| too many latinos?

On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 04:19:44 GMT, "bobb" wrote:

By Chris Moran
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

October 10, 2003

For the first time, more Latinos than whites will attend San Diego County
public schools this year, according to a report to be released tomorrow.

Too many Bigots?.

Kane

Kane wrote:

On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 04:19:44 GMT, "bobb" wrote:

By Chris Moran
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

October 10, 2003

For the first time, more Latinos than whites will attend San Diego County
public schools this year, according to a report to be released tomorrow.

Too many Bigots?.

Kane


Interesting. Check to see if the numbers of crime go up with them?

wondermind wrote in message ...
Kane wrote:

On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 04:19:44 GMT, "bobb" wrote:

By Chris Moran
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

October 10, 2003

For the first time, more Latinos than whites will attend San Diego County
public schools this year, according to a report to be released tomorrow.

Too many Bigots?.

Kane


Interesting. Check to see if the numbers of crime go up with them?

They go up of course. The more bigots the more bigotry. The more
bigotry the more crime. It's been a constant for centuries. I would
have thought everyone knew that.

Did you ask for some reason?

LidoKane

From: wondermind )
Subject: More trouble?
This is the only article in this thread
View: Original Format
Newsgroups: alt.support.child-protective-services,
alt.support.foster-parents
Date: 2003-10-24 14:30:01 PST


Kane wrote:

On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 04:19:44 GMT, "bobb"
wrote:

By Chris Moran
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

October 10, 2003

For the first time, more Latinos than whites

Very strange observation from a writer apparently situated in San
Diego County.

"Latinos" are many colors, including rather a lot of them that are
"white."

So we start off with an error and compound it. My bet is that this
writer has a little number to run.

will attend San Diego County
public schools this year, according to a report to be released
tomorrow.

Too many Bigots?.

Kane


Interesting. Check to see if the numbers of crime go up with them?

Well, I'm weary of doing research for numbnuts that come trollin' on
through here, but I'll share an observation with you: You are
abso****in'lutely correct. Crime does go up with them.

It works like this: The more bigots, the more bigotry. The more
bigotry the more reactive the subjects of that bigotry become. The
more reactive they are the more crime and other undesirable behaviors
by them insue.

Once upon a time one it was common to claim the lowlife scum Irish
imigrants (one of which was my great grandfather) caused crime to go
up. Then, dagnabitanyway, they stopped being so discriminated against
and their crime rate went down. There is even a little residual Irish
hating that goes on, but it's so small it's pretty innocuous.

So the problem isn't the "Greasers," little man. It's the bigots.

Among the hispanic folks I've known, of all colors, there is a healthy
contingent...a super majority, that are law abiding, rather
conservative, family focused...big time...decent and very likable
folks. As there is less bigotry toward them these more stable folks
will prevail and crime will go down, considerably.

Your attempt to assign some evil to hispanics..latinos... is duly
noted for the ignorant racism it obvious is. Thanks. We need to be
reminded of the true source of minority crime.

Do a google on "blue eyes brown eyes" read the results. And ponder,
ponder deeply, and think if you can.

Then see if you can find a copy of some of the tapes of the blue eye
brown eye experiments done with whites occupying the place of a
minority, and watch'em behave like "******s" and "Greasers" and wonder
at the destructive power of bigotry.

You might come to, even as I have, thank goodness most of the folks
discriminated against haven't risen up to cut your white trash
throats. A remarkable exercise in self control if ever I've seen one,
historically speaking.

An exhibit about "latinos" and "Whites"

http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/cgi-...=1&word=latino

WordNet 1.7.1 Search
Overview for "latino"

The noun "latino" has 2 senses in WordNet.

1. Spanish American, Hispanic American, Hispanic, Latino -- (an
American whose first language was Spanish)
2. Latino -- (an artificial language based on words common to the
Romance languages)

The adjective "latino" has 1 sense in WordNet.

1. Hispanic, Latino -- (related to or derived from the people or
culture of Spain; "the Hispanic population of California is growing
rapidly")

I met a latina one day on an elevator. I found it odd that she and her
obviously latina friend were speaking to each other in Mandarin
chinese, a language I'm a little familiar with. But then she looked
asian (something Amerinds often do..given their racial origins) while
the other lady did not. I addressed her in Mandarin. She smiled and
turned to her friend and said, in unaccented Spanish, "he speaks
mandarin with a terrible accent doesn't he?" I speak enough spanish
to have figured that out.

The lady answered her in Portuguese, another language I have a very
small knowledge of. And then the first lady, the one that looked
asian, turned to me and asked me in perfectly good Japanese, "do you
speak any of these languages besides Mandarin?" My japanese is very
weak and my puzzled look must have tipped her off...so she reasked the
question in nearly unaccented english.

She was a 3rd generation descendent of Japanese immigrants to Brazil,
and a lady with multiple degrees and books to her credit. I was at an
academic conference so shouldn't have been surprized, but I was of
course.

When I think about my own red neck origins and the expansion of my
world when I got over it, I'm apparently in remission and haven't had
a seriously racist thought in some time now, I am most grateful. And I
pray that other's of my group, the recividist rednecks, will get with
the program. I am soooooooo tired of the hate and pain they generate.

Best, Kane

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 23:19:33 -0500 (EST), "Ricardo Montalban"
wrote:

Kane wrote:

Interesting. Check to see if the numbers of crime go up with them?

They go up of course. The more bigots the more bigotry. The more
bigotry the more crime. It's been a constant for centuries. I would
have thought everyone knew that.

Did you ask for some reason?

LidoKane


Do you have an empirical source for your theory of correlation between
bigotry/race/crime, or are you merely talking out of your well-loosened ass?



Having endured several months of Kane's almost daily asinine drivel,
I'd vote for the latter.

On 27 Oct 2003 00:50:01 -0800, (Greg Hanson)
wrote:

Kane AKA AKA Frank Andrews
AKA Commander McBrag said he worked at SAC under LeMay.

There was a Frank M Andrews who worked with LeMay and
did great things for what would become the Air Force.
But he died in 1943.
Andrews Air Force Base was named after him.

And our Frank says that he worked under
LeMay in the 1950's?

Was Kane a Frank Junior, working for his deceased
father's old boss? At an air base named for
Frank's Dad?

And yes, is him because he posted
in some homeschooling newsgroups with his personal
fears about Christian Reconstructionism. It's him.

This is what tipped his hand:

From: )
Subject: Not sufficiently spanked........
Newsgroups: alt.parenting.spanking
Date: 2003-10-06 17:32:47 PST

Football Players In Sodomy Case May Be Tried As Adults
Team's Season Canceled

http://www.wftv.com/news/2534849/detail.html

POSTED: 1:14 p.m. EDT October 6, 2003
UPDATED: 2:08 p.m. EDT October 6, 2003

HONESDALE, Pa. -- A prosecutor says he will seek to have three high
school football players from Long Island, N.Y., tried as adults on
charges that they sodomized and hazed younger teammates at a
preseason
training camp in northeast Pennsylvania.

Wayne County District Attorney Mark Zimmer held a news conference
Monday, describing the crimes as "horrific."

Three N.Y. high school football players who are accused of sodomizing
younger teammates at a training camp may be tried as adults. They
allegedly sodomized a 13-year-old and two 14-year-olds with a
broomstick, pine cones and golf balls.

Two of the players who are accused are 16 and one is 17. They
allegedly sodomized a 13-year-old and two 14-year-old boys with a
broomstick, pine cones and golf balls.

snip.......click the URL above for the complete story...........

The alleged perps must have come from the 10% or so minority of
children that are "never spanked."

It's obvious that these boys weren't sufficiently spanked by their
parents or they'd have developed consciences and been unable to do
such foul things to others.

Right, Spankers?

Kane

too bad kane. they finally caught up with you and you claimed that no
one could get you, smart ass. come play with me again some time. give
me an r r r r.

;-]

Frank

With Kane's bragging about serving under
Curtis LeMay in the 1950's, isn't it an odd
coincidence that somebody pestering Kane would
choose a name of a famous person who served
under LeMay?

Why did/would the faker post Kanes' very same
concerns about religious reconstructionism
in homeschool newsgroups?

Was the "LidoKane" (anesthetic) reference merely
coincidental to the ""other person"" on the
R N .com account showing up?

How do we know that if fandrews admits to being
some nemesis of Kane's, that it isn't Kane himself
burning an exposed sock puppet?

As for the idea of Frank Andrews recently posting as
Kane, I find it interesting that Frank posted
Kane's fears about reconstructionism.
Why would a faker use RN.com to spoof you?
Spend months posting your opinions?
All to PRETEND to be you now?

The below posting did NOT claim to be Kane, but if you
read the text, IT IS KANE, minus the swearing.

I think == Frank Andrews == Kane.

wrote in message . com...
Newsgroups: misc.education.home-school.misc, ott.education.homeschooling
Date: 2003-10-20 19:44:30 PST

snip
Exactly!

That's so in tune with our experience. We are long removed from direct
homeschooling - our 4 children are aged 22 to 43 - but the same
principles still apply.

We often got the feeling we so often had to just jump back and give
them room with an occasional foray into doing some rigorous learning
ourselves right along with them. I didn't learn calculus until my
children did.

We are still active in homeschooling politically though, and I try to
read each new book that comes out.

I recently came across a treasure in a book by Ann Larson-Fischer,
Fundamentals of Homeschooling. The title made me think it was going to
be a bore, but she told the truth from my view point...she wrote this
book that can make it possible for anyone looking for a system of
homeschooling to find what they and their family can best apply to
their situation.

This is a gem and going to be one of the great classics of
homeschooling writing. Though it's been out since January I think the
title has kept it from being discovered.

But the libraries are starting to stock more copies of it and renewing
interest in her last book, Homeschooling In Oregon: The Handbook...and
that book had some of the same qualities and it wasn't really all the
limited to Oregon homeschooing issues.

I'm going out and buying some copies for my children for Christmas
presents.

I did a google on the title and author and came up with:

http://nettlepatch.net/homeschool/

The reviews cannot adequately describe the quality of writing and easy
to read style that I found. I wish we'd had this when we started
homeschooling in the 60's.

Frank

What if THIS DENIAL is a giant bluff to distract?

From: Kane )
Subject: Frank, don't be posting as Kane..
Newsgroups: alt.parenting.spanking
Date: 2003-10-06 17:54:40 PST

Hi "Frank," I see you are playing with my posts again.

Don't do that.

Or I'll have to pay you a little visit.

I posted and article, and apparently "Frank Andrews," one of my
favorite trolls, and not his real name, reposted without attributing
me.

Here's the article: Football Players In Sodomy Case snip

"Greg Hanson" wrote in message
om...
With Kane's bragging about serving under
Curtis LeMay in the 1950's, isn't it an odd
coincidence that somebody pestering Kane would
choose a name of a famous person who served
under LeMay?

Why did/would the faker post Kanes' very same
concerns about religious reconstructionism
in homeschool newsgroups?

Was the "LidoKane" (anesthetic) reference merely
coincidental to the ""other person"" on the
R N .com account showing up?

How do we know that if fandrews admits to being
some nemesis of Kane's, that it isn't Kane himself
burning an exposed sock puppet?

As for the idea of Frank Andrews recently posting as
Kane, I find it interesting that Frank posted
Kane's fears about reconstructionism.
Why would a faker use RN.com to spoof you?
Spend months posting your opinions?
All to PRETEND to be you now?

It's like a freakin Hitchcock movie.

The suspense is killing me.

The below posting did NOT claim to be Kane, but if you
read the text, IT IS KANE, minus the swearing.

I think == Frank Andrews == Kane.

WOW!

wrote in message
. com...
Newsgroups: misc.education.home-school.misc, ott.education.homeschooling
Date: 2003-10-20 19:44:30 PST

snip
Exactly!

That's so in tune with our experience. We are long removed from direct
homeschooling - our 4 children are aged 22 to 43 - but the same
principles still apply.

We often got the feeling we so often had to just jump back and give
them room with an occasional foray into doing some rigorous learning
ourselves right along with them. I didn't learn calculus until my
children did.

We are still active in homeschooling politically though, and I try to
read each new book that comes out.

I recently came across a treasure in a book by Ann Larson-Fischer,
Fundamentals of Homeschooling. The title made me think it was going to
be a bore, but she told the truth from my view point...she wrote this
book that can make it possible for anyone looking for a system of
homeschooling to find what they and their family can best apply to
their situation.

This is a gem and going to be one of the great classics of
homeschooling writing. Though it's been out since January I think the
title has kept it from being discovered.

But the libraries are starting to stock more copies of it and renewing
interest in her last book, Homeschooling In Oregon: The Handbook...and
that book had some of the same qualities and it wasn't really all the
limited to Oregon homeschooing issues.

I'm going out and buying some copies for my children for Christmas
presents.

I did a google on the title and author and came up with:

http://nettlepatch.net/homeschool/

The reviews cannot adequately describe the quality of writing and easy
to read style that I found. I wish we'd had this when we started
homeschooling in the 60's.

Frank

What if THIS DENIAL is a giant bluff to distract?

What if it is?

What if it isn't?

What if it means something else entirely?

What is the importance of any of your suspicions, Greg?

Dan

What if it is?
What if it isn't?
What if it means something else entirely?
What is the importance of any of your suspicions, Greg?

IN or OUT of the "court of public opinion", Dan?

Your suspicions are the only ones that matter, right Dan?

"Greg Hanson" wrote in message
om...
What if it is?
What if it isn't?
What if it means something else entirely?
What is the importance of any of your suspicions, Greg?

IN or OUT of the "court of public opinion", Dan?

I couldn't care less.

Your suspicions are the only ones that matter, right Dan?

If you say so.

Dan