If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
DNA sampling? Be cautious about use for foster children
DNA sampling
Be cautious about use for foster children http://www.news-journalonline.com/Ne...PN48111207.htm When state protective-services workers make the decision to remove children from abusive or neglectful homes, they expect the transition to be traumatic. Even when children are living in horrific conditions -- even when the foster home is warm and nurturing -- it's a shock, one that can resonate for the rest of those children's lives. But state officials also know that children go missing from the foster system. Statewide, around 470 children are currently missing from the foster-care system, including 12 from Volusia and Flagler counties. Looking for ways to track missing children, a statewide task force has recommended taking DNA swabs of any child taken into state custody. The DNA collection could replace the current practice of fingerprinting children, and would be used in conjunction with photographs. Advocates like Ron Zychowski, CEO of Community Partnership for Children (the local non-profit group that runs foster care in Volusia and Flagler counties) argue that DNA sampling could be too jarring for children already wracked with anxiety. But task force member Alan Abramowitz, who (like Zychowski) once served as the Department of Children and Families' district administrator here, says he thinks DNA swabs would be less traumatic for children than fingerprints -- and more accurate. Fingerprints are often hard to read, especially for infants and small children. And a quick swipe at the inside of a child's lower lip might leave less of an impression than the laborious inking, pressing and rolling of 10 tiny digits on a fingerprint card. Both arguments are worth considering. But there are bigger issues at stake. How would DNA samples be obtained, processed and banked? Compared to fingerprints, DNA samples are expensive and require a high level of scientific training to analyze. And what happens to the DNA samples once a child leaves the foster-care system? Are they destroyed -- or is that child forever linked to their genetic code in government-operated databases? Civil libertarians have long been concerned about the push to archive genetic fingerprints of law-abiding citizens. Would the DNA data of foster children be handed over to child-support authorities in an attempt to track down absent fathers? Could samples be made available to potential employers, who could look for markers signifying genetic predispositions to diseases like alcoholism or obesity? Could DNA data someday be combined with the massive consumer-behavior databases already being compiled? These concerns are too weighty for the shoulders of most children entering the foster-care system, but they are issues that state leaders should be concerned about. If they decide to collect DNA samples, officials should adopt strict protocols that restrict the use of genetic material to the foster-care system only. And any DNA swabs should be destroyed, along with accompanying analyses, when a child is no longer under state supervision. State officials deserve credit for seeking out ways to track missing children. However, the DNA proposal is one that deserves a great deal more scrutiny before it becomes law. CURRENTLY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES VIOLATES MORE CIVIL RIGHTS ON A DAILY BASIS THEN ALL OTHER AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NSA / CIA WIRETAPPING PROGRAM.... CPS Does not protect children... It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and even killed at the hands of Child Protective Services. every parent should read this .pdf from connecticut dcf watch... http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com/8x11.pdf http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com Number of Cases per 100,000 children in the US These numbers come from The National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect in Washington. (NCCAN) Recent numbers have increased significantly for CPS *Perpetrators of Maltreatment* Physical Abuse CPS 160, Parents 59 Sexual Abuse CPS 112, Parents 13 Neglect CPS 410, Parents 241 Medical Neglect CPS 14 Parents 12 Fatalities CPS 6.4, Parents 1.5 Imagine that, 6.4 children die at the hands of the very agencies that are supposed to protect them and only 1.5 at the hands of parents per 100,000 children. CPS perpetrates more abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse and kills more children then parents in the United States. If the citizens of this country hold CPS to the same standards that they hold parents too. No judge should ever put another child in the hands of ANY government agency because CPS nationwide is guilty of more harm and death than any human being combined. CPS nationwide is guilty of more human rights violations and deaths of children then the homes from which they were removed. When are the judges going to wake up and see that they are sending children to their death and a life of abuse when children are removed from safe homes based on the mere opinion of a bunch of social workers. CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, HAPPILY DESTROYING THOUSANDS OF INNOCENT FAMILIES YEARLY NATIONWIDE AND COMING TO YOU'RE HOME SOON... BE SURE TO FIND OUT WHERE YOUR CANDIDATES STANDS ON THE ISSUE OF REFORMING OR ABOLISHING CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES ("MAKE YOUR CANDIDATES TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|