimbursed chiropractic care. This was intentionally done to "sabotage" chiropractic coverage under Medicare. See below. REGARDING VACCINATION AND MORE BIZARRE CHIROPRACTIC SILENCE... The Foundation for Health Choice asks: "Do you want the freedom to say no to vaccinations?...Should organized medicine, the pharmaceutical companies and government agencies refuse to change this state of affairs, and in fact continue to support it?...Had enough?...Want to go on the*offensive?...Then join us." http://www.foundationforhealthchoice.com/ I believe that organized medicine first played on chiropractic fear of prosecution for the Medicare/x-ray/subluxation fraud back in 1986 when the fraud was oficially discovered by the Department of Health and Human Services. In the last quarter of 1986, ACA Attorney Rosenfeld wrote, "Chiropractic must join the 'real world' by ceasing opposition to innoculation..." [Rosenfeld ACA Journal Oct 1986] The last quarter of 1986 just happened to coincide with a "marked struggle" by MDs and PharmCo's to cause Congress to give them virtual immunity from liability for their mass vaccination behavior...[Smith MH. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensation Act. Pediatrics. 1988;82(2):264-9] The "last quarter of 1986" ALSO just preceded a key 1987 Congressional battle for FUNDING the vaccine injury act...[which MDs and pharmcos had been working to get passed since 1983.] Smith [1988] notes that "there were powerful opponents to a mandatory system" back in 1983... 1983 was when PharmCo's and MDs asked Congress for TOTAL immunity from liability - for a system wherein families of vaccine-injured and vaccine-dead children could NOT go to court after being forced through the regulatory process by the new system. [Smith 1988:268] 1983 also happened to be the year a new trial was ordered in Wilk v. AMA...but the new trial did not get underway until four years later - in 1987...see below... Fast forward to the last quarter of 1986...the MDs and PharmCo's were on their SECOND try for immunity from vaccination liability...Smith [1988] wrote: "The only means of avoiding a complete new beginning of the legislation again in the 100th Congress was to agree that the funding provisions of the legislation be omitted from consideration...[and]...taken up the next year..." Smith [1988] notes that the 100th Congress convened in January 1987... 1987 (May) just happened to be the moment in time when Judge Susan Getzendanner decided to convene a non-jury trial in Wilk v. AMA - FOUR YEARS after a trial was ordered. On August 24, 1987 - as Congress was funding the MD's immunity from vaccine liability program - Judge Getzendanner was ordering the AMA to publicize in JAMA the AMA's "loss" to the chiropractors. [Wilk v. AMA, 671 F. Supp. 1465] In December 1987, the vaccine injury act was passed by Congress and signed by the President. On January 1, 1988, under Judge Getzendanner's court order, the AMA published news of the Getzendanner verdict in JAMA. Has anyone else wondered why the Wilk v. AMA case was suddenly resurrected in May 1987 - FOUR YEARS after the new trial was ordered in 1983? Probably just another coincidence, right? REMEMBER: the new trial was ordered back in 1983 when MDs and PharmCo's were making their FIRST attempt at virtual immunity from liability for their mass vaccination behavior... DCs AMONG "POWERFUL OPPONENTS"? According to Smith [1988], "it became evident early in these [1983] efforts that there were powerful opponents to a mandatory system...furthermore, Congress made it clear that they simply would not consider a system that precluded some opportunity to go to court." What if it **DCs** were among the "powerful opponents" in 1983? Even if DCs *weren't* "powerful opponents*, who ARE the "powerful opponents"? I ask because 81% of DCs *might* just have something in common with "powerful opponents." (The 81% estimate comes from Haas and Colley [JMPT 1994:585], as in, "Eighty-one percent [of DCs surveyed] felt that [vaccination] should be strictly voluntary"... MASSIVE VACCINATION FRAUD... Smith [1988] notes: "[R]eporting requirements HAD TO BE ACCEPTED in the process of negotiations through the years..." (emphasis added) Smith [1988] also notes: "Congress had DEMANDED the inclusion of the reaction reporting requirements as a condition of the legislation. It will give a better epidemiologic store of information concerning the real facts in vaccine reactions than we have ever had before." ARRGGGHHH!...Congress had to DEMAND that MDs report serious vaccine reactions? Years later, in 1993, then-FDA Commissioner David Kessler, MD offered evidence that physicians were STILL failing to report up to 99% of serious adverse reactions to MEDICATIONS - and this inspite of the fact that such reports are "essential" for determining the safety of medications. [Kessler DA. Introducing MEDWatch: a new approach to reporting medication and device adverse effects and product problems. JAMA (Jun2)1993;269(21):2765-68] ....I mention the potential 99% failure-to-report rate for MEDICATIONS because CDC's Vaccination Information Sheets compare safety of medications (unknown) with safety of vaccinations (unknown). INTERESTINGLY: The American Chiropractic Association/ACA initially did not support the Wilk v. AMA lawsuit. The ACA in effect told Dr. Chester Wilk to go to hell - because ACA was holding all-important behind-the-scenes talks with AMA... Dr. Wilk says that his discussions with ACA General Counsel Harry Rosenfeld were almost "dogfights." [See Wilk. Medicine, Monopolies and Malice. Garden City Park, NY: Avery 1996] We must ask ourselves: What *were* ACA and AMA "dialoguing" about in the 70s and 80s? What business did ACA's Rosenfeld have exhorting DCs to do what an estimated 81% (perhaps more) of them didn't want to do - end their opposition to mandatory vaccination? ([NOTE:] When DCs are finally truly informed regarding CDC's sordid adverse event reporting behavior - the percent opposed to MANDATORY vaccination will likely be closer to 100%.) I submit that in October 1986 Mr. Rosenfeld and the ACA were currying favor with AMA at an extremely critical time in the pharmaceutical industry's effort to win from Congress immunity from liability for themselves and MDs for vaccine injuries and deaths. I submit further that the MD-dominated HHS was not prosecuting obvious DC health fraud - known about in 1972 and "officially" discovered in 1986 - in order to offer DCs a reason to be silent as organized medicine went for immunity from liability for mass vaccination behavior. Excerpted from (slight editing/some additions) from: VACCINATION SUBLUXATION http://groups.google.com/group/ misc.health.alternative/msg/05d5ea68f816b93e and from, PPAC, vaccinations and chiro bouncer Bob (Bob Dubin, Diplomate, American Board of Chiropractic Censorship) http://groups.google.com/group/ misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/e393ae3facee79d7 Todd Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon USA PS Here's another post, alluded to above, regarding Koren's recent courtroom victory over Barrett... ---------- From: Todd Gastaldo Newsgroups: misc.kids.pregnancy, misc.health.alternative, sci.med Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:39:07 -0700 Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: N. Mexico babies, x-rays and - 'Quackbuster' Barrett loses to a chiropractor? N. MEXICO BABIES, X-RAYS AND - "QUACKBUSTER" BARRETT LOSES TO A CHIROPRACTOR? Tedd Koren, DC reportedly beat "Quackbuster" Steve Barrett, MD in court. See the very end of this post. Oddly, Koren and Barrett are both ignoring massive spinal manipulation quackery - by the most prolific manipulators of children's spines - MDs. REGARDING BABIES... PREGNANT WOMEN: You can help prevent spinal manipulation quackery by MDs. Just roll onto your side as you push your baby out - or use some other "alternative" delivery position. Talk to your OB or midwife today. Please forward this email to your chiropractor. Your chiropractor may wish to start informing pregnant women that obstetricians are closing birth canals up to 30% - and that it is easy for women to allow their birth canals to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%. With birth canals senselessly closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30%, obstetricians are pulling with hands, forceps and vacuums - sometimes pulling so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. Note: Bizarrely, California chiropractors MAY be forbidden from educating pregnant women about this - or so I was informed years ago by a man calling himself Michael Schroeder, attorney for the California Board of Chiropractic Examiners. Schroeder is an honorary member of the California Chiropractic Association - and friend of BOB DUBIN, DC - who is now with the New Mexico Chiropractic Association. See the end of this post. REGARDING N. MEXICO BABIES AND X-RAYS... Attn: NEW MEXICO Board of Chiropractic Examiners Chairwoman Dr. Leslie Schmidt - via NMBCE members Dr. Bill Doggett and Dr. Michael Plaman and Dr. Guruchander Khalsa: Is it legal in New Mexico for DCs to inform pregnant women that obstetricians are closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30%? ALSO: Is the New Mexico Board of Chiropractic Examiners doing anything to end the x-ray fraud? See the CHIRO COMEDY HEALTH CRIME discussed in my Open Letter to Gene Veno below? Gene Veno, President of the Foundation for Chiropractic Progress says to chiropractors: "[F]ederal rules...require you to practice one way and then advise you to practice another." Dynamic Chiropractic November 7, 2005, Volume 23, Issue 23 http://www.chiroweb.com/archives/23/23/05.html (Accessed Oct. 13, 2005) OPEN LETTER (archived for global access; see below) Gene Veno President Foundation for Chiropractic Progress Gene, Hmmmm.... Federal rules require chiropractors to practice one way and then advise them to practice another... You aren't by any chance referring to CHIRO COMEDY HEALTH CRIME - the fact that federal Medicare rules/laws forbid chiropractors from submitting fraudulent bills even as federal Medicare rules/laws require chiropractors - if they wish to be paid - to fraudulently claim on their bills that they have identified correctable, disease-causing vertebral subluxations? It's a sordidly hilarious comedy: Congress' first Medicare law required Medicare patients be subjected to ionizing radiation before their spinal adjustments. Then in 1997, Congress acknowledged that it is illegal to mandate radiation of chiropractic patients prior to treatment - but Congress kept the radiation mandate for two years - because the Congressional Budget Office determined that if the radiation mandate were removed too soon - too many people would go to chiropractors and it would cost the government too much! The American Chiropractic Association (Mike Pedigo, DC was president) silently went along with the radiation gag! LOL! (It *is* sort of funny, after all!) See Radiation is NOT a tool of managed care! http://groups.google.com/group/ sci.med/msg/9930156e31bd2fe7? Also sort of funny: The Medicare ionizing radiation mandate for documenting vertebral subluxations is now optional - but the mandatory Medicare fraud is not: Chiropractors still must document having identified correctable, disease-causing vertebral subluxations before treating Medicare patients - even though there is NO scientific evidence that vertebral subluxations cause disease and stop causing disease when adjusted. The kicker: There never was any such evidence - and the chiropractic profession TOLD Congress this way back in 1973. See Chiro x-ray fraud (also: Why Dr. Gastaldo is unlicensed - voluntarily...) http://groups.google.com/group misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/9e0c34fe3be2efe3? I suspect it was "Quackbusters" (Steve Barrett, MD et al? The AMA?) who lobbied and got the obviously illegal radiation mandate passed by Congress. AMA member Stephen Barrett reported in 1995 that AMA attorney Doyl Taylor told him that when it appeared that chiropractic reimbursement under Medicare was inevitable, "subluxation demonstrated to exist on x-ray" language was inserted to "sabotage" chiropractic. [Magner, Barrett (ghost). Chiropractic: The Victim's Perspective. Amherst, NY: Prometheus 1995:3_] *See also http://www.chirobase.org/02Research/oig.html) Fortunately, Congress' obviously illegal radiation mandate accorded with the then (still?)-accepted practice of x-raying the spines of elderly persons before applying high velocity/low amplitude thrusts...While there is radiation fraud - it can serve an important purpose if there is radiographically demonstrable gross pathology in the spine. Something far worse than possibly beneficial Medicare radiation fraud is going on in medicine... MDs GET AWAY WITH FAR WORSE HEALTH CRIME... Simple biomechanics [Gastaldo TD. Birth. 1992;19(4):230-1] require obstetricians to allow birth canals to open an "extra" up to 30%; yet obstetric texts advise obstetricians to, in effect, CLOSE birth canals the "extra" up to 30%. Worse, when babies get stuck, an American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists/ACOG video in effect advises obstetricians to KEEP birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30%. Obstetricians are lying to cover-up. For the Four OB Lies (they are whoppers)... See Dents in babies' skulls... http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3897 UNNECESSARY SPINAL MANIPULATION It's a massive spinal manipulation crime. As obstetricians keep birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30%, they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums - sometimes pulling so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. Some babies die - some get paralyzed - most "only" have their spines gruesomely wrenched. (Any estimated 4.6% of "health" term babies are born with unexplained brain bleeds.) ALL spinal manipulation is gruesome with the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30%. UNNECESSARY EPISIOTOMIES/UNNECESSARY C-SECTIONS There is also the matter of obstetricians slicing vaginas and abdomens en masse (episiotomy/c-section) - surgically/fraudulently inferring they are doing/have done everything possible to open birth canals - even as they keep birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30%. To be sure, compelling obstetricians to allow birth canals to open the "extra" up to 30% is not going to prevent all episiotomies, c-sections and forceps deliveries - it's just that obstetricians have no business keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30%. The kicker is that obstetricians are telling obvious lies to cover-up. Again, for the Four OB Lies (they are whoppers)... See Dents in babies' skulls... http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3897 MORE OBSTETRIC CRIME Obstetricians are immediately clamping umbilical cords - temporarily asphyxiating babies - cutting off umbilical cord oxygen - forcing babies to breathe with their lungs before they are ready - and in the process robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG indicates the massive blood robbery happens to EVERY CESAREAN BABY - and in most "cord blood banking" births.... See Water birth and breathing without lungs... http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3936 HOW MDs GET AWAY WITH THESE (AND OTHER) MASSIVE CRIMES... Law enforcement officers (attorney generals) look the other way - and as Steve B. Harris, MD once boasted: "Without enforcement, there is no law. Without law, there is no crime. *These are elementary principles. Get an adult to explain them to you." http://groups.google.com/group/misc....866f3384801ae9 THE SAD FACT IS... Chiropractors are competing with a massive criminal enterprise euphemistically known as medical "science." Gene, you said to chiropractors: "...Just because you have a license to practice does not guarantee your practice is free from governmental intrusion." Yes, but chiropractic's main economic competitors ARE free from governmental intrusion in an important respect: Law enforcement is ignoring obvious MD lies and letting MDs commit obvious massive (sometimes fatal) crimes against mothers and babies. NOTE: Chiropractic is free from governmental intrusion in regard to IT'S ongoing crime - and that may be the reason for the bizarre silence of chiropractors regarding the massive spinal manipulation crime of MDs. Gene, you also wrote: "Be very careful to understand that your scope of practice in your respective state is as valuable, if not more valuable, than your individual license to practice." Well said! I stopped paying for (voluntarily forfeited) my chiropractic license after I was told^^^ that telling women that obstetricians are closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30% is outside the scope of chiropractic practice in California. ^^^I was told this years ago by a man calling himself Michael Schroeder, attorney for the California Board of Chiropractic Examiners. Years later, I was SUED by a man calling himself Michael Schroeder who was once an attorney for the California Board of Chiropractic Examiners. More on this below. ATTENTION CALIFORNIA CHIROPRACTORS: IS it outside the scope of chiropractic in California to tell pregnant women that obstetricians are closing birth canals up to 30%? It's been two years - I've asked the Board a few times - no answer yet... See Birth Danger: Cal Chiro Bd - SIMPLE QUESTION http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3526 FINALLY GENE... WHY THE SILENCE... You wrote: "By now, I am sure you are getting the picture that you cannot practice these days without national and state representation, to ensure that your right to practice is protected on all levels." Ummmm Gene... In addition to the California Board of Chiropractic Examiners remaining silent, prominent people at national and state chiropractic associations have also remained silent. (The names Bob Dubin, DC and James Edwards, DC spring to mind. I will copy them at and ) National and state chiropractic associations are making NO protest about the obvious, massive spinal manipulation crime of MDs. Nor are national and state chiropractic associations making any protest that the California State Board of Chiropractic Examiners won't answer my SIMPLE QUESTION. You yourself have been silent. Or maybe you just didn't receive or read my previous emails? Gene, if you ever get an answer to my SIMPLE QUESTION from the Calif. Chiro Bd. of Examiners (or any other chiro board), I hope you'll share it with me - preferably publicly. Since you are interested in chiropractic progress, consider this: Chiropractic is missing out on a GOLDEN opportunity to save tiny lives and tiny limbs and PREVENT more vertebral subluxations than DCs will ever be able to adjust by hand. (See the massive spinal manipulation crime of MDs discussed above.) REMEMBER GENE: Preventing vertebral subluxations is included in the STANDARDS of the Council on Chiropractic Education/CCE, as in, Health promotion is "inclusive of subluxation prevention" [CCE Standards, p. 56 or 66 (pdf version)] I recently noted this subluxation prevention fact for CCE President Joseph Brimhall, DC.... See Babies, CCE and upper cervical chiropractic... http://groups.google.com/group/ misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/53e7391731c561c6 CCE Pres. Brimhall never got back to me. I will cc him again via: Thanks for reading Gene. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon USA Copied to: NEW MEXICO CHIROPRACTIC ASSOCIATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2005-2006 Executive Committee President Dr. Susan M. Bright 1504 St. Francis Dr. Santa Fe, NM 87505 Office: 505-984-1222 Fax: 505-984-1376 Vice President Dr. Harold Steinberg 1400 Maclovia St., Ste. 1 Santa Fe, NM 87505 Office: 505-473-0057 Fax: 505-473-7974 Treasurer Dr. Susan Hilliker P. O. Box 1687 Taos, NM 87571 Office: 505-758-3050 Secretary Dr. Robert Woodruff 2904 Montclaire, NE Albuquerque, NM 87110 Office: 505-865-3333 Fax: 505-865-3840 Past President Dr. Michael Pendleton 7520 Montgomery, NE, #E-9 Albuquerque, NM 87109 Office: 505-888-6800 Fax: 505-888-6812 Executive Director Jaeni Aarden 10700 Academy Rd., NE, #817 Albuquerque, NM 87111 Office: 505-280-0689 Fax: 505-828-1128 Board of Directors Central Dist. Directors Dr. David Peer 7520 Montgomery, NE, #E-9 Albuquerque, NM 87109 Office: 505-888-6800 Fax: 505-888-6812 Dr. Bob Dubin 03 Homesteads Road, Suite E Placitas, NM 87043 505-771-3933 Dr. Norman Dawson 12932 Granite Avenue, NE Albuquerque, NM 87112 505-275-0422 * * East Central District Director Dr. Bill Smith 1400 S. Ave. D, #A Portales, NM 88130 Office: 505-356-4440 Fax: 505-356-4433 North Central District Directors Dr. Michael Crawford #11 Calle Medico, Ste. 3 Santa Fe, NM 87505 Office: 505-983-3037 Fax: 505-982-3737 Dr. Susan Pisano 208 Camino Rio Santa Fe, NM 87505 Office: 505-982-0288 Northeast District Director Dr. Monty McGowen 1800 Hospital Drive Raton, NM 87740 Office: 505-445-0222 Fax: 505-445-0222 Northwest District Director Dr. Andy Sandoval 4251 E. Main St., #F Farmington, NM 87402 Office: 505-325-3355 Fax: 505-325-4479 South Central District Directors Dr. Douglas Patrick 1301 Oregon Ave. Alamogordo, NM 88310 Office: 505-437-0667 Fax: 505-437-0083 Southeast District Director Dr. Kendall Boyd P. O. Box 113 Jal, NM 88252 Office: 505-395-2311 Fax: 505-395-2750 * * Southwest District Director Dr. John Rogers 1205 N. West Street Silver City, NM 88061 Office: 505-538-2558 Fax 505-538-3996 * * West Central District Director Dr. Wayne Goforth 108 Hill Street Gallup, NM 87301 Office: 505-722-9002 Fax: 505-722-7031 * * Committee Chairs ACA Liaison Nat'l Legislative Affairs Dr. Bill Doggett 3500 Comanche, NE, Suite I Albuquerque, NM 87107 Office: 505-884-0771 Fax: 505-884-0776 www.sunbear.cc * COCSA Committee Dr. John A. Rogers 1205 N. West Street Silver City, NM 88061 Office: 505-538-2558 Fax: 505-538-3996 Convention Committee Dr. Michael Pendleton 7520 Montgomery, NE, E-9 Albuquerque, NM 87109 Office: 505-888-6800 Fax: 505-888-6812 Education Committee Dr. Ben Markham 5200 Eubank, NE, Suite B-1 Albuquerque, NM 87111 Office: 505-237-1050 Fax: 505-237-0113 * Ethics/Bylaws Committee Dr. Elaine Adams 7007 Wyoming, NE, E-1 Albuquerque, NM 87109 Office: 505-822-0306 Fax: 505-822-0316 dradams@lifetime chiropractic.com * Insurance Relations Dr. Robert E. Byrd 7611 Indian School Rd., NE Albuquerque, NM 87110 Office: 505-268-0808 Fax: 505-278-2458 Legislative Dr. Stephen Perlstein Dr. Sherry Gaber 2019 Galisteo St., Ste. M6 Santa Fe, NM 87505 Office: 505-984-0006 Fax: 505-995-0884 Medicare Dr. Gretchen Peterson Dr. James M. Barber, Alt. 3701 Eubank, NE, #24 Albuquerque, NM 87111 Office: 505-299-4446 Fax: 505-275-8505 Membership/Pub. Relations Dr. Bob Dubin 5 Cerrito Rojo Road Placitas, NM 87043 Office: 505-771-9833 Peer Review Dr. David Peer 7520 Montgomery, NE, #E-9 Albuquerque, NM 87109 Office: 505-888-6800 Fax: 505-888-6812 Scholarship Dr. Kevin Atchley 8004 Pennsylvania Cr., NE Albuquerque, NM 87110 Office: 505-265-5651 Fax: 505-268-0820 Scholarship Information Worker's Compensation Dr. George Simmons 10401 Montgomery Pkwy., NE Albuquerque, NM 87111 Office: 505-299-7077 Fax: 505-292-6369 NMCA Members on NMCA Member Delegate to Congress of Chiropractic State Associations Dr. John Rogers 1205 N. West Street Silver City, NM 88061 Office: 505-538-2558 Fax 505-538-3996 NMCA Attorney Angela M. Martinez, Esq. Law Office of Angela M. Martinez 10131 Coors Rd. I-2 PMB #715 Albuquerque, NM 87114 Office: 505-710-6725 Fax: 505-890-4517 "QUACKBUSTER" LOSES TO CHIROPRACTOR... As noted above... In 1995, AMA member and "Quackbuster" Stephen Barrett, MD reported that AMA attorney Doyl Taylor told him that when it appeared that chiropractic reimbursement under Medicare was inevitable, "subluxation demonstrated to exist on x-ray" language was inserted to "sabotage" chiropractic. [Magner, Barrett (ghost). Chiropractic: The Victim's Perspective. Amherst, NY: Prometheus 1995:3_] *See also http://www.chirobase.org/02Research/oig.html) Now in 2005, "Quackbuster" Barrett recently lost a court case to Tedd Koren, DC... http://www.bolenreport.net/feature_article.htm The funny thing is - both "Quackbuster" Barrett and Tedd Koren, DC are silent about the massive criminal quackery of obstetricians. Silence on both sides of the health care aisle is something to ponder as babies sometimes DIE from spinal manipulation - as obstetricians manipulate their spines with birth canals senselessly closed the "extra" up to 30%. BACK TO THE X-RAY FRAUD... In 2002, I quoted from a 2001 newsletter by Tedd Koren, DC: "Dr. Winterstein of National College of Chiropractic...states as a 'fact' that, 'We have not yet demonstrated, through scientific evidence, that spinal subluxation is a causative agent in human disease or dis-ease, nor that we can actually 'correct' subluxation...This fundamental concept of chiropractic has not been scientifically tested." (p. 10) Dr. Koren then wrote: "big snip...No one has ever seen a subluxation. It is quite possible no one ever will...big snip" --Tedd Koren, DC What is a Subluxation? http://www.korenpublications.com/newsletters/index.htm (Click on May 2001, as soon as Dr. Koren puts it up.) TWO COINCIDENCES... 1. Tedd Koren, DC has two MD brothers - one an obstetrician. (I should note that two of my brothers are MDs - but we are estranged - with both of them refusing so far to speak out about the massive obstetric crimes. Then again, perhaps neither of them have seen my emails. I doubt it.) 2. Bob Dubin, DC, mentioned above, said he persuaded Michael Schroeder, formerly attorney for the California Board, not to sue other DCs when he (Schroeder) sued me. It turned out Schroeder's lawsuit was a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation/SLAPP - an illegal attempt to deny me my First Amendment right to petition for redress of grievances caused by Schroeder in his role as a public official - attorney for the California Board of Chiropractic Examiners. California DCs used to attend births - indeed - at one time attending a birth was a requirement for chiropractic licensure in California. Schroeder was working for the Caliifornia Chiropractic Association during the bizarre case against California's last chiropractic obstetrician, Laura Flores, DC, PhD. (Dr. Flores' patients did not sue - district attorneys sued - and she beat them - but ultimately - IIRC - the chiropractic board took her license.) After Dr. Flores was out of the way, Schroeder wrote a regulation (Rule 302) that prohibited California DCs from so much as severing umbilical cords and then jumped to the California Board of Chiropractic Examiners to defend Rule 302 from 10 MD-obstetricians who were ostensibly attacking Rule 302 - but who - I suspect - were getting Rule 302 judicially rubberstamped. MD-obstetricians were then - and are still - committing a massive baby asphxiation/baby blood robbery crime (mentioned above) and they did NOT need chiropractors to be able to testify as experts - or so I say. Dubin - who said he persuaded Schroeder to sue only me - moved from California to New Mexico - which is why I have cc'd Dubin and his fellow New Mexico Chiropractic Association members (listed above). I think it is time - finally - for chiropractic boards to speak out and stop both the ongoing Medicare radiation fraud AND (especially) the ongoing spinal manipulation crime of MDs. Hopefully the New Mexico Chiropractic Board will lead the way - with Dubin and other New Mexico Chiropractic Association members publicly encouraging such action. As usual, I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical students, MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious felonies. Thanks for reading everyone. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon USA This Open Letter to Gene Veno will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive. Search http://groups.google.com for "[New Mexico b]abies, x-rays and - 'Quackbuster' Barrett loses to a chiropractor?" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Get flu, get spine adjusted? (also: college vaccination fraud) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | April 13th 04 05:42 PM |
Arnold! (also: Channeling Gastaldo) (also: chiros/SACA/WFC) (also: Warning about usenet MDs) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | October 9th 03 09:21 PM |
Awesome breasts! OBs causing otitis media? (also: 'Osteopathic' v. 'Chiropractic' manipulation) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | September 17th 03 08:18 PM |
VACCINATION SUBLUXATION! (Thimerosal: Sen Frist subluxating VICA) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | September 15th 03 09:19 PM |
PPAC, vaccinations and chiro bouncer Bob (Bob Dubin, Diplomate, American Board of Chiropractic Censorship) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 1 | September 6th 03 08:55 PM |