A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » misc.kids » General
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Review: Ellie Parker (* 1/2)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 6th 05, 07:00 PM posted to misc.kids
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Review: Ellie Parker (* 1/2)

ELLIE PARKER
A film review by Steve Rhodes

Copyright 2005 Steve Rhodes



RATING (0 TO ****): * 1/2



Because of the considerable talents of Naomi Watts, an Oscar nominee for 21
GRAMS, ELLIE PARKER is almost bearable. But, even if Watts, in the title
role, makes it almost watchable, the ugly cinematography is too much of an
eye strain to endure for such a thin and uninteresting story.



A movie that would undoubtedly work better as a short had its origin as a
short that writer and director Scott Coffey was encouraged to develop into a
full length motion picture. With more padding that a movie exec's expense
account, the story now features trips to the zoo to see the monkeys cavort
and the eating of greenish blue ice cream while our heroine drives down the
road. The latter does serve some purpose, since it makes more dramatic
Ellie's puking when she finds her boyfriend in bed with another woman.



As an aspiring actress with no talent, Watts chews up the scenery delivering
incredibly awful auditions for equally pathetic parts in really terrible
pictures. While you're admiring Watts's skills, you can easily see that
this movie just doesn't deserve them.



The manager of a gallery, whose current avant-garde display looks like
children's junk, is heard to remark on the phone, "It's supposed to be out
of focus." One assumes that line is intended to be some sort of in-joke,
since the cinematography for ELLIE PARKER is off the scale bad. Some movies
are best seen on the big screen, but ELLIE PARKER, with its grainy, jagged
and over-exposed images, would probably look best when viewed on a cell
phone's tiny display.



While leaving the theater keep an eye out for a collection box in the lobby.
You can leave your donations there to buy Coffey a decent camera to shoot
his next movie. Even better, bring in the one you got last Christmas and
leave it for him, since it would have to be better than whatever one he used
to shoot ELLIE PARKER.



ELLIE PARKER runs 1:35. It is not rated but would be R for language, sex
and drug usage and would be acceptable for most teenagers.



The film is playing in nationwide release now in the United States. In the
Silicon Valley, it is showing at the Camera Cinemas.



Web: http://www.InternetReviews.com

Email:



************************************************** *********************



Want free reviews and weekly movie and video recommendations via Email?

Just send me a letter with the word "subscribe" in the subject line.




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AL: Court issues history-making decision in child custody case Dusty Child Support 1 August 3rd 05 01:07 AM
Child abuse by OBs: A simple no peer review required solution Todd Gastaldo Pregnancy 3 March 20th 05 01:22 AM
Review team loses access to FL records w DCF Fern5827 Foster Parents 0 February 2nd 05 03:01 PM
Foster care board keeps watch over Arizona children wexwimpy Foster Parents 0 March 30th 04 07:16 PM
Review: DCF cases were closed too early Wex Wimpy Foster Parents 0 September 2nd 03 05:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.