Prayer for Sue Rogers

Bilbo bagginsed:
In our last episode , Jason Gastrich
pirouetted gracefully and with great fanfare proclaimed:

Roger wrote:
In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Tommy wrote
in message 2454134.0b2FJAZcPd@FreeBSD:

You should not be so judgemental Bev, that's not nice.

Says the lamer that condemns entire groups of people zie has never met
nor ever will, based on a tissue of lies about them.

Well, it's safe to say that Roger can't bring anything positive to
free.christians.

So you condone the anti-semitic screed just posted by this "Tommy" do you
now Gastrich?

It's right over in message: 3488648.BdPV5a2kXN@FreeBSD

"Article not found".

I don't condone Anti-Semitism, but I don't know what he said.

The gates of free.christians slowly swung open, and there stood
"David" ,who intoned thus:

Bilbo bagginsed:
In our last episode , Jason Gastrich
pirouetted gracefully and with great fanfare proclaimed:

Roger wrote:
In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Tommy wrote
in message 2454134.0b2FJAZcPd@FreeBSD:

You should not be so judgemental Bev, that's not nice.

Says the lamer that condemns entire groups of people zie has never met
nor ever will, based on a tissue of lies about them.

Well, it's safe to say that Roger can't bring anything positive to
free.christians.

So you condone the anti-semitic screed just posted by this "Tommy" do you
now Gastrich?

It's right over in message: 3488648.BdPV5a2kXN@FreeBSD

"Article not found".

I don't condone Anti-Semitism, but I don't know what he said.


Sorry, I posted this reply to the wrong message just now, meant to
reply to this one.

He said:
Path:
border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.gig anews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news2.euro.net!in.100p roofnews.com!in.100proofnews.com!hwmnpeer01.lga!hw media!hw-filter.lga!fe04.lga.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
Message-Id: 3488648.BdPV5a2kXN@FreeBSD
From: Tommy
Subject: Refute This Secular Fundamentalist
Newsgroups: free.christians
Lines: 127
Organization:
User-Agent: KNode/0.8.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-No-Archive: Yes
X-Trace:
badccedimaighclehkoebiamjjpahafjdoambjdjiemiijbbja bkembfoggfmelkmmiadbmmgpofggfigldlfphnpckgcjfnhdoa aflhbcggmkhbkembbaclmkjginfcegcmjhhibopfakdb
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 20:01:15 MST
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 22:57:20 +0000
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com free.christians:55382

Benjamin H. Freedman, Jewish Historian - Researcher - Scholar.
From "Common Sense", p. 2-1-53 and 5-1-59


"Christians have beed duped by the unholiest hoax in all history, by
so-called Jews. This is considered their most effective weapon."


"This 'big lie' technique is brainwashing United States Christians
into
believing that Jesus Christ was "King of the Jews", in the sense that
so-called 'Jews' today call themselves 'Jews'. This reference was
first made
in English translations of the Old and New Testaments, centuries
before the
so-called Jews highjacked the word 'Jew' in the 18th A.D. century to
palm
themselves off on the Christian world as having a kinship with Jesus
Christ.
This alleged kinship comes from the myth of their common ancestry with
the
so-called 'Jews' of the Holy Land in the Old Testament history, a
fiction
based on fable."


"American Christians little suspect they are being brainwashed
twenty-four
hours of every day over television and radio, by newspapers and
magazines,
by motion pictures and plays, by books, by political leaders in office
and
seeking office, by religious leaders in their pulpits and outside
their
churches, by leaders in the field of education inside and outside
their
cirricular activities, and by all leaders in business, professions and
finance, whose economic security demands that they curry the favor of
so-called "Jews" of historic Khazar ancestry. Unsuspecting Christians
are
subjected to this barrage from sources they have little reason to
suspect.
Incontestable facts supply the unchallengeable proof of the historic
accuracy that so-called "Jews" throughout the world today of eastern
European origin are unquestionably the historic descendants of the
Khazars,
a pagan Turko-Finn ancient Mongoloid nation deep in the heart of Asia,
according to history, who battled their way in bloody wars about the
1st
century B.C. into eastern Europe where they set up their Khazar
kingdom. For
some mysterious reason the history of the Khazar kingdom is
conspicuous by
its absence from history courses in the schools and colleges.


"The historic existence of the Khazar kingdom of so-called "Jews",
their
rise and fall, the permanent disappearance of the Khazar kingdom as a
nation
from the map of Europe, and how King Bulan and the Khazar nation in
about
740 A.D. became so-called "Jews" by conversion, were concealed from
American
Christians by censorship imposed by so-called "Jews", of historic
Khazar
ancestry, upon all U.S.A. media of mass communications directed by
them.
Then in 1945 this author gave nation-wide publicity to his many years
intensive research into the "facts of life" concerning Khazars. The
disclosures were sensational and very effective but apparently angered
so-called "Jews" who have continued to vent their spleen upon this
author
since then solely for that reason. Since 1946 they have conducted a
vicious
smear campaign against him, seeking thus to further conceal these
facts, for
obvious reasons. What have they to fear from the truth?


"In an original 1903 edition of the Jewish Encyclopedia in New York's
Public
Library, and in the Library of Congress, Volume IV, pages 1 to 5
inclusive,
appears a most comprehensive history of the Khazars. Also in the New
York
Public Library are 327 books by the world's greatest historians and
other
sources of reference, in addition to the Jewish Encyclopedia, dealing
with
Khazar history, and written between the 3rd A.D. and 20th centuries by
contemporaries of the Khazars and by modern historians on that
subject."


Jesus was a 'Judean', not a Jew.


During His lifetime, no persons were described as "Jews" anywhere.
That fact
is supported by theology, history and science. When Jesus was in
Judea, it
was not the "homeland" of the ancestors of those who today style
themselves
"Jews". Their ancestors never set a foot in Judea. They existed at
that time
in Asia, their "homeland", and were known as Khazars. In none of the
manuscripts of the original Old or New Testament was Jesus described
or
referred to as a "Jew". The term originated in the late eighteenth
century
as an abbreviation of the term Judean and refers to a resident of
Judea
without regard to race or religion, just as the term "Texan" signifies
a
person living in Texas.


In spite of the powerful propaganda effort of the so-called "Jews",
they
have been unable to prove in recorded history that there is one
record,
prior to that period, of a race religion or nationality, referred to
as
"Jew". The religious sect in Judea, in the time of Jesus, to which
self-styled "Jews" today refer to as "Jews", were known as
"Pharisees".
"Judaism" today and "Pharisaism" in the time of Jesus are the same.


Jesus abhorred and denounced "Pharisaism"; hence the words, "Woe unto
you
Scribes and Pharisees, Hypocrites, Ye Serpents, Ye Generation of
Vipers".


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


WHO WAS THE FIRST JEW ?
John Standring


We know that Saul was the first king of Israel and that John was the
first
man called Baptist, but who was the first jew? Neither Adam, Seth or
Noah
are called jew. Nor were Abraham, Isaac or Jacob. Moses was not called
a jew
and neither were Saul, David or Solomon called jew. In fact you will
not
find the word jew in the first eleven books of the Bible. The first
time
jews are mentioned in the Bible, is in 2nd Kings 16:6 (and then only
in
translations revised in the eighteenth century) where we find Israel
was at
war with the jews and drave the jews from Elath. Isn't it interesting
that
we can read over five hundred pages of the Bible before we find a Jew
anywhere, yet those who call themselves jew today claim the first five
books
of the bible and call it there Torah. Do you not find it very strange
that
those who claim to have written the first five books of the Bible and
call
themselves Jew, can't find the word jew written in the book anywhere,
they
call there own bible and claim to have written? Jesus Christ tells
John in
Revelation 2:9 "I know the blasphemy of them which say they are jews
and are
not, but are the SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN". We know that God changed the
name of
Abram to Abraham, Gen. 17:5 and that God changed the name of Jacob to
Israel
Gen. 32:28, but no where in the Bible do we find where God changed the
name
of Israel to jew! There is therefore no authority by which those who
say
they are jews can claim to be Israel!


By the time of Jesus the word Edom or Edomite had been translated by
Greek
and Latin into Ioudaios and Iudaeus meaning a Judean or person living
in
Judea. The original King James version of the Bible, 1611, translated
Idumaean-Judean into Iewes. It wasn't until the revised editions of
the King
James Bible, that the word Jew appeared. The word Jew does not mean
Israel
or Israelite! We must conclude therefore that the first "Jews" were
Canaanite-Edomite-Hittite. It is certain, according to the Bible, that
Jews
are not Israel.

David Silverman F.L.A.H.N.
aa #2208



Mistabit doesn't work in mysterious ways, people just don't pay attention.

Beverly was craven:
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:33:05 +0200,
David ) wrote:
So we are to take it that you were anthropomorphizing meat balls
when asserting, "'bigot' is a faggot's word"? By an odd coincidence,
I'm also anthropomorphizing when referring to you.

Beverly

And I'm gynaecomorphising when I refer to you.

At least one of us is capable of an original thought, that
the other's mental capacity forces him to copy.

Beverly

Precisely.

As in the Google count:

http://www.google.co.uk/groups?as_q=...&num=100&hl=en
shows 645 postes in the last 365 days for "anthropomorphizing", and

http://www.google.co.uk/groups?num=1...4&as_maxy=2005
shows 2 postes in the same period for "gynaecomorphising"; yours and mine.

So you're right. One of us has original ideas and the other just copies, but
you got your gender wrong.

Just a sec:
The gates of free.christians slowly swung open, and there stood
"David" ,who intoned thus:

Bilbo bagginsed:
In our last episode , Jason
Gastrich
pirouetted gracefully and with great fanfare proclaimed:

Roger wrote:
In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Tommy wrote
in message 2454134.0b2FJAZcPd@FreeBSD:

You should not be so judgemental Bev, that's not nice.

Says the lamer that condemns entire groups of people zie has never
met
nor ever will, based on a tissue of lies about them.

Well, it's safe to say that Roger can't bring anything positive to
free.christians.

So you condone the anti-semitic screed just posted by this "Tommy" do
you
now Gastrich?

It's right over in message: 3488648.BdPV5a2kXN@FreeBSD

"Article not found".

I don't condone Anti-Semitism, but I don't know what he said.


Sorry, I posted this reply to the wrong message just now, meant to
reply to this one.

He said:
Path:

border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.gig anews.com!nntp.giganews.co
m!news2.euro.net!in.100proofnews.com!in.100proofne ws.com!hwmnpeer01.lga!hwme
dia!hw-filter.lga!fe04.lga.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
Message-Id: 3488648.BdPV5a2kXN@FreeBSD
From: Tommy
Subject: Refute This Secular Fundamentalist
Newsgroups: free.christians
Lines: 127
Organization:
User-Agent: KNode/0.8.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-No-Archive: Yes
X-Trace:

badccedimaighclehkoebiamjjpahafjdoambjdjiemiijbbja bkembfoggfmelkmmiadbmmgpof
ggfigldlfphnpckgcjfnhdoaaflhbcggmkhbkembbaclmkjgin fcegcmjhhibopfakdb
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 20:01:15 MST
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 22:57:20 +0000
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com free.christians:55382

Benjamin H. Freedman, Jewish Historian - Researcher - Scholar.
From "Common Sense", p. 2-1-53 and 5-1-59


"Christians have beed duped by the unholiest hoax in all history, by
so-called Jews. This is considered their most effective weapon."


"This 'big lie' technique is brainwashing United States Christians
into
believing that Jesus Christ was "King of the Jews", in the sense that
so-called 'Jews' today call themselves 'Jews'. This reference was
first made
in English translations of the Old and New Testaments, centuries
before the
so-called Jews highjacked the word 'Jew' in the 18th A.D. century to
palm
themselves off on the Christian world as having a kinship with Jesus
Christ.
This alleged kinship comes from the myth of their common ancestry with
the
so-called 'Jews' of the Holy Land in the Old Testament history, a
fiction
based on fable."


"American Christians little suspect they are being brainwashed
twenty-four
hours of every day over television and radio, by newspapers and
magazines,
by motion pictures and plays, by books, by political leaders in office
and
seeking office, by religious leaders in their pulpits and outside
their
churches, by leaders in the field of education inside and outside
their
cirricular activities, and by all leaders in business, professions and
finance, whose economic security demands that they curry the favor of
so-called "Jews" of historic Khazar ancestry. Unsuspecting Christians
are
subjected to this barrage from sources they have little reason to
suspect.
Incontestable facts supply the unchallengeable proof of the historic
accuracy that so-called "Jews" throughout the world today of eastern
European origin are unquestionably the historic descendants of the
Khazars,
a pagan Turko-Finn ancient Mongoloid nation deep in the heart of Asia,
according to history, who battled their way in bloody wars about the
1st
century B.C. into eastern Europe where they set up their Khazar
kingdom. For
some mysterious reason the history of the Khazar kingdom is
conspicuous by
its absence from history courses in the schools and colleges.


"The historic existence of the Khazar kingdom of so-called "Jews",
their
rise and fall, the permanent disappearance of the Khazar kingdom as a
nation
from the map of Europe, and how King Bulan and the Khazar nation in
about
740 A.D. became so-called "Jews" by conversion, were concealed from
American
Christians by censorship imposed by so-called "Jews", of historic
Khazar
ancestry, upon all U.S.A. media of mass communications directed by
them.
Then in 1945 this author gave nation-wide publicity to his many years
intensive research into the "facts of life" concerning Khazars. The
disclosures were sensational and very effective but apparently angered
so-called "Jews" who have continued to vent their spleen upon this
author
since then solely for that reason. Since 1946 they have conducted a
vicious
smear campaign against him, seeking thus to further conceal these
facts, for
obvious reasons. What have they to fear from the truth?


"In an original 1903 edition of the Jewish Encyclopedia in New York's
Public
Library, and in the Library of Congress, Volume IV, pages 1 to 5
inclusive,
appears a most comprehensive history of the Khazars. Also in the New
York
Public Library are 327 books by the world's greatest historians and
other
sources of reference, in addition to the Jewish Encyclopedia, dealing
with
Khazar history, and written between the 3rd A.D. and 20th centuries by
contemporaries of the Khazars and by modern historians on that
subject."


Jesus was a 'Judean', not a Jew.


During His lifetime, no persons were described as "Jews" anywhere.
That fact
is supported by theology, history and science. When Jesus was in
Judea, it
was not the "homeland" of the ancestors of those who today style
themselves
"Jews". Their ancestors never set a foot in Judea. They existed at
that time
in Asia, their "homeland", and were known as Khazars. In none of the
manuscripts of the original Old or New Testament was Jesus described
or
referred to as a "Jew". The term originated in the late eighteenth
century
as an abbreviation of the term Judean and refers to a resident of
Judea
without regard to race or religion, just as the term "Texan" signifies
a
person living in Texas.


In spite of the powerful propaganda effort of the so-called "Jews",
they
have been unable to prove in recorded history that there is one
record,
prior to that period, of a race religion or nationality, referred to
as
"Jew". The religious sect in Judea, in the time of Jesus, to which
self-styled "Jews" today refer to as "Jews", were known as
"Pharisees".
"Judaism" today and "Pharisaism" in the time of Jesus are the same.


Jesus abhorred and denounced "Pharisaism"; hence the words, "Woe unto
you
Scribes and Pharisees, Hypocrites, Ye Serpents, Ye Generation of
Vipers".


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
----


WHO WAS THE FIRST JEW ?
John Standring


We know that Saul was the first king of Israel and that John was the
first
man called Baptist, but who was the first jew? Neither Adam, Seth or
Noah
are called jew. Nor were Abraham, Isaac or Jacob. Moses was not called
a jew
and neither were Saul, David or Solomon called jew. In fact you will
not
find the word jew in the first eleven books of the Bible. The first
time
jews are mentioned in the Bible, is in 2nd Kings 16:6 (and then only
in
translations revised in the eighteenth century) where we find Israel
was at
war with the jews and drave the jews from Elath. Isn't it interesting
that
we can read over five hundred pages of the Bible before we find a Jew
anywhere, yet those who call themselves jew today claim the first five
books
of the bible and call it there Torah. Do you not find it very strange
that
those who claim to have written the first five books of the Bible and
call
themselves Jew, can't find the word jew written in the book anywhere,
they
call there own bible and claim to have written? Jesus Christ tells
John in
Revelation 2:9 "I know the blasphemy of them which say they are jews
and are
not, but are the SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN". We know that God changed the
name of
Abram to Abraham, Gen. 17:5 and that God changed the name of Jacob to
Israel
Gen. 32:28, but no where in the Bible do we find where God changed the
name
of Israel to jew! There is therefore no authority by which those who
say
they are jews can claim to be Israel!


By the time of Jesus the word Edom or Edomite had been translated by
Greek
and Latin into Ioudaios and Iudaeus meaning a Judean or person living
in
Judea. The original King James version of the Bible, 1611, translated
Idumaean-Judean into Iewes. It wasn't until the revised editions of
the King
James Bible, that the word Jew appeared. The word Jew does not mean
Israel
or Israelite! We must conclude therefore that the first "Jews" were
Canaanite-Edomite-Hittite. It is certain, according to the Bible, that
Jews
are not Israel.

David Silverman F.L.A.H.N.
aa #2208


If anyone in the Church buys into that Khazars ****, they need to look out
for them selves. It is a satanic lie and highly provocative to God.

On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:13:16 +0200,
David ) wrote:
http://www.google.co.uk/groups?num=1...4&as_maxy=2005
shows 2 postes in the same period for "gynaecomorphising"; yours and mine.

Because it isn't a word. Shame your command of the language is so poor.

Beverly
--
Many a smale maketh a grate -- Geoffrey Chaucer

In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Tommy wrote
in message 2552772.QX7****RuW@FreeBSD:

Roger wrote:

In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Tommy wrote
in message 2454134.0b2FJAZcPd@FreeBSD:

You should not be so judgemental Bev, that's not nice.

Says the lamer that condemns entire groups of people zie has never met
nor ever will, based on a tissue of lies about them.

I don't hate all Jews for simply being Jewish, I like many of 'em - like
David Horowitz, Michael Savage & David Cole etc, etc.

Then why do you condemn all Jews in the rants you post?

I don't like the Zionist and NeoCons, and yes you have many Christian
Zionist also like Pat Robertson and Jerry Fallwell. You on the other hand
seem to hate all Gentiles for the simple fact that, well, they're Gentiles.

Of course, the pathetic ignorant lying hypocritical child cannot even
begin to attempt to support this by quoting my posts: zie just
assumes that anyone opposing the lies zie tells must have the same
motive zie has for posting them: an irrational hatred of an entire
group of people.

I don't even hate *you*, brat: I hate *lies* and will continue to
point them out every time you post them.

In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Tommy wrote
in message 2348173.Cxt5ksnmN9@FreeBSD:


You *do* realize you keep responding to the same message, right?

Says the lamer that condemns entire groups of people zie has never met
nor ever will, based on a tissue of lies about them.

I judge Zionist on the Government they support.. This is a slap in the
FACE TO AMERICA.

And anyone you who doesn't agree with you on the Holocaust or other
"Jewish" issues is automatically a Zionist.

Some of them, not all of 'em

Actually, you've already admitted that this is the case, in one of the
four? five? other responses you've made to this post.

Of course, "whites" would never engage in activity similar to the
Lavon affair...

Were not talking about Whites, Blacks, or Jews. Were talking about
government sponsored TERRORISM AGAINST AMERICA!!

No, we're talking about the double standard you use in a doomed
attempt to justify your irrational hatred of an entire group. One
never sees you bemoaning any examples of terrorism, and you have a
singularly ... individual definition that only applies (but *always*
applies) to Jews.

In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Tommy wrote
in message 3785428.USchXWCfen@FreeBSD:

You should not be so judgemental Bev, that's not nice.

Says the lamer that condemns entire groups of people zie has never met
nor ever will, based on a tissue of lies about them.

I judge Zionist on the Government they support.. This is a slap in the
FACE TO AMERICA.

And anyone you who doesn't agree with you on the Holocaust or other
"Jewish" issues is automatically a Zionist.

Yes......

LOL -- and you don't even see the problem the what *is* your
definition of "zionist?"

Of course, "whites" would never engage in activity similar to the
Lavon affair...

It's not just the Lavon Affair and Israel honoring the terrorist that
tried to murder Americans in hopes to get us to fight their proxy-war in
Eygpt or anything like that.

Can you name one country on this earth that has stabbed America in the
back more than Israel? The Lavon Affair, Uss-Liberty, selling secrets to
China, Russia....Damn the list goes on and on........

I ask you Roger, what country on this earth has stabbed America in the
back more than Israel???????????

Well, there are those we've actually been at war with, like your
beloved Nazis, who killed circa 300,000 American soldiers.

That was a war.

As there was in this case...

Or how about the War Between the States, which took ~ 600000 lives?

War being the key-word.

Indeed.

Of course, I guess it would depend upon one's definition of "stab in
the back" -- why don't you tell us what that is, while you're trying
to come up with a definition of "zionist" to justify your
characterization of every opponent as one...

If you want to learn about Zionism, look in the mirror.

Of course, the pathetic brat has no idea of my opinion of zionism,
never having bothered to ask...

Kupf gave us her two coppers:
David ) wrote:

http://www.google.co.uk/groups?num=1...4&as_maxy=2005
shows 2 postes in the same period for "gynaecomorphising"; yours and
mine.

Because it isn't a word. Shame your command of the language is so poor.

Shame you have such a proscriptive approach to English when no such
authority exists for English, and no one has the authority to say that a
cefrtain word does or does not exist in English.

Go and become French or German if you are hankering for an Academie
francaise or a Duden equivalent.

Scratch the surface of the person who claims originality and watch her go
seek solace in a dictionary.

In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Tommy wrote
in message 5152152.mUxyrsIqG1@FreeBSD:

Says the lamer that condemns entire groups of people zie has never
met nor ever will, based on a tissue of lies about them.

I judge Zionist on the Government they support.. This is a slap in the
FACE TO AMERICA.

And anyone you who doesn't agree with you on the Holocaust or other
"Jewish" issues is automatically a Zionist.

Yes......

Then why did you *(just* deny this?

LOL -- and you don't even see the problem the what *is* your
definition of "zionist?"

Or is this another term like "white" and "black" that you use without
ever being able to actually say what they mean?

I can see, unlike you.

But cannot give an objective definition of "zionist," just like you
cannot offer an objective definition of the difference between
"whites" and "blacks"

Have you turned yourself in as a danger to society yet?

Of course, "whites" would never engage in activity similar to the
Lavon affair...

It's not just the Lavon Affair and Israel honoring the terrorist that
tried to murder Americans in hopes to get us to fight their proxy-war in
Eygpt or anything like that.

Can you name one country on this earth that has stabbed America in the
back more than Israel? The Lavon Affair, Uss-Liberty, selling secrets to
China, Russia....Damn the list goes on and on........

I ask you Roger, what country on this earth has stabbed America in the
back more than Israel???????????

Well, there are those we've actually been at war with, like your
beloved Nazis, who killed circa 300,000 American soldiers.

That's war.

And how many Americans, total, has Israel killed in its entire
existence?

Or how about the War Between the States, which took ~ 600000 lives?
War

Of course, I guess it would depend upon one's definition of "stab in
the back" -- why don't you tell us what that is, while you're trying
to come up with a definition of "zionist" to justify your
characterization of every opponent as one...

Do you have another word for the evil that Israel has perpetrated on
America?

Yep -- business as usual for each and every country on Earth.

Or are you so naive as to suppose that the US has never done anything
similar?

Hmmmmm, did we send those countries millions of tax-payer dollars while
children in America have to use out dated books? I think not!

We send almost as much to Egypt -- and yet we don't hear you complain
about that.

Egypt hasn't tried to blow up American installations to get us into a war
that could have cost thousands of America life's.

Displaying your ignorance, again.

Egypt did attack an American ship in international waters leaving 37-dead
Americans.

A case of mistaken identity, as everyone except anti-semitic crackpots
acknowledges, and one which has been apologized for and compensation
made.

Egypt has sold American technology like advanced radar warning systems to
Russia and China.

No, just to other unstable regimes in the area.

The list goes on.

And who else in that area of the world even pretends to be an ally of
the US?

Funny, that.

Hell, not only do they stick a knife in our back, they honer those that
did it.

Roger, why is your first loyalty to Israel and not America?

Why is your first loyalty to your own prejudices and not to the
greater good?

My first loyalty is to America.

Bullsh*t. Your first loyalty is to your irrational hatred.

And why do you claim that I have any loyalty at all to Israel? Just
because my knees don't jerk like yours do, doesn't mean I haven't
contributed in much more substantial ways to my country.

Only an anti-American traitor would want 'your hero' John Pollard to be set
free. Why do you idolize him?

He is not my hero, nor have I ever expressed any opinion on him at
all.

Why are you lying about this?

I do not want him to be set free.

Why are you lying about this?

I do not idolize him.

Why are you lying about this?

You tried to brand me a traitor once before and got your head handed
to you -- got any more proof this time?

But then, I'm not a pathetic little lamer that thinks the world owes
him a good time, either...

Nothing wrong with having a good time.

No, if one earns it there is not.

If one is a little leach that expects the world to be handed him,
there is.