If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Libertarians: Crooked obstetrician Ron Paul, MD (also: MichaelBadnarik for Congress)
LIBERTARIANS: CROOKED OBSTETRICIAN RON PAUL, MD
(ALSO: MICHAEL BADNARIK FOR CONGRESS - will you forward this to Ron?) PREGNANT WOMEN: Crooked obstetricians (most obstetricians are crooked) are using semisitting and dorsal delivery thereby closing birth canals up to 30% - and KEEPING birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with forceps - and lying to cover-up. For details - and the Four OB Lies (they are whoppers)... See ACOG's 2005 edition: How NOT to birth http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3606 LADIES: It is EASY to allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%. See the just cited URL. MASSIVE OBSTETRIC BABY BLOOD ROBBERY Obstetricians are asphyxiating EVERY CESAREAN BABY^^^ - immediately clamping/cutting umbilical cords - forcing babies to breathe with their lungs before they are ready. This obvious crime robs babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. (^^^This according to retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG, quoted below.) LADIES: It is EASY for you to make sure your baby gets the "extra" up to 50% of his/her blood volume. See the simple PREVENTION instruction at the very end of this post. CROOKED OBSTETRICIAN RON PAUL, MD, Member of Congress says: "If we wish to remain free, we must constantly question and challenge conventional views about the proper role of government in our society."^^^ ^^^From Congressman/Obstetrician Ron Paul, MD's Foreword to Michael Badnarik's book, Good to be King: The Foundation of Our Constitutional Freedom [2004] http://www.constitutionpreservation.org/book.html DR. GASTALDO REMARKS: Since obstetricians are so obviously committing crimes of mass child abuse (see above), the proper role of government in our society is NOT attorney general silence and district attorney silence (and obstetrician-congressmen silence). Congressman/Obstetrician Ron Paul, MD (via Michael Badnarik), you could stop the obstetric crimes just by speaking out publicly finally - and by filing MANDATORY suspected child abuse reports - and publicly urging your fellow MDs to file them. (I'm assuming you and your fellow MDs agree that obstetricians senselessly closing birth canals up to 30% and senselessly robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume constitutes, at the very least, SUSPECTED child abuse - for which IMMEDIATE reports are MANDATORY.) Stopping the mass child abuse by obstetricians will save tiny lives and tiny limbs - not to mention nearly instantly saving Americans much grief and nearly instantly saving BILLIONS per year. HOMEBIRTH LIBEL BY OBSTETRICIANS: A past-president of ACOG referred to homebirth as the crime of "child abuse." [Marsden Wagner, MD Pursuing the Birth Machine 1994. Quoted in Gaskin's interview with Wagner. Birth Gazette 1995] It was/is a hoax. Homebirth midwives are economic competitors of obstetricians. Obstetricians are committing obvious CRIMES - and lying to cover-up. See the Four OB Lies at the URL above. They are whoppers. LIBERTARIAN STEVE B. HARRIS, MD SAYS: "I'm a libertarian, so don't blame ME." http://groups-beta.google.com/group/ alt.health/msg/4b6166dbed3e06c4? When I noted that MDs are committing obvious crimes and that law enforcement isn't enforcing the law. The "don't-blame-me" Libertarian Steve B. Harris, MD replied: "Without enforcement, there is no law. Without law, there is no crime. These are elementary principles. Get an adult to explain them to you." http://groups-beta.google.com/group/ misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/28866f3384801ae9? Do ALL Libertarians believe that MDs are above the law? I SORT of believe this - as long as MDs stop their crimes. That is - I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs - because as medical students MDs are TRAINED to commit obvious felonies. Even VACCINATIONS are being fraudulently promoted by MDs - and administered without true informed consent (which is the crime of battery - which is what stimulated Libertarian Harris' "no-enforcement-no-crime" comment quoted above)... Meanwhile, MDs lie by omission and thereby deny massive numbers of babies massive numbers of free daily immunizations. See The MD who slapped the nurse/A nation of 'ninnies'... http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3782 CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE MICHAEL BADNARIK OPEN LETTER (archived for global access at http://groups.google.com) Michael Badnarik Congressional Candidate (Texas 10, 2006) Former Libertarian Presidential Candidate (2004***) ***On ballot in 48 states, more than Ralph Nader Constitution Preservation Trust P.O. Box 3136 Grapevine, Texas 76099-3136 Phone: (817) 727-6510 Via Michael, I hope you will forward this to the man who wrote your Foreword, Congressman/Obstetrician Ron Paul, MD. It is POSSIBLE that Congressman/Obstetrician Ron Paul, MD has not yet taken public action to stop the obvious obstetric crimes because he never received (or read) my emails sent years ago. If so, I will apologize for suggesting here that he received and read my emails. Then again, the evidence for the crimes has been in the medical literature since early last century and obstetricians have been LYING to cover-up. (I myself published the simple biomechanics late last century. See Gastaldo TD. Birth. 1992;19(4):230-1.) For further details (including The Four OB Lies - they are whoppers)... See ACOG's 2005 edition: How NOT to birth http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3606 Michael, sorry to publicly hammer your Congressman/Obstetrician friend - but he and his fellow obstetricians have been and are still hammering babies - sometimes fatally so. You write that you are here to "reconnect" people to their "birthright," saying, "I bring you the message of Liberty. I'm here to reconnect you to your birthright, the freedom you were supposed to be born into but never really had..." http://www.constitutionpreservation.org/index.html Babies have the use of all their blood - their birthright - up to the time of birth - then crooked obstetricians ROB them of up to 50% of their blood volume birthright. This is happening to EVERY CESAREAN BABY, according to retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG, quoted below. Michael, I urge you to speak out - even if Congressman/Obstetrician Paul does not. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon USA PS Usenetters, some remarks on US Congressional Candidate Michael Badnarik's position on HEALTHCARE... CANDIDATE BADNARIK SAYS: "Health care and insurance costs will plummet if excess regulation is eliminated and malpractice awards are made only on the basis of real damages caused by real negligence..." http://badnarik.org/plans_healthcare.php DR. GASTALDO REMARKS: Health care and insurance costs will plummet even faster if obvious crimes of health professionals - especially medical doctors - are finally prosecuted as crimes. I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs because as medical students, MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious felonies. The most obvious MD felony is medicine's most frequent surgical behavior - the way American MDs perform it. See the very end of this post. CANDIDATE BADNARIK SAYS: "Costs are high because of the excessive regulation in virtually every aspect of health care...." DR. GASTALDO REMARKS: Yep. Excessive regulation (licensure) serves as a shield behind which health professionals - especially medical doctors - commit obvious crimes and bilk billions per year from the health care system. CANDIDATE BADNARIK SAYS: "Fewer new drugs translate into higher health care costs...." DR. GASTALDO REMARKS: It's possible - but I doubt it. CANDIDATE BADNARIK SAYS: "...For example, people with ulcers used to pay $28,000 for surgery and were unable to work for weeks. The introduction of Tagametr allowed ulcer patients to stay on the job, while spending only $1,000-$3,000 on medication." DR. GASTALDO REMARKS: I suspect that the vast majority of ulcers do not happen because people are "low" on pharmaceutical industry products; but it is good that there is a pharmaceutical industry to develop pharmaceutical disease treatments. I myself have used some pharmaceutical industry disease treatments and am glad they exist. Regarding ulcer medications to counter ulcer-causing organisms, Libertarian Steve B. Harris, MD says: "Heh. *Remember however that ulcers are not like AIDS or even tooth decay, where you never see them without the causal organisms. They are a multifactorial beast like atherosclerosis/heart disease. With ulcers where bacteria play a primary causal role (sort of like LDL in heart disease), but by no means the only one. It's very hard for the stomach to ulcerate without acid, just as advertised, pre-1980. *And lifestyle things like smoking and stress DO have a role in duodenal ulcers, as does gender and age (young male smokers are hit hardest, bacteria or no)." http://groups-beta.google.com/group/ alt.health/msg/4b6166dbed3e06c4? CANDIDATE BADNARIK SAYS: "One of the easiest ways to lower health care costs is to get rid of excess regulation of the pharmaceutical industry." DR. GASTALDO REMARKS: A lot of dead people on Vioxx - and a lot more sick on Vioxx. MAYBE the problem was "excess regulation of the pharmaceutical industry" - but I doubt it. That said, I agree with Libertarian Steve B. Harris, MD who says: If it were up to me, you could buy any drug BUT antibiotics, at the local state liquor store. Without a Rx..." http://groups-beta.google.com/group/ alt.health/msg/4b6166dbed3e06c4? CANDIDATE BADNARIK SAYS: "In addition, excess regulation drives up the cost of training physicians, who must then raise their fees accordingly." DR. GASTALDO REMARKS: When medical doctors are stopped from hiding behind excess regulation (medical licensure) to commit obvious crimes - medical doctors will stop using billions in Medicare tax dollars (see below) to train new medical doctors to commit obvious crimes - and the cost of training physicians will decrease significantly. CANDIDATE BADNARIK SAYS: "Just as the high cost of pharmaceutical regulation results in fewer medications, the high cost of gaining a medical license means fewer doctors..." DR. GASTALDO REMARKS: Part of "the high cost of gaining a medical license" APPEARS to happen because of the excessive regulation called medical licensure... [In November of 1982, the Public Affairs Research Group (PARG), 1826 Capitol Avenue, Sacramento, CA *95814 issued a Medical Board-commissioned report indicating that in the early days of licensure, medical associations were "virtually indistinguishable" from state licensing agencies. *According to the PARG report, "in California, the medical association still plays a significant role..."...According to Medical Board staff analysis of the 1980-82 PARG study: "[T]he foremost advocates of licensure have been the members of health professions themselves, not the citizens they serve...While the professional associations used public protection to justify the need for licensure, the more immediate motivations appear to have been gaining control of health care delivery, elimininating competition, restricting supply, acquiring the mantle of orthodoxy and assuring desirable levels of reimbursement." (p. 7, PARG)] DR. GASTALDO REMARKS: It may be that CERTIFICATION - rather than licensure - is a better way to inform the public regarding medical and surgical skill. CANDIDATE BADNARIK SAYS: "...so patients must often wait weeks for an appointment." DR. GASTALDO REMARKS: As suggested by the PARG report just quoted, health professional licensure may be artificially reducing the number of healthcare professionals thereby driving up patient waiting times. Also possibly driving up patient waiting times is the generation of new patients itself - because culturally powerful medical licentiates (MDs/pharmaceutical industry salesmen) have used their political power to either eliminate or *******ize (medicalize) non-medical alternatives - like for example midwifery. CANDIDATE BADNARIK SAYS: "The regulations governing medical schools have resulted in homogenized training of physicians, which often neglects cost-saving approaches such as disease prevention, nutrition, and alternative therapies." DR. GASTALDO REMARKS: BINGO! But "homogenized" is the wrong word. CRIMINAL is a better word. American medicine's most frequent surgical behaviors are obvious crimes the way American MDs perform them - and regulations perpetuate the crimes - in part because of the medico-"legal" "just us" system which has attorney generals and district attorneys looking the other way - relying on regulation instead of criminal law - failing to prosecute the obvious medical crimes.) CANDIDATE BADNARIK SAYS: "Government-mandated red tape increases the paperwork burden for physicians and their staff." DR. GASTALDO REMARKS: I agree. CANDIDATE BADNARIK SAYS: "Medicare and Medicaid come with an additional layer of busy work for over-extended physicians, with criminal penalties for clerical mistakes." DR. GASTALDO REMARKS: This is the exception to my claim that MDs are not generally criminally prosecuted. The problem is, there is ONLY criminal prosecution for fraudulent billing - which may or may not have been "clerical mistakes." But even this criminal prosecution is selective: The obvious crimes being committed by MDs - which obviously ALSO involve fraudulent billing - are not being criminally prosecuted. CANDIDATE BADNARIK SAYS: "More and more doctors are refusing to treat patients with government 'insurance' to avoid the red tape, late payments, and poor compensation that have become a hallmark of these programs." DR. GASTALDO REMARKS: One of the most expensive "hallmarks" of Medicare is - medical training - taxpayers are funding the $100 billion per year Medicare training of MDs to commit crimes. More on this below. CANDIDATE BADNARIK SAYS: "Courts today often impose malpractice penalties on physicians who have done nothing wrong so that patients can access the "deep pockets" of insurers." DR. GASTALDO REMARKS: Yes. CIVIL or administrative actions - where insurance companies risk losing money and MDs risk losing licenses - these are the norm. Only rarely do MDs lose their licenses and only VERY rarely do MDs risk being imprisoned/subjected to criminal prosecutions. It happened in 1995...doctors were "frightened out of their wits." In 1995, after an MD (Einaugler) was prosecuted and imprisoned, American Medical Association (AMA) executive vice-president, Dr. James S. Todd stated that doctors were "frightened out of their wits" - they feared criminal prosecution for their medical decisions. [Nossiter A. A mistake, a rare prosecution, and a doctor is headed for jail. New York Times (Mar16)1995:front page] According to the New York Times article, Dr. Einaugler contended that he shouldn't have been criminally prosecuted - in part because criminal prosecution of doctors is "unprecedented." AMA general counsel Kirk Johnson (who resigned in the AMA/Sunbeam fiasco) echoed Einaugler's sentiment, telling the Times that physicians have "never before" been subject to criminal prosecution in New York; and that criminal prosecution is "extraordinarily uncommon" anywhere in the nation. AMA executive vice-president James Todd, MD chimed in, assuring the Times that "Society has been poorly served by this decision" - doctors "traditionally" handle such matters through "peer review and malpractice," he said. LOL! Traditional "peer review" resulted in NO Medical Board penalty for Einaugler, because the Medical Board found that his "clear and obvious" failure to act - after subjecting his patient to an "enormous anatomical insult" - was not a "flagrant or dramatic departure from standards." (!) FACT: MDs are a protected class - able to commit obvious (sometimes fatal) crime with impunity. To my knowledge, it isn't written anywhere that MDs are above the law. That's just the way it is. I suspect I am not the only one reading who was not aware of this. I suspect I am not the only one who (paraphrasing Steve B. Harris, MD) needs an adult to explain it. RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS.... "[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage in fraud or deception." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the patient." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to patients, colleagues, and the public..." http://www.psych.org/psych_pra ct/ethics/ethics_opinions53101.cfm AMA PRESIDENT IS AN OBSTETRICIAN: *JOHN NELSON, MD According to the front page story in the March 3, 2005 USA Today, there is a doctor shortage: "Even the American Medical Association (AMA)...has abandoned its long-standing position that an 'oversupply exists'... The article quotes AMA President John Nelson, a Salt Lake City obstetrician: "The truth is, we don't know if there's a shortage of physicians..." Kevin Grumbach, MD of San Francisco General Hospital was quoted: "Investing billions of dollars to produce more doctors is a foolish way to spend money. Don Detmer, MD of the Institute of Medicine was quoted: "Doctors create their own demand." Richard Cooper, MD of the Medical College of Wisconsin was quoted: "Doctors don't drive medical costs...Sickness does." Doctors (including and especially OBs) are driving a LOT of sickness! Doctors have been ANTI-SCIENTIFICALLY libeling their homebirth midwife competitors as child abusers! In 1977, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) publicly libeled homebirth as "child abuse" [Ob.Gyn.News Oct1,1977] In 1993, a representative for 3500 California ACOG members stated that California physicians had rejected collegial relationships with licensed midwives - and had held out for physician supervision of them - in order to discourage homebirths. [Ob.Gyn.News Sep15,1993] As indicated above, a past-president of ACOG more recently referred to homebirth as "child abuse." [Wagner Pursuing the Birth Machine 1994. Quoted in Gaskin's interview with Wagner. Birth Gazette 1995] It was a hoax. Homebirth midwives are economic competitors of obstetricians. "THEY WORSHIP EVEN ERROR WHEN IT AFFORDS THEM A SUBSISTENCE..." "Thus I say that most men only care for science so far as they get a living by it, and they worship even error when it affords them a subsistence." --Johann Wolfgang Goethe (1749-1832) THE AMERICAN MEDICAL RELIGION... "Religion comprises all, extends to all [including] ethics, law, the principles of political organization, and even science." --Durkheim E: Division of Labor, p. 135 "JOINING THE AMA IS LIKE JOINING A CHURCH..." "There is one quotation that captures the essence of what membership in both the AMA and our state medical associations is all about...'Joining the AMA is like joining a church...' [Hopkins D reviewing Campion FD: The AMA and U.S. Health Policy Since 1940, 1984, Review Press: Chicago, IL. In Western J Med, 1985;142(2):273] KEY POINT ABOUT THE AMA... A federal appeals court had to order the American medical religion's largest diocese (the AMA) to let individual MDs and individual hospitals make "individual decisions." [Wilk CA. Medicine, monopolies, and malice. Garden City Park, NY: Avery 1996] Of course, letting MDs make "individual decisions" is no solution because: "[T]he intellectual foundation of medical care...is...whatever a physician decides is by definition correct." [Eddy DM. The challenge. (Jan12)1990 JAMA] OBs are deciding to LIE to cover-up massive crime against mothers and babies. "The cruelest lies are often told in silence." --Robert Louis Stevenson Virginibus Puerisque OBs are lying in silence - babies be damned. IN USA TODAY... Florida Attorney General Charlie Crist was quoted saying: "It's illegal to lie." [Quoted by Julie Appleby. USA Today. 2005(Mar3):3B] The Florida Attorney General also was quoted saying: "It's illegal to inflate billings beyond what they really were." OBs are inflating SUFFERING (sometimes inflating death and paralysis)... I may as well state the Four OB Lies here (they are whoppers)... THE FOUR OB LIES OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in 1957, the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvic diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery. OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet. OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does Semisitting [Gastaldo. Birth. 1992;19(4):230-1] - and pointed this out to the authors of Williams Obstetrics - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the same paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention to their text... OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal open maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum births are performed with the mother in lithotomy.) See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS... http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2983 I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago... http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/part2ftc.html CANDIDATE BADNARIK SAYS: "The result [of higher malpractice liability insurance costs - TG] has been skyrocketing premiums for doctors, driving up prices and causing many practitioners to abandon high-risk specialties such as obstetrics." DR. GASTALDO REMARKS: LOL! The ol' "higher malpractice liability insurance costs" hoax! There is a book out (by an attorney-MD) that exposes it. *According to Attorney Harvey Wachsman, MD [Lethal Medicine 1993] women "suddenly" need hysterectomies when old obstetricians decide to bring in new obstetricians so they can quit obstetrics and practice gynecology. * According to Wachsman, when organized medicine pleads that OBs are leaving practice at the rate of 11% per year, organized medicine forgets to mention that OBs have ALWAYS left practice at about 11% per year over the last 50 years. As indicated above, obstetricians anti-scientifically stomped an entire profession called midwifery. Obstetricians are STILL anti-scientifically stomping the midwifery profession - going to the the California legislature (for example) - saying "no collegial relationship" because they need to "supervise" homebirth midwives (without being present at homebirths!) - then saying they CAN'T supervise because their malpractice liability insurance companies (the largest in California owned by MDs!) won't let them! (It's sordidly funny - in an anti-competitive, anti-scientific sort of way.) CANDIDATE BADNARIK SAYS: "Most states mandate what medical insurance must cover, making everyone buy an expensive 'one-size-fits-all' policy instead of one tailored to their needs and budget. Consequently, fewer people can afford insurance at all." DR. GASTALDO REMARKS: States (attorney generals/"the People") are currently failing to prosecute obvious medical crimes. Step One: Stop the obvious medical crimes - stop insurance reimbursement for obvious medical crimes. (Same goes for obvious CHIROPRACTIC crimes - BTW - like for example the now-optional radiation to identify still-undemonstrated disease-causing correctable "vertebral subluxations" prior to federally (Medicare)-reimbursed chiropractic adjustments. Until 2000, this was MANDATORY radiation prior to federally (Medicare)-reimbursed chiropractic adjustments - radiation which chiros protested - but which was mandated by Congress anyway (but not paid for by Medcare!) because of medical lobby influence in Congress. It was obviously illegal for Congress to mandate radiation of chiropractic patients - but it happened.) CANDIDATE BADNARIK SAYS: "If you elect me as your president..." DR. GASTALDO REMARKS: Must have used this during presidental campaign. CANDIDATE BADNARIK SAYS: "...I will end excess regulation of pharmaceuticals, health care providers, and insurance companies. Physicians will be held liable for malpractice, but not for problems beyond their control. Health care costs will plummet." DR. GASTALDO REMARKS: That's the spirit! But MDs should be held CRIMINALLY liable for obvious crimes - with pardons in advance - for the reason given above. Most of American medicine's surgeries - numerically speaking - are performed obviously criminally - the way American MDs perform them. The best example is IMMEDIATE umbilical cord clamping/cutting which robs babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. See the very end of this post for the simple method of preventing this obvious MD crime. CANDIDATE BADNARIK SAYS: "Taxpayers will save as much as they are now spending on Medicare/Medicaid when they no longer have to fund this destructive bureaucracy..." DR. GASTALDO REMARKS: Taxpayers should be informed immediately that Medicare is paying BILLIONS per year to train MDs to commit obvious felonies. Organized medicine's hospital residency Medicare boondoggle should be changed immediately. The March 3, 2005 USA Today front page article quoted above indicates that recently graduated medical students in obstetric residencies are receiving from Medicare $35,000 to $50,000 per year. Hospitals get from Medicare a total of $11 billion annually to train 100,000 residents - roughly $110,000 per year per resident. THINK ABOUT IT: *Medicare is right now paying recently graduated medical students in obstetric residencies to close birth canals up to 30% and keep birth canals closed when babies get stuck (among other obvious obstetric crimes - see the very end of this post) - and to train medical students to do the same. CANDIDATE BADNARIK SAYS: If you aren't able to make a contribution to the campaign today, help us spread the word instead! Let all of your friends, family, and co-workers know there is another choice this year. http://badnarik.org/plans_healthcare.php DR. GASTALDO REMARKS: Candidate Badnarik (and anyone else reading) - the obstetric crimes are real and PREVENTABLE. At the very least, please spread the word - inform pregnant women in your circle of family and friends.... I AM SIMULTANEOUSLY SPREADING THE WORD - TO PREGNANT WOMEN AND MDs... HERE IS A RECENT POST TO MDs IN ISRAEL... PREGNANT WOMEN: *Obstetricians are closing birth canals up to 30% and keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck - as they pull with forceps - sometimes pulling so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords... It's easy to allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%. See ACOG's 2005 edition: How NOT to birth http://health.groups.yahoo.com /group/chiro-list/message/3606 Also related to forceps use... POSTPARTUM FECAL INCONTINENCE - "PREVENTION BY AVOIDING BIRTH TRAUMA" Ronen S. Gold, MD et al. "Risk factors for postpartum fecal incontinence a forceps delivery, nulliparity, birth weight over 4 kilograms and persistent occiput posterior presentation of the fetal head. Anal incontinence developed in 42% of women who had posterolateral episiotomy. Therefore, the main focus of the treating physician should be on prevention by avoiding birth trauma followed by early recognition and skilful correction." --Ronen S. Gold, MD et al.^^^ ^^^ RONEN S. GOLD*, ASNAT GROUTZ, JOSEPH LESSING, DAVID GORDON Harefuah. 2005 Jul;144(7):502-5, 525. *PubMed abstract OPEN LETTER (archived for global access at http://groups.google.com) Ronen S. Gold, MD Lis Maternity Hospital Tel Aviv Medical Center ISRAEL Ronen, Obstetricians are closing birth canals up to 30% and KEEPING birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck as they pull with forceps - and you say: "Forceps delivery was a risk factor for anal incontinence." Obstetricians are slicing vaginas - surgically/fraudulently inferring they are doing everything possible to open birth canals - even as they close birth canals the "extra" up to 30% - and you say: "42% of women who had posterolateral episiotomy developed anal incontinence." [Added in Open Letter to Michael Badnarik: Mass vagina slicing/routine episiotomy is known to increase severe perineal tears by 50X - and perineal tearing is the most common reason for hospitalization of women after they leave the hospital: "The most common diagnosis for hospitalization among all women is trauma to perineum due to childbirth." http://www.ahcpr.gov/data/hcup ?/factbk3/factbk3.htm] RONEN: I LIKE YOUR "PREVENTION BY AVOIDING BIRTH TRAUMA" IDEA. Women shouldn't have to ASK for the "extra" up to 30%. Most women don't KNOW to ask. Medicine has a simple prevention opportunity. Todd Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon USA PS ANOTHER SIMPLE PREVENTION OPPORTUNITY Obstetricians are temporarily asphyxiating babies - forcing them to breathe through their lungs before they want - and in the process robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. This is happening to EVERY CESAREAN BABY, according to retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG. See again: ACOG's 2005 edition: How NOT to birth http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3606 Keeping in mind that babies breathe through their umbilical cords, Dr. Morley is recommending a sort of temporary baby strangling experiment to help obstetricians understand that they shouldn't rob babies of massive amounts of blood... Here is Dr. Morley's temporary baby strangling experiment: "[T]he umbilical cord [is] immediately closed between finger and thumb...The [fetal heart rate/FHR] will decelerate quickly to about 60 bpm...the color will change from purple-pink (normal at birth) to pallid blue (vaso-constriction and asphyxia.)...Few midwives or obstetricians will be able to observe, without interference, a deep, prolonged FHR deceleration on a non-breathing newborn for a period of 60 seconds.* Common sense will soon release the finger and thumb." http://www.cordclamping.com/ac og-cp.htm PREGNANT WOMEN: To make sure your baby gets the "extra" up to 50% of blood volume, do not let the obstetrician or midwife clamp your baby's umbilical cord until it has stopped pulsating and your baby is pink and breathing and not in need of resuscitation. *Talk to your obstetrician or midwife today. This Open Letter to Ronen S. Gold, MD will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive. Search http://groups.google.com for "Postpartum fecal incontinence - 'prevention by avoiding birth trauma'" END Open Letter to Ronen S. Gold, MD LIBERTARIAN MICHAEL BADNARIK: Imagine simply using EXISTING LAWS - existing child protection statutes to save BILLIONS per year and protect children from the most massive child abuse for profit scheme in human history - medical "science." PROBLEM: Until obstetricians (i.e., Ron Paul, MD) report the crimes, Writs of Mandamus may be necessary because state law enforcement/attorneys general/district attorneys will not generally criminally prosecute MDs. Again quoting Libertarian Steve B. Harris, MD: "Without enforcement, there is no law. Without law, there is no crime. These are elementary principles. Get an adult to explain them to you." http://groups-beta.google.com/group/ misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/28866f3384801ae9? As I asked above, Do ALL Libertarians believe that MDs are above the law? Again, I SORT of believe this - as long as MDs stop their crimes. That is - I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs - because as medical students MDs are TRAINED to commit obvious felonies. I say again regarding American medicine's MOST frequent surgical behavior: Via immediate cord clamping/cutting, obstetricians are asphyxiating babies - forcing them to breathe through their lungs before they are ready - and in the process robbing them of up to 50% of their blood volume. PREGNANT WOMEN: To make sure your baby gets the "extra" up to 50% of blood volume, do not let the obstetrician or midwife clamp your baby's umbilical cord until it has stopped pulsating and your baby is pink and breathing and not in need of resuscitation. *Talk to your obstetrician or midwife today. Thanks for reading everyone. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon USA This Open Letter to Michael Badnarik will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive. Search http://groups.google.com for "Libertarians: Crooked obstetrician Ron Paul, MD (also: Michael Badnarik for Congress)" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Babies, a massive slow chemical burn crime, QUILES faucet fraudand 'our National leader' Paul Connett, PhD (for anti-fluoride folks only) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | June 22nd 05 02:15 AM |
Burned by our drinking water? (Hydrofluoric acid: The burn thatkeeps on burning until...) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | June 20th 05 09:03 PM |
Clay's Fluoridation Beast (Attn: Lead poisoning prevention folkseverywhere...) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | May 25th 05 11:30 PM |
Roger and me...(also: Question about FAN's Paul Connett, PhD) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | August 22nd 04 04:31 PM |
Strokes in babies! (also: WFC Pres. Paul F. Carey, DC) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | January 25th 04 09:00 PM |