If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
HUGE NEWS: Government Concedes Vaccine-Autism Link in Federal Court!
http://ilenarose.blogspot.com/2008/0...accine_26.html
Note from Ilena: This is a landmark case and one to make the enormous Vaccination Public Relations Teams go wild. www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/snake-oil.htm I highly doubt it was the 'plaintiff's' identity that sealed this case. In the breast implant debacle, one of the ways the manufacturer's keep their cover up going, was with gag orders silencing the women after paying even after paying pittances for their damages. The Vaccination and Breast Implant PR teams have used nearly identical strategies (and PR people) for several years. By David Kirby After years of insisting there is no evidence to link vaccines with the onset of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), the US government has quietly conceded a vaccine-autism case in the Court of Federal Claims. The unprecedented concession was filed on November 9, and sealed to protect the plaintiff's identify. It was obtained through individuals unrelated to the case. http://ilenarose.blogspot.com/2008/0...accine_26.html |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
HUGE NEWS: Government Concedes Vaccine-Autism Link in FederalCourt!
On Feb 26, 2:23*pm, Ilena Rose wrote:
http://ilenarose.blogspot.com/2008/0...ent-concedes-v... Note from Ilena: *This is a landmark case and one to make the enormous Vaccination Public Relations Teams go wild. If you read the actual decision, as I have, you would see that the child was diagnosed with "autism-like symptoms" and not with Autism. That is a major difference. Further, this was one of the original three test cases for the hearings. The government noticed that autism was not the primary diagnosis, and the case had to be dropped from the Omnibus. The government then reviewed the case, found that there were very substantial problems predisposing the child to possible vaccine related injury, and paid the claim. In reality, it has NOTHING to do with the Omnibus claim. Of course, you should feel free to say what you want about this, and I would hope that you will stick to the facts, as I have, and not unleash a personal attack. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
HUGE NEWS: Government Concedes Vaccine-Autism Link in FederalCourt!
In reality, it has NOTHING to do with the Omnibus claim.
Wrong AGAIN!! The claim, one of 4,900 autism cases currently pending in Federal "Vaccine Court," was conceded by US Assistant Attorney General Peter Keisler and other Justice Department officials, on behalf of the Department of Health and Human Services, the "defendant" in all Vaccine Court cases. On Feb 26, 2:30*pm, Mark Probert wrote: On Feb 26, 2:23*pm, Ilena Rose wrote: http://ilenarose.blogspot.com/2008/0...ent-concedes-v... Note from Ilena: *This is a landmark case and one to make the enormous Vaccination Public Relations Teams go wild. If you read the actual decision, as I have, you would see that the child was diagnosed with "autism-like symptoms" and not with Autism. That is a major difference. Further, this was one of the original three test cases for the hearings. The government noticed that autism was not the primary diagnosis, and the case had to be dropped from the Omnibus. The government then reviewed the case, found that there were very substantial problems predisposing the child to possible vaccine related injury, and paid the claim. In reality, it has NOTHING to do with the Omnibus claim. Of course, you should feel free to say what you want about this, and I would hope that you will stick to the facts, as I have, and not unleash a personal attack. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
HUGE NEWS: Government Concedes Vaccine-Autism Link in FederalCourt!
On Feb 26, 3:03*pm, Kevysmom wrote:
In reality, it has NOTHING to do with the Omnibus claim. Wrong AGAIN!! The claim, one of 4,900 autism cases currently pending in Federal "Vaccine Court," was conceded by US Assistant Attorney General Peter Keisler and other Justice Department officials, on behalf of the Department of Health and Human Services, the "defendant" in all Vaccine Court cases. Even assuming that this is correct, and my recollection says otherwise, for this to be relevant to the other claims would require that each of the other children have nearly the same clinical picture of this child. This child has a rare mitochondrial disorder and this makes it unlikely that it would apply to any more than a handful, if that many, of the other claims. Donna, I have read the decision. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
HUGE NEWS: Government Concedes Vaccine-Autism Link in FederalCourt!
You realize there are 50 attorneys across America working on behalf of
American children who were injected with mercury via vaccines in which 3 of these cases are being used as a "test" to see if they should go forward with the rest of the lawsuits. BTW, The attorneys felt this should NOT be a class action lawsuit as some children are clearly more disabled than others..So...They are taking one case at a time. On Feb 26, 3:07*pm, Mark Probert wrote: On Feb 26, 3:03*pm, Kevysmom wrote: In reality, it has NOTHING to do with the Omnibus claim. Wrong AGAIN!! The claim, one of 4,900 autism cases currently pending in Federal "Vaccine Court," was conceded by US Assistant Attorney General Peter Keisler and other Justice Department officials, on behalf of the Department of Health and Human Services, the "defendant" in all Vaccine Court cases. Even assuming that this is correct, and my recollection says otherwise, for this to be relevant to the other claims would require that each of the other children have nearly the same clinical picture of this child. This child has a rare mitochondrial disorder and this makes it unlikely that it would apply to any more than a handful, if that many, of the other claims. Donna, I have read the decision. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
HUGE NEWS: Government Concedes Vaccine-Autism Link in FederalCourt!
Mark Probert wrote:
On Feb 26, 2:23 pm, Ilena Rose wrote: http://ilenarose.blogspot.com/2008/0...ent-concedes-v... Note from Ilena: This is a landmark case and one to make the enormous Vaccination Public Relations Teams go wild. If you read the actual decision, as I have, you would see that the child was diagnosed with "autism-like symptoms" and not with Autism. That is a major difference. Further, this was one of the original three test cases for the hearings. The government noticed that autism was not the primary diagnosis, and the case had to be dropped from the Omnibus. The government then reviewed the case, found that there were very substantial problems predisposing the child to possible vaccine related injury, and paid the claim. In reality, it has NOTHING to do with the Omnibus claim. Of course, you should feel free to say what you want about this, and I would hope that you will stick to the facts, as I have, and not unleash a personal attack. You're correct, of course. And the determination that the child was harmed by the vaccines is a legal determination, not a medical one. Jeff |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
HUGE NEWS: Government Concedes Vaccine-Autism Link in FederalCourt!
And the determination that the child was harmed by the vaccines is a
legal determination, not a medical one. How lame they really are! On Feb 26, 4:43*pm, Jeff wrote: Mark Probert wrote: On Feb 26, 2:23 pm, Ilena Rose wrote: http://ilenarose.blogspot.com/2008/0...ent-concedes-v... Note from Ilena: *This is a landmark case and one to make the enormous Vaccination Public Relations Teams go wild. If you read the actual decision, as I have, you would see that the child was diagnosed with "autism-like symptoms" and not with Autism. That is a major difference. Further, this was one of the original three test cases for the hearings. The government noticed that autism was not the primary diagnosis, and the case had to be dropped from the Omnibus. The government then reviewed the case, found that there were very substantial problems predisposing the child to possible vaccine related injury, and paid the claim. In reality, it has NOTHING to do with the Omnibus claim. Of course, you should feel free to say what you want about this, and I would hope that you will stick to the facts, as I have, and not unleash a personal attack. You're correct, of course. And the determination that the child was harmed by the vaccines is a legal determination, not a medical one. Jeff- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
HUGE NEWS: Government Concedes Vaccine-Autism Link in FederalCourt!
On Feb 26, 12:13*pm, Kevysmom wrote:
You realize there are 50 attorneys across America working on behalf of American children who were injected with mercury via vaccines in which 3 of these cases are being used as a "test" to see if they should go forward with the rest of the lawsuits. It should be remembered that mercury has been removed from childhood vaccines since 2001. Yet the incidence of autism continues to increase at an alarming rate. This fact doesn't seem to quell the hystrionic performances of the anti-vac folks in their crusade to quell protection from disease for children world-wide! Myrl http://www.webstarmagic.com/wisletter.htm |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
HUGE NEWS: Government Concedes Vaccine-Autism Link in FederalCourt!
2003, NOT 2001.
And the babies are still getting mercury injected via the flu vaccines, ALSO Pregnant women are being injected with mercury via the flu vaccine, and if you know anything at all about mercury poisoning you would know that a fetus is the MOST susceptible to the harmful effects of mercury. On Feb 26, 6:47*pm, Myrl wrote: On Feb 26, 12:13*pm, Kevysmom wrote: You realize there are 50 attorneys across America working on behalf of American children who were injected with mercury via vaccines in which 3 of these cases are being used as a "test" to see if they should go forward with the rest of the lawsuits. It should be remembered that mercury has been removed from childhood vaccines since 2001. *Yet the incidence of autism continues to increase at an alarming rate. This fact doesn't seem to quell the hystrionic performances of the anti-vac folks in their crusade to quell protection from disease for children world-wide! Myrlhttp://www.webstarmagic.com/wisletter.htm |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
HUGE NEWS: Government Concedes Vaccine-Autism Link in FederalCourt!
On Feb 26, 3:58*pm, Kevysmom wrote:
2003, NOT 2001. And the babies are still getting mercury injected via the flu vaccines, ALSO Pregnant women are being injected with mercury via the flu vaccine, and if you know anything at all about mercury poisoning you would know that a fetus is the MOST susceptible to the harmful effects of mercury. On Feb 26, 6:47*pm, Myrl wrote: On Feb 26, 12:13*pm, Kevysmom wrote: You realize there are 50 attorneys across America working on behalf of American children who were injected with mercury via vaccines in which 3 of these cases are being used as a "test" to see if they should go forward with the rest of the lawsuits. It should be remembered that mercury has been removed from childhood vaccines since 2001. *Yet the incidence of autism continues to increase at an alarming rate. This fact doesn't seem to quell the hystrionic performances of the anti-vac folks in their crusade to quell protection from disease for children world-wide! Myrlhttp://www.webstarmagic.com/wisletter.htm- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - According to the CDC and most recognized sources, the year mercury was removed from childhood vaccines was 2001. See following excerpt from their website. In spite of the removal of mercury from childhood vaccines, incidence of autism has continued to increase each year. . . "Thimerosal is a mercury-containing preservative used in some vaccines and other products since the 1930s. There is no convincing scientific evidence of harm caused by the low doses of thimerosal in vaccines, except for minor reactions like redness and swelling at the injection site. However, in July 1999, the Public Health Service agencies, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and vaccine manufacturers agreed that thimerosal should be reduced or eliminated in vaccines as a precautionary measure. Since 2001, with the exception of some influenza (flu) vaccines, thimerosal is not used as a preservative in routinely recommended childhood vaccines." http://www.cdc.gov/od/science/iso/co...thimerosal.htm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Federal Government recently conceded a real vaccine-autism lawsuit in a real court | Jan Drew | Pregnancy | 0 | February 8th 08 05:09 AM |
The Federal Government recently conceded a real vaccine-autism lawsuit in a real court | Jan Drew | Kids Health | 0 | February 8th 08 05:09 AM |
The Federal Government recently conceded a real vaccine-autism lawsuit in a real court | Jan Drew | Breastfeeding | 0 | February 8th 08 05:09 AM |
The Federal Government recently conceded a real vaccine-autism lawsuit in a real court | Jan Drew | Pregnancy | 0 | February 6th 08 05:59 AM |