A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » misc.kids » Kids Health
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"Beware of Vaccine Bullies"--Malkin column



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 5th 04, 04:42 PM
JG
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Beware of Vaccine Bullies"--Malkin column

Beware of vaccine bullies

Michelle Malkin

February 4, 2004

Why on earth should we vaccinate our newborn baby against Hepatitis B --
a virus that is contracted mostly through intravenous drug use and
sexual contact? That is the question my husband and I had for the
doctors and nurses at the hospital where our son was born two and a half
months ago.

We didn't get very good answers. It was "convenient," "recommended" and
"routine," the medical staff assured us. We wanted more information. A
nurse gave us a brochure, which explained that babies whose mothers had
the Hep B virus were at high risk of developing acute Hep B infections.
Well, I tested negative for Hep B. The Centers for Disease Control named
unprotected sex, IV drug use and being stuck with a needle on the job as
the likeliest routes of Hep B transmission. Well, my husband and I both
work primarily from home, our two children stay at home, and neither we
nor our 3-year-old daughter nor our baby (for heaven's sake!) live the
Kid Rock-and-Pamela Anderson Lee lifestyle.

When we told the hospital staff that we simply wanted more time to think
about giving the Hep B shot to our son -- doesn't "informed consent"
mean we should be truly informed? -- we were badgered aggressively. Some
lectured us about the need to "get on the proper vaccination schedule."
Others warned that Maryland, like more than 40 other states, requires
all schoolchildren to be vaccinated for Hep B. Teachers, however, are
not subject to the mandate, which is driven not just by altruistic
concern for children's health. Ohio legislator Dale Van Vyven snuck the
Hep B mandate into a 1998 hazardous-waste bill at the behest of
profit-maximizing vaccine manufacturers' lobbyists.

The "everybody does it" and "for the greater good" arguments worked when
we were overcautious, over-trusting, first-time parents who submitted
our daughter to every single vaccine without question. This time, we
resolved not to be rushed or bullied. We declined to give our son the
politically correct Hep B shot, decided to do more research, and then
took up the issue with our pediatrician.

Boy, were we in for a rude awakening. Our doctor parroted the American
Academy of Pediatrics line and mindlessly emphasized the efficacy of
vaccines in eradicating childhood diseases. Well, we weren't questioning
their collective efficacy. We questioned what the individual health
benefits and health risks to our newborn were. Physicians have blindly
plied vaccines before that have done more harm than good. A childhood
rotavirus vaccine, for example, was approved for widespread use in 1998
and withdrawn from the market less than a year later after causing an
increase in the incidence of painful bowel obstruction among infants.

Our doctor, however, pooh-poohed our inquiries about potential side
effects. He seemed to have no idea what those risks were and no interest
in finding out. He was also incredibly condescending: "95 percent of
what you read on the Internet" is unreliable, he sermonized, as if we
were too dumb to separate scientific fact from fraud.

In the end, we concluded that some of the vaccines were more worth the
risks than others. At my son's two-month checkup, the pediatrician
expected him to receive a triple-combination shot called "Pediarix"
(consisting of Hep B, inactivated polio, and DTaP, which covers
diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis), as well as HiB (for
certain bacterial infections) and Prevnar (for meningitis and blood
infections). I reiterated my refusal of Hep B, accepted DTaP and HiB,
and asked to put off polio and Prevnar. In response, I received a
threat: Get all the vaccines or get out of our practice.

"Informed consent"? Ha. This was uninformed coercion.

We're leaving for another practice, a little bitter but wiser. The
strong-arm tactics of the medical establishment mustn't intimidate
parents from challenging the universal vaccine orthodoxy. When it comes
to protecting our children's health, skepticism is the best medicine.


  #2  
Old February 5th 04, 04:46 PM
JG
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Beware of Vaccine Bullies"--Malkin column


"JG" wrote in message
...
Beware of vaccine bullies


Michelle Malkin


February 4, 2004


The column is available at
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/m...20040204.shtml.


  #3  
Old February 5th 04, 08:16 PM
Mark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Beware of Vaccine Bullies"--Malkin column

"JG" wrote in message ...
Beware of vaccine bullies

Michelle Malkin

February 4, 2004

Why on earth should we vaccinate our newborn baby against Hepatitis B --
a virus that is contracted mostly through intravenous drug use and
sexual contact? That is the question my husband and I had for the
doctors and nurses at the hospital where our son was born two and a half
months ago.


Because among those who *somehow* contract Hep B in childhood, in
about 30-40% of the cases, a vector is never found. Mom is Hep B
negative, there's no blood or sexual contact...there are other,
as-yet-unidentified vectors.


snip

We declined to give our son the
politically correct Hep B shot, decided to do more research, and then
took up the issue with our pediatrician.

Boy, were we in for a rude awakening. Our doctor parroted the American
Academy of Pediatrics line and mindlessly emphasized the efficacy of
vaccines in eradicating childhood diseases. Well, we weren't questioning
their collective efficacy. We questioned what the individual health
benefits and health risks to our newborn were. Physicians have blindly
plied vaccines before that have done more harm than good. A childhood
rotavirus vaccine, for example, was approved for widespread use in 1998
and withdrawn from the market less than a year later after causing an
increase in the incidence of painful bowel obstruction among infants.


Wrong. The incidence of bowel obstruction was NOT higher in the
vaccinated population. This author is doing some parroting of her
own.


Our doctor, however, pooh-poohed our inquiries about potential side
effects. He seemed to have no idea what those risks were and no interest
in finding out. He was also incredibly condescending: "95 percent of
what you read on the Internet" is unreliable, he sermonized, as if we
were too dumb to separate scientific fact from fraud.


And this "informed" research led her to decline Prevnar? Well
informed indeed.


In the end, we concluded that some of the vaccines were more worth the
risks than others. At my son's two-month checkup, the pediatrician
expected him to receive a triple-combination shot called "Pediarix"
(consisting of Hep B, inactivated polio, and DTaP, which covers
diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis), as well as HiB (for
certain bacterial infections) and Prevnar (for meningitis and blood
infections). I reiterated my refusal of Hep B, accepted DTaP and HiB,
and asked to put off polio and Prevnar. In response, I received a
threat: Get all the vaccines or get out of our practice.


Why should the doctor be compelled to keep a patient whose parents
don't follow his recommendations? I can tell you *I'm* in no hurry to
take care of a kid with Hib meningitis, nor invasive pneumococcal
disease nor pertussis.

This author is free to find a doctor who will allow her daffy
decisions to usurp his training and better sense. No one is holding a
gun to her head to *make* her get her child vaccinated; why does she
have her panties in a twist because this particular doctor won't play
her game?

It's called choice: She chose not to have her child fully
immunized...the doctor chose not to have her child as a patient.
Pretty straighforward, I say.

Mark, MD
  #4  
Old February 5th 04, 08:52 PM
Roger Schlafly
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Beware of Vaccine Bullies"--Malkin column

"Mark" wrote
Why on earth should we vaccinate our newborn baby against Hepatitis B --
a virus that is contracted mostly through intravenous drug use and
sexual contact? That is the question my husband and I had for the
doctors and nurses at the hospital where our son was born two and a half
months ago.

Because among those who *somehow* contract Hep B in childhood, in
about 30-40% of the cases, a vector is never found.


That is because of family members who do not admit to the risky sex
and drug use.

rotavirus vaccine, for example, was approved for widespread use in 1998
and withdrawn from the market less than a year later after causing an
increase in the incidence of painful bowel obstruction among infants.

Wrong. The incidence of bowel obstruction was NOT higher in the
vaccinated population.


That is why the vaccine was withdrawn. If you have some other
explanation, please post it.

Why should the doctor be compelled to keep a patient whose parents
don't follow his recommendations?


She made a completely rational choice. She is much better off with
a ped who understands that recommendations are just that --
recommendations.


  #5  
Old February 6th 04, 12:13 AM
JG
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Beware of Vaccine Bullies"--Malkin column

"Mark" wrote in message
om...
"JG" wrote in message

...

Beware of vaccine bullies


Michelle Malkin


February 4, 2004


Why on earth should we vaccinate our newborn baby against Hepatitis

B --a virus that is contracted mostly through intravenous drug use
and
sexual contact? That is the question my husband and I had for the
doctors and nurses at the hospital where our son was born two and a

half
months ago.


Because among those who *somehow* contract Hep B in childhood, in
about 30-40% of the cases, a vector is never found. Mom is Hep B
negative, there's no blood or sexual contact...there are other,
as-yet-unidentified vectors.


Scaremonger. The likelihood of an infant/child who has diligent parents
and is not subjected to to "high risk" persons--e.g., the Malkins'
son--contracting hep B is no doubt so ridiculously small as to be
laughable.

snip


We declined to give our son the
politically correct Hep B shot, decided to do more research, and

then
took up the issue with our pediatrician.


Boy, were we in for a rude awakening. Our doctor parroted the

American
Academy of Pediatrics line and mindlessly emphasized the efficacy of
vaccines in eradicating childhood diseases. Well, we weren't

questioning
their collective efficacy. We questioned what the individual health
benefits and health risks to our newborn were. Physicians have

blindly
plied vaccines before that have done more harm than good. A

childhood
rotavirus vaccine, for example, was approved for widespread use in

1998
and withdrawn from the market less than a year later after causing

an
increase in the incidence of painful bowel obstruction among

infants.

Wrong. The incidence of bowel obstruction was NOT higher in the
vaccinated population. This author is doing some parroting of her
own.


Our doctor, however, pooh-poohed our inquiries about potential side
effects. He seemed to have no idea what those risks were and no

interest
in finding out. He was also incredibly condescending: "95 percent of
what you read on the Internet" is unreliable, he sermonized, as if

we
were too dumb to separate scientific fact from fraud.


And this "informed" research led her to decline Prevnar? Well
informed indeed.


In the end, we concluded that some of the vaccines were more worth

the
risks than others. At my son's two-month checkup, the pediatrician
expected him to receive a triple-combination shot called "Pediarix"
(consisting of Hep B, inactivated polio, and DTaP, which covers
diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis), as well as HiB (for
certain bacterial infections) and Prevnar (for meningitis and blood
infections). I reiterated my refusal of Hep B, accepted DTaP and

HiB,
and asked to put off polio and Prevnar. In response, I received a
threat: Get all the vaccines or get out of our practice.


Why should the doctor be compelled to keep a patient whose parents
don't follow his recommendations?


Who said, or even suggested, he should?

I can tell you *I'm* in no hurry to
take care of a kid with Hib meningitis, nor invasive pneumococcal
disease nor pertussis.


This author is free to find a doctor who will allow her daffy
decisions to usurp his training and better sense. No one is holding a
gun to her head to *make* her get her child vaccinated; why does she
have her panties in a twist because this particular doctor won't play
her game?


It doesn't sound to me like she has "her panties in a twist" at all.
What did she write that gave you the impression she was bothered by
having to engage a pediatrician more amenable to her views? Sure, she's
"bitter" and obviously ticked off by the doctor's condescending attitude
(good for her!), but I would think she's more than happy to find another
pediatrician

It's called choice: She chose not to have her child fully
immunized...the doctor chose not to have her child as a patient.
Pretty straighforward, I say.


Yes. So? Looks like both parties will get what they want.


  #6  
Old February 6th 04, 02:07 AM
Roger Schlafly
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Beware of Vaccine Bullies"--Malkin column

"JG" wrote
Scaremonger. The likelihood of an infant/child who has diligent parents
and is not subjected to to "high risk" persons--e.g., the Malkins'
son--contracting hep B is no doubt so ridiculously small as to be
laughable.


It is possible that the ped falsely assumed that Malkin is an Asian
immigrant, hence at risk for HBV. Yes, much of the HBV in the
USA comes from Asia, and Malkin looks like a Filipino. But Malkin
was born in Philadelphia. (Her parents were Filipino immigrants.)


  #7  
Old February 6th 04, 04:18 AM
Jeff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Beware of Vaccine Bullies"--Malkin column


"JG" wrote in message
...
Beware of vaccine bullies

Michelle Malkin

February 4, 2004

Why on earth should we vaccinate our newborn baby against Hepatitis B --
a virus that is contracted mostly through intravenous drug use and
sexual contact?


(...)

Mostly. Not entirely. Do you know if you child is going to be in a car crash
and require a blood transfusion next week?

Jeff

(...)


  #8  
Old February 6th 04, 04:22 AM
Jeff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Beware of Vaccine Bullies"--Malkin column


"Roger Schlafly" wrote in message
et...
"Mark" wrote
Why on earth should we vaccinate our newborn baby against Hepatitis

B --
a virus that is contracted mostly through intravenous drug use and
sexual contact? That is the question my husband and I had for the
doctors and nurses at the hospital where our son was born two and a

half
months ago.

Because among those who *somehow* contract Hep B in childhood, in
about 30-40% of the cases, a vector is never found.


That is because of family members who do not admit to the risky sex
and drug use.


Really? Can cite evidence that this is the case for most of the kids who get
hep B? How do you know that the family members don't admit to something? Are
reading their minds?

rotavirus vaccine, for example, was approved for widespread use in

1998
and withdrawn from the market less than a year later after causing an
increase in the incidence of painful bowel obstruction among infants.

Wrong. The incidence of bowel obstruction was NOT higher in the
vaccinated population.


That is why the vaccine was withdrawn. If you have some other
explanation, please post it.


Incorrect. It was temporarily withdrawn because VAERS found a *potential*
increase in the rate of intussecption in kids who got the vaccine. However,
the data showed that there was no statistically significant increase in
intussecption. However, the company kept the vaccine off the market for fear
of losing lots of money to lawsuits.


(...)

Jeff


  #9  
Old February 6th 04, 08:46 PM
Mark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Beware of Vaccine Bullies"--Malkin column

"JG" wrote in message ...
"Mark" wrote in message
om...
"JG" wrote in message

...

Beware of vaccine bullies


Michelle Malkin


February 4, 2004


Why on earth should we vaccinate our newborn baby against Hepatitis

B --a virus that is contracted mostly through intravenous drug use
and
sexual contact? That is the question my husband and I had for the
doctors and nurses at the hospital where our son was born two and a

half
months ago.


Because among those who *somehow* contract Hep B in childhood, in
about 30-40% of the cases, a vector is never found. Mom is Hep B
negative, there's no blood or sexual contact...there are other,
as-yet-unidentified vectors.


Scaremonger. The likelihood of an infant/child who has diligent parents
and is not subjected to to "high risk" persons--e.g., the Malkins'
son--contracting hep B is no doubt so ridiculously small as to be
laughable.


*I'm* the scaremonger? That's a laugh. The other vectors *aren't
identified*. How you know that you're being diligent in protecting
your child against these vectors if you don't even know what they are?


snip


We declined to give our son the
politically correct Hep B shot, decided to do more research, and

then
took up the issue with our pediatrician.


Boy, were we in for a rude awakening. Our doctor parroted the

American
Academy of Pediatrics line and mindlessly emphasized the efficacy of
vaccines in eradicating childhood diseases. Well, we weren't

questioning
their collective efficacy. We questioned what the individual health
benefits and health risks to our newborn were. Physicians have

blindly
plied vaccines before that have done more harm than good. A

childhood
rotavirus vaccine, for example, was approved for widespread use in

1998
and withdrawn from the market less than a year later after causing

an
increase in the incidence of painful bowel obstruction among

infants.

Wrong. The incidence of bowel obstruction was NOT higher in the
vaccinated population. This author is doing some parroting of her
own.


Our doctor, however, pooh-poohed our inquiries about potential side
effects. He seemed to have no idea what those risks were and no

interest
in finding out. He was also incredibly condescending: "95 percent of
what you read on the Internet" is unreliable, he sermonized, as if

we
were too dumb to separate scientific fact from fraud.


And this "informed" research led her to decline Prevnar? Well
informed indeed.


In the end, we concluded that some of the vaccines were more worth

the
risks than others. At my son's two-month checkup, the pediatrician
expected him to receive a triple-combination shot called "Pediarix"
(consisting of Hep B, inactivated polio, and DTaP, which covers
diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis), as well as HiB (for
certain bacterial infections) and Prevnar (for meningitis and blood
infections). I reiterated my refusal of Hep B, accepted DTaP and

HiB,
and asked to put off polio and Prevnar. In response, I received a
threat: Get all the vaccines or get out of our practice.


Why should the doctor be compelled to keep a patient whose parents
don't follow his recommendations?


Who said, or even suggested, he should?


The author's entire thesis appears to be about the unfairness of the
doctor kicking her kid out of his practice. She referred to it as a
"threat".


I can tell you *I'm* in no hurry to
take care of a kid with Hib meningitis, nor invasive pneumococcal
disease nor pertussis.


This author is free to find a doctor who will allow her daffy
decisions to usurp his training and better sense. No one is holding a
gun to her head to *make* her get her child vaccinated; why does she
have her panties in a twist because this particular doctor won't play
her game?


It doesn't sound to me like she has "her panties in a twist" at all.
What did she write that gave you the impression she was bothered by
having to engage a pediatrician more amenable to her views? Sure, she's
"bitter" and obviously ticked off by the doctor's condescending attitude
(good for her!), but I would think she's more than happy to find another
pediatrician


What did she write? Let's see...the "coercion", her "bitterness",
calling the Hep B "politically correct", being "threatened"...the fact
that she even bothered to write an entire article in the first place
leads me to believe she has a bee in her bonnet over this issue.


It's called choice: She chose not to have her child fully
immunized...the doctor chose not to have her child as a patient.
Pretty straighforward, I say.


Yes. So? Looks like both parties will get what they want.


Exactly.
  #10  
Old February 7th 04, 12:20 AM
Roger Schlafly
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Beware of Vaccine Bullies"--Malkin column

"Mark" wrote
The author's entire thesis appears to be about the unfairness of the
doctor kicking her kid out of his practice. She referred to it as a
"threat".


Nowhere does she say that was unfair. Her complaint was that the
ped was trying to pressure her into getting vaccines that she didn't
want.
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/m...20040204.shtml


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Get flu, get spine adjusted? (also: college vaccination fraud) Todd Gastaldo Pregnancy 0 April 13th 04 05:42 PM
Homeschoolers to be vaccinated al gu Pregnancy 20 March 1st 04 05:28 AM
vaccine genocide in Uganda update john Kids Health 1 December 11th 03 03:31 PM
Vaccination is NOT immunization/Breastfeeding *is* immunization! Todd Gastaldo Pregnancy 30 October 6th 03 09:16 PM
CAN YOU LOSE YOUR HAIR FROM A VACCINE? john Kids Health 3 September 25th 03 04:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.