A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » alt.support » Child Support
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Man Forced To Use Loan For Child Support, Not Car



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #181  
Old April 24th 04, 03:56 AM
Mel Gamble
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Man Forced To Use Loan For Child Support, Not Car

Leave it to indy to try to flamboozle us with her lack of logic. Let's
try thinking this through:

Let's assume mommy "would have spent" the money on the kids if she'd had
it.... So what? She didn't have it so she didn't spend it so why
should she be "repaid" for spending what she didn't spend? The money
should be owed directly to the kids if owed at all.

HOWEVER....in this case, the mother CHOSE not to accept the money (by
disappearing) and in so doing CHOSE not to either not spend it on the
kids or to spend on them and do without herself. It matters not which
option she chose, only that SHE CHOSE to do without the CS. *I*F* she
did without herself, it was her choice and she should not be able to
decide now to "have her cake and eat it too". And if she chose not to
spend on the kids what she didn't receive for them....then SHE owes an
amount equivalent to the ignored CS directly to the kids.

But, as usual, indy would have dad pay for mommy's choices...no matter
how much her choices hurt his kids.

You see, indy is like your legislators...she really doesn't give a ****
what happens to kids as long as mommies get to make whatever choices
they want...

Mel Gamble

Indyguy1 wrote:

editor wrote:


"Indyguy1" wrote in message
...
editor wrote:

When you're order directs you to pay your ex-wife and she vanishes with

your
child ILLEGALLY, you're not left with much of a choiice, are you?

You could have put the money you have been ordered to pay in CS in an

interest
drawing account and then you'd have had it to pay when she resurfacd.


We're fathers...not ATMs.


Fathers WITH the obligation to support their kids.


As I told you, at least ONE Virginia judge has ruled that when a parent
"actively conceals" a child in violation of a court order, the non-custodial
parent has NO DUTY to seek the parent in hiding out and put money into her
hands.


I didn't say the NCP should have actively sought them out. I just said the
money would be owed regardless and a smart person would stash it as oppossed to
spending it and crying about when they didn't have it to pay if and when the
owed shows up again.

Mrs Indyguy








 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Paternity Fraud - US Supreme Court Wizardlaw Child Support 12 June 4th 04 02:19 AM
Sample Supreme Court Petition Wizardlaw Child Support 0 January 16th 04 03:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.