If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Vitamins alert for pregnant women
Colin Blackstock, "Vitamins alert for pregnant women", Guardian, July
20, 2005, Link: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/st...532030,00.html Pregnant women should avoid taking multi-vitamins unless they are certain that the supplement does not contain vitamin A, because of the risk of damage to the unborn child, according to a study. Trading standards watchdogs and the charity BDF (Birth Defects Foundation) Newlife found that a third of all multi-vitamin suppliers do not label their products with warnings that they contain vitamin A, which can damage foetuses. They are concerned that women who are pregnant or are planning to be could be misled by inadequate labelling. Vitamin A, present in liver, has been shown to damage the development of cells in foetuses, leading to conditions like spina bifida, hydrocephalus and urinary tract malformations. BDF Newlife's chief executive, Sheila Brown, said: "Our big message to women of child-bearing age is to look at the packet and to avoid vitamin A. Lots of products do not have warnings and they should have." The damage is usually done in the first few days or weeks of a pregnancy. Mrs Brown said she asked trading standards officers to investigate after a pregnant woman contacted BDF New-life. Her doctor had pointed out that the multi-vitamin supplement she was taking contained vitamin A. The product did not carry any warning. Nigel Strick, head of Oxfordshire trading standards, said that between November last year and March this year, 20 out of 60 multi-vitamin products were found to be without vitamin A warnings. They included big brands like Sanatogen, Centrum and Quest. Boots and Tesco products did carry warnings. Mr Strick said: "People are suing tobacco firms these days so it is not inconceivable that mothers may sue a manufacturer for not labelling its products." He added that if manufacturers dragged their feet in agreeing to label products, legislation would be sought to "tighten up" the industry. Bayer Healthcare, which owns the Sanatogen brand, said that a number of their multi-vitamin products, those not specifically targeted at pregnant women, "currently do not contain a specific warning regarding vitamin A". It added: "Bayer Consumer Care agrees with the report that good labelling for all vitamin products is essential, whether these are general vitamins or those specifically marketed at pregnant women." PAGB, the trade association representing manufacturers of over-the-counter medicines and food supplements, said: "Our member companies are waiting for Europe to announce recommendations for labelling and usage of vitamin A in food supplements." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Stay-at-home dilemma" | [email protected] | Pregnancy | 140 | August 20th 05 05:21 AM |
A praise report. PRAISE GOD!!! | [email protected] | Solutions | 8 | April 23rd 05 02:44 PM |
caesarean ops 'no help for blues' | Anna | Pregnancy | 8 | April 19th 05 12:33 AM |
dumb things from DH's mouth | Kelly | Pregnancy | 87 | April 8th 05 06:31 PM |
Homebirth (also: AMA: Is it illegal for OBs to lie?) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 1 | March 6th 05 09:18 PM |