If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
| 7 state sites for families w CPS prob. spanking
On 15 Sep 2003 21:49:54 GMT, (Fern5827) wrote:
You sad little smelly ****. Kane This is uncalled for SEXUAL HARASSMENT, Kane. Really? How so? Are you not engaged in harrassment of your own? And by supporting abusive parents harassing children sexually who have been raped by them? Stop it immediately. No. This is totally beyond the pale. No it isn't. It's a very weak accusation. You are far worse than a smelly little ****. You are a liar that effects others lives adversely. You are a danger to the truth and humankind. A Plant is shaken and a Plum falls out. The uncouth, Yah got me there, Sweet Potato. foul-mouthed Mouth Got me again...good for you. K-9 Whoops! A name. Are you calling me a dog? Tsk. I expect better from those that consider themselves genteel ladies, but then you are a Plant, right? insults everyone Everyone? Hmmm. Not likely. Some perhaps. My apologies folks. This isn't intended to describe you, only the smelly little ****. reading this NG with this type of language: I don't THINK so, Potato. Only those such as your precious little Twiggy self that think harassment is confined to YOUR use. And USENET has no restrictions on language of any kind. Even YOUR treacherous malicious kind. 1st amendment. You do support the Bill of Rights, do you not? I've seen you and your cronies cite it for your own purposes. You can't just pick and choose, mix and match the Rights, yah know. BTW, you NEED ANGER MANAGEMENT. I'm not yelling. You are. And as I mentioned, and I'm sure anyone with half a wit would see, I don't speak to everyone this way, only the chosen few. Hence, I manage my anger very nicely thank you very much. Isn't that same excuse CPS uses to remove another's children and RIGHTS? Why would YOU, you paragon of crusading reformers, use their tactics on me? Subject: | 7 state sites for families w CPS prob. spanking From: (Kane) Date: 9/15/2003 2:11 PM Eastern Daylight Time Message-id: On 15 Sep 2003 14:50:39 GMT, (Fern5827) wrote: The states a FL IA IL KS MO NC OH Can all be reached thru Website of: http://www. CPSWatch.com While you, Pimp, refer the innocent, do remember you also refer the guilty and those that could have been helped to reform as parents had they gotten badly needed assistance from the state. Then there are those children that will go home to the perps tender mercies because of you...tsk. You sad little smelly ****. Kane Note K-9 has taken something from aps and fwd it here. Just so he can mouth his OBSCENITIES. Why then would you post it again, you of the habit of NEVER attributing others posts, until now...hmmmmmm? Suddenly you are all attributes. How refreshing for a change. Whatever to suit YOUR purposes, eh, but would deny others. Nice going. I imagine Ric Werme, the founder of this NG would shake his head in disgust at what you just wrote. Can't say. I don't try to imagine what people say much. I respond to what they do say and do. If he was honorable he'd also shake his head at those you defend, the nonsense you post, the biased news article you cut and paste, but I don't think he's going to do that, do you? Have you no boundaries to your miserable behavior? Just about the same as you, mostly. But I won't support lies, and you do. I won't defend those that use CPS to keep a child and mother apart, but you will. I won't post, except in response to anothers attempt to decieve, opposing information and not cite ALL of it so the reader can judge for themselves. You do. Screen upon screen of it for miles and miles. Daily. Perhaps Paula Werme who DEFENDS JUST SUCH INNOCENT FAMILIES who have been falsely accused by DCYF would be tarred by such an epithet, also. Perhaps you are pretty frantic, aren't you, DeadNettle? How would my calling you a smelly little **** reflect on either? Are you positioning yourself with them? Are you claiming that your efforts, like hers, only defend the innocent? And how do you KNOW she only defends the innocent. In fact, how does she? I've known perps to lie. Haven't you? Hell, even Dan doesn't confine himself to the INNOCENT. He helps the guilty too, when it's warranted. But you, you lie. Alot. You help the guilty when it's NOT warranted. You post things that are of no possible use to the reform of CPS and in fact throw a great deal in the way of them doing their job correctly. They have to defend themselves against the results of your lies. That time and energy is supposed to be spent on protecting children. You cripple reform by lying. You bust'em in the knee then you howl about them not doing their job while crippled. You ARE a dirty smelly little ****. For shame. Apparently you have never learned respectful communication. For shame, You fake learned respectful communication while lying through your teeth....r r r r There are sweeter conversationalist than conmen. They are ever soooooo polite, until they get what they want. The latecomer to this NG needs to curb his anger and his vitriol: Read back over your posts. You are full of anger and vitriol. You just fake that you are nicey nice. You are pathetic dirtly little ****. And a con. Isn't it odd, that you, who would rather break a Limb than attibute another's post you reply to, in this instance, decided to quote me THREE times. You really think anyone will take you seriously because you shriek over being called out for what you are? Well, a few numbskulls like you might object and think it over the top, and even a few that I respect, but that in no way detracts from your response, and its revalation of what a hypocrite you are even in your manner of posting replies, let alone your media ****. Continue to post lies and I'll continue to call you a dirtly little ****, what you are. Subject: | 7 state sites for families w CPS prob. spanking From: (Kane) Date: 9/15/2003 2:11 PM Eastern Daylight Time Message-id: On 15 Sep 2003 14:50:39 GMT, (Fern5827) wrote: The states a FL IA IL KS MO NC OH Can all be reached thru Website of: http://www. CPSWatch.com While you, Pimp, refer the innocent, do remember you also refer the guilty and those that could have been helped to reform as parents had they gotten badly needed assistance from the state. Then there are those children that will go home to the perps tender mercies because of you...tsk. You sad little smelly ****. Kane http://www.syc.org NH site for those who DCYF has accused unjustly. And for those who have been justly accused as well. So sad, a smelly little **** goes off on a rant when It get's labelled for what it is. By the way, how is it you don't fall into such a state of indignation over Gregs revelations or anyone elses name calling but me? Where is your indignation when a reporter makes a statement but fails entirely to back it with quotes of rulings, just guesses. No outcry when a poster carefully avoids data that would show the entire picture and posts only that which damns fosters or CPS? Nothing. Not a whimper. No, Tulips, you are a liar and a cheat and a smelly little ****. Get honest or simply get called what you are. Your phony, one-track indignation is duly noted. chuckle Kane |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
| 7 state sites for families w CPS prob. spanking
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 04:10:16 GMT, "bobb" wrote:
"Dan Sullivan" wrote in message v.net... "Fern5827" wrote in message ... You sad little smelly @^&#. Kane This is uncalled for SEXUAL HARASSMENT, Kane. I wish you'd clean up the vocab, Kane. THIS was especially offensive. Stop it immediately. This is totally beyond the pale. Stick to the flora references, if you must. But why don't ya just stick to the facts? The uncouth, foul-mouthed Mouth K-9 insults everyone reading this NG with this type of language: I could do without it. And you'd be much more effective without it too. I've said this before. Dan I, too, think that was totally uncouth and uncalled for. Certainly you can make a point without that type of language, can't you. It makes whatever arguement you make quite meaningless. That's patient nonsense. The truth withstands any strain it's put to. But then how would you know that? The Plant lies constantly, and attacks when it is uncalled for. For no other reason than harrassment. It serves no reform purpose whatsoever. It is to titilate and nothing more. If you can read and comprehend you know that already. When you beaten a horse to death continuing to savage the body isn't killing the horse more. It just shows the sick mind you possess. Why are YOU not admonishing The Plant to lay off the harrassment? bobb I'll stop when IT stops. Not before. I'm perfectly fine with posting the faults and failures of CPS. I am also perfectly fine with being honest about their daily and hourly successes that save children pain and death. When IT posts one of each to a single screen, consistently, watch me back off. Hell, watch me congratulate Fern for finally growing up and getting honest, and reforming herself. `Til then it is A Plant with no rights to expect any kind of mercy or consideration of any kind and certainly not polite discourse. And you barely pass the mark yourself, much of the time. You are one of the stupidest individuals I've run across here. If you were not I'd put up with more of your nonsense and ignorance that hurts children. When YOU grow up and learn something I might be polite to even YOU. You are, until then, in my estimation, a menace to children. Go **** up a rope 'til you read a few child development books. You are ignorant as a stump and stubbornly wedded to your own dangerous ignorance. You are lucky I reply to you at all, and especially to your apologist defense of a Plant. Is that the company you want to keep? Kane |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
| 7 state sites for families w CPS prob. spanking
On 15 Sep 2003, Kane wrote:
On 15 Sep 2003 14:50:39 GMT, (Fern5827) wrote: The states a FL IA IL KS MO NC OH Can all be reached thru Website of: http://www. CPSWatch.com While you, Pimp, refer the innocent, do remember you also refer the guilty and those that could have been helped to reform as parents had they gotten badly needed assistance from the state. Then there are those children that will go home to the perps tender mercies because of you...tsk. You sad little smelly ****. Kane Sad! This is a perfect example of how a "never-spanked" boy like Kane9 turned into. Hey, Kane9! Remember that you once crawled out of a "smelly ****"! ;-) Doan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
| 7 state sites for families w CPS prob. spanking
His profane language reveals just how desperate he is.
Very sad when dementia sets in. Sad! This is a perfect example of how a "never-spanked" boy like Kane9 turned into. Hey, Kane9! Remember that you once crawled out of a "smelly ****"! ;-) However, we have some discrepancies in K-9's story. One story shows his mother giving him up to FOSTER CARE, guess not even FAMILY wanted him. Doan wrote: Subject: | 7 state sites for families w CPS prob. spanking From: Doan Date: 9/17/2003 10:25 AM Eastern Daylight Time Message-id: On 15 Sep 2003, Kane wrote: On 15 Sep 2003 14:50:39 GMT, (Fern5827) wrote: The states a FL IA IL KS MO NC OH Can all be reached thru Website of: http://www. CPSWatch.com While you, Pimp, refer the innocent, do remember you also refer the guilty and those that could have been helped to reform as parents had they gotten badly needed assistance from the state. Then there are those children that will go home to the perps tender mercies because of you...tsk. You sad little smelly ****. Kane Sad! This is a perfect example of how a "never-spanked" boy like Kane9 turned into. Hey, Kane9! Remember that you once crawled out of a "smelly ****"! ;-) Doan Really his language violates TOS, and constitutes sexual harassment. http://www.CPSWatch.com Can you imagine his being associated with *child protection* his verbal abuse is on the level of a retarded 8yo. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
| 7 state sites for families w CPS prob. spanking
Yes, Doan, in case you missed it, Kane gradually
revealed that he was "saved" by foster care, and he seems to be livid at his bio parents. This would explain why he seems to hate all bio-parents. But there is a problem with that story, and that is as Fern mentioned: 1. Why wasn't he adopted by any relatives? 2. His purported age is over 50, so he would have been terminated from his parents back before 1970. (Before Mondale wrote CAPTA! and started CPS agencies) (And they started out with MUCH less power and authority, it took about ten years before they began developing God complexes.) (Back before 1970 kids were generally only taken from parents who went to prison for murder.) (And almost ALWAYS went to relatives!) 3. He uses his own experience from 30 years ago to describe the system of today, which is NOTHING like the system he ostensibly went through. 4. Kane says he served on an oversight panel over one state's CPS agency. How could somebody who seems to rely on obscenity to ""win"" discussions/arguments function in such a capacity? Not very civil, much less professional. Downright abnormal behavior for somebody over 50 years of age. 5. Consider this also: His rash comments seem to indicate he lacks impulse control. This is the sort of thing that CPS caseworkers would blackball a bio-parent for. Would they tolerate supervision/oversight by somebody with such poor impulse control? 6. He claims to be politically conservative. This does NOT fit his ersatz role of defending the fine work of our many CPS bureaucrats. Early on he mentioned that he has a relative who works in Child Protection, then much later he revealed his alleged role on an oversight group. He has shown no other sign of being conservative other than self-affixing the label. But he also tried pinning NAZI onto right wingers, forgetting that the Z was for Zocialist. As Fern said, there are inconsistencies in his story. Again I must revive the idea that he is just somebody's sock puppet, an internet cartoon. Aside from their pack bahaviors, Dan and Kane seem to share some subtle similarities in behavior just as sock puppets often reflect mannerisms of the puppeteer, while assuming a different character. Defending each other is to be taken for granted. The character of Dan goes to the brink of swearing often, and sometimes swears. Kane swears profusely. They both use an abrupt style, much like school ground bullies, complete with taunting, repetition, distortion and twisting to insult, and a huge need to control and be big shots. Real bullies, by the way, are often liked by many other kids, or else. Perceived weaklings are shunned and even attacked. Then consider that this thread was intended to help families in LEGAL trouble for spanking, which is LEGAL, yet Kane seeks to shout that down as EVIL and accuses Fern of helping child abusers. (By law it's not abuse!) Sometimes it just seems to me that Kane Dan just want to be their own cultic leaders and react like most cultic leaders do when their cult shuns them. You are right, Doan, Kane's swearing is the sign of a feeble mind. Even a dimwit like me can see that. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
| 7 state sites for families w CPS prob. spanking
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Parenting Without Punishing" | Chris | General | 328 | July 1st 04 05:59 AM |
Debate on spanking | Doan | General | 0 | June 12th 04 08:30 PM |
| | Kids should work... | Kane | General | 13 | December 10th 03 02:30 AM |
Kids should work. | LaVonne Carlson | General | 22 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |
7 state sites for families w CPS prob. spanking | Fern5827 | Spanking | 0 | September 15th 03 03:50 PM |