If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
If he has a 5 percent or less rater of c-sections, I'd drop on the floor and kiss his feet. I think the odds you'll find that are slim and none. The national average is about 26 percent now, so anything lower than that would be better than average. Good homebirth midwives probably weigh in around 5 percent or less, so that would be absolutely outstanding. If he were truly non-interventionist, he could have a 10 percent c-section rate. Homebirth midwifes do have the advantage that elective c-sections are not going to be in their statistics, plus their patients are usually very committed to natural birth. A direct comparison is difficult. I find it quite scary that even with a good homebirth midwife the rate is still 5%, but then I am overly freaked out by c-sections. Anne |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Emily wrote: wrote: I *always* bring lists (for my OB appts, GP appts, DS's ped appts), and I always get a positive reaction from the caregivers. I feel bad asking a lot of questions because I just hate waiting at the doctor's office (although I've been pleasantly surprised that this doctor hasn't kept us waiting much). I always feel like I'm keeping someone else waiting if I ask a lot of questions. It makes it difficult, because there's so much that I want to know about my OB. I never found it necessary to get to know my GP, because he was basically a human vending machine for antibiotics for years and years (I've been blessed with extremely good health for most of my life, and have never had to get to know a doctor). I probably need to get over this. The OB is very accommodating and willing to answer questions. I always feel, though, like I need to rush through them in order to let the next patient have her turn. The next patient is probably in there for three hours... Amy |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Melania wrote: Hah! Our doctor group was a fun bunch; one of the doctors said "basically we're really lazy and don't do any work. We just hang out, act encouraging, and after we make sure the cord isn't wrapped around the neck, we even get Dad to catch the baby." I leaned over to dh and said "do you *want* to catch the baby?" "uh, no!" "oh, GOOD. Let's just let the people who've done that a few hundred times handle it, then." He was busy helping me, anyway. After my husband mentioned that he wanted to catch the baby, before we found out that the OB won't let him, we got into a big hairy discussion about who was going to be helping me while he was down there playing doctor. I said, "If you're catching, I want my sister there to hold my hand and help me count." He insisted that he could do both. He just couldn't understand why it wouldn't be every bit as good if he were between my feet, and I couldn't make him understand that I wanted his attention on ME, not the baby, for 10 more seconds before it's on the baby for the rest of our lives. I would imagine that if he did catch, it would take concentration, and he certainly wouldn't be able to focus on me and catching the baby... I was really relieved when the doctor said he wouldn't let him catch, because my husband was unwilling to let anyone else in the room. I even suggested hiring a doula, so that someone would be able to support me, and he wouldn't hear of it. *sigh* Amy |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Anne Rogers wrote: He's also not going to let my husband catch the baby, due to liability, which is also a relief. I'd rather have him holding my hand at that point, anyway. The last thing I want to have to worry about is Daddy vs. Slippery Baby. would he let you catch the baby? this wasn't something I asked for, but when the time came the midwife did what she needed to do on the penultimate contraction, which was unloop the cord from the baby's neck and then told me to lift it on to me tummy on the next contraction, which I did and it was a fantastic moment, my husband was up my my head so he was close too, it was a wonderful moment, I didn't think to ask, but it sure doesn't sound like it. I don't think I'd want to, anyway. Mommy vs. Slippery Baby doesn't sound any better than Daddy vs. Slippery Baby (although I'm glad that it worked well for you!!). I'm clumsy, and I'm not very bendy. I can't figure out how I would do it without hurting myself or dropping the baby... I need to see video of this happening. I also need to see video of various birthing positions (so that I can show my husband that squatting isn't weird). Is there such a thing online? You all would know, if there is... Amy |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message
oups.com... I said, "If you're catching, I want my sister there to hold my hand and help me count." Just for the record, there's no need to "count" while pushing if you're not anesthetized. That whole counting-to-ten thing while pushing originates because women who've had epidurals often can't feel the urge to push and have to be "coached" to push through contractions. If did that to me when I could actually *feel* the urge to push, I'd knock their blocks off! He insisted that he could do both. He just couldn't understand why it wouldn't be every bit as good if he were between my feet, and I couldn't make him understand that I wanted his attention on ME, not the baby, for 10 more seconds before it's on the baby for the rest of our lives. I would imagine that if he did catch, it would take concentration, and he certainly wouldn't be able to focus on me and catching the baby... Of course, that's perfectly reasonable (wanting his attention on you rather than the baby), but you might be surprised by how you actually feel when that moment comes. Don't be too surprised if you find him wanting to focus on the baby because *you're* focussed on the baby (or getting it out, anyway g). I was really relieved when the doctor said he wouldn't let him catch, because my husband was unwilling to let anyone else in the room. I even suggested hiring a doula, so that someone would be able to support me, and he wouldn't hear of it. *sigh* Try to talk him into a doula, anyway, especially if you have any hopes of having an unmedicated birth. A doula has seen labor *waaaaay* more times than either you or your husband have and is going to have far more tricks up her sleeve for helping you cope with labor than either of you could come up with on your own or together. In addition, because your husband is your husband, he is probably more susceptible to suggestions from medical staff that this or that (unnecessary, annoying) procedure is really only for your good and/or the baby's good (when it may well just be what the hospital staff are *used* to doing and therefore it makes their jobs easier). A good doula who understands your preferences and knows what type of birth you're aiming for is better able of separating the wheat from the chaff in these sorts of situations and of acting as your advocate without the conflict of such close emotional ties. I never had a doula for any of my births, but I greatly regret that I didn't for my first. I strongly suspect I would have had a much more positive birth experience if I'd had someone knowledgeable and experienced there to help me and advocate for me. By the time I got to my second and third births, I knew what I wanted well enough to be my own advocate (and my husband knew how *my* labors went well enough to support me in what I wanted), but the first time, we were both too green for it to work out very well. -- Be well, Barbara Mom to Mr. Congeniality (7), the Diva (5) and the Race Car Fanatic (almost 3) Didn't make sense not to live for fun Your brain gets smart but your head gets dumb. So much to see, so much to do, So what's wrong with taking the back streets? You'll never know if you don't go. You'll never shine if you don't glow. - "All Star", Smashmouth |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Circe wrote: wrote in message oups.com... I said, "If you're catching, I want my sister there to hold my hand and help me count." Just for the record, there's no need to "count" while pushing if you're not anesthetized. That whole counting-to-ten thing while pushing originates because women who've had epidurals often can't feel the urge to push and have to be "coached" to push through contractions. If did that to me when I could actually *feel* the urge to push, I'd knock their blocks off! Hahaha! It's frightening, how many of the ideas I have for what this is going to be like come from TV and movies. *sigh* Being a first timer is kind of hard. Of course, that's perfectly reasonable (wanting his attention on you rather than the baby), but you might be surprised by how you actually feel when that moment comes. Don't be too surprised if you find him wanting to focus on the baby because *you're* focussed on the baby (or getting it out, anyway g). I'm glad you think it's reasonable. I felt like a shrew typing it. I just want *SOMEONE* paying attention to me! If I pass out or have a stroke or something, I want someone to notice right away, not 10 minutes later when they finally wonder why I'm not cooing at the baby. Try to talk him into a doula, anyway, especially if you have any hopes of having an unmedicated birth. A doula has seen labor *waaaaay* more times than either you or your husband have and is going to have far more tricks up her sleeve for helping you cope with labor than either of you could come up with on your own or together. In addition, because your husband is your husband, he is probably more susceptible to suggestions from medical staff that this or that (unnecessary, annoying) procedure is really only for your good and/or the baby's good (when it may well just be what the hospital staff are *used* to doing and therefore it makes their jobs easier). I suggested that to him, once, that he might listen to the doctors because I'm in pain and he doesn't want me to be in pain... He got really offended. But I know it's a natural tendency for men. I really need to work on this doula thing... A good doula who understands your preferences and knows what type of birth you're aiming for is better able of separating the wheat from the chaff in these sorts of situations and of acting as your advocate without the conflict of such close emotional ties. That sounds so nice... I need one. I never had a doula for any of my births, but I greatly regret that I didn't for my first. I strongly suspect I would have had a much more positive birth experience if I'd had someone knowledgeable and experienced there to help me and advocate for me. By the time I got to my second and third births, I knew what I wanted well enough to be my own advocate (and my husband knew how *my* labors went well enough to support me in what I wanted), but the first time, we were both too green for it to work out very well. I will definitely try to talk to him about this, but it seems like he gets insulted whenever I suggest that his support might not be enough... He doesn't understand that a doula would be there to support *him* too. Men!! Thanks for the really great advice, Amy |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
After my husband mentioned that he wanted to catch the baby, before we
found out that the OB won't let him, we got into a big hairy discussion about who was going to be helping me while he was down there playing doctor. I said, "If you're catching, I want my sister there to hold my hand and help me count." He insisted that he could do both. He just couldn't understand why it wouldn't be every bit as good if he were between my feet, and I couldn't make him understand that I wanted his attention on ME, not the baby, for 10 more seconds before it's on the baby for the rest of our lives. I would imagine that if he did catch, it would take concentration, and he certainly wouldn't be able to focus on me and catching the baby... Honestly, it could be totally different for you. When I was pushing the first time, I didn't need my DH holding my hand. He was paying attention to me, absolutely, but mostly he was holding the mirror for me and encouraging me verbally. I don't want it to sound like I didn't need him, because I did, but he was doing exactly what I needed him to do. If I had needed him to hold my hand or whatever, he would have done that, but as it happened, I needed his physical touch more during labor than during the pushing part. He would have been able to catch the baby without it taking any attention from me at all. As it happened, once the baby's head and shoulders were out, he put down the mirror, and the two of us together put our hands around the baby's chest and brought her the rest of the way out and onto my chest. This time we're intending for him to catch the baby, including the head (with the midwife providing guidance and perineal protection), if he wants to at the time, if I don't need him to be holding my hand or otherwise physically supporting me, and if the baby and I are in a good position for him to catch. We're not stuck on it, though, so if it doesn't turn out to be the best thing, that's okay too. All that to say that you may be surprised at what you do or don't need/want your DH to do. IMO, it's most important to be flexible and for your DH to be willing to do or not do whatever it is you do or don't need/want. -- -Sara Mommy to DD, 3 Very Soon And Someone Now Overdue |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
misc.kids FAQ on Childhood Vaccinations, Part 1/4 | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 3 | July 29th 04 05:16 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Childhood Vaccinations, Part 1/4 | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 3 | April 17th 04 12:24 PM |
misc.kids FAQ on Childhood Vaccinations, Part 1/4 | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 3 | March 18th 04 09:11 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Childhood Vaccinations, Part 1/4 | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 3 | January 16th 04 09:15 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Childhood Vaccinations, Part 1/4 | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 1 | December 15th 03 09:41 AM |