If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Dan's credibility concerning his computer FELONY
Hey Dan! When they interview you, will you record them?
I love the irony! |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Dan's credibility concerning his computer FELONY
Greegor wrote: Hey Dan! When they interview you, will you record them? I love the irony! Why wouldn't I? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Dan's credibility concerning his computer FELONY
alt.support.child-protective-services, alt.parenting.spanking,
alt.support.foster-parents In a thread titled Another BUFU fostie bites the dust Greg wrote Do these pederasts stop when they are 80 years old? Do molesters in general stop when they get elderly? Kane's dictionary definition a rhetorical question is one asked solely to produce an effect (especially to make an assertion) rather than to elicit a reply I actually hoped for answers to my questions, Kane. I had no idea that the Socratic method was rhetoric. Kane wrote The "BUFU Fostie" by your joining in on it, while running from other subject threads is the issue. When you try to justify hauling some pet pukey ""issue"" to every place where it doesn't belong, Occam's razor clearly says you are jest a might tetched in the head. Aren't you able to spot your own "affectations"? Kane wrote It's time you answered for your accusations and your dangrous advice. Do so now, or live with the consequences. NO other subject is acceptable for you to engage in here until you respond on your lies, evasions, and flat out bull****. Again I assert Occam's razor. Off your meds Kane? No other subject is acceptable here? ROFL! Clear signs of Megalomania and OBSESSION! Not to me, at any rate. And I'll continue to make that plain. Prove Dan committed a felony as you claim. PROVE IT WITH LEGAL STATUTE, the only way it can be proved. Defend your position on someone revealing to the court they have committed a crime (stop defending the crime...that won't work as evasion or in any other way...we aren't debating it rightness or wrongness morally, we are debating the danger to the women) to challenge the law while in the middle of another case, where she could lose her children. Do the program, Greg. Stop making these kind so outlandish, stupid, irrational and lying statements and figuring you can simply then walk away from them as those your challengers don't exist. Don't post here if you don't want to be challenged. YOU AND I both have free speech. Your to spout bull**** all you wish, and ours to challenge your bull**** all we wish. Got that? Good. There are two easy ways out for you. Admit your error and apologize and withdraw your claims on both issues.....and do so directly to the people involved. Easy eh? A man could do it instantly. Even Doug has done it on small errors. What a freaking CON ARTIST! Your BUDDY VIOLATES like that and you try all this blustering in the hopes the victim will back down from the complaint? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Dan's credibility concerning his computer FELONY
In a thread called Foster Survivor take on Mary Ellen story
From: 0:- Date: Fri, Nov 10 2006 1:31 pm alt.support.child-protective-services, alt.parenting.spanking, alt.support.foster-parents Greegor wrote: Taking a stand on a legal technicality that impinges on the right of a citizen to record a government official interviewing themself Greg wrote (about ""bad advice"") is hardly a CRIME, and it's FUNNY when presented by a person who perpetrates a computer breaking and entering Felony to obtain the information! Dan Sullivan wrote Which law did I break, Greg? FightCPS.com has no secret password.. Access is available to the public. Greg wrote Then why would you need to fake your IP ""Oliver Sutton""? g Kane wrote Then why would you fail to provide proof, dummy? That could have been me, or Michael@, or even Doug. You have no way of knowing. It's too late Kane. Dan already self identified. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Dan's credibility concerning his computer FELONY
Another thread discussing ""bad advice"" vs. computer breakin
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...8006fe/?hl=en# |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Dan's credibility concerning his computer FELONY
"Greegor" wrote in message oups.com... alt.support.child-protective-services, alt.parenting.spanking, alt.support.foster-parents In a thread titled Another BUFU fostie bites the dust Greg wrote Do these pederasts stop when they are 80 years old? Do molesters in general stop when they get elderly? Kane's dictionary definition a rhetorical question is one asked solely to produce an effect (especially to make an assertion) rather than to elicit a reply I actually hoped for answers to my questions, Kane. I had no idea that the Socratic method was rhetoric. Kane wrote The "BUFU Fostie" by your joining in on it, while running from other subject threads is the issue. When you try to justify hauling some pet pukey ""issue"" to every place where it doesn't belong, Occam's razor clearly says you are jest a might tetched in the head. Aren't you able to spot your own "affectations"? Kane wrote It's time you answered for your accusations and your dangrous advice. Do so now, or live with the consequences. NO other subject is acceptable for you to engage in here until you respond on your lies, evasions, and flat out bull****. Again I assert Occam's razor. Off your meds Kane? No other subject is acceptable here? ROFL! Clear signs of Megalomania and OBSESSION! Not to me, at any rate. And I'll continue to make that plain. Prove Dan committed a felony as you claim. PROVE IT WITH LEGAL STATUTE, the only way it can be proved. Defend your position on someone revealing to the court they have committed a crime (stop defending the crime...that won't work as evasion or in any other way...we aren't debating it rightness or wrongness morally, we are debating the danger to the women) to challenge the law while in the middle of another case, where she could lose her children. Do the program, Greg. Stop making these kind so outlandish, stupid, irrational and lying statements and figuring you can simply then walk away from them as those your challengers don't exist. Don't post here if you don't want to be challenged. YOU AND I both have free speech. Your to spout bull**** all you wish, and ours to challenge your bull**** all we wish. Got that? Good. There are two easy ways out for you. Admit your error and apologize and withdraw your claims on both issues.....and do so directly to the people involved. Easy eh? A man could do it instantly. Even Doug has done it on small errors. What a freaking CON ARTIST! Your BUDDY VIOLATES like that and you try all this blustering in the hopes the victim will back down from the complaint? Yes - also a crime - intimidating witnesses. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Dan's credibility concerning his computer FELONY
Greegor wrote: Dan already self identified. Yes, Greg, I'm me. There I did it again. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Dan's credibility concerning his computer FELONY
Greegor wrote: In a thread called Foster Survivor take on Mary Ellen story From: 0:- Date: Fri, Nov 10 2006 1:31 pm alt.support.child-protective-services, alt.parenting.spanking, alt.support.foster-parents Greegor wrote: Taking a stand on a legal technicality that impinges on the right of a citizen to record a government official interviewing themself Greg wrote (about ""bad advice"") is hardly a CRIME, and it's FUNNY when presented by a person who perpetrates a computer breaking and entering Felony to obtain the information! Dan Sullivan wrote Which law did I break, Greg? FightCPS.com has no secret password.. Access is available to the public. Greg wrote Then why would you need to fake your IP ""Oliver Sutton""? g Kane wrote Then why would you fail to provide proof, dummy? That could have been me, or Michael@, or even Doug. You have no way of knowing. It's too late Kane. Dan already self identified. He did? Boy, I must be missing some posts. I can't find that anywhere. Do you mean when he created a phrase like this, "If you had a brain cell Greg, Oliver Sutton, you'd have two"? 0:-] |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Dan's credibility concerning his computer FELONY
In another thread where this was OFF TOPIC Kane wrote NO other subject [Dan's computer break in] is acceptable for you to engage in here until you respond Another BUFU fostie bites the dust is the subject in this message thread. You were the first to go off topic in this thread, Greg. You just don't like OTHERS to do it when you are the subject. YOU, for instance, went off topic when Dan posted your commentary on using an illegal act to tryin and fight a CPS case. Instead of dealing with the issue, you quickly switched to the process...how he might have gotten your bull**** commentary and dangerous advice. Notice YOUR changes of topic, Greg. That's what gives us license to keep dragging you back by the scruff of your scruffy little neck to the subjects YOU bring up in the first place. This isn't about BUFU. It's about you trying to use every possible dodge to avoid answering for what you told that women to do. Keep dodging. It's wonderfully entertaining. But not successful. We SEE what you are. No one can miss it. And those that use you LOVE that you do such things because it indicates you are still dishonest and available for their dishonesty peddling. You are their 'venue,' stupid. You told someone to reveal their crime in court in the middle of a child protection case that could likely result in her arrest, and the loss of her case. Admit to it. Correct it, and get on with life. Nothing less will suffice here, unless of course you can show us how this action you suggest had a chance in hell of getting her her children back. Go for it. Truth and dare. I DARE you to correct your mistake, Greg. 0:-] J.D.Wentworth wrote: "Greegor" wrote in message oups.com... alt.support.child-protective-services, alt.parenting.spanking, alt.support.foster-parents In a thread titled Another BUFU fostie bites the dust Greg wrote Do these pederasts stop when they are 80 years old? Do molesters in general stop when they get elderly? Kane's dictionary definition a rhetorical question is one asked solely to produce an effect (especially to make an assertion) rather than to elicit a reply I actually hoped for answers to my questions, Kane. I had no idea that the Socratic method was rhetoric. Kane wrote The "BUFU Fostie" by your joining in on it, while running from other subject threads is the issue. When you try to justify hauling some pet pukey ""issue"" to every place where it doesn't belong, Occam's razor clearly says you are jest a might tetched in the head. Aren't you able to spot your own "affectations"? Kane wrote It's time you answered for your accusations and your dangrous advice. Do so now, or live with the consequences. NO other subject is acceptable for you to engage in here until you respond on your lies, evasions, and flat out bull****. Again I assert Occam's razor. Off your meds Kane? No other subject is acceptable here? ROFL! Clear signs of Megalomania and OBSESSION! Not to me, at any rate. And I'll continue to make that plain. Prove Dan committed a felony as you claim. PROVE IT WITH LEGAL STATUTE, the only way it can be proved. Defend your position on someone revealing to the court they have committed a crime (stop defending the crime...that won't work as evasion or in any other way...we aren't debating it rightness or wrongness morally, we are debating the danger to the women) to challenge the law while in the middle of another case, where she could lose her children. Do the program, Greg. Stop making these kind so outlandish, stupid, irrational and lying statements and figuring you can simply then walk away from them as those your challengers don't exist. Don't post here if you don't want to be challenged. YOU AND I both have free speech. Your to spout bull**** all you wish, and ours to challenge your bull**** all we wish. Got that? Good. There are two easy ways out for you. Admit your error and apologize and withdraw your claims on both issues.....and do so directly to the people involved. Easy eh? A man could do it instantly. Even Doug has done it on small errors. What a freaking CON ARTIST! Your BUDDY VIOLATES like that and you try all this blustering in the hopes the victim will back down from the complaint? Yes - also a crime - intimidating witnesses. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Dan's credibility concerning his computer FELONY
Greegor wrote:
In another thread where this was OFF TOPIC No thread YOU are in is off topic to ask YOU to answer for your lies, deceit, and attempt to lab rat someone into doing what you are too chicken **** to do yourself. Just like Chuckles. You are a coward. And a bully of a coward trying to trap that women into losing her children. Show us where your strategy would have even had the remotest of chances of recovering her children from the state. 0:- Kane wrote NO other subject [Dan's computer break in] is acceptable for you to engage in here until you respond Another BUFU fostie bites the dust is the subject in this message thread. You were the first to go off topic in this thread, Greg. You just don't like OTHERS to do it when you are the subject. YOU, for instance, went off topic when Dan posted your commentary on using an illegal act to tryin and fight a CPS case. Instead of dealing with the issue, you quickly switched to the process...how he might have gotten your bull**** commentary and dangerous advice. Notice YOUR changes of topic, Greg. That's what gives us license to keep dragging you back by the scruff of your scruffy little neck to the subjects YOU bring up in the first place. This isn't about BUFU. It's about you trying to use every possible dodge to avoid answering for what you told that women to do. Keep dodging. It's wonderfully entertaining. But not successful. We SEE what you are. No one can miss it. And those that use you LOVE that you do such things because it indicates you are still dishonest and available for their dishonesty peddling. You are their 'venue,' stupid. You told someone to reveal their crime in court in the middle of a child protection case that could likely result in her arrest, and the loss of her case. Admit to it. Correct it, and get on with life. Nothing less will suffice here, unless of course you can show us how this action you suggest had a chance in hell of getting her her children back. Go for it. Truth and dare. I DARE you to correct your mistake, Greg. 0:-] J.D.Wentworth wrote: "Greegor" wrote in message oups.com... alt.support.child-protective-services, alt.parenting.spanking, alt.support.foster-parents In a thread titled Another BUFU fostie bites the dust Greg wrote Do these pederasts stop when they are 80 years old? Do molesters in general stop when they get elderly? Kane's dictionary definition a rhetorical question is one asked solely to produce an effect (especially to make an assertion) rather than to elicit a reply I actually hoped for answers to my questions, Kane. I had no idea that the Socratic method was rhetoric. Kane wrote The "BUFU Fostie" by your joining in on it, while running from other subject threads is the issue. When you try to justify hauling some pet pukey ""issue"" to every place where it doesn't belong, Occam's razor clearly says you are jest a might tetched in the head. Aren't you able to spot your own "affectations"? Kane wrote It's time you answered for your accusations and your dangrous advice. Do so now, or live with the consequences. NO other subject is acceptable for you to engage in here until you respond on your lies, evasions, and flat out bull****. Again I assert Occam's razor. Off your meds Kane? No other subject is acceptable here? ROFL! Clear signs of Megalomania and OBSESSION! Not to me, at any rate. And I'll continue to make that plain. Prove Dan committed a felony as you claim. PROVE IT WITH LEGAL STATUTE, the only way it can be proved. Defend your position on someone revealing to the court they have committed a crime (stop defending the crime...that won't work as evasion or in any other way...we aren't debating it rightness or wrongness morally, we are debating the danger to the women) to challenge the law while in the middle of another case, where she could lose her children. Do the program, Greg. Stop making these kind so outlandish, stupid, irrational and lying statements and figuring you can simply then walk away from them as those your challengers don't exist. Don't post here if you don't want to be challenged. YOU AND I both have free speech. Your to spout bull**** all you wish, and ours to challenge your bull**** all we wish. Got that? Good. There are two easy ways out for you. Admit your error and apologize and withdraw your claims on both issues.....and do so directly to the people involved. Easy eh? A man could do it instantly. Even Doug has done it on small errors. What a freaking CON ARTIST! Your BUDDY VIOLATES like that and you try all this blustering in the hopes the victim will back down from the complaint? Yes - also a crime - intimidating witnesses. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Recent article by Stephen Baskerville - What God Hath Joined Together . . . | Dusty | Child Support | 0 | September 7th 06 08:11 PM |
We don need no steenkin' CPS. | 0:-> | Spanking | 223 | July 19th 06 07:32 AM |
WBYAGTHT, or ... | 0:-> | Spanking | 23 | June 14th 06 10:50 PM |
FOAD Bigots | bobbie sellers | General | 190 | August 1st 05 10:07 AM |
A Plant's Motivation? | Kane | Foster Parents | 46 | October 16th 03 01:51 PM |