A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » misc.kids » Kids Health
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

BOLEN REPORT: Ritalin - The Hidden Effects... Jon Rappaport



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 31st 06, 03:36 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,talk.politics.medicine,misc.kids.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default BOLEN REPORT: Ritalin - The Hidden Effects... Jon Rappaport

(This will surely bring out the Disbarred Quack / Ritalin Pushers
attacking this important work)


Ritalin - The Hidden Effects...

Article by Independent Investigative Reporter Jon Rappaport

Tuesday, May 23rd, 2006

(Jon Rappoport has worked as an independent investigative reporter
since 1982. He has published articles on medical issues and politics
for LA Weekly, Spin, CBS Healthwatch, Stern, and many other newspapers
in the US and Europe. His website is www.nomorefakenews.com. Mr.
Rappoport also writes extensively on the mind-body connection,
alternative healing, and the extraordinary use of imagination to build
futures in which oppressive power is decentralized.)

In 1986, The International Journal of the Addictions published a very
important literature review by Richard Scarnati. It was called “An
Outline of Hazardous Side Effects of Ritalin (Methylphenidate)”
[v.21(7), pp. 837-841].

Scarnati listed a large number of adverse affects of Ritalin and cited
published journal articles which reported each of these symptoms.

For every one of the following Ritalin effects, there is at least one
confirming source in the medical literatu

.. Paranoid delusions
· Paranoid psychosis
· Hypomanic and manic symptoms, amphetamine-like psychosis
· Activation of psychotic symptoms
· Toxic psychosis
· Visual hallucinations
· Auditory hallucinations
· Can surpass LSD in producing bizarre experiences
· Effects pathological thought processes
· Extreme withdrawal
· Terrified affect
· Started screaming
· Aggressiveness
· Insomnia
· Since Ritalin is considered an amphetamine-type drug, expect
amphetamine-like effects
· Psychic dependence
· High-abuse potential DEA Schedule II Drug
· Decreased REM sleep
· When used with antidepressants one may see dangerous reactions
including hypertension, seizures and hypothermia
· Convulsions
· Brain damage may be seen with amphetamine abuse.

Many parents around the country have discovered that Ritalin has
become a condition for their children continuing in school. There are
even reports, by parents, of threats from social agencies: “If you
don't allow us to prescribe Ritalin for your ADHD child, we may decide
that you are an unfit parent. We may decide to take your child away.”

This mind-boggling state of affairs is fueled by teachers, principals,
and school counselors, none of whom have medical training. Yet even if
they did…

The very existence of the “illnesses” for which Ritalin would be
prescribed is unproven. It is merely assumed.

In commenting on Dr. Lawrence Diller's book, Running on Ritalin, Dr.
William Carey, Director of Behavioral Pediatrics, Children's Hospital
of Philadelphia, has written, “Dr. Diller has correctly described...
the disturbing trend of blaming children's social, behavioral, and
academic performance problems entirely on an unproven brain
deficit...”

On November 16-18, 1998, the National Institute of Mental Health held
the prestigious “NIH Consensus Development Conference on Diagnosis and
Treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder [ADHD].” The
conference was explicitly aimed at ending all debate about the
diagnoses of ADD, ADHD, and about the prescription of Ritalin. It was
hoped that at the highest levels of medical research and bureaucracy,
a clear position would be taken: this is what ADHD is, this is where
it comes from, and these are the drugs it should be treated with. That
didn't happen, amazingly. Instead, the official panel responsible for
drawing conclusions from the conference threw cold water on the whole
attempt to reach a comfortable consensus.

Panel member Mark Vonnegut, a Massachusetts pediatrician, said, “The
diagnosis [of ADHD] is a mess.”

The quite conventional and orthodox panel essentially said it was not
sure ADHD was even a valid diagnosis. In other words, it virtually
admitted that ADD and ADHD might be nothing more than attempts to
categorize certain children's behaviors---with no organic cause, no
clear-cut biological basis, no provable reason for even using the ADD
or ADHD labels.

The panel found “no data to indicate that ADHD is due to a brain
malfunction [which malfunction had been the whole psychiatric
assumption].”

The panel found that Ritalin has not been shown to have long-term
benefits. In fact, the panel stated that Ritalin has resulted in
“little improvement on academic achievement or social skills.”

Panel chairman, David Kupfer, professor of psychiatry at the
University of Pittsburgh, said, “There is no current validated
diagnostic test [for ADHD].”

Yet at every level of public education in America, there remains what
can only be called a voracious desire to give children Ritalin (or
other similar drugs) for so-called ADD or ADHD.

The 1994 Textbook of Psychiatry, published by the American Psychiatric
Press, contains this review (Popper and Steingard): “Stimulants [such
as Ritalin] do not produce lasting improvements in aggressivity,
conduct disorder, criminality, education achievement, job functioning,
marital relationships, or long-term adjustment.”

Parents should also wake up to the fact that, in the aftermath of the
Littleton, Colorado, school-shooting tragedy, pundits and doctors
began urging much more extensive “mental health” services for
children. Whether you have noticed it or not, this no longer means,
for the most part, therapy with a caring professional. It means drugs.
Drugs like Ritalin.

In December 1996, the US Drug Enforcement Agency held a conference on
ADHD and Ritalin. Surprisingly, it issued a sensible statement about
drugs being a bad substitute for the presence of caring parents:
“[T]he use of stimulants [such as Ritalin] for the short-term
improvement of behavior and underachievement may be thwarting efforts
to address the children's real issues, both on an individual and
societal level. The lack of long-term positive results with the use of
stimulants and the specter of previous and potential stimulant abuse
epidemics, give cause to worry about the future. The dramatic increase
in the use of methylphenidate [Ritalin] in the 1990s should be viewed
as a marker or warning to society about the problems children are
having and how we view and address them.”

In his book, Talking Back to Ritalin, Dr. Peter Breggin expands on the
drug's effects: “Stimulants such as Ritalin and amphetamine... have
grossly harmful impacts on the brain -- reducing overall blood flow,
disturbing glucose metabolism, and possibly causing permanent
shrinkage or atrophy of the brain.”

In the American press, although many articles have appeared covering
“the debate” about Ritalin and ADHD, no newspaper or TV network has
taken it upon itself to hammer on all the lies, day after day, month
after month. That kind of campaign could turn around the whole nation
on this vital subject---but of course, pharmaceutical advertising is a
more powerful force.

And one should not forget that Ritalin came out of a Swiss drug giant
called Ciba Geigy (now Novartis) fifty years ago. That company once
had very close business ties with the infamous Nazi cartel, IG Farben.
Farben stood for inhuman experiments on human beings. Read the adverse
effects of Ritalin again, and consider that millions of children take
those pills every day.

JON RAPPOPORT - http://www.nomorefakenews.com

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  #2  
Old June 1st 06, 02:11 AM posted to misc.health.alternative,talk.politics.medicine,misc.kids.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default BOLEN REPORT: Ritalin - The Hidden Effects... Jon Rappaport


Ilena Rose wrote in message
...
(This will surely bring out the Disbarred Quack / Ritalin Pushers
attacking this important work)



For every one of the following Ritalin effects, there is at least one
confirming source in the medical literatu

. Paranoid delusions
· Paranoid psychosis
· Hypomanic and manic symptoms, amphetamine-like psychosis
· Activation of psychotic symptoms
· Toxic psychosis
· Visual hallucinations
· Auditory hallucinations
· Can surpass LSD in producing bizarre experiences
· Effects pathological thought processes
· Extreme withdrawal
· Terrified affect
· Started screaming
· Aggressiveness
· Insomnia
· Since Ritalin is considered an amphetamine-type drug, expect
amphetamine-like effects
· Psychic dependence
· High-abuse potential DEA Schedule II Drug
· Decreased REM sleep
· When used with antidepressants one may see dangerous reactions
including hypertension, seizures and hypothermia
· Convulsions
· Brain damage may be seen with amphetamine abuse.


Oops, he left out Anorexia Nervosa.

;o) Rich


  #3  
Old June 10th 06, 03:58 AM posted to misc.health.alternative,talk.politics.medicine,misc.kids.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default BOLEN REPORT: Ritalin - The Hidden Effects...... Jon Rappaport




Ritalin - The Hidden Effects...

Article by Independent Investigative Reporter Jon Rappaport

Tuesday, May 23rd, 2006

(Jon Rappoport has worked as an independent investigative reporter
since 1982. He has published articles on medical issues and politics
for LA Weekly, Spin, CBS Healthwatch, Stern, and many other newspapers
in the US and Europe. His website is www.nomorefakenews.com. Mr.
Rappoport also writes extensively on the mind-body connection,
alternative healing, and the extraordinary use of imagination to build
futures in which oppressive power is decentralized.)

In 1986, The International Journal of the Addictions published a very
important literature review by Richard Scarnati. It was called “An
Outline of Hazardous Side Effects of Ritalin (Methylphenidate)”
[v.21(7), pp. 837-841].

Scarnati listed a large number of adverse affects of Ritalin and cited
published journal articles which reported each of these symptoms.

For every one of the following Ritalin effects, there is at least one
confirming source in the medical literatu

.. Paranoid delusions
· Paranoid psychosis
· Hypomanic and manic symptoms, amphetamine-like psychosis
· Activation of psychotic symptoms
· Toxic psychosis
· Visual hallucinations
· Auditory hallucinations
· Can surpass LSD in producing bizarre experiences
· Effects pathological thought processes
· Extreme withdrawal
· Terrified affect
· Started screaming
· Aggressiveness
· Insomnia
· Since Ritalin is considered an amphetamine-type drug, expect
amphetamine-like effects
· Psychic dependence
· High-abuse potential DEA Schedule II Drug
· Decreased REM sleep
· When used with antidepressants one may see dangerous reactions
including hypertension, seizures and hypothermia
· Convulsions
· Brain damage may be seen with amphetamine abuse.

Many parents around the country have discovered that Ritalin has
become a condition for their children continuing in school. There are
even reports, by parents, of threats from social agencies: “If you
don't allow us to prescribe Ritalin for your ADHD child, we may decide
that you are an unfit parent. We may decide to take your child away.”

This mind-boggling state of affairs is fueled by teachers, principals,
and school counselors, none of whom have medical training. Yet even if
they did…

The very existence of the “illnesses” for which Ritalin would be
prescribed is unproven. It is merely assumed.

In commenting on Dr. Lawrence Diller's book, Running on Ritalin, Dr.
William Carey, Director of Behavioral Pediatrics, Children's Hospital
of Philadelphia, has written, “Dr. Diller has correctly described...
the disturbing trend of blaming children's social, behavioral, and
academic performance problems entirely on an unproven brain
deficit...”

On November 16-18, 1998, the National Institute of Mental Health held
the prestigious “NIH Consensus Development Conference on Diagnosis and
Treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder [ADHD].” The
conference was explicitly aimed at ending all debate about the
diagnoses of ADD, ADHD, and about the prescription of Ritalin. It was
hoped that at the highest levels of medical research and bureaucracy,
a clear position would be taken: this is what ADHD is, this is where
it comes from, and these are the drugs it should be treated with. That
didn't happen, amazingly. Instead, the official panel responsible for
drawing conclusions from the conference threw cold water on the whole
attempt to reach a comfortable consensus.

Panel member Mark Vonnegut, a Massachusetts pediatrician, said, “The
diagnosis [of ADHD] is a mess.”

The quite conventional and orthodox panel essentially said it was not
sure ADHD was even a valid diagnosis. In other words, it virtually
admitted that ADD and ADHD might be nothing more than attempts to
categorize certain children's behaviors---with no organic cause, no
clear-cut biological basis, no provable reason for even using the ADD
or ADHD labels.

The panel found “no data to indicate that ADHD is due to a brain
malfunction [which malfunction had been the whole psychiatric
assumption].”

The panel found that Ritalin has not been shown to have long-term
benefits. In fact, the panel stated that Ritalin has resulted in
“little improvement on academic achievement or social skills.”

Panel chairman, David Kupfer, professor of psychiatry at the
University of Pittsburgh, said, “There is no current validated
diagnostic test [for ADHD].”

Yet at every level of public education in America, there remains what
can only be called a voracious desire to give children Ritalin (or
other similar drugs) for so-called ADD or ADHD.

The 1994 Textbook of Psychiatry, published by the American Psychiatric
Press, contains this review (Popper and Steingard): “Stimulants [such
as Ritalin] do not produce lasting improvements in aggressivity,
conduct disorder, criminality, education achievement, job functioning,
marital relationships, or long-term adjustment.”

Parents should also wake up to the fact that, in the aftermath of the
Littleton, Colorado, school-shooting tragedy, pundits and doctors
began urging much more extensive “mental health” services for
children. Whether you have noticed it or not, this no longer means,
for the most part, therapy with a caring professional. It means drugs.
Drugs like Ritalin.

In December 1996, the US Drug Enforcement Agency held a conference on
ADHD and Ritalin. Surprisingly, it issued a sensible statement about
drugs being a bad substitute for the presence of caring parents:
“[T]he use of stimulants [such as Ritalin] for the short-term
improvement of behavior and underachievement may be thwarting efforts
to address the children's real issues, both on an individual and
societal level. The lack of long-term positive results with the use of
stimulants and the specter of previous and potential stimulant abuse
epidemics, give cause to worry about the future. The dramatic increase
in the use of methylphenidate [Ritalin] in the 1990s should be viewed
as a marker or warning to society about the problems children are
having and how we view and address them.”

In his book, Talking Back to Ritalin, Dr. Peter Breggin expands on the
drug's effects: “Stimulants such as Ritalin and amphetamine... have
grossly harmful impacts on the brain -- reducing overall blood flow,
disturbing glucose metabolism, and possibly causing permanent
shrinkage or atrophy of the brain.”

In the American press, although many articles have appeared covering
“the debate” about Ritalin and ADHD, no newspaper or TV network has
taken it upon itself to hammer on all the lies, day after day, month
after month. That kind of campaign could turn around the whole nation
on this vital subject---but of course, pharmaceutical advertising is a
more powerful force.

And one should not forget that Ritalin came out of a Swiss drug giant
called Ciba Geigy (now Novartis) fifty years ago. That company once
had very close business ties with the infamous Nazi cartel, IG Farben.
Farben stood for inhuman experiments on human beings. Read the adverse
effects of Ritalin again, and consider that millions of children take
those pills every day.

JON RAPPOPORT - http://www.nomorefakenews.com
  #4  
Old June 11th 06, 10:33 AM posted to misc.health.alternative,talk.politics.medicine,misc.kids.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default BOLEN REPORT: Ritalin - The Hidden Effects...... Jon Rappaport


"BreastImplantAwareness.org" wrote in message
...



Ritalin - The Hidden Effects...

Article by Independent Investigative Reporter Jon Rappaport

Tuesday, May 23rd, 2006

(Jon Rappoport has worked as an independent investigative reporter
since 1982. He has published articles on medical issues and politics
for LA Weekly, Spin, CBS Healthwatch, Stern, and many other newspapers
in the US and Europe. His website is www.nomorefakenews.com. Mr.
Rappoport also writes extensively on the mind-body connection,
alternative healing, and the extraordinary use of imagination to build
futures in which oppressive power is decentralized.)

In 1986, The International Journal of the Addictions published a very
important literature review by Richard Scarnati. It was called "An
Outline of Hazardous Side Effects of Ritalin (Methylphenidate)"
[v.21(7), pp. 837-841].

Scarnati listed a large number of adverse affects of Ritalin and cited
published journal articles which reported each of these symptoms.

For every one of the following Ritalin effects, there is at least one
confirming source in the medical literatu

. Paranoid delusions
· Paranoid psychosis
· Hypomanic and manic symptoms, amphetamine-like psychosis
· Activation of psychotic symptoms
· Toxic psychosis
· Visual hallucinations
· Auditory hallucinations
· Can surpass LSD in producing bizarre experiences
· Effects pathological thought processes
· Extreme withdrawal
· Terrified affect
· Started screaming
· Aggressiveness
· Insomnia
· Since Ritalin is considered an amphetamine-type drug, expect
amphetamine-like effects
· Psychic dependence
· High-abuse potential DEA Schedule II Drug
· Decreased REM sleep
· When used with antidepressants one may see dangerous reactions
including hypertension, seizures and hypothermia
· Convulsions
· Brain damage may be seen with amphetamine abuse.

Many parents around the country have discovered that Ritalin has
become a condition for their children continuing in school. There are
even reports, by parents, of threats from social agencies: "If you
don't allow us to prescribe Ritalin for your ADHD child, we may decide
that you are an unfit parent. We may decide to take your child away."

This mind-boggling state of affairs is fueled by teachers, principals,
and school counselors, none of whom have medical training. Yet even if
they did.

The very existence of the "illnesses" for which Ritalin would be
prescribed is unproven. It is merely assumed.

In commenting on Dr. Lawrence Diller's book, Running on Ritalin, Dr.
William Carey, Director of Behavioral Pediatrics, Children's Hospital
of Philadelphia, has written, "Dr. Diller has correctly described...
the disturbing trend of blaming children's social, behavioral, and
academic performance problems entirely on an unproven brain
deficit..."

On November 16-18, 1998, the National Institute of Mental Health held
the prestigious "NIH Consensus Development Conference on Diagnosis and
Treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder [ADHD]." The
conference was explicitly aimed at ending all debate about the
diagnoses of ADD, ADHD, and about the prescription of Ritalin. It was
hoped that at the highest levels of medical research and bureaucracy,
a clear position would be taken: this is what ADHD is, this is where
it comes from, and these are the drugs it should be treated with. That
didn't happen, amazingly. Instead, the official panel responsible for
drawing conclusions from the conference threw cold water on the whole
attempt to reach a comfortable consensus.

Panel member Mark Vonnegut, a Massachusetts pediatrician, said, "The
diagnosis [of ADHD] is a mess."

The quite conventional and orthodox panel essentially said it was not
sure ADHD was even a valid diagnosis. In other words, it virtually
admitted that ADD and ADHD might be nothing more than attempts to
categorize certain children's behaviors---with no organic cause, no
clear-cut biological basis, no provable reason for even using the ADD
or ADHD labels.

The panel found "no data to indicate that ADHD is due to a brain
malfunction [which malfunction had been the whole psychiatric
assumption]."

The panel found that Ritalin has not been shown to have long-term
benefits. In fact, the panel stated that Ritalin has resulted in
"little improvement on academic achievement or social skills."

Panel chairman, David Kupfer, professor of psychiatry at the
University of Pittsburgh, said, "There is no current validated
diagnostic test [for ADHD]."

Yet at every level of public education in America, there remains what
can only be called a voracious desire to give children Ritalin (or
other similar drugs) for so-called ADD or ADHD.

The 1994 Textbook of Psychiatry, published by the American Psychiatric
Press, contains this review (Popper and Steingard): "Stimulants [such
as Ritalin] do not produce lasting improvements in aggressivity,
conduct disorder, criminality, education achievement, job functioning,
marital relationships, or long-term adjustment."

Parents should also wake up to the fact that, in the aftermath of the
Littleton, Colorado, school-shooting tragedy, pundits and doctors
began urging much more extensive "mental health" services for
children. Whether you have noticed it or not, this no longer means,
for the most part, therapy with a caring professional. It means drugs.
Drugs like Ritalin.

In December 1996, the US Drug Enforcement Agency held a conference on
ADHD and Ritalin. Surprisingly, it issued a sensible statement about
drugs being a bad substitute for the presence of caring parents:
"[T]he use of stimulants [such as Ritalin] for the short-term
improvement of behavior and underachievement may be thwarting efforts
to address the children's real issues, both on an individual and
societal level. The lack of long-term positive results with the use of
stimulants and the specter of previous and potential stimulant abuse
epidemics, give cause to worry about the future. The dramatic increase
in the use of methylphenidate [Ritalin] in the 1990s should be viewed
as a marker or warning to society about the problems children are
having and how we view and address them."

In his book, Talking Back to Ritalin, Dr. Peter Breggin expands on the
drug's effects: "Stimulants such as Ritalin and amphetamine... have
grossly harmful impacts on the brain -- reducing overall blood flow,
disturbing glucose metabolism, and possibly causing permanent
shrinkage or atrophy of the brain."

In the American press, although many articles have appeared covering
"the debate" about Ritalin and ADHD, no newspaper or TV network has
taken it upon itself to hammer on all the lies, day after day, month
after month. That kind of campaign could turn around the whole nation
on this vital subject---but of course, pharmaceutical advertising is a
more powerful force.

And one should not forget that Ritalin came out of a Swiss drug giant
called Ciba Geigy (now Novartis) fifty years ago. That company once
had very close business ties with the infamous Nazi cartel, IG Farben.
Farben stood for inhuman experiments on human beings. Read the adverse
effects of Ritalin again, and consider that millions of children take
those pills every day.

JON RAPPOPORT - http://www.nomorefakenews.com


John Rappaport is a good writer on good topics.
So is tim bolen.

Carole
http://www.cellsalts.net



  #5  
Old June 11th 06, 01:42 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,talk.politics.medicine,misc.kids.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default BOLEN REPORT: Ritalin - The Hidden Effects...... Jon Rappaport


Carole wrote:
"BreastImplantAwareness.org" wrote in message
...



Ritalin - The Hidden Effects...

Article by Independent Investigative Reporter Jon Rappaport

Tuesday, May 23rd, 2006

(Jon Rappoport has worked as an independent investigative reporter
since 1982. He has published articles on medical issues and politics
for LA Weekly, Spin, CBS Healthwatch, Stern, and many other newspapers
in the US and Europe. His website is www.nomorefakenews.com. Mr.
Rappoport also writes extensively on the mind-body connection,
alternative healing, and the extraordinary use of imagination to build
futures in which oppressive power is decentralized.)

In 1986, The International Journal of the Addictions published a very
important literature review by Richard Scarnati. It was called "An
Outline of Hazardous Side Effects of Ritalin (Methylphenidate)"
[v.21(7), pp. 837-841].

Scarnati listed a large number of adverse affects of Ritalin and cited
published journal articles which reported each of these symptoms.

For every one of the following Ritalin effects, there is at least one
confirming source in the medical literatu

. Paranoid delusions
· Paranoid psychosis
· Hypomanic and manic symptoms, amphetamine-like psychosis
· Activation of psychotic symptoms
· Toxic psychosis
· Visual hallucinations
· Auditory hallucinations
· Can surpass LSD in producing bizarre experiences
· Effects pathological thought processes
· Extreme withdrawal
· Terrified affect
· Started screaming
· Aggressiveness
· Insomnia
· Since Ritalin is considered an amphetamine-type drug, expect
amphetamine-like effects
· Psychic dependence
· High-abuse potential DEA Schedule II Drug
· Decreased REM sleep
· When used with antidepressants one may see dangerous reactions
including hypertension, seizures and hypothermia
· Convulsions
· Brain damage may be seen with amphetamine abuse.

Many parents around the country have discovered that Ritalin has
become a condition for their children continuing in school. There are
even reports, by parents, of threats from social agencies: "If you
don't allow us to prescribe Ritalin for your ADHD child, we may decide
that you are an unfit parent. We may decide to take your child away."

This mind-boggling state of affairs is fueled by teachers, principals,
and school counselors, none of whom have medical training. Yet even if
they did.

The very existence of the "illnesses" for which Ritalin would be
prescribed is unproven. It is merely assumed.

In commenting on Dr. Lawrence Diller's book, Running on Ritalin, Dr.
William Carey, Director of Behavioral Pediatrics, Children's Hospital
of Philadelphia, has written, "Dr. Diller has correctly described...
the disturbing trend of blaming children's social, behavioral, and
academic performance problems entirely on an unproven brain
deficit..."

On November 16-18, 1998, the National Institute of Mental Health held
the prestigious "NIH Consensus Development Conference on Diagnosis and
Treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder [ADHD]." The
conference was explicitly aimed at ending all debate about the
diagnoses of ADD, ADHD, and about the prescription of Ritalin. It was
hoped that at the highest levels of medical research and bureaucracy,
a clear position would be taken: this is what ADHD is, this is where
it comes from, and these are the drugs it should be treated with. That
didn't happen, amazingly. Instead, the official panel responsible for
drawing conclusions from the conference threw cold water on the whole
attempt to reach a comfortable consensus.

Panel member Mark Vonnegut, a Massachusetts pediatrician, said, "The
diagnosis [of ADHD] is a mess."

The quite conventional and orthodox panel essentially said it was not
sure ADHD was even a valid diagnosis. In other words, it virtually
admitted that ADD and ADHD might be nothing more than attempts to
categorize certain children's behaviors---with no organic cause, no
clear-cut biological basis, no provable reason for even using the ADD
or ADHD labels.

The panel found "no data to indicate that ADHD is due to a brain
malfunction [which malfunction had been the whole psychiatric
assumption]."

The panel found that Ritalin has not been shown to have long-term
benefits. In fact, the panel stated that Ritalin has resulted in
"little improvement on academic achievement or social skills."

Panel chairman, David Kupfer, professor of psychiatry at the
University of Pittsburgh, said, "There is no current validated
diagnostic test [for ADHD]."

Yet at every level of public education in America, there remains what
can only be called a voracious desire to give children Ritalin (or
other similar drugs) for so-called ADD or ADHD.

The 1994 Textbook of Psychiatry, published by the American Psychiatric
Press, contains this review (Popper and Steingard): "Stimulants [such
as Ritalin] do not produce lasting improvements in aggressivity,
conduct disorder, criminality, education achievement, job functioning,
marital relationships, or long-term adjustment."

Parents should also wake up to the fact that, in the aftermath of the
Littleton, Colorado, school-shooting tragedy, pundits and doctors
began urging much more extensive "mental health" services for
children. Whether you have noticed it or not, this no longer means,
for the most part, therapy with a caring professional. It means drugs.
Drugs like Ritalin.

In December 1996, the US Drug Enforcement Agency held a conference on
ADHD and Ritalin. Surprisingly, it issued a sensible statement about
drugs being a bad substitute for the presence of caring parents:
"[T]he use of stimulants [such as Ritalin] for the short-term
improvement of behavior and underachievement may be thwarting efforts
to address the children's real issues, both on an individual and
societal level. The lack of long-term positive results with the use of
stimulants and the specter of previous and potential stimulant abuse
epidemics, give cause to worry about the future. The dramatic increase
in the use of methylphenidate [Ritalin] in the 1990s should be viewed
as a marker or warning to society about the problems children are
having and how we view and address them."

In his book, Talking Back to Ritalin, Dr. Peter Breggin expands on the
drug's effects: "Stimulants such as Ritalin and amphetamine... have
grossly harmful impacts on the brain -- reducing overall blood flow,
disturbing glucose metabolism, and possibly causing permanent
shrinkage or atrophy of the brain."

In the American press, although many articles have appeared covering
"the debate" about Ritalin and ADHD, no newspaper or TV network has
taken it upon itself to hammer on all the lies, day after day, month
after month. That kind of campaign could turn around the whole nation
on this vital subject---but of course, pharmaceutical advertising is a
more powerful force.

And one should not forget that Ritalin came out of a Swiss drug giant
called Ciba Geigy (now Novartis) fifty years ago. That company once
had very close business ties with the infamous Nazi cartel, IG Farben.
Farben stood for inhuman experiments on human beings. Read the adverse
effects of Ritalin again, and consider that millions of children take
those pills every day.

JON RAPPOPORT - http://www.nomorefakenews.com


John Rappaport is a good writer on good topics.
So is tim bolen.


Hm. Carole also thinks that David "the world is being run by giant
shape-shifting lizards" Icke is a worthy source. And I'm sure Bolen and
Rappenport are just as reliable


Carole
http://www.cellsalts.net


  #6  
Old June 11th 06, 04:12 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,talk.politics.medicine,misc.kids.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default BOLEN REPORT: Ritalin - The Hidden Effects...... Jon Rappaport

Carole wrote:

John Rappaport is a good writer on good topics.
So is tim bolen.


Dear Carole:

I regret to inform you that the position of Literary Critic that you
applied for has been filled by a Chimpanzee, who used copies of Bolen
and Rappaport's writings to line the bottom of its cage.

Please feel free to re-apply in the future, around 2106. With a century
of practice behind you, you may get it right.

Very truly yours

  #7  
Old June 11th 06, 07:22 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,talk.politics.medicine,misc.kids.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default BOLEN REPORT: Ritalin - The Hidden Effects...... Jon Rappaport

In article ,
Carole wrote:

John Rappaport is a good writer on good topics.
So is tim bolen.


Bolen is a paid propagandist -- but I guess that's OK with you as long
as you happen to agree with the people paying him this week.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"If you can't say something nice, then sit next to me."
-- Alice Roosevelt Longworth
  #8  
Old June 12th 06, 01:13 AM posted to misc.health.alternative,talk.politics.medicine,misc.kids.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default BOLEN REPORT: Ritalin - The Hidden Effects...... Jon Rappaport


"cathyb" wrote in message
oups.com...

Carole wrote:
"BreastImplantAwareness.org" wrote in message
...



Ritalin - The Hidden Effects...

Article by Independent Investigative Reporter Jon Rappaport

Tuesday, May 23rd, 2006

(Jon Rappoport has worked as an independent investigative reporter
since 1982. He has published articles on medical issues and politics
for LA Weekly, Spin, CBS Healthwatch, Stern, and many other newspapers
in the US and Europe. His website is www.nomorefakenews.com. Mr.
Rappoport also writes extensively on the mind-body connection,
alternative healing, and the extraordinary use of imagination to build
futures in which oppressive power is decentralized.)

In 1986, The International Journal of the Addictions published a very
important literature review by Richard Scarnati. It was called "An
Outline of Hazardous Side Effects of Ritalin (Methylphenidate)"
[v.21(7), pp. 837-841].

Scarnati listed a large number of adverse affects of Ritalin and cited
published journal articles which reported each of these symptoms.

For every one of the following Ritalin effects, there is at least one
confirming source in the medical literatu

. Paranoid delusions
· Paranoid psychosis
· Hypomanic and manic symptoms, amphetamine-like psychosis
· Activation of psychotic symptoms
· Toxic psychosis
· Visual hallucinations
· Auditory hallucinations
· Can surpass LSD in producing bizarre experiences
· Effects pathological thought processes
· Extreme withdrawal
· Terrified affect
· Started screaming
· Aggressiveness
· Insomnia
· Since Ritalin is considered an amphetamine-type drug, expect
amphetamine-like effects
· Psychic dependence
· High-abuse potential DEA Schedule II Drug
· Decreased REM sleep
· When used with antidepressants one may see dangerous reactions
including hypertension, seizures and hypothermia
· Convulsions
· Brain damage may be seen with amphetamine abuse.

Many parents around the country have discovered that Ritalin has
become a condition for their children continuing in school. There are
even reports, by parents, of threats from social agencies: "If you
don't allow us to prescribe Ritalin for your ADHD child, we may decide
that you are an unfit parent. We may decide to take your child away."

This mind-boggling state of affairs is fueled by teachers, principals,
and school counselors, none of whom have medical training. Yet even if
they did.

The very existence of the "illnesses" for which Ritalin would be
prescribed is unproven. It is merely assumed.

In commenting on Dr. Lawrence Diller's book, Running on Ritalin, Dr.
William Carey, Director of Behavioral Pediatrics, Children's Hospital
of Philadelphia, has written, "Dr. Diller has correctly described...
the disturbing trend of blaming children's social, behavioral, and
academic performance problems entirely on an unproven brain
deficit..."

On November 16-18, 1998, the National Institute of Mental Health held
the prestigious "NIH Consensus Development Conference on Diagnosis and
Treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder [ADHD]." The
conference was explicitly aimed at ending all debate about the
diagnoses of ADD, ADHD, and about the prescription of Ritalin. It was
hoped that at the highest levels of medical research and bureaucracy,
a clear position would be taken: this is what ADHD is, this is where
it comes from, and these are the drugs it should be treated with. That
didn't happen, amazingly. Instead, the official panel responsible for
drawing conclusions from the conference threw cold water on the whole
attempt to reach a comfortable consensus.

Panel member Mark Vonnegut, a Massachusetts pediatrician, said, "The
diagnosis [of ADHD] is a mess."

The quite conventional and orthodox panel essentially said it was not
sure ADHD was even a valid diagnosis. In other words, it virtually
admitted that ADD and ADHD might be nothing more than attempts to
categorize certain children's behaviors---with no organic cause, no
clear-cut biological basis, no provable reason for even using the ADD
or ADHD labels.

The panel found "no data to indicate that ADHD is due to a brain
malfunction [which malfunction had been the whole psychiatric
assumption]."

The panel found that Ritalin has not been shown to have long-term
benefits. In fact, the panel stated that Ritalin has resulted in
"little improvement on academic achievement or social skills."

Panel chairman, David Kupfer, professor of psychiatry at the
University of Pittsburgh, said, "There is no current validated
diagnostic test [for ADHD]."

Yet at every level of public education in America, there remains what
can only be called a voracious desire to give children Ritalin (or
other similar drugs) for so-called ADD or ADHD.

The 1994 Textbook of Psychiatry, published by the American Psychiatric
Press, contains this review (Popper and Steingard): "Stimulants [such
as Ritalin] do not produce lasting improvements in aggressivity,
conduct disorder, criminality, education achievement, job functioning,
marital relationships, or long-term adjustment."

Parents should also wake up to the fact that, in the aftermath of the
Littleton, Colorado, school-shooting tragedy, pundits and doctors
began urging much more extensive "mental health" services for
children. Whether you have noticed it or not, this no longer means,
for the most part, therapy with a caring professional. It means drugs.
Drugs like Ritalin.

In December 1996, the US Drug Enforcement Agency held a conference on
ADHD and Ritalin. Surprisingly, it issued a sensible statement about
drugs being a bad substitute for the presence of caring parents:
"[T]he use of stimulants [such as Ritalin] for the short-term
improvement of behavior and underachievement may be thwarting efforts
to address the children's real issues, both on an individual and
societal level. The lack of long-term positive results with the use of
stimulants and the specter of previous and potential stimulant abuse
epidemics, give cause to worry about the future. The dramatic increase
in the use of methylphenidate [Ritalin] in the 1990s should be viewed
as a marker or warning to society about the problems children are
having and how we view and address them."

In his book, Talking Back to Ritalin, Dr. Peter Breggin expands on the
drug's effects: "Stimulants such as Ritalin and amphetamine... have
grossly harmful impacts on the brain -- reducing overall blood flow,
disturbing glucose metabolism, and possibly causing permanent
shrinkage or atrophy of the brain."

In the American press, although many articles have appeared covering
"the debate" about Ritalin and ADHD, no newspaper or TV network has
taken it upon itself to hammer on all the lies, day after day, month
after month. That kind of campaign could turn around the whole nation
on this vital subject---but of course, pharmaceutical advertising is a
more powerful force.

And one should not forget that Ritalin came out of a Swiss drug giant
called Ciba Geigy (now Novartis) fifty years ago. That company once
had very close business ties with the infamous Nazi cartel, IG Farben.
Farben stood for inhuman experiments on human beings. Read the adverse
effects of Ritalin again, and consider that millions of children take
those pills every day.

JON RAPPOPORT - http://www.nomorefakenews.com


John Rappaport is a good writer on good topics.
So is tim bolen.


Hm. Carole also thinks that David "the world is being run by giant
shape-shifting lizards" Icke is a worthy source. And I'm sure Bolen and
Rappenport are just as reliable

Now I didn't say that Cathy, all I said was that it was possible. And there
are various degrees of possible from highly likely to highly unlikely. And
until you can prove that there aren't shape shifting reptiles involved
somewhere in the grand scheme of things, you are in no position to ridicule.

Remember, truth is often stranger than fiction.

Carole
http://www.cellsalts.net





  #9  
Old June 12th 06, 02:35 AM posted to misc.health.alternative,talk.politics.medicine,misc.kids.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default BOLEN REPORT: Ritalin - The Hidden Effects...... Jon Rappaport


Carole wrote:
"cathyb" wrote in message
oups.com...

Carole wrote:
"BreastImplantAwareness.org" wrote in message
...



Ritalin - The Hidden Effects...

Article by Independent Investigative Reporter Jon Rappaport

Tuesday, May 23rd, 2006

(Jon Rappoport has worked as an independent investigative reporter
since 1982. He has published articles on medical issues and politics
for LA Weekly, Spin, CBS Healthwatch, Stern, and many other newspapers
in the US and Europe. His website is www.nomorefakenews.com. Mr.
Rappoport also writes extensively on the mind-body connection,
alternative healing, and the extraordinary use of imagination to build
futures in which oppressive power is decentralized.)

In 1986, The International Journal of the Addictions published a very
important literature review by Richard Scarnati. It was called "An
Outline of Hazardous Side Effects of Ritalin (Methylphenidate)"
[v.21(7), pp. 837-841].

Scarnati listed a large number of adverse affects of Ritalin and cited
published journal articles which reported each of these symptoms.

For every one of the following Ritalin effects, there is at least one
confirming source in the medical literatu

. Paranoid delusions
· Paranoid psychosis
· Hypomanic and manic symptoms, amphetamine-like psychosis
· Activation of psychotic symptoms
· Toxic psychosis
· Visual hallucinations
· Auditory hallucinations
· Can surpass LSD in producing bizarre experiences
· Effects pathological thought processes
· Extreme withdrawal
· Terrified affect
· Started screaming
· Aggressiveness
· Insomnia
· Since Ritalin is considered an amphetamine-type drug, expect
amphetamine-like effects
· Psychic dependence
· High-abuse potential DEA Schedule II Drug
· Decreased REM sleep
· When used with antidepressants one may see dangerous reactions
including hypertension, seizures and hypothermia
· Convulsions
· Brain damage may be seen with amphetamine abuse.

Many parents around the country have discovered that Ritalin has
become a condition for their children continuing in school. There are
even reports, by parents, of threats from social agencies: "If you
don't allow us to prescribe Ritalin for your ADHD child, we may decide
that you are an unfit parent. We may decide to take your child away."

This mind-boggling state of affairs is fueled by teachers, principals,
and school counselors, none of whom have medical training. Yet even if
they did.

The very existence of the "illnesses" for which Ritalin would be
prescribed is unproven. It is merely assumed.

In commenting on Dr. Lawrence Diller's book, Running on Ritalin, Dr.
William Carey, Director of Behavioral Pediatrics, Children's Hospital
of Philadelphia, has written, "Dr. Diller has correctly described...
the disturbing trend of blaming children's social, behavioral, and
academic performance problems entirely on an unproven brain
deficit..."

On November 16-18, 1998, the National Institute of Mental Health held
the prestigious "NIH Consensus Development Conference on Diagnosis and
Treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder [ADHD]." The
conference was explicitly aimed at ending all debate about the
diagnoses of ADD, ADHD, and about the prescription of Ritalin. It was
hoped that at the highest levels of medical research and bureaucracy,
a clear position would be taken: this is what ADHD is, this is where
it comes from, and these are the drugs it should be treated with. That
didn't happen, amazingly. Instead, the official panel responsible for
drawing conclusions from the conference threw cold water on the whole
attempt to reach a comfortable consensus.

Panel member Mark Vonnegut, a Massachusetts pediatrician, said, "The
diagnosis [of ADHD] is a mess."

The quite conventional and orthodox panel essentially said it was not
sure ADHD was even a valid diagnosis. In other words, it virtually
admitted that ADD and ADHD might be nothing more than attempts to
categorize certain children's behaviors---with no organic cause, no
clear-cut biological basis, no provable reason for even using the ADD
or ADHD labels.

The panel found "no data to indicate that ADHD is due to a brain
malfunction [which malfunction had been the whole psychiatric
assumption]."

The panel found that Ritalin has not been shown to have long-term
benefits. In fact, the panel stated that Ritalin has resulted in
"little improvement on academic achievement or social skills."

Panel chairman, David Kupfer, professor of psychiatry at the
University of Pittsburgh, said, "There is no current validated
diagnostic test [for ADHD]."

Yet at every level of public education in America, there remains what
can only be called a voracious desire to give children Ritalin (or
other similar drugs) for so-called ADD or ADHD.

The 1994 Textbook of Psychiatry, published by the American Psychiatric
Press, contains this review (Popper and Steingard): "Stimulants [such
as Ritalin] do not produce lasting improvements in aggressivity,
conduct disorder, criminality, education achievement, job functioning,
marital relationships, or long-term adjustment."

Parents should also wake up to the fact that, in the aftermath of the
Littleton, Colorado, school-shooting tragedy, pundits and doctors
began urging much more extensive "mental health" services for
children. Whether you have noticed it or not, this no longer means,
for the most part, therapy with a caring professional. It means drugs.
Drugs like Ritalin.

In December 1996, the US Drug Enforcement Agency held a conference on
ADHD and Ritalin. Surprisingly, it issued a sensible statement about
drugs being a bad substitute for the presence of caring parents:
"[T]he use of stimulants [such as Ritalin] for the short-term
improvement of behavior and underachievement may be thwarting efforts
to address the children's real issues, both on an individual and
societal level. The lack of long-term positive results with the use of
stimulants and the specter of previous and potential stimulant abuse
epidemics, give cause to worry about the future. The dramatic increase
in the use of methylphenidate [Ritalin] in the 1990s should be viewed
as a marker or warning to society about the problems children are
having and how we view and address them."

In his book, Talking Back to Ritalin, Dr. Peter Breggin expands on the
drug's effects: "Stimulants such as Ritalin and amphetamine... have
grossly harmful impacts on the brain -- reducing overall blood flow,
disturbing glucose metabolism, and possibly causing permanent
shrinkage or atrophy of the brain."

In the American press, although many articles have appeared covering
"the debate" about Ritalin and ADHD, no newspaper or TV network has
taken it upon itself to hammer on all the lies, day after day, month
after month. That kind of campaign could turn around the whole nation
on this vital subject---but of course, pharmaceutical advertising is a
more powerful force.

And one should not forget that Ritalin came out of a Swiss drug giant
called Ciba Geigy (now Novartis) fifty years ago. That company once
had very close business ties with the infamous Nazi cartel, IG Farben.
Farben stood for inhuman experiments on human beings. Read the adverse
effects of Ritalin again, and consider that millions of children take
those pills every day.

JON RAPPOPORT - http://www.nomorefakenews.com


John Rappaport is a good writer on good topics.
So is tim bolen.


Hm. Carole also thinks that David "the world is being run by giant
shape-shifting lizards" Icke is a worthy source. And I'm sure Bolen and
Rappenport are just as reliable

Now I didn't say that Cathy, all I said was that it was possible.


Carole, please learn to read. You certainly have said that David Icke
is a worthy source.

The fact that you also said that his shape-shifting lizard overlords
were possible but unlikely is another issue. Yet again, one that does
not redound to your credit.

And there
are various degrees of possible from highly likely to highly unlikely. And
until you can prove that there aren't shape shifting reptiles involved
somewhere in the grand scheme of things, you are in no position to ridicule.

Remember, truth is often stranger than fiction.


Not so when the fiction in question is our being slaves to giant
shape-shifting lizards, Carole.


Carole
http://www.cellsalts.net


  #10  
Old June 12th 06, 02:46 AM posted to misc.health.alternative,talk.politics.medicine,misc.kids.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default BOLEN REPORT: Ritalin - The Hidden Effects...... Jon Rappaport


"Carole" wrote in message
...

"cathyb" wrote in message
oups.com...



Hm. Carole also thinks that David "the world is being run by giant
shape-shifting lizards" Icke is a worthy source. And I'm sure Bolen and
Rappenport are just as reliable

Now I didn't say that Cathy, all I said was that it was possible. And
there
are various degrees of possible from highly likely to highly unlikely. And
until you can prove that there aren't shape shifting reptiles involved
somewhere in the grand scheme of things, you are in no position to
ridicule.

Remember, truth is often stranger than fiction.


Hmm. Has Jan learned how to shape-shift?
--


--Rich

Recommended websites:

http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
http://www.acahf.org.au
http://www.quackwatch.org/
http://www.skeptic.com/
http://www.csicop.org/


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FOAD Bigots bobbie sellers General 190 August 1st 05 10:07 AM
Ritalin and Russian roulette Ilena Rose Kids Health 52 May 19th 05 02:17 PM
[OT] What Is "Terrorism?" Catherine Woodgold General 39 August 10th 03 01:23 AM
[OT] What Is "Terrorism?" Chris Spanking 0 July 28th 03 06:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.