If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
http://www.talkinternational.com
Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced A bill for banning amalgam dental fillings has been (re)introduced to the house by Congresswoman Diane Watson. The bill is HR 4011. Congresswoman Watson's staff has encouraged us to get behind the bill and has asked the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology to have its members contact their local representatives. We also strongly encourage the public to also do so. Please let them hear your voice! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
"Jan Drew" wrote:
http://www.talkinternational.com Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced A bill for banning amalgam dental fillings has been (re)introduced to the house by Congresswoman Diane Watson. The bill is HR 4011. Congresswoman Watson's staff has encouraged us to get behind the bill and has asked the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology to have its members contact their local representatives. We also strongly encourage the public to also do so. Please let them hear your voice! Excellent news for dentists. If amalgams are banned there will be tens of billions of dollars going into dentists' pockets. What a laugh! -- Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
"Peter Bowditch" wrote: "Jan Drew" wrote: http://www.talkinternational.com Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced A bill for banning amalgam dental fillings has been (re)introduced to the house by Congresswoman Diane Watson. The bill is HR 4011. Congresswoman Watson's staff has encouraged us to get behind the bill and has asked the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology to have its members contact their local representatives. We also strongly encourage the public to also do so. Please let them hear your voice! Excellent news for dentists. I see you are for dentists. NOT the people--including children who could and are P O I S O N E D!! If amalgams are banned there will be tens of billions of dollars going into dentists' pockets. Some dentists are STILL using them. WITHOUT warning of the risks. Neither CONSENT forms. But--YOU are all for $$$$$$ going to dentists. The general public has no clue what is going in their mouth. This comes from the LIES of *organized medicine and dentistry*. What a laugh! A pity you think it is funny! Very telliing! LIAR AND SPAMMER! -- Peter Bowditch |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
it usually costs more for the patient to place a composite filling, so the
if dentists were in it just for the money, why wouldn't the opt for the more expensive treatment? "Jan Drew" wrote in message om... "Peter Bowditch" wrote: "Jan Drew" wrote: http://www.talkinternational.com Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced A bill for banning amalgam dental fillings has been (re)introduced to the house by Congresswoman Diane Watson. The bill is HR 4011. Congresswoman Watson's staff has encouraged us to get behind the bill and has asked the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology to have its members contact their local representatives. We also strongly encourage the public to also do so. Please let them hear your voice! Excellent news for dentists. I see you are for dentists. NOT the people--including children who could and are P O I S O N E D!! If amalgams are banned there will be tens of billions of dollars going into dentists' pockets. Some dentists are STILL using them. WITHOUT warning of the risks. Neither CONSENT forms. But--YOU are all for $$$$$$ going to dentists. The general public has no clue what is going in their mouth. This comes from the LIES of *organized medicine and dentistry*. What a laugh! A pity you think it is funny! Very telliing! LIAR AND SPAMMER! -- Peter Bowditch |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
"Jan Drew" wrote in message om... "Peter Bowditch" wrote: "Jan Drew" wrote: http://www.talkinternational.com Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced A bill for banning amalgam dental fillings has been (re)introduced to the house by Congresswoman Diane Watson. The bill is HR 4011. Congresswoman Watson's staff has encouraged us to get behind the bill and has asked the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology to have its members contact their local representatives. We also strongly encourage the public to also do so. Please let them hear your voice! Excellent news for dentists. I see you are for dentists. NOT the people--including children who could and are P O I S O N E D!! If amalgams are banned there will be tens of billions of dollars going into dentists' pockets. Some dentists are STILL using them. WITHOUT warning of the risks. Neither CONSENT forms. But--YOU are all for $$$$$$ going to dentists. The general public has no clue what is going in their mouth. This comes from the LIES of *organized medicine and dentistry*. What a laugh! A pity you think it is funny! Very telliing! LIAR AND SPAMMER! -- Peter Bowditch |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
In message , C.J. Thomas
wrote: it usually costs more for the patient to place a composite filling, so the if dentists were in it just for the money, why wouldn't the opt for the more expensive treatment? A lot of insurance plans don't cover anything else. -- begin signature.exe A:*Because*it*messes*up*the*order*in*which*people* normally*read*text. Q:*Why*is*top-posting*such*a*bad*thing? A:*Top-posting. Q:*What*is*the*most*annoying*thing*on*usenet? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
Jan,
I also have a question for you. When are we going to see all the research demonstrating the negative side-effects of amalgam fillings on actual people who have had fillings in their mouths for the past 40-50 years? How long does it take for toxicity to present itself? Surely, people are going to start dropping like flies. "Jan Drew" wrote in message om... "Peter Bowditch" wrote: "Jan Drew" wrote: http://www.talkinternational.com Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced A bill for banning amalgam dental fillings has been (re)introduced to the house by Congresswoman Diane Watson. The bill is HR 4011. Congresswoman Watson's staff has encouraged us to get behind the bill and has asked the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology to have its members contact their local representatives. We also strongly encourage the public to also do so. Please let them hear your voice! Excellent news for dentists. I see you are for dentists. NOT the people--including children who could and are P O I S O N E D!! If amalgams are banned there will be tens of billions of dollars going into dentists' pockets. Some dentists are STILL using them. WITHOUT warning of the risks. Neither CONSENT forms. But--YOU are all for $$$$$$ going to dentists. The general public has no clue what is going in their mouth. This comes from the LIES of *organized medicine and dentistry*. What a laugh! A pity you think it is funny! Very telliing! LIAR AND SPAMMER! -- Peter Bowditch |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
"C.J. Thomas" wrote in message ... Jan, I also have a question for you. When are we going to see all the research demonstrating the negative side-effects of amalgam fillings on actual people who have had fillings in their mouths for the past 40-50 years? How long does it take for toxicity to present itself? Surely, people are going to start dropping like flies. The same question applies to fluoridation. Robert |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
In article , "Robert"
wrote: "C.J. Thomas" wrote in message ... Jan, I also have a question for you. When are we going to see all the research demonstrating the negative side-effects of amalgam fillings on actual people who have had fillings in their mouths for the past 40-50 years? How long does it take for toxicity to present itself? Surely, people are going to start dropping like flies. The same question applies to fluoridation. Robert ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ PubMed Research Report: Italian Association for Metals and Biocompatibility Research (AIRMEB), Milan, Italy. Eighteen cadavers from routine autopsy casework were subject to a study of tissue levels of total mercury in brain, thyroid, and kidney samples by atomic absorption. On these same cadavers, all dental amalgam fillings (the most important source of inorganic mercury exposure in the general population, according to the World Health Organization (WHO) were charted. Total mercury levels were significantly higher in subjects with a greater number of occlusal amalgam surfaces (12) compared with those with fewer occlusal amalgams (0-3) in all types of tissue (all P or = 0.04). Mercury levels were significantly higher in brain tissues compared with thyroid and kidney tissues in subjects with more than 12 occlusal amalgam fillings (all P or = 0.01) but not in subjects with 3 or less occlusal amalgams (all P or = 0.07). PMID: 16501347 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Related Links * Correlation of dental amalgam with mercury in brain tissue. [J Prosthet Dent. 1987] PMID: 3480359 * [Study on the significance of mercury accumulation in the brain from dental amalgam fillings through direct mouth-nose-brain transport] [Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1996] PMID: 9376055 * Alzheimer's disease, dental amalgam and mercury. [J Am Dent Assoc. 1999] PMID: 10036842 * The distribution of mercury in various tissues of guinea-pigs after application of dental amalgam fillings (a pilot study). [Sci Total Environ. 1987] PMID: 3685953 * Determination of mercury in blood, urine and saliva for the biological monitoring of an exposure from amalgam fillings in a group with self-reported adverse health effects. [Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2002] PMID: 12040918 * See all Related Articles... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
Robert wrote: "C.J. Thomas" wrote in message ... Jan, I also have a question for you. When are we going to see all the research demonstrating the negative side-effects of amalgam fillings on actual people who have had fillings in their mouths for the past 40-50 years? How long does it take for toxicity to present itself? Surely, people are going to start dropping like flies. I took several chemisrty classes at U.C. Berkeley and biochem. in med school. Last time I looked at the periodic table of the elements,there was only one mercury. Why do people act like we need seperate studies on hg from amalgam,fish,latex paint ,pesticides,contact lens soln.,vaccines etc.?It's all the same hg.The only issue is dose and if you have several fillings,especially the non gamma 2 type,you have toxic levels, especially if you have TMJ and/or chew gum. Was the lead that was used in paint different from lead in gasoline? The same question applies to fluoridation. Robert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dozens of Chemicals Found in Most Americans' Bodies | Kids Health | 26 | August 12th 06 02:29 AM | |
Vaccine quote of the week by Bernard Rimland, PhD | john | Kids Health | 164 | July 28th 06 02:59 PM |
Vaccine quote of the week by Bernard Rimland, PhD | Ilena Rose | Kids Health | 12 | July 22nd 06 10:45 PM |
MERCK'S GARDASIL VACCINE NOT PROVEN SAFE FOR LITTLE GIRLS | Bryan Heit | Kids Health | 12 | July 7th 06 12:18 PM |
Personal perspective: new era of consumer protection possible in USA, if legislature acts on aspartame ban, Stephen Fox, 49 citizen comments, Leland Lehrman: Murray 2006.01.21 | Rich Murray | Kids Health | 0 | January 22nd 06 04:01 AM |