CS and women's greed strikes again..

Krista wrote:
"Bob" wrote in message
...

Krista wrote:

BTW, if you are not a licensed therapist, then I don't think you have

any

right to say whether I'm playing a victim "game" or not. I'm not a
"victim," if I was I'd be living my life a lot differently, and I damn

sure

wouldn't have remarried!

Take the blinders off, Bob.
Krista
Mother of three
Student of Psychology and Latin



You can stop playing victim any time you like.


If you are a licensed therapist, you ought to have your license revoked.
No licensed therapist would be posting that kind of fiction about
someone.You are so far from reality that nothing of what you say holds
water.


I never said *I* was a therapist. I said unless YOU are one, you have no
right to tell me I'm playing games. You try living as a woman with my ex
and THEN tell me I'm playing games.

What fiction about someone? What in my post was fiction, and how would you
know?
Krista
Mother of three
Student of Psychology and Latin

All that crap and psychobabble you posted about Bob was pure nuts. But
then you can't tell truth from fiction anyway. It's a "woman's way of
knowing" no doubt.

Bob





--

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/


























[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

Krista wrote:
"Bob" wrote in message
...

Krista wrote:

BTW, if you are not a licensed therapist, then I don't think you have

any

right to say whether I'm playing a victim "game" or not. I'm not a
"victim," if I was I'd be living my life a lot differently, and I damn

sure

wouldn't have remarried!

Take the blinders off, Bob.
Krista
Mother of three
Student of Psychology and Latin



You can stop playing victim any time you like.


If you are a licensed therapist, you ought to have your license revoked.
No licensed therapist would be posting that kind of fiction about
someone.You are so far from reality that nothing of what you say holds
water.


I never said *I* was a therapist. I said unless YOU are one, you have no
right to tell me I'm playing games. You try living as a woman with my ex
and THEN tell me I'm playing games.

What fiction about someone? What in my post was fiction, and how would you
know?
Krista
Mother of three
Student of Psychology and Latin

All that crap and psychobabble you posted about Bob was pure nuts. But
then you can't tell truth from fiction anyway. It's a "woman's way of
knowing" no doubt.

Bob





--

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/


























[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

Krista wrote:
"Bob" wrote in message
...

Krista wrote:

BTW, if you are not a licensed therapist, then I don't think you have

any

right to say whether I'm playing a victim "game" or not. I'm not a
"victim," if I was I'd be living my life a lot differently, and I damn

sure

wouldn't have remarried!

Take the blinders off, Bob.
Krista
Mother of three
Student of Psychology and Latin



You can stop playing victim any time you like.


If you are a licensed therapist, you ought to have your license revoked.
No licensed therapist would be posting that kind of fiction about
someone.You are so far from reality that nothing of what you say holds
water.


I never said *I* was a therapist. I said unless YOU are one, you have no
right to tell me I'm playing games. You try living as a woman with my ex
and THEN tell me I'm playing games.

What fiction about someone? What in my post was fiction, and how would you
know?
Krista
Mother of three
Student of Psychology and Latin

All that crap and psychobabble you posted about Bob was pure nuts. But
then you can't tell truth from fiction anyway. It's a "woman's way of
knowing" no doubt.

Bob





--

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/


























[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

"Bob" wrote in message
...
Kenneth S. wrote:
Anyone reading Krista's message below cannot help but be struck by
the
vocabulary she uses. For example, she's a "survivor" of many
"emotionally
abusive" relationships. This is the victim mindset that has been
encouraged
by the modern-day feminist movement. It's been cynically used to gain
advantages for women over men -- destroying many families in the
process,
and inflicting serious damage on children.

What in heck in "emotional abuse?" I'll tell you what it is. It's
an
attempt to equate things that are SAID with physical violence. The
phony
domestic violence crisis ginned up by feminist activists relies very
much on
this kind of vocabulary. It's one method they use to justify their
grotesque exaggeration of the extent of the problem. The domestic
violence
activists succeeded in deceiving people by getting such actions as
stomping
out of a room classified as domestic violence (for details, see
Christina
Hoff Sommers' book "Who Stole Feminism?"). However, in addition, they
get
their followers to use terms like "emotional abuse" to try to inflate
the
significance of a man saying things to a woman that the woman doesn't
like.

The question about the definition of "abuse" was a perfectly valid
one.
And I think Krista's message gives us our answer. It's someone telling
her
something that she doesn't like. In this, as in many other matters,
perverting the meaning of words has been a vital element in advancing
the
anti-male agenda of feminism.



Yep. It's classic feminist victimology. She blames the nearest
available man, and then blames any man who points out her victimology.

Bob

BZZZT! Wrong again, Bob. The *nearest* man would be my husband. I don't
blame him at all. In fact, I think we should all nominate him for the
sainthood for putting up with my baggage, although he does have his fair
share. He's a great guy and a wonderful father, even to my daughter. You'd
never know she's not his child just from looking at us.

Thanks for the laugh, though.

--
Krista
Mother of three
Student of Psychology and Latin

"Bob" wrote in message
...
Kenneth S. wrote:
Anyone reading Krista's message below cannot help but be struck by
the
vocabulary she uses. For example, she's a "survivor" of many
"emotionally
abusive" relationships. This is the victim mindset that has been
encouraged
by the modern-day feminist movement. It's been cynically used to gain
advantages for women over men -- destroying many families in the
process,
and inflicting serious damage on children.

What in heck in "emotional abuse?" I'll tell you what it is. It's
an
attempt to equate things that are SAID with physical violence. The
phony
domestic violence crisis ginned up by feminist activists relies very
much on
this kind of vocabulary. It's one method they use to justify their
grotesque exaggeration of the extent of the problem. The domestic
violence
activists succeeded in deceiving people by getting such actions as
stomping
out of a room classified as domestic violence (for details, see
Christina
Hoff Sommers' book "Who Stole Feminism?"). However, in addition, they
get
their followers to use terms like "emotional abuse" to try to inflate
the
significance of a man saying things to a woman that the woman doesn't
like.

The question about the definition of "abuse" was a perfectly valid
one.
And I think Krista's message gives us our answer. It's someone telling
her
something that she doesn't like. In this, as in many other matters,
perverting the meaning of words has been a vital element in advancing
the
anti-male agenda of feminism.



Yep. It's classic feminist victimology. She blames the nearest
available man, and then blames any man who points out her victimology.

Bob

BZZZT! Wrong again, Bob. The *nearest* man would be my husband. I don't
blame him at all. In fact, I think we should all nominate him for the
sainthood for putting up with my baggage, although he does have his fair
share. He's a great guy and a wonderful father, even to my daughter. You'd
never know she's not his child just from looking at us.

Thanks for the laugh, though.

--
Krista
Mother of three
Student of Psychology and Latin

"Bob" wrote in message
...
Kenneth S. wrote:
Anyone reading Krista's message below cannot help but be struck by
the
vocabulary she uses. For example, she's a "survivor" of many
"emotionally
abusive" relationships. This is the victim mindset that has been
encouraged
by the modern-day feminist movement. It's been cynically used to gain
advantages for women over men -- destroying many families in the
process,
and inflicting serious damage on children.

What in heck in "emotional abuse?" I'll tell you what it is. It's
an
attempt to equate things that are SAID with physical violence. The
phony
domestic violence crisis ginned up by feminist activists relies very
much on
this kind of vocabulary. It's one method they use to justify their
grotesque exaggeration of the extent of the problem. The domestic
violence
activists succeeded in deceiving people by getting such actions as
stomping
out of a room classified as domestic violence (for details, see
Christina
Hoff Sommers' book "Who Stole Feminism?"). However, in addition, they
get
their followers to use terms like "emotional abuse" to try to inflate
the
significance of a man saying things to a woman that the woman doesn't
like.

The question about the definition of "abuse" was a perfectly valid
one.
And I think Krista's message gives us our answer. It's someone telling
her
something that she doesn't like. In this, as in many other matters,
perverting the meaning of words has been a vital element in advancing
the
anti-male agenda of feminism.



Yep. It's classic feminist victimology. She blames the nearest
available man, and then blames any man who points out her victimology.

Bob

BZZZT! Wrong again, Bob. The *nearest* man would be my husband. I don't
blame him at all. In fact, I think we should all nominate him for the
sainthood for putting up with my baggage, although he does have his fair
share. He's a great guy and a wonderful father, even to my daughter. You'd
never know she's not his child just from looking at us.

Thanks for the laugh, though.

--
Krista
Mother of three
Student of Psychology and Latin

"Bob" wrote in message
...
Kenneth S. wrote:
Anyone reading Krista's message below cannot help but be struck by
the
vocabulary she uses. For example, she's a "survivor" of many
"emotionally
abusive" relationships. This is the victim mindset that has been
encouraged
by the modern-day feminist movement. It's been cynically used to gain
advantages for women over men -- destroying many families in the
process,
and inflicting serious damage on children.

What in heck in "emotional abuse?" I'll tell you what it is. It's
an
attempt to equate things that are SAID with physical violence. The
phony
domestic violence crisis ginned up by feminist activists relies very
much on
this kind of vocabulary. It's one method they use to justify their
grotesque exaggeration of the extent of the problem. The domestic
violence
activists succeeded in deceiving people by getting such actions as
stomping
out of a room classified as domestic violence (for details, see
Christina
Hoff Sommers' book "Who Stole Feminism?"). However, in addition, they
get
their followers to use terms like "emotional abuse" to try to inflate
the
significance of a man saying things to a woman that the woman doesn't
like.

The question about the definition of "abuse" was a perfectly valid
one.
And I think Krista's message gives us our answer. It's someone telling
her
something that she doesn't like. In this, as in many other matters,
perverting the meaning of words has been a vital element in advancing
the
anti-male agenda of feminism.



Yep. It's classic feminist victimology. She blames the nearest
available man, and then blames any man who points out her victimology.

Bob

BZZZT! Wrong again, Bob. The *nearest* man would be my husband. I don't
blame him at all. In fact, I think we should all nominate him for the
sainthood for putting up with my baggage, although he does have his fair
share. He's a great guy and a wonderful father, even to my daughter. You'd
never know she's not his child just from looking at us.

Thanks for the laugh, though.

--
Krista
Mother of three
Student of Psychology and Latin

"I can now only assume that he was after my
money the whole time because in the short time I was with him he spent the
whole $50,000 of my inheritance"

Now you want it back and then some in child support, right?
What did he spend it on, hookers and beer?
That's a lot of hookers and beer.

"I can now only assume that he was after my
money the whole time because in the short time I was with him he spent the
whole $50,000 of my inheritance"

Now you want it back and then some in child support, right?
What did he spend it on, hookers and beer?
That's a lot of hookers and beer.

"I can now only assume that he was after my
money the whole time because in the short time I was with him he spent the
whole $50,000 of my inheritance"

Now you want it back and then some in child support, right?
What did he spend it on, hookers and beer?
That's a lot of hookers and beer.