If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Does "no presents" really mean that?
x-no-archive:yes Penny Gaines wrote:
Rosalie B. wrote in : [snip] I agree with Banty that manners are not so common now (I think it is incredibly rude to bring wedding gifts TO a wedding as it results in all kinds of chaos no matter how well it is handled). So just as one must put reply cards in wedding invitations because otherwise (and even so) people will not tell you if they are coming or not, one must also specify about presents on an invitation. And that is absolutely against etiquette to do. [snip] I don't think it is that there are *no* manners, just that they are *different* manners. So just like UK wedding invites don't have lots of different envelopes (the invitees names are on the invitation itself), most UK weddings have arrangements for receiving presents. Postage in the UK is sufficiently expensive that if you don't live near the bride and groom it would be too expensive to mail it. Can the postage expense not be figured into the cost of the gift? When I shop I mostly shop by catalog, and the shipping charge is part of the cost. The problems here are that presents are commonly put on a table, but the giver may (often does) forget to put a card in them under the impression that he or she will give the gift directly to the bridal couple and that the couple will REMEMBER who it was that handed them that specific present. This latter assumption is especially unrealistic. Or the card is outside the package and gets separated. So no one (except the giver) knows who the present is from. If the bride and groom actually open the presents at the reception, the separation of the card and gift becomes even more of a problem. Plus someone must be delegated to log the gifts in and take the presents somewhere after the reception, without getting them broken or damaged. And there is the not insignificant problem of theft. From the reception, from the car of the person doing the transporting, or from the house or apartment of the honeymooning couple. When you read older books, the manners then are quite different to now. At times manners have been very formal, with strict details on such things as when and how long to visit people (afternoons only, leave after 15 minutes), other times they are informal and apparently left to the individual to decide. Yes I've got an etiquette book from the 1800s which is quite amusing to read. But while formal calls are not made anymore, there's a basic underlying appropriateness of behavior. Such as that it's rude to overstay your welcome, and the people in the neighborhood should welcome a newcomer. grandma Rosalie |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Does "no presents" really mean that?
x-no-archive:yes ==Daye== wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 06:22:45 EDT, "D&K Condron" wrote: What do the rest of you think "no presents" means? What would you have done? Well, no presents to me means just that. However, I probably would have gotten the child a card or something small for his birthday. When I say small, I mean a present that is less than $5. Before I had my daughter, I decided to stop celebrating Xmas. (I celebrate now because of my daughter... she makes it enjoyable.) I asked for no presents. I told everyone that I would not be buying gifts, so don't buy me anything. My DH did buy gifts, but he was still celebrating. I STILL got presents. I didn't buy anyone anything, but I was heaped with presents. When I asked them about it, they said, "We thought you weren't serious." I responded, "I was serious." I decided to stop exchanging gifts except with very close family members (i.e. grandparents) when I got to the point that I had more children than anyone else. I had two and they had one or none. I told them a couple of months in advance. My SIL still sent gifts, but she told me she had bought them already. We didn't send her family anything. And the next year, we didn't get anything or send anything to sisters, brothers, aunts or uncles. So it can be done without any ill feelings. I still sometimes send my sister a non-birthday gift "just because". grandma Rosalie |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Does "no presents" really mean that?
In ,
David desJardins wrote: *dragonlady writes: * According to Miss Manners (also Emily Post and other such experts) an * invitation is NOT a demand for a gift, one is NOT under an obligation to * bring gifts, and putting "no presents" on an invitation implies that * there normally IS an obligation and is therefore improper. * *If that's what Miss Manners and Emily Post think, they are wrong. You can say that as often as you like, but it will not magically become correct. The thing is, among MANY members of American "polite society," for want of a better term, what dragonlady says is in fact believed to be true. Formal etiquette is basically a codification of the rules of polite society, right? So MM and EP are not wrong! Certainly if you tell me you disagree with them, and that people you know disagree with them, hey, no problem...but I know LOTS of people do do not disagree with them, so for at least "a whole lot of urban/suburban well-educated Jewish and/or Christian relatively well-off people" they are correct. *Putting "No Presents" just implies that you don't want any presents. It *doesn't imply that there would have been an obligation to bring presents *if that statement were omitted. That's the fundamental mistake. The thing is, you would never write "no presents" on an invitation unless there were an underlying assumption that without such notation, presents would be brought. It would be rude of a host to make that assumption. You wouldn't issue an invitation to a party and write "no elephants allowed" on it, would you? No, because you don't assume people will bring elephants unless otherwise instructed. Similarly, gifts. One must not assume gifts will be forthcoming unless guests are otherwise instructed, it's considered rude. As for me, I don't really care if someone writes "no gifts," I pretty much just figure they don't know any better, it's not like I find it offensive. But many of my older-than-me family members DO find it offensive, as do many others in my social circle. FWIW. hillary israeli vmd http://www.hillary.net "uber vaccae in quattuor partes divisum est." not-so-newly minted veterinarian-at-large |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Does "no presents" really mean that?
Hillary Israeli writes:
According to Miss Manners (also Emily Post and other such experts) an invitation is NOT a demand for a gift, one is NOT under an obligation to bring gifts, and putting "no presents" on an invitation implies that there normally IS an obligation and is therefore improper. If that's what Miss Manners and Emily Post think, they are wrong. You can say that as often as you like, but it will not magically become correct. It doesn't have to "become correct". It is correct. The statement, "Putting 'no presents' on an invitation implies that there normally is an obligation," is factually and logically wrong. You don't have to know anything about 'manners' to know that---only about logic. The thing is, among MANY members of American "polite society," for want of a better term, what dragonlady says is in fact believed to be true. Formal etiquette is basically a codification of the rules of polite society, right? Hey, I didn't disagree with the 'etiquette' proscription against 'No Presents'. If someone wants to call that uncouth, that's fine with me; they can think whatever they want. But if they say that writing 'No Presents' implies that presents would otherwise be required, they are just wrong. The thing is, you would never write "no presents" on an invitation unless there were an underlying assumption that without such notation, presents would be brought. The thing is, you are wrong. If I did write that, it wouldn't depend on such an assumption. You wouldn't issue an invitation to a party and write "no elephants allowed" on it, would you? No, because you don't assume people will bring elephants unless otherwise instructed. If I were to write 'No Presents', it wouldn't be because I assume that everyone would otherwise bring a present. It would be because I fear that some people might bring presents. That's quite different. I don't assume "People must bring presents to birthday parties." But I do know, from experience, that some people sometimes do. Can you see the difference? David desJardins |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Does "no presents" really mean that?
Rosalie B. wrote in :
x-no-archive:yes Penny Gaines wrote: Rosalie B. wrote in : [snip] I agree with Banty that manners are not so common now (I think it is incredibly rude to bring wedding gifts TO a wedding as it results in all kinds of chaos no matter how well it is handled). So just as one must put reply cards in wedding invitations because otherwise (and even so) people will not tell you if they are coming or not, one must also specify about presents on an invitation. And that is absolutely against etiquette to do. [snip] I don't think it is that there are *no* manners, just that they are *different* manners. So just like UK wedding invites don't have lots of different envelopes (the invitees names are on the invitation itself), most UK weddings have arrangements for receiving presents. Postage in the UK is sufficiently expensive that if you don't live near the bride and groom it would be too expensive to mail it. Can the postage expense not be figured into the cost of the gift? When I shop I mostly shop by catalog, and the shipping charge is part of the cost. I suppose it could be, but I don't tend to buy presents from catalogues. I think the last present I took to a wedding was a compost bin (well, it was on the gift list), combined with a garden ornament made of concrete. The postage cost would probably have doubled the cost of the gift, *and* the recipients would have had to make a special trip to the post office depot to collect them. We didn't live anywhere near the wedding, so we couldn't have taken it to them seperately. The problems here are that presents are commonly put on a table, but the giver may (often does) forget to put a card in them under the [snip] Yes, it does come with its own set of problems. OTOH, English weddings do other things differently to American weddings - eg we don't have bridal showers, we don't have rehersal dinners, we don't have lots of groomsmen. From reading US wedding sites, each of those has its own set of problems. -- Penny Gaines UK mum to three |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Does "no presents" really mean that?
The host has requested for "something yummy to share" instead of
presents perhaps indicated that she may or may not have prepared many varieties of food and would like to have another 8 more dishes (8 moms invited) to be added to the list. However, if guests still bring a little gift on top of the dish (since it is a children's party), then it'll be a bonus. Kat, did all the moms bring both food and present (except you)? I guess if the request is meant for an adult occasion, then probably guests will just bring food and treat it as pot-luck. Jean "D&K Condron" wrote in message ... I recently went to a child's birthday party that requested no presents, but a dish of something yummy to share instead. Well, out of 8 moms invited, I was the *only* one who did not bring a gift. Did I miss something? I admit that I am new at the mommy thing, but to be the only one who did as instructed? I am very confused. What do the rest of you think "no presents" means? What would you have done? Kat |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Does "no presents" really mean that?
"Cathy Kearns" wrote in message
.com... Miss Manners would point out that presents should never be expected, and telling guests that normally they are expected, but not this time by writing "no presents" on an invitation, no matter how well intentioned, is rude. I would also presume that making disparaging remarks about guests who could not contain their joy about their dear friends' occasion without bringing them a token would also be considered rude. I suspect Miss Manners has not quite grasped the era of the Birthday Gift Registry. If that is an indication that the rules have changed since Miss Manners' time... -- "There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary numbers and those who don't." ----------------------------- Byron "Barn" Canfield |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Does "no presents" really mean that?
In article vP9Oa.56185$926.6971@sccrnsc03,
"Byron Canfield" wrote: "Cathy Kearns" wrote in message .com... Miss Manners would point out that presents should never be expected, and telling guests that normally they are expected, but not this time by writing "no presents" on an invitation, no matter how well intentioned, is rude. I would also presume that making disparaging remarks about guests who could not contain their joy about their dear friends' occasion without bringing them a token would also be considered rude. I suspect Miss Manners has not quite grasped the era of the Birthday Gift Registry. If that is an indication that the rules have changed since Miss Manners' time... Miss Manners' time is now. Her POV, I think, would be that just because tacky phenomena like gift registries exist, that doesn't make them correct. I've personally given in to the concept of bridal registries, both as a bride and as a gift giver, because the general idea of wedding presents (if one chooses to give them) is to help the happy couple outfit their new establishment and it seems like a practical approach because it helps the giver determine what's most needed. But what's the deal with birthday registries? To help kids fill out their toy collection? I don't see any need to foster their greed further. Or to relieve their friends of the requirement to put some thought into gift selection. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Does "no presents" really mean that?
Kat ) wrote:
Yes, all of the other moms brought food in addition to the gifts. Yet these were not "little" gifts as you mention, but ones that I guess were in the $20 - $30 dollar range. Egads. That's *way* more than I ever spend on the gifts my kids take. Our limit is $10 or so. And that's for parties where gifts *are* expected. --Helen |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Does "no presents" really mean that?
"Elizabeth Gardner" wrote in message
... In article vP9Oa.56185$926.6971@sccrnsc03, "Byron Canfield" wrote: "Cathy Kearns" wrote in message .com... Miss Manners would point out that presents should never be expected, and telling guests that normally they are expected, but not this time by writing "no presents" on an invitation, no matter how well intentioned, is rude. I would also presume that making disparaging remarks about guests who could not contain their joy about their dear friends' occasion without bringing them a token would also be considered rude. I suspect Miss Manners has not quite grasped the era of the Birthday Gift Registry. If that is an indication that the rules have changed since Miss Manners' time... Miss Manners' time is now. Her POV, I think, would be that just because tacky phenomena like gift registries exist, that doesn't make them correct. I've personally given in to the concept of bridal registries, both as a bride and as a gift giver, because the general idea of wedding presents (if one chooses to give them) is to help the happy couple outfit their new establishment and it seems like a practical approach because it helps the giver determine what's most needed. But what's the deal with birthday registries? To help kids fill out their toy collection? I don't see any need to foster their greed further. Or to relieve their friends of the requirement to put some thought into gift selection. I'm not defending birthday registries -- I think they are very near the height of presumptiousness. I was just making the observation that Miss Manners' opinion and the current reality do not match. -- "There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary numbers and those who don't." ----------------------------- Byron "Barn" Canfield |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AD/HD World Expert Presents Online Thurs May 27 | TerryM2442 | General | 0 | May 26th 04 05:33 AM |
They opened their Chanukkah presents today...sigh | dejablues | General | 128 | December 28th 03 06:25 PM |
America's Favorite Grandma Presents: Christmastime Do's and DON'Ts!! | Mother Henrietta Hickey | General | 6 | December 17th 03 08:08 AM |
Holiday presents for the neighbors kids? | P. Tierney | General | 10 | December 8th 03 08:09 PM |
First Christmas Presents | Marie | General | 12 | November 18th 03 07:44 PM |