At least some Missouri state senators are trying something

From the NCP Revue (http://www.pueblonative.com/blog):

http://www.newstribune.com/articles/...4paternity.txt

Missouri is taking up the issue that my own home state of Colorado has
taken up as well; namely, paternity fraud. More and more people are
beginning to realize the severity of this problem.

And I’d like the Tracy Rumans of the world to step up and answer this
one, as well. Now you have a case where both the mother and the father
agree that the named father is not the father. The two have been
separated for 11 months. How, in the name of all that is good, is
letting him off the hook because these two were too poor to divorce
harmful to a parent-child relationship?

And while we’re on this whole "parent-child relationship" thing that
Tracy and her ilk keep using to defend wholesale theft and fraud, let’s
examine the interest of the state. Since when has any state, anywhere,
established a Department of Child VISITATION enforcement? Since when
has any state hauled a mother into court for denying parenting time to
the father (or vice versa, in the rare cases where that happens)? If
the state is so interested in keeping this paternal relationship alive,
don’t you think they would have demanded the father be more than a
paycheck? Wouldn’t they have MANDATED visitation time?

But you all know this issue too closely. Go into any CSE department and
demand that they enforce the visitation agreement and you will be
laughed right out of the department. The same department that can ruin
anybody’s life if they so choose will suddenly claim complete and total
powerlessness when it comes time to make that relationship something real.

So when you hear Tracy Rumans, or anybody else, state that they are
interested in preserving a relationship by opposing "paternity fraud"
legislation, feel free to laugh their asses out the door. You know what
they are interested in preserving at the end of the day. Their own jobs.