new five-in-one vaccine

"Ilena Rose" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 15:44:58 GMT, "M,a,r,k P,r,o,b,e,r,t-August 15,
2004" M,a,r,k P,r,o,b,e,r,t wrote:

If a child gets a reaction from a vaccination, the fewere times he is
vaccinated, the fewer chances of a freaction. Simple math. But beyond
you.


Vac Flack Probert posts BS yet again ...

It only makes harder to figure out what this child is reacting to ...
or which combination.

Did you learn this garbage in law school? Too bad you had to leave
that profession ... you can hurt more people this way with your lies.

http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/P...stProbert.html

Another person's free speech, when you do not agree with it, is an
anathema
to you. Your sole purpose is to stifle any disagreement with you.


That's just crap Probert ... you are talking about the tactics of
Barrett & Polevoy and the rest of you Quack Flacks.

Another person's free speech, when *you* do not agree with it, is an
anathema
to you. Your sole purpose is to stifle any disagreement with you.

Another person's free speech, when you do not agree with it, is an anathema
to you. Your sole purpose is to stifle any disagreement with you.

"Jeff" wrote in message
...

"Ilena Rose" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 15:44:58 GMT, "M,a,r,k P,r,o,b,e,r,t-August 15,
2004" M,a,r,k P,r,o,b,e,r,t spouts utter
Quack Flack projection:

Another person's free speech, when you do not agree with it, is an
anathema
to you. Your sole purpose is to stifle any disagreement with you.


On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 17:12:09 GMT, "M,a,r,k P,r,o,b,e,r,t-August 13,
2004" M,a,r,k P,r,o,b,e,r,t projected his
own job on Usenet onto me ... and with one crooked finger aimed at me
... and the rest back on him slurped:




Another person's free speech, when you do not agree with it, is an
anethma
to you. Your sole purpose in you inquisitional questioning is to stifle
any
disagreement with you.


You mean that if people KNEW you DO have a law degree ...

(...)

I don't care if Mark has any degree.

All I can do to judge him is judge him by what he says.

What he says, IMHO, is correct on most things (perhaps all).

Jeff


Bwahahahahaha!