If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The F Crime: Has Chris Gupta (of Friends of Freedom) reported it?
THE F CRIME: HAS CHRIS GUPTA (OF FRIENDS OF FREEDOM) REPORTED IT?
CHRIS GUPTA (of Friends of Freedom, http://www.friendsoffreedom.org) wrote: Dr. Gastaldo, not sure what to make of this? If you think this is a simple matter, then I was wondering why you yourself have not proceeded with the action you state? Obviously someone with your background (as stated in your note) should make a quick win? And we should all be so grateful. Chris Gupta ------------ (NEW READERS: The post to which Chris Gupta responded is reproduced below) OPEN LETTER archived for global access, see below. Chris, You are pretending that I have not done what I myself recommend. By copy of this post to Oregon Atty Genl Hardy Myers, I am (ONCE AGAIN) doing what I myself recommend: 1) I am publicly reporting the massive crime of battery against children (the mass water poisoning/mass child abuse) to law enforcement; and 2) I am publicly encouraging others to report the crime to law enforcement... Assuming you, too, suspect that the mass water poisoning is mass battery... Have YOU publicly reported the mass water poisoning crime to law enforcement? Are you publicly encouraging others to do so? Or - like Paul Connett, PhD - are you indirectly promoting the fluoride polluters' fraudulent notion that people can VOTE to force medicate other people? FOR NEW READERS: Paul indirectly promotes the fraudulent notion that people can vote to force medicate other people - by uncritically encouraging people to vote against "fluoridation" - even as he announces election victories. NOTE: I have NO problem with people VOTING the F out of the water - as long as it is clearly noted that common law indicates that force medication is a crime. When one suspects (as Paul Connett does) that the mass water poisoning is causing limb amputations in children, encouraging people to identify the crime as child abuse and report it - becomes that much more important. REMEMBER CHRIS: When ending a massive water-poisoning-child-abuse crime thought to cause limb amputations, it is important for people to petition TWO branches of government: the executive (law enforcement) branch of AND the legislative branch. (If enough people report the crime, the executive branch could end it immediately - and in the meantime legislative branches would likely start more avidly voting to get the F out of the water.) KEY POINT: As I've noted so many times, when child abuse is so much as SUSPECTED, legislative branches MANDATE reports to executive branches from mandatory reporters - and the State of Oregon encourages EVERYONE to report (see quote below). So Chris... Have YOU reported the mass water poisoning child abuse? Are you encouraging others to report it? If not, why not? REMEMBER: If the Harvard research is right, the mass water poisoning child abuse is causing LIMB AMPUTATIONS in some children. REMEMBER ALSO: Even if the F crime PREVENTED limb amputations - it would still be illegal - because forcing people to take even good medicines is illegal. (See THOR quoted below.) Todd Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon USA Copied to: Friends of Freedom via PS1 Chris, if you don't suspect that the mass water poisoning is mass battery (see the case laws I quoted), please explain. PS2 NEW READERS: Here is the post to which Chris Gupta responded... THE F CRIME: STUPIDITY TO DOCILITY * TO AGGRESSION ³It appears that the judicial use of this toxin [fluoride] can have many effects all the way from Stupidity...docility to even aggression...² --Chris Gupta (see full post below) OPEN LETTER (archived for global access; see below) Chris Gupta Councilmember Friends of Freedom http://www.friendsoffreedom.org Via Also via: Chris, TWO FACTS... 1. It is a battery to force medicate * even if one force medicates with good medicine (see THOR quoted below) * and battery against children is child abuse. 2. Mandatory reporters MUST report child abuse when it is so much as suspected. Everyone else is ENCOURAGED to report (in Oregon at least). See below. QUESTION ABOUT THE MASS WATER POISONING: Is it F-Crime-induced stupidity or docility * or complicity in the F Crime * that keeps ³anti-fluoridationists² from encouraging lawful (MANDATORY-for-some) acts of aggression (suspected child abuse reports) to petition law enforcement to stop the mass poisoning of children and others? Todd Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon USA PS The following is a substantial excerpt of a post criticizing Paul Connett, PhD for failing to encourage reporting of the mass water poisoning crime... Paul Connett, PhD puts out much good info (like the quotes from the American Dental Association/ADA below) * but he is failing to do something obvious... THE F CRIME: WHY DENTISTS (BLINDLY) PROMOTE "FLUORIDATION" FACT: "Fluoridation" in most cities is the injection of hazardous substances from waste sites (FSA, arsenic and lead) into drinking water. (Some cities use a "pharmaceutical grade" of the cumulative poison fluoride.) If your dentist is promoting the mass water poisoning, here is the likely reason why: He or she trusted dentists (or attorneys?) at the American Dental Association/ADA who reportedly [according to Paul Connett, PhD] wrote in 1979... "Individual dentists must be convinced that they need not be familiar with scientific reports of laboratory and field investigations on fluoridation to be effective participants in the promotion program and that nonparticipation is overt neglect of professional responsibility." The American Dental Association/ADA reportedly (see below) said in 1995: "The ADA owes no legal duty of care to protect the public from allegedly dangerous products used by dentists..." Tolhurst v. J & J and ADA, Superior Court, Santa Clara, CA. Case No. 718228, 1995. NOTE: Even if "fluoridation"/injection of hazardous substances from waste sites (FSA, arsenic and lead) into drinking water was GOOD medicine - it would still be illegal. (As indicated above, some cities force medicate with a "pharmaceutical grade" of the cumulative poison fluoride.) FACT: Forced medication - even with good medicine - is a CRIME - battery. See THOR quoted below. THEREFORE... Dentists are blindly urging elected officials and others to VOTE to commit the crime of putting the poison into the water of people who don't want it there - and elected officials and others are blindly going along with the criminal water poisoning gag. "Fluoridation" is OBVIOUS forced medication with a cumulative poison... THOR The California Supreme Court wrote in the 1993 case of Daniel Thor v. The Superior Court of Solano County 93 C.D.O.S. 5658: "The common law has long recognized this principle: *A physician who performs any medical procedure without the patient's consent commits a battery irrespective of the skill or care used." [Thor at 5659] JUST THINK: Dentists are blindly urging elected officials and others to commit a forced medication crime that physicians (and dentists) can get prosecuted for... In the US, most "fluoridation" is "unconsented touching" of people's insides with hazardous substances from waste sites (FSA, lead and arsenic). KEY POINT: EXPERT TESTIMONY IS NOT NEEDED to prosecute such a crime (at least not in Missouri and probably not in most states), as in this Missouri case law, Wuerz v. Huffaker, 42 S.W.3d 652* (Mo.App. E.D. 2001) THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI EASTERN DISTRICT No. ED77427 2001.MO.0000030 http://www.versuslaw.com January 23, 2001: "In the absence of any consent, a physician is subject to liability for battery....Baltzell, 752 S.W.2d at 906; Louisell & Williams, Sections 22.03, 8.06 (1998)." "To establish battery based on lack of consent, a plaintiff is only required to prove the occurrence of unconsented touching. Louisell & Williams, Section 22.03." "The sole question in such a case is whether the patient was informed of the nature of the procedure and consented to it. Id. Thus, expert testimony is not required..." http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/con...v_Huffaker.htm AGAIN: EXPERT TESTIMONY IS NOT NEEDED. NOTE WELL... When it is so much as SUSPECTED that children are having their water poisoned... When it is so much as suspected that children are having limbs amputated as a consequence (one Harvard dentist is under investigation for covering up the research)... Penal law MANDATES that the crime be reported by mandated reporters immediately. The State of Oregon encourages reports from EVERYONE when child abuse is Suspected (other states likely do the same)... "ALL OREGON CITIZENS ARE ENCOURAGED TO REPORT SUSPECTED [CHILD ABUSE] TO DHS OR LAW ENFORCEMENT. Over 25 percent of the substantiated cases of child abuse are reported by concerned citizens who are not required to report. Failure to report is a violation and carries a maximum penalty of $1,000.00. Mandatory reporters have also been successfully sued for damages in civil court for failing to report.©®¢ http://www.oregon.gov/DHS/children/a...s/report.shtml Oddly, Paul Connett has so far refused to publicize just the fact that common law indicates that the mass water poisoning is a crime. Paul Connett has also refused to publicize the fact that poisoning children's water is obvious child abuse - which is strange because... Paul Connett likes to tell everyone about how babies who drink formula reconstituted with poisoned water get as much as 100 times more of the poison than breastfed babies. See www.fluoridealert.org. Paul also likes to tell everyone about the Harvard dentistry professor who apparently concealed the conclusion of one of his own graduate students who demonstrated that boys who drink the poisoned water are at 700% greater risk of limb amputation and death than boys who drink water that is not poisoned. Again, see www.fluoridealert.org. TRULY STRANGE: Paul Connett is failing to publicize the bizarre QUILES case rubberstamped by the Florida Supreme Court. According to QUILES, the mass water poisoning is not forced medication because Florida cities are "fluoridating" FAUCETS - not bloodstreams! I only found out about QUILES because Paul Connett fobbed me off on (instantly had at the ready the email address for) the losing QUILES attorney - Doug Balog - when I asked Paul why he wasn't publicizing the criminal aspect of the mass water poisoning.... For details... See The F Crime: The QUILES faucet fraud... http://groups.google.com/group/ misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/b6568f6e51f9d395 When one suspects that crime is being committed and that boys are having limbs amputated as a consequence... One reports to law enforcement immediately (and urges mandatory reporters to report)... IT'S THE LAW. Thanks for reading. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon USA This post will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive. Search http://groups.google.com for ³The F Crime: Stupidity to Docility * to Aggression² CHRIS GUPTA WROTE: The following article yet again shows why Fluoride compounds are a the darling of the drug industry http://www.mercola.com/2001/aug/18/fluoride_drugs.htm . Hence one can find many drugs rife with fluorides. These include SSRI's (selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors) all the way to some cholesterol drugs such as Prozac, Paxil, Zoloft, Celexa to Lipitor. It appears that the judicial use of this toxin can have many effects all the way from Stupidity...docility to even aggression... Extracted from: Fluoride To Make Prisoners 'stupid & Docile http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chri...ke_prisoners_s tupid_docile.htm "There is a medical problem that affects an estimated 40 percent of people in developed world. It can cause symptoms that vary wildly from exhaustion to killer heart disease, and everything in between. The majority of physicians haven't a clue; they don't know how to diagnose it, they don't know about the 64 diseases it causes, and they don't know a safe and effective way to reverse it. All but the most progressive doctors leave their patients in limbo." Extracted from: Doctors Are Dangerous http://www.doctorsaredangerous.com/ These medical problems stem form thyroid dysfunction for which we have the clueless and pig headed Fluoridationists to blame. Who usurp any attempts to remove this damaging substance form our drinking water. "The NRC also reported on pages 231 and 236 that fluoride can ³stimulate secretion of acid in the stomachŠreduce blood flow away from the stomach liningŠdilate blood vesselsŠincrease redness of the stomach liningŠand cause cell death and desquamation of the GI tract epithelium.² " Impairing the digestive track http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chri..._to_cure_ibs.h tm is a sure way to ill health as the inability to absorb vital nutrients is the primary cause for disease. The so called authorities continually behave as though we have deficiency of their toxic drugs and the nutrients are just incidental! These are very serious issues and we need to take the fluoride promoters to task as per: To All Anti-Public Water Fluoridationists In Canada http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chri...lic_water_fluo ridationists_in_canada.htm Not all Fluoride compounds are same. Silicofluorides primarily used in nearly all mass medication through our water systems http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chri..._violation_of_ medical_ethics_and_human_right.htm is even more harmful and will be the subject of a later post. Chris Gupta http://tinyurl.com/jehyy http://tinyurl.com/jehyy See also: Questions For Water Fluoridation http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chri...water_fluorida tion.htm --------------------------- Fluoride Levels Too High - National Academies (What the Press Release Did Not Mention) Copyright 2006 by Mary Sparrowdancer March 26, 2006 - In what many are regarding as a first step in the long-awaited correction of a 60-year old nationwide medical mistake, a study by the National Academies¹ National Research Council (NRC), sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), has found that the current maximum levels of fluoride allowed by the EPA in drinking water should be lowered due to concerns over adverse health effects. The current maximum contaminant level of fluoride is 4 mg/L and the secondary maximum contaminant level is 2 mg/L. The NRC found that these levels are too high, ³not protective² of the population and the Council urged further studies. Although the press release of this fluoride report states, ³The report does not examine the health risks or benefits of the artificially fluoridated water that millions of Americans drinkŠ² the 576-page report cites numerous studies that describe adverse health effects associated with water fluoridation, and after reviewing this evidence, the committee concluded unanimously that the maximum contaminant level of fluoride in drinking water should be lowered. (1, 2) The press release makes reference to tooth enamel discoloration as a side effect of excessive fluoride consumption, a risk factor for bone fractures and possibly bone cancer. Again, however, the 576-page report contains numerous studies showing an association between fluoride ingestion and a variety of other health problems that are now prevalent and widespread in The United States, where now two-thirds of the people are exposed to fluoridated drinking water. Among those now-prevalent conditions found in Americans of all backgrounds, are thyroid malfunction and GI problems. Numerous studies are reviewed in the NRC report that indicate subclinical or malfunctioning thyroid is ³associated with increased cholesterol concentrations, increased incidence of depression, diminished response to standard psychiatric treatment, cognitive dysfunction, and in pregnant women, decreased IQ of their offspring.² (Page 198.) Additionally, their study reveals that a number of authors have reported enamel disorders in juveniles suffering from hypothyroidism. Yet, the possibility that dental fluorosis might actually be late-appearing signs of thyroid fluorosis and malfunction has not yet been studied in this country. The NRC also reported on pages 231 and 236 that fluoride can ³stimulate secretion of acid in the stomachŠreduce blood flow away from the stomach liningŠdilate blood vesselsŠincrease redness of the stomach liningŠand cause cell death and desquamation of the GI tract epithelium.² In referencing a 1961 study pertaining to GI complaints, the NRC tentatively states on page 230, ³Perhaps it is safe to say that less than 1% of the population complains of GI symptoms after fluoridation is initiated (Feltman and Kosel, 1961).² The ³less than 1%² figure based on the 1961 Feltman and Kosel report does not seem reasonable at the present, however, because we have new and better evidence than in the past of widespread gastric problems including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and acid reflux. A population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota, published in a 1997 issue of Gastroenterology also decried a lack of available data on GERD. ³Gastroesophageal reflux is considered a common condition, but detailed population-based data on reflux in the United States are lacking.² The findings of their study in Olmsted were, ³The prevalence per 100 of heartburn and/or acid regurgitation experienced at least weekly was 19.8.² Olmsted County was fluoridated 1959, and according to the CDC¹s records, most of Olmsted is now fluoridated at 1.20 mg/L. (3, 4, 5,) The IMS Health¹s list of top ranking pharmaceuticals sales for 2005 also indicates a much greater prevalence of national GI problems. Two drugs that decrease stomach acid, Prevacid and Nexium, were among the top ten bestsellers, with sales for the combined products totaling 9.7 billion US dollars during 2005. The top seller for 2005 according to this report was Lipitor, a cholesterol-lowering agent, with sales of 12.9 billion US dollars. (6) According to the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, approximately 27,000,000 Americans have thyroid disorders, but only about half of them are aware of it. In the RxList website¹s, ³Top 300 Prescriptions for 2004 by Number of US Prescriptions Dispensed,² Synthroid, a thyroid drug, is ranked as the fifth most popular prescription, with a total of 44,056,176 prescriptions dispensed during that year. Lipitor, had the second highest number of prescriptions dispensed, at 69,766,431. The NRC states on Page 2 of their report that in 2000, there were approximately 162,000,000 people receiving water artificially fluoridated at levels of 0.7 to 1.2 mg/L. (7, 8) One report studied by the NRC on page 194 showed ³statistically significant changes in TSH concentrations (increased), T3 concentrations (decreased),² following ³prolonged consumption of Œhigh-fluoride,¹² at 2.3 mg/L. On page 195, another study examined children in a high fluoride and low iodine area. The ³high² fluoride level in this study was ³0.88 mg/L.² The children were found to have a ³lower mean IQ,² as well as deviations in TSH and T3 levels. An additional study by Susheela et al. (2005), found ³well-defined hormonal derangements² in children with fluorosis from drinking water with ³1.1 - 14.3 mg/L² fluoride. On page 196, the NRC states that ³studies showing no effect of fluoride on thyroid function did not measure actual hormone concentrationsŠdid not report iodine intakes,² and used lower fluoride doses than other studies. ³Thus,² NRC stated on page 197, ³several lines of information² were reviewed that indicated fluoride exposure had an effect on thyroid function. The effects included decreased production of thyroid hormone, disruption of conversion of T4 to T3, and effects on blood transport - the details of which remain unclear. Also mentioned was the fact that some studies were not available in English. The historic impact of this extraordinary report is immeasurable. I contacted Dr. Hardy Limeback - BSc, PhD, DDS, Associate Professor and Head of Preventive Dentistry, University of Toronto - one of the twelve members of the NRC who had co-authored the report. I asked if there were any comments he might have. His reply was, ³I, for one, would look at the graph at the top of page194 and ask, ŒAre undernourished black children in fluoridated cities (1 ppm) more susceptible to thyroid problems than those living in non-fluoridated cities, as that graph might suggest?¹ Perhaps. As far as I know, we have no data for this problem in North America.² Perhaps, indeed, this might explain the pandemic of obesity and type-2 diabetes seen in low-income, ethnic neighborhoods in the United States. Since current recommendations suggest that babies up to six months of age receive no fluoride at all, Dr. Luise Light, former USDA Director of Dietary Guidance and Nutrition Education, proposed other questions that concerned parents should now ask: ³How do we avoid giving babies fluoridated water if it¹s in our municipal water systems? Does this mean we have to buy special water to make our babies¹ food and drinks? And what about the water we bathe them in?² Because the EPA has now been advised of the potentially adverse effects fluoride has on the entire body when administered systemically in unknowable doses via drinking water, it would be in the interest of this nation if diligent members of the EPA would now locate and have translated the extensive German studies dating back to the 1930s. That was when German scientists discovered that fluorides could be used as an effective agent to block thyroid function in patients suffering from overactive thyroids. Of particular national interest would be translations of the German studies in which hundreds of patients with overactive thyroids had their thyroid function blocked by being bathed in fluoridated water. The EPA should call for an immediate moratorium on water fluoridation until scientists and healthcare professionals can determine - at last - what the true health impacts have been and will continue to be as a result of fluoridating a nation of people through their drinking water. -------------------------------------- Mary Sparrowdancer is the author of The Love Song of the Universe, (2001, Hampton Roads), and is a science and health writer with training in clinical laboratory sciences, including bacteriology, electroencephalography, hematology and microscopic evaluation. www.sparrowdancer.com http://www.sparrowdancer.com/ Mary co-authors a health newsletter with Dr. Luise Light, author of ³What to Eat,² (2006, McGraw-Hill). Luise is former USDA Director of Dietary Guidance and Nutrition Education, and was the creator of the real fruit and vegetable Food Pyramid. www.luiselight.com http://www.luiselight.com/ ------------------------------ References 1. National Academies Press - ³Fluoride in Drinking Water,² Full Report. Table of Contents. March 2006 http://darwin.nap.edu/books/030910128X/html/ 2. News Release - National Academies - ³EPA Standard for Fluoride in Drinking Water Is Not Protective; Tooth Enamel Loss, Bone Fractures of Concern at High Levels² March 2006 http://www4.nationalacademies.org/news.nsf/isbn/030910128X?OpenDocument 3. Medscape - Gastroenterology, 1997, ³Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota.² March 2006. http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/9136821 4. Rochester, MN - Olmstead Fluoridation record: 1959. March 2006. https://www.rochestermn.gov/departments/attorney/ordinances/pdf/ORD140.pdf 5. CDC - My Water¹s Fluoride, Olmstead County. March 2006. http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/MWF/SearchResultsV.asp 6. IMS Health - ³Leading Products by Global Pharmaceutical Sales, 2005² - March 2006 http://www.imshealth.com/ims/portal/...77478579_77479 663,00.html 7. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists - ³Thyroid Awareness Month, 2003.² March 2006 http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/cgi-bin/ http://www.aace.com/public/awareness/tam/2003/facts.php 8. RxList - Internet Drug Index - ³The Top 300 Prescriptions for 2004 by Number of US Prescriptions Dispensed.² March 2006 http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/cgi-bin/ http://www.rxlist.com/top200.htm GERMAN TRANSLATIONS http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/html/thyroid_history.html 9. Schuld, Andreas, Parents of Fluoride Poisoned Children - A. ³History of Fluoride² - ³Around the same time (1932) Gorlitzer von Mundy, being aware that fluorides also get absorbed through the skin, began fluoride treatments of hyperthyroid patients in Austria by prescribing 20 minute baths containing 30ccm (0.03l) HF per 200 liters of water. He reported on his successful treatment spanning over 30 years and involving over 600 patients at a 1962 symposium on fluoride toxicityŠin Bern, also attended by other world-leading experts includingŠGeorge Waldbott.² B. Gorlitzer von Mundy V - "Ein neuer Weg zur Behandlung der Thyreotoxikose mit Fluorwasserstoffsäure" Med Klin 21:&17-719 (1932) (reports on the first successful use of baths containing HF in the treatment of hyperthyroidism) C. Gautier - Bull Soc Chim 14:241 (1914); cited in: Kraft K -³Beiträge zur Biochemie des Fluors I.Über den Antagonismus zwischen Fluor und Thyroxin.² Hoppe-Seglers Z.Physiol. Chem 245:58 -65 (1937) D. May W - "Behandlung der Hypothyreosen einschließlich des schweren genuinen Morbus Basedow mit Fluor" Klin Wochenschr 16:562-564 (1937) March 2006 Schuld, Andreas, PFPC 10. Meiers, Peter - (Historian) - http://www.fluoride-history.de/ A. ³Guenther Schiemann, Wolfgang Winkelmueller, Wilhelm Roselius: ŒVerfahren zur Darstellung von Kondensationsprodukten kernfluorierter Arylaldehyde¹, German Patent DE 621,862; filed July 1, 1932; pat. Nov. 14, 1935.² - Patent for fluoride medication used to treat hyperthyroidism. B. Kurt Kraft, Ferdinand Dengel: ³Verfahren zur Herstellung kernsubstituierter Phenylessigsäuren,² German Patent DE 819,696; filed Feb. 3, 1943; pat. Nov. 5, 1951 (A compound similar to fluorotyrosine, i.e. 3-Fluoro-4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid, was patented by Kraft and Dengel of Knoll, pharmaceutical company of Ludwigshafen, and became known under the names of ³Capacin,² ³Kapacin,² and ³Wiflucin² [marketed by Knoll] as a treatment against hyperthyroidism. - s.a. The Merck Index, 9th edition, Merck & Co., Rahway, N.J., 1976) March 2006 Meiers, Peter To subscribe / unsubscribe: List information is at: http://tinyurl.com/2xohw ARCHIVES: http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/archives.htm http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/archives.htm Share The Wealth: http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/ Communication Agents: http://www.communicationagents.com/ Council Member: Friends of Freedom - http://www.friendsoffreedom.org http://www.friendsoffreedom.org/ END CHRIS GUPTA¹S POST I say again: JUST THINK: Dentists are blindly urging elected officials and others to commit a forced medication crime that physicians (and dentists) can get prosecuted for... In the US, most "fluoridation" is "unconsented touching" of people's insides with hazardous substances from waste sites (FSA, lead and arsenic). KEY POINT: EXPERT TESTIMONY IS NOT NEEDED to prosecute such a crime (at least not in Missouri and probably not in most states), as in this Missouri case law, Wuerz v. Huffaker, 42 S.W.3d 652* (Mo.App. E.D. 2001) THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI EASTERN DISTRICT No. ED77427 2001.MO.0000030 http://www.versuslaw.com January 23, 2001: "In the absence of any consent, a physician is subject to liability for battery....Baltzell, 752 S.W.2d at 906; Louisell & Williams, Sections 22.03, 8.06 (1998)." "To establish battery based on lack of consent, a plaintiff is only required to prove the occurrence of unconsented touching. Louisell & Williams, Section 22.03." "The sole question in such a case is whether the patient was informed of the nature of the procedure and consented to it. Id. Thus, expert testimony is not required..." http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/con...v_Huffaker.htm AGAIN: EXPERT TESTIMONY IS NOT NEEDED. NOTE WELL... When it is so much as SUSPECTED that children are having their water poisoned... When it is so much as suspected that children are having limbs amputated as a consequence (one Harvard dentist is under investigation for covering up the research)... Penal law MANDATES that the crime be reported by mandated reporters immediately. The State of Oregon encourages reports from EVERYONE when child abuse is Suspected (other states likely do the same)... "ALL OREGON CITIZENS ARE ENCOURAGED TO REPORT SUSPECTED [CHILD ABUSE] TO DHS OR LAW ENFORCEMENT. Over 25 percent of the substantiated cases of child abuse are reported by concerned citizens who are not required to report. Failure to report is a violation and carries a maximum penalty of $1,000.00. Mandatory reporters have also been successfully sued for damages in civil court for failing to report.©®¢ http://www.oregon.gov/DHS/children/a...s/report.shtml QUESTION: Is it F-Crime-induced stupidity or docility * or complicity in the F Crime * that keeps ³anti-fluoridationists² from encouraging lawful (MANDATORY-for-some) acts of aggression (suspected child abuse reports) to petition law enforcement to stop the mass poisoning of children and others? Again, thanks for reading. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon USA This post will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive. Search http://groups.google.com for ³The F Crime: Stupidity to Docility * to Aggression² |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
misc.kids FAQ on Childhood Vaccinations, Part 1/4 | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 3 | January 18th 06 05:47 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Childhood Vaccinations, Part 1/4 | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 3 | December 19th 05 05:35 AM |
Babies, a massive slow chemical burn crime, QUILES faucet fraudand 'our National leader' Paul Connett, PhD (for anti-fluoride folks only) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | June 22nd 05 02:15 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Childhood Vaccinations, Part 1/4 | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 3 | May 30th 05 05:28 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Childhood Vaccinations, Part 1/4 | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 3 | June 28th 04 07:41 PM |