If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Calif. Custody Law-Very good change
In alt.support.divorce Fido wrote:
: This is good, good news in a landmark case that was being watched very : closely by many groups. : The decision simply allowes the court to consider the relationship of the : child to the parents when considering change of custody requests with : circumstance. Also note that the criticising judge ignores the fact that the father may facilitate a relationship with *both* parents vs. "never mentioning the potential harm to the children from losing their mother as primary caretaker". I'm in a situation where my son's mother has a history of custodial interference. If I had primary custody, I would not repeat that error. b. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Calif. Custody Law-Very good change
In alt.support.divorce Fido wrote:
: This is good, good news in a landmark case that was being watched very : closely by many groups. : The decision simply allowes the court to consider the relationship of the : child to the parents when considering change of custody requests with : circumstance. Also note that the criticising judge ignores the fact that the father may facilitate a relationship with *both* parents vs. "never mentioning the potential harm to the children from losing their mother as primary caretaker". I'm in a situation where my son's mother has a history of custodial interference. If I had primary custody, I would not repeat that error. b. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Calif. Custody Law-Very good change
In alt.support.divorce Fido wrote:
: This is good, good news in a landmark case that was being watched very : closely by many groups. : The decision simply allowes the court to consider the relationship of the : child to the parents when considering change of custody requests with : circumstance. Also note that the criticising judge ignores the fact that the father may facilitate a relationship with *both* parents vs. "never mentioning the potential harm to the children from losing their mother as primary caretaker". I'm in a situation where my son's mother has a history of custodial interference. If I had primary custody, I would not repeat that error. b. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
misc.kids FAQ on breastpumps, Part 1/2 | Beth Weiss | Info and FAQ's | 1 | June 28th 04 07:42 PM |
misc.kids FAQ on Good things about having kids | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | April 17th 04 12:26 PM |
misc.kids FAQ on Breastfeeding Past the First Year | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | April 17th 04 12:24 PM |
misc.kids FAQ on breastpumps, Part 1/2 | Beth Weiss | Info and FAQ's | 1 | April 3rd 04 12:36 PM |
A Good Man | chillin' | Child Support | 83 | September 28th 03 05:37 AM |